Conceived and designed the experiments: PKK GJS JK LAM FO KFL. Performed the experiments: PKK JK JO GO FO. Analyzed the data: PKK GO. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PKK GJS JK LAM FO KFL. Wrote the paper: PKK LAM JK JO FO KFL BZ JV GJS.
Facility-based assessments of prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programs may overestimate population coverage. There are few community-based studies that evaluate PMTCT coverage and uptake.
During 2011, a cross-sectional community survey among women who gave birth in the prior year was performed using the KEMRI-CDC Health and Demographic Surveillance System in Western Kenya. A random sample (n = 405) and a sample of women known to be HIV-positive through previous home-based testing (n = 247) were enrolled. Rates and correlates of uptake of antenatal care (ANC), HIV-testing, and antiretrovirals (ARVs) were determined.
Among 405 women in the random sample, 379 (94%) reported accessing ANC, most of whom (87%) were HIV tested. Uptake of HIV testing was associated with employment, higher socioeconomic status, and partner HIV testing. Among 247 known HIV-positive women, 173 (70%) self-disclosed their HIV status. Among 216 self-reported HIV-positive women (including 43 from the random sample), 82% took PMTCT ARVs, with 54% completing the full antenatal, peripartum, and postpartum course. Maternal ARV use was associated with more ANC visits and having an HIV tested partner. ARV use during delivery was lowest (62%) and associated with facility delivery. Eighty percent of HIV infected women reported having their infant HIV tested, 11% of whom reported their child was HIV infected, 76% uninfected, 6% declined to say, 7% did not recall; 79% of infected children were reportedly receiving HIV care and treatment.
Community-based assessments provide data that complements clinic-based PMTCT evaluations. In this survey, antenatal HIV test uptake was high; most HIV infected women received ARVs, though many women did not self-disclose HIV status to field team. Community-driven strategies that encourage early ANC, partner involvement, and skilled delivery, and provide PMTCT education, may facilitate further reductions in vertical transmission.
Global elimination of mother-to-child HIV transