<!DOCTYPE article
PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1-4-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article"><?properties manuscript?><processing-meta base-tagset="archiving" mathml-version="3.0" table-model="xhtml" tagset-family="jats"><restricted-by>pmc</restricted-by></processing-meta><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">9438793</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">8561</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Xenotransplantation</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Xenotransplantation</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Xenotransplantation</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0908-665X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1399-3089</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">41846435</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">13242699</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/xen.70115</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">NIHMS2181260</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Impact of gene duplication of <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> in pigs for xenotransplantation- technical &#x00026; practical</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lucas</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name><xref rid="A1" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Whitworth</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><xref rid="A1" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Samuel</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><xref rid="A1" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Redel</surname><given-names>BK</given-names></name><xref rid="A1" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="A3" ref-type="aff">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Prather</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><xref rid="A1" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wells</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><xref rid="A1" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="A1"><label>1</label>Division of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.</aff><aff id="A2"><label>2</label>National Swine Resource and Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.</aff><aff id="A3"><label>3</label>United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Plant Genetics Research Unit, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.</aff><author-notes><fn fn-type="con" id="FN1"><p id="P1">Author Contributions</p><p id="P2">CGL and KDW conceived and designed the experiments. KMW assisted with the methodology, provided husbandry for the pigs, revised and edited the manuscript. MSS assisted with animal tissue collection, coordinate pig breeding and establishment of pig cell lines. BKR contributed to the optimization of the DBA staining protocol, revised and edited the manuscript. KDW and RSP supervised the work, provided the funding, revised and edited the manuscript. CGL wrote the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p></fn><corresp id="CR1"><bold>Correspondence:</bold> Caroline Gomes Lucas (<email>lucascg@missouri.edu</email>)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>31</day><month>5</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><season>Jan-Feb</season><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>07</day><month>6</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>e70115</fpage><lpage>e70115</lpage><abstract id="ABS1"><p id="P3">The <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> gene has become an important target for xenotransplantation because its inactivation reduces the antigenicity of porcine tissues. The growing use of organ-source pig models has led to an increased demand for the rapid creation of these animals. However, the physiological role of this gene in pigs remains poorly understood. In 2015, after generating pigs lacking <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> expression, researchers observed a third allele for this gene. Subsequently, another gene, described as <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic>, was found in the porcine genome. We have collected data over four years since the production of our first line of xenotransplantation pigs lacking <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> expression. In this study, we were able to show that pig cells expressing <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> also reacted to <italic toggle="yes">Dolichos biflorus</italic> Agglutinin (DBA) lectin, which recognizes GalNAc epitopes. Additionally, we demonstrated that <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-like</italic> knockout embryos were able to be carried to term in females with the same genotype. We hypothesized that the presence of both genes in the porcine genome might have occurred due to duplication, inversion, and reinsertion of part of the <italic toggle="yes">Phospho1</italic>-<italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> segment. Finally, the pig <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like gene</italic> showed greater similarity to the human, bovine, and murine <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> genes than the original pig <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic>. These data clarify the importance of targeting both <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> for xenotransplantation studies and have improved our knowledge about their genomic structure and role in pig reproduction.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>pig</kwd><kwd>B4GALNT2</kwd><kwd>B4GALNT2-like</kwd><kwd>duplication</kwd><kwd>xenotransplantation</kwd><kwd>reproduction</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="S1"><title>Introduction</title><p id="P4">The elimination of carbohydrate-based antigens, that can be targeted by natural human antibodies, has been crucial in overcoming the immunological barriers to xenotransplantation. Efforts to eliminate galactose &#x003b1; 1,3-galactose (Gal) in pigs, one of the major molecules triggering hyperacute rejections [<xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>,<xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>], resulted in extended graft survival after pig-to-nonhuman primate transplantation, but it was not sufficient to prevent antibody mediated rejection (AMR) [<xref rid="R4" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>].</p><p id="P5">In addition to Gal epitopes synthesized by the &#x003b1;1,3-galactosyltransferase (GGTA1), other xenoantigens have been found relevant for xenotransplantation. The porcine glycan Sd(a), produced by B4GALNT2 (<italic toggle="yes">&#x003b2;</italic>1,4 <italic toggle="yes">N</italic>-acetylgalactosaminyl transferase 2), has been shown to act as an antigen to both humans and primates [<xref rid="R5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>]. <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> expression has been detected in pig endothelial cells and a wide range of tissues, including heart, liver, kidney, pancreas, lung, and spleen. The porcine <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> gene sequence has been cloned and characterized, revealing 76% and 70% amino acid identity with human and murine <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> genes, respectively [<xref rid="R6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>]</p><p id="P6">To further investigate cross-species incompatibilities, Estrada et al. 2015 [<xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>] created the first pigs lacking <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic>. Interestingly, they identified three alleles for <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic>, suggesting possible gene duplication, as the animals exhibited normal karyotypes. Subsequently, the presence of four copies for <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> was reported [<xref rid="R8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>], and later, a gene with high homology to <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic>, known as <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic>-<italic toggle="yes">like</italic> (<italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2L</italic>), was discovered [<xref rid="R9" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>]. Since then, <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic>-like (LOC110255214 in Sus Scrofa11.1) has been increasingly described in the literature [<xref rid="R10" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>,<xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="R12" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="R13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>,<xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="R15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>,<xref rid="R16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>], but its transcriptional and translational activity remains poorly understood.</p><p id="P7">Pigs carrying knockout alleles for <italic toggle="yes">GGTA1</italic>, <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic>, and the human transgene <italic toggle="yes">hCD55</italic> (human decay accelerating factor), known as NSRRC:0086 line, have been created in the National Swine Research and Resource Center and phenotypically characterized over a period of 4 years. Here, we investigated whether <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> could also be involved in the biosynthesis of the Sd(a) antigen. Additionally, we shared our observations regarding the annotation of the <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> gene and the creation of these animals by breeding instead of cloning. This publication will clarify the importance of targeting both <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> for xenotransplantation studies and provide valuable insights about the <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> gene structure and its impact during reproduction in pigs.</p></sec><sec id="S2"><title>Material and Methods</title><p id="P8">All animal care and experiments were conducted in accordance with approved protocols and standard operating procedures by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Missouri.</p><sec id="S3"><title>Generation of the NSRRC:0086 line</title><p id="P9"><italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> modifications were introduced into a <italic toggle="yes">GGTA1</italic> KO background expressing hCD55 to generate quadruple-modified (4GM) pigs by using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. <italic toggle="yes">GGTA1</italic> KO targeted (Tg)-hCD55 fetal fibroblast cells (2&#x000d7;10<sup>5</sup> cells) were co-transfected via electroporation with gRNA/Cas9 plasmids targeting both <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> genes (gRNA oligonucleotide 1 forward: 5&#x02019; - CACCGTGAGGATCGACAGACATCTA &#x02212;3&#x02019;, reverse: 5&#x02019;- AAACTAGATGTCTGTCGATCCTCAC- 3&#x02019;; gRNA oligonucleotide 2 forward [<xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>]: 5&#x02019; CACCGTGTATCGAGGAACACGCTT-3&#x02019;, reverse: 5&#x02019;- AAACAAGCGTGTTCCTCGATACAC-3&#x02019;). Two hundred cells were seeded per 100 mm dish for colony formation (~200 cells/plate). Following culture for 10 days, individual colonies were collected for genotyping (1/3 of the cells) and the remaining (2/3) were expanded to be cryopreserved for long-term preservation [<xref rid="R17" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>].</p><p id="P10">Primers were designed to amplify homologous regions between <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic>. These assays encompassed unique nucleotide signatures, allowing us to identify all four alleles. PCR amplicons were cloned and Sanger sequenced, and colonies showing bi-allelic modifications for <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> were used for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) [<xref rid="R18" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>]. Six embryo transfer were performed, resulting in two pregnant recipient gilts that gave rise to female and male cloned founders (NSRRC:0086 line). For phenotypic analysis, liver and kidney sections from NSRRC:0086 and a wild-type (WT) pig were stained with isolectin B4 (IB4)-FITC (Sigma-Aldrich), which binds to Gal residues, and rhodamine labeled <italic toggle="yes">Dolichos biflorus</italic> agglutinin (DBA) (Vector Laboratories), which recognizes GalNAc epitopes as presented in the Sd(a) glycan. PCR diagnostic assays to confirm <italic toggle="yes">GGTA1</italic> homozygous deletion and <italic toggle="yes">hCD55</italic> integration were performed (data not shown). Additionally, we isolated primary porcine kidney (PKC) cells as previously described [<xref rid="R19" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>] from two of the euthanized NSRRC:0086 piglets and from a WT piglet to confirm the results observed in the <italic toggle="yes">ex vivo</italic> experiment.</p><p id="P11">A breeding colony was established by crossing NSRRC:0086 founder (F0) clones with <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-like</italic> KO pigs (R614 line, produced via zygote injection) and non-cloned <italic toggle="yes">GGTA1 KO/hCD55</italic> pigs. Genotyping and phenotyping confirmed successful transmission of genetic modifications to F1 progeny. To generate <italic toggle="yes">GGTA1/B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-like</italic> KO piglets, F1 individuals were bred with each other and with F0 founders. Subsequently, F2 pigs with the desired modifications were bred with WT pigs to enhance genetic diversity.</p></sec><sec id="S4"><title>Plasmid construction</title><p id="P12">Plasmids expressing the most common transcript of <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> (Accession No: NM_001244330) or <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> (Accession No: XM_021067117.1) were generated commercially (GenScript) by inserting synthesized coding sequence between the XhoI/XbaI restriction sites of pcDNA3.1/Hygro (+) (GenScript, SC1317).</p></sec><sec id="S5"><title>Cell culture and Transfection</title><p id="P13">To evaluate the potential involvement of <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> in the synthesis of the Sd(a) antigen, cells were transfected with plasmids expressing either <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> or <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic>. WT and the NSRRC:0086 line, which did not stain for DBA, served as negative control. WT porcine kidney cells were used as a positive control, as DBA binding had been successfully confirmed previously.</p><p id="P14">Porcine tail, kidney, and fetal fibroblasts from WT and NSRRC:0086 lines, isolated as previously described [<xref rid="R19" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>,<xref rid="R20" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>,<xref rid="R21" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>], were cultured in Dulbecco Modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Gibco, Cat #11885084) supplemented with 0.5% Glutamax (Gibco, Cat #35050061) and 12% FBS (Gibco, Grand Island, NY). These cells were incubated at 38.5&#x000b0;C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% O<sub>2</sub> and 5% CO<sub>2</sub> and transfected with 2 &#x003bc;g of <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> or <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> pcDNA3.1/Hygro (+)-expressing plasmid. WT and NSRRC:0086 tail and fetal fibroblast cells were transfected via electroporation [<xref rid="R17" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>], while WT and NSRRC:0086 PKC were transfected by using Jet-OPTIMUS transfection reagent (Polyplus #101000025) and seeded in a 6 well-plate. Non-transfected WT fibroblast cells and NSRRC:0086 line served as negative controls. WT PKC were used as positive controls. Forty-eight hours post-transfection, the cells were incubated in the dark with DBA (1:400; Vector Laboratories) or PBS for 20 minutes at 4&#x000b0;C.</p></sec><sec id="S6"><title>Fluorescence DBA lectin staining in porcine uterine tissues</title><p id="P15">Uterine cross sections from WT and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-like</italic> KO (derived from NSRRC:0086 &#x000d7; R614 breeding) females were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24&#x02013;48 h and paraffin embedded using standard procedures. For fluorescence localization, sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated to water through a graded alcohol series. Sections were submerged into citrate solution and then blocked in SuperBlock<sup>&#x02122;</sup> (Thermo Scientific) solution. Sections were incubated with DBA lectin&#x02013;FITC conjugate (30 &#x003bc;g/mL) in PBS solution overnight at 4C. Sections were lightly stained with hematoxylin and overlaid with a coverslip and antifade mounting reagent (VectaSheild, Vector Co, USA).</p></sec><sec id="S7"><title>Cell Imaging to detect DBA staining</title><p id="P16">Cells and slides were examined under a fluorescence stereo microscope (M165FC, Leica Microsystems AG, Heerbrugg, Switzerland) to confirm binding to Rhodamine or FITC-labeled <italic toggle="yes">Dolichos biflorus</italic> agglutinin (DBA) lectin. All digital fluorescence and brightfield images were recorded by using the Leica LAS X Software.</p></sec><sec id="S8"><title>Structural examination of the B4GALNT2 and B4GALNT2-like flanking regions in the current pig genome assembly</title><p id="P17">By using the annotated pig genome assembly <italic toggle="yes">Sus scrofa</italic> 11.1 from the NCBI database, we compared the <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> regions across four species. We identified conserved flanking sequences, which corresponded to the <italic toggle="yes">IGF2BP1</italic>-<italic toggle="yes">ZNF652</italic> interval, and then searched for this region in the human (GRCh38.p14), mouse (GRCm39), and bovine (ARS-UCD2.0) genomes. Genomic view images from the NCBI database were included in the <xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Data</xref> (<xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Figure S4</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">S7</xref>).</p><p id="P18">To determine the conservation of the <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> gene across species, nucleotide and protein sequences for porcine, human, bovine, and murine orthologs were retrieved from the NCBI RefSeq database. Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) was performed using Clustal Omega (v1.2.4) via the EMBL-EBI web portal using default parameters. Percent identity scores were subsequently calculated based on the resulting pairwise identity matrix to quantify the genetic relatedness between the porcine B4GALNT2 isoforms and their mammalian counterparts.</p></sec></sec><sec id="S9"><title>Results</title><sec id="S10"><title>NSRRC:0086 and R614 pigs lack the xenoantigens Gal and Sd(a).</title><p id="P19">PCR diagnostic assays and Sanger sequencing confirmed the absence of WT alleles in the genetically modified lines (<xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Figure S1</xref>). Consistent with these genotypic results, no fluorescence signal was detected when organs or primary kidney cells (PKCs) from founder pigs were stained with Rhodamine-labeled <italic toggle="yes">DBA</italic> lectin to detect B4GALNT2 and B4GALNT2-like activity (<xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Figure S2</xref>), or with FITC-conjugated isolectin B4 to detect GGTA1 expression Additionally, uterine tissues from a <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-</italic>like null female did not stain for DBA when compared to a WT female (<xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Figure S3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="S11"><title>Quadruple-modified (4GM) piglets were generated by breeding</title><p id="P20">Male and female founder cloned lines (NSRRC:0086) were bred; however, they were unable to establish pregnancies. Thus, we developed a breeding plan by using different combinations of genotypes, as shown in <xref rid="F1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>. We produced 13 independent pregnancies that reached full term, resulting in viable null offspring. These <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-like</italic> knockout piglets were derived from founder lines NSRRC:0086 and R614. The consistent birth and survival of these animals provide definitive evidence that the loss of these enzymes does not impair porcine fetal development or parturition.</p><p id="P21">As summarized in <xref rid="F1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>, three specific breeding strategies generated a total of 14 <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-like</italic> null piglets. Notably, most of these offspring also carried knockout alleles for the <italic toggle="yes">GGTA1</italic> gene and the human transgene <italic toggle="yes">hCD55</italic>. To our knowledge this is the first report showing the creation of a domestic line of <italic toggle="yes">GGTA</italic>1<sup>&#x02212;/&#x02212;,</sup>
<italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic>
<sup><italic toggle="yes">&#x02212;/&#x02212;</italic></sup><italic toggle="yes">, B4GALNT2-like</italic><sup>&#x02212; /&#x02212;</sup><italic toggle="yes">, Tg-hCD55</italic> piglets by breeding.</p></sec><sec id="S12"><title>Validation of B4GALNT2-like function by immunofluorescence</title><p id="P22">Edited pig cells lacking <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> expression were stained with Rhodamine-DBA lectin after transfection with either pcDNA3.1/<italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> or pcDNA3.1/<italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> expressing vectors (<xref rid="F2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>). Similarly, WT tail and fetus cell lines that previously did not stain for DBA fluoresced red after transfection and Rhodamine-DBA staining (<xref rid="F2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>). Non-transfected (<xref rid="F2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>) or PBS-treated (data not shown) fetal and tail lines did not react with DBA lectin. Transfected and non-transfected WT PKC cells were positive for DBA staining (<xref rid="F2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="S13"><title>Comparison of the IGF2BP1- ZNF652 interval among different species</title><p id="P23">We found that the IGF2BP1-ZNF652 interval is conserved among the four species (<xref rid="F3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3A</xref> and <xref rid="F3" ref-type="fig">3C</xref>). However, in the pig genome we observed a duplication of the genes <italic toggle="yes">Phospho1, ABI3, GNGT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> (<xref rid="F3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3C</xref>). We propose that a chromosomal rearrangement occurred involving three distinct events: duplication, inversion, and reinsertion. Specifically, we hypothesize that this rearrangement was triggered by a double-strand break (DSB) repaired via a template-switching mechanism involving the homologous chromosome (<xref rid="F3" ref-type="fig">Figures 3B</xref> and <xref rid="F3" ref-type="fig">3C</xref>).</p><p id="P24">Interestingly, the porcine tRNA region appears to be the site of reinsertion. Since the tRNA was not duplicated and now resides between the rearranged segments, we suspect that the duplicated genes replaced a portion of the original tRNA region (<xref rid="F3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3C</xref>).</p><p id="P25">Multiple sequence alignment revealed that, at nucleotide level, <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> exhibits greater similarity to bovine, murine, and human <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> orthologs than does the annotated porcine <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> (<xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Tables S1</xref> and <xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">S2</xref>). Consequently, we hypothesize that <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> represents the ancestral locus, while the current porcine <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> is the duplicated copy (<xref rid="F3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3D</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="S14"><title>Discussion</title><p id="P26">Recently, genetically modified pig organs have been used in studies with decedents [<xref rid="R22" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>,<xref rid="R23" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>,<xref rid="R24" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>] and living patients [<xref rid="R25" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>,<xref rid="R26" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>] and this field is moving forward to clinical trials. <italic toggle="yes">GGTA1/B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-like</italic> knockout modifications have often served as base modifications for creating pig-to-primate models. <italic toggle="yes">GGTA</italic>1 KO pigs have been studied since 2002, and extensive literature is available. However, information regarding the role of <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic>, and the recently discovered <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> gene remains limited.</p><p id="P27">In this study, we provide functional evidence supporting the findings of Zhang et al. (2023)[<xref rid="R27" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>] that B4GALNT2-like is not a pseudogene, but rather an active enzyme involved in the synthesis of the Sda xenoantigen. Transfected WT and NSRRC:0086 fibroblast cells reacted to DBA lectin, confirming the potential enzymatic role of B4GALNT2-like, as demonstrated by Zhang <italic toggle="yes">et al</italic>. [<xref rid="R27" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>]. This result highlights the importance of targeting both genes, as B4GALNT2-like may be immunogenic in humans. Similar to observations by S&#x000f6;llner JH <italic toggle="yes">et al</italic>. [<xref rid="R28" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>], we could not detect B4GALNT2 expression with DBA in WT pig fibroblasts.</p><p id="P28">We also collected data regarding the breeding of quadruple-modified (4GM) pigs, as the <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> gene has been described to regulate reproduction in different species [<xref rid="R29" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>,<xref rid="R30" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>,<xref rid="R31" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>,<xref rid="R32" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>]. In pigs, we showed that females lacking <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> expression were able to become pregnant and carry pregnancies to term. This leads us to the conclusion that <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-like</italic> null embryos were able to attach to the uterine surface and establish pregnancy. In mice, blocking B4GALNT2 <italic toggle="yes">in vivo</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">in vitro</italic> impaired embryo implantation. Additionally, <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> expression in the uterus was shown to be modulated by progesterone and estrogens [<xref rid="R29" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>]. DBA binding has been detected in porcine uterine epithelia during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle and glandular epithelium (GE) formation, suggesting a role for n-acetyl-D-galactosamine molecules during the peri-implantation period [<xref rid="R33" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>]. We believe that Sd(a) antigen could be involved in pig embryo attachment, but it is not essential for that to occur, or the lack of <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-like</italic> expression triggered a compensation mechanism. These differences observed between pig and mice could also be attributed to their distinct implantation process. Pig embryo attachment to the uterine luminal epithelia is noninvasive (epitheliochorial placentation), whereas in mice, implantation is achieved by invasive growth of trophoblast cells through the epithelial layer of the endometrium (hemochorial placentation) [<xref rid="R34" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>].</p><p id="P29">Next, special attention was paid to the porcine <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> genomic region since we observed the presence of a highly conserved region among mammalian species. We postulated that duplication, inversion and reinsertion of part of the <italic toggle="yes">Phospho1-B4GALNT2</italic> segment might have occurred. These mutations could play key roles in organism evolution; however, little is known about these structural divergences. We also reported that at the nucleotide levels, pig <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> showed greater similarity to the human, bovine, and murine <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> genes than the original pig <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic>. Further studies are needed to confirm if the pig <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> is appropriately annotated in the reference genome.</p><p id="P30">Collectively our data provide important information about the pig <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic>/<italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> genes, which can positively impact in the process of creation of organ-source pigs. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration approved the first clinical trials that will require the large-scale breeding and raising of these animals. Thus, understanding the possible effects of the lack of function of <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> in a genetically modified pig will help to overcome future barriers in the xenotransplantation field, which is currently becoming a viable life-saving option.</p></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="SM1"><title>Supplementary Material</title><supplementary-material id="SD1" position="float" content-type="local-data"><label>Supplementary Material</label><media xlink:href="NIHMS2181260-supplement-Supplementary_Material.docx" id="d67e783" position="anchor"/></supplementary-material></sec></body><back><ack id="S15"><title>Acknowledgments</title><p id="P31">The authors thank Raissa Cecil, Joshua Benne and Melissa Fudge for performing SCNT. We thank Lee Spate for preparing all embryo media and organizing the embryo transfers. We would like to acknowledge Nathan Schwartz, Skylar Young and Dakotah Moore for helping with piglet processing after farrowing and tissue collections, and Sierra Long for helping with fluorescence DBA lectin staining in porcine uterine tissues. Funding for Bethany Redel&#x02019;s salary was provided by USDA-ARS project number 5070-31320-001-00D. The National Swine Resource and Research Center (NSRRC) is supported by grant U42OD011140 from the NIH, Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (ORIP) in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).</p></ack><fn-group><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="FN2"><p id="P32">Conflict of Interest</p><p id="P33">The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.</p></fn></fn-group><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="R1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Galili</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name>. <article-title>Discovery of the natural anti-Gal antibody and its past and future relevance to medicine</article-title>. <source>Xenotransplantation</source>
<year>2013</year>; <volume>20</volume>: <fpage>138</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>147</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23577774</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Dai</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Vaught</surname><given-names>TD</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Boone</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Targeted disruption of the &#x003b1;1,3-galactosyltransferase gene in cloned pigs</article-title>. <source>Nature Biotechnology 2002</source>
<volume>20</volume>:<issue>3</issue>
<year>2002</year>; 20: <fpage>251</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>255</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Lai</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kolber-Simonds</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Production of &#x003b1;&#x02212;1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning</article-title>. <source>Science (1979)</source>
<year>2002</year>;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Byrne</surname><given-names>GW</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Stalboerger</surname><given-names>PG</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Davila</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Proteomic Identification of Non-Gal Antibody Targets After Pig-to-Primate Cardiac Xenotransplantation</article-title>. <source>Xenotransplantation</source>
<year>2008</year>; <volume>15</volume>: <fpage>268</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18957049</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Byrne</surname><given-names>GW</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Stalboerger</surname><given-names>PG</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>TR</given-names></name>, <name><surname>McGregor</surname><given-names>CGA</given-names></name>. <article-title>Identification of new carbohydrate and membrane protein antigens in cardiac xenotransplantation</article-title>. <source>Transplantation</source>
<year>2011</year>; <volume>91</volume>: <fpage>287</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>292</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21119562</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Byrne</surname><given-names>GW</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Stalboerger</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kogelberg</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>, <name><surname>McGregor</surname><given-names>CGA</given-names></name>. <article-title>Cloning and expression of porcine &#x003b2;1,4 N-acetylgalactosaminyl transferase encoding a new xenoreactive antigen</article-title>. <source>Xenotransplantation</source>
<year>2014</year>; <volume>21</volume>: <fpage>543</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25176027</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Estrada</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Martens</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Evaluation of Human and Nonhuman Primate Antibody Binding to Pig Cells Lacking GGTA1/CMAH/&#x003b2;4GalNT2 Genes</article-title>. <source>Xenotransplantation</source>
<year>2015</year>; <volume>22</volume>: <fpage>194</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25728481</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Yue</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kan</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Extensive germline genome engineering in pigs</article-title>. <source>Nat Biomed Eng</source>
<year>2021</year>; <volume>5</volume>: <fpage>134</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>143</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32958897</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Fischer</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Schnieke</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>. <article-title>Xenotransplantation becoming reality</article-title>. <source>Transgenic Res</source>
<year>2022</year>; <volume>31</volume>: <fpage>391</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35545691</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Reichart</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Cooper</surname><given-names>DKC</given-names></name>, <name><surname>L&#x000e4;ngin</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Cardiac xenotransplantation: from concept to clinic</article-title>. <source>Cardiovasc Res</source>
<year>2022</year>; <volume>118</volume>: <fpage>3499</fpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kemter</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Wolf</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>. <article-title>Advances in Organ and Tissue Xenotransplantation</article-title>. <source>Annu Rev Anim Biosci</source>
<year>2024</year>; <volume>12</volume>: <fpage>369</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>390</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37906838</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Anand</surname><given-names>RP</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Layer</surname><given-names>JV</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Heja</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Design and testing of a humanized porcine donor for xenotransplantation</article-title>. <source>Nature 2023</source>
<volume>622</volume>:<issue>7982</issue>
<year>2023</year>; 622: <fpage>393</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>401</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Wolf</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Reichart</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>. <article-title>Kidney xenotransplantation edges closer to the clinic</article-title>. <source>Nature Reviews Nephrology 2023</source>
<volume>20</volume>:<issue>4</issue>
<year>2023</year>; 20: <fpage>204</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>205</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Wolf</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Schmoeckel</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Reichart</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>. <article-title>Cardiac xenotransplantation &#x02013; from bench to bedside</article-title>. <source>European Journal of Transplantation</source>
<year>2023</year>; <volume>1</volume>: <fpage>192</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>206</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Wolf</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Reichart</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Moretti</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Laugwitz</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name>. <article-title>Designer pigs for xenogeneic heart transplantation and beyond</article-title>. <source>Dis Model Mech</source>
<year>2023</year>; <volume>16</volume>: dmm050177.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Huai</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>The generation and evaluation of TKO/hCD55/hTM/hEPCR gene-modified pigs for clinical organ xenotransplantation</article-title>. <source>Front Immunol</source>
<year>2025</year>; <volume>15</volume>: <fpage>1488552</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39902050</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Ross</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Whyte</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Optimization of square-wave electroporation for transfection of porcine fetal fibroblasts</article-title>. <source>Transgenic Res</source>
<year>2010</year>; <volume>19</volume>: <fpage>611</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>620</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19937273</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Redel</surname><given-names>BK</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>PR</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Telugu</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<source>Accelerating genomic improvement in pigs by using reproductive biotechnologies</source>. <year>2025</year>; <fpage>231</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>262</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Richter</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kurome</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kessler</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Potential of primary kidney cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer mediated transgenesis in pig</article-title>. <source>BMC Biotechnol</source>
<year>2012</year>; <volume>12</volume>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Lucas</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Spate</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Samuel</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>A novel swine sex-linked marker and its application across different mammalian species</article-title>. <source>Transgenic Res</source>
<year>2020</year>; <volume>29</volume>: <fpage>395</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>407</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32607872</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Lai</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Prather</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name>. <article-title>Production of Cloned Pigs by Using Somatic Cells as Donors</article-title>. <source>Cloning Stem Cells</source>
<year>2003</year>; <volume>5</volume>: <fpage>233</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>241</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14733743</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Montgomery</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Stern</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Lonze</surname><given-names>BE</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Results of Two Cases of Pig-to-Human Kidney Xenotransplantation</article-title>. <source>N Engl J Med</source>
<year>2022</year>; <volume>386</volume>: <fpage>1889</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1898</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35584156</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Porrett</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Orandi</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>First clinical-grade porcine kidney xenotransplant using a human decedent model</article-title>. <source>Am J Transplant</source>
<year>2022</year>; <volume>22</volume>: <fpage>1037</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1053</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35049121</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Moazami</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Stern</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Khalil</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Pig-to-human heart xenotransplantation in two recently deceased human recipients</article-title>. <source>Nat Med</source>
<year>2023</year>; <volume>29</volume>: <fpage>1989</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1997</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37488288</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Griffith</surname><given-names>BP</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Goerlich</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Genetically Modified Porcine-to-Human Cardiac Xenotransplantation</article-title>. <source>N Engl J Med</source>
<year>2022</year>; <volume>387</volume>: <fpage>35</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>44</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35731912</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>First gene-edited pig kidney transplant</article-title>. <source>Nat Biotechnol</source>
<year>2024</year>; <volume>42</volume>: <fpage>543</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38632452</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Zhong</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Enzymatic comparison and expression pattern of pig B4GALNT2 and B4GALNT2-like proteins</article-title>. <source>Turkish Journal of Biochemistry</source>
<year>2024</year>; <volume>49</volume>: <fpage>220</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>226</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>S&#x000f6;llner</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Sake</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Frenzel</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>In vitro genome editing activity of Cas9 in somatic cells after random and transposon-based genomic Cas9 integration</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source>
<year>2022</year>; <volume>17</volume>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>PT</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Liao</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>WG</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Chu</surname><given-names>ST</given-names></name>. <article-title>Progesterone-regulated B4galnt2 expression is a requirement for embryo implantation in mice</article-title>. <source>Fertil Steril</source>
<year>2011</year>; <volume>95</volume>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Drouilhet</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Mansanet</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Sarry</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>The highly prolific phenotype of Lacaune sheep is associated with an ectopic expression of the B4GALNT2 gene within the ovary</article-title>. <source>PLoS Genet</source>
<year>2013</year>; <volume>9</volume>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Ben Jemaa</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Ruesche</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Sarry</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>The high prolificacy of D&#x02019;man sheep is associated with the segregation of the FecLL mutation in the B4GALNT2 gene</article-title>. <source>Reprod Domest Anim</source>
<year>2019</year>; <volume>54</volume>: <fpage>531</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>537</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30561778</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Freitag</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Maternal-derived galectin-1 shapes the placenta niche through Sda terminal glycosylation: Implication for preeclampsia</article-title>. <source>PNAS nexus</source>
<year>2023</year>; <volume>2</volume>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Bailey</surname><given-names>DW</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Dunlap</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Frank</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Effects of long-term progesterone on developmental and functional aspects of porcine uterine epithelia and vasculature: progesterone alone does not support development of uterine glands comparable to that of pregnancy</article-title>. <source>Reproduction</source>
<year>2010</year>; <volume>140</volume>: <fpage>583</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>594</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20634388</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Geisert</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Bazer</surname><given-names>FW</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Lucas</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name>
<etal/>
<article-title>Maternal recognition of pregnancy in the pig: A servomechanism involving sex steroids, cytokines and prostaglandins</article-title>. <source>Anim Reprod Sci</source>
<year>2024</year>; <volume>264</volume>.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back><floats-group><fig position="float" id="F1"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>Summary of breeding plan to generate quadruple-modified (4GM) pigs.</title><p id="P34">A total of fourteen <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic>, <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2 -like</italic> knockout piglets were born, most of which also carried knockout alleles for <italic toggle="yes">GGTA1</italic> and the human transgene <italic toggle="yes">hCD55</italic>. Females lacking <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-like</italic> expression were able to carry <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-like</italic> KO embryos to term. The crosses R652 &#x000d7; R801 and 147&#x02013;8 &#x000d7; 147&#x02013;1 resulted in two <italic toggle="yes">GGTA1/B4GALNT2/B4GALNT2-like</italic> full KO piglets expressing the <italic toggle="yes">hCD55</italic> transgene. KO: knockout; &#x02212;/+: heterozygous modification. Pigs R652, R801, 147&#x02013;8, and 147&#x02013;4 were generated through selective breeding of established founder lines. Specifically, R652 was derived from crosses between the NSRRC:0086 line and non-cloned GGTA1 KO/hCD55 pigs. Furthermore, R801, 147&#x02013;8, and 147&#x02013;4 were produced from crosses between the NSRRC:0086 and R614 lines.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="nihms-2181260-f0001" position="float"/></fig><fig position="float" id="F2"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>DBA staining images of pig cells transfected with pcDNA3.1/<italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> or pcDNA3.1/<italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-lik</italic>e expressing vectors.</title><p id="P35">Cells that previously did not stain for DBA (WT tail fibroblast and pFF) became DBA positive after transfected with vectors expressing <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> or <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic>-like. pFF: porcine fetal fibroblast; WT: wild-type; DBA: <italic toggle="yes">Dolichos biflorus</italic> Agglutinin; +: positive for DBA staining; -: negative for DBA staining.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="nihms-2181260-f0002" position="float"/></fig><fig position="float" id="F3"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>Structural examination of the <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> locus in the porcine genome.</title><p id="P36"><bold>(A)</bold> Comparative genomic organization of the <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> flanking region in human (<italic toggle="yes">Homo sapiens</italic>), mouse (<italic toggle="yes">Mus musculus</italic>), and cow (<italic toggle="yes">Bos taurus</italic>), based on NCBI database annotation. <bold>(B)</bold> Proposed mechanism for the porcine-specific rearrangement: a double-strand break (DSB) at the <italic toggle="yes">TRNAQ-UUG</italic> region (indicated by the yellow lightning bolt), followed by a segmental duplication and inversion event. <bold>(C)</bold> Genomic view of the <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> locus in the porcine (<italic toggle="yes">Sus Scrofa</italic>) genome, based on the NCBI database. Insertion of the duplicated segments (orange boxes) into the tRNA region, resulting in the expanded porcine locus. <bold>(D)</bold> Proposed model for the porcine <italic toggle="yes">IGF2BP1&#x02013;ZNF652</italic> interval organization. The tRNA region appears to be the site of reinsertion, as the tRNA was not duplicated but resides between the rearranged segments; we hypothesize that the duplicated genes replaced a portion of the original tRNA region. Based on structural, nucleotide, and protein analyses, we suggest that <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2-like</italic> represents the ancestral gene, while <italic toggle="yes">B4GALNT2</italic> is the duplicated copy. Colored arrows denote transcriptional orientation and gene identity.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="nihms-2181260-f0003" position="float"/></fig></floats-group></article>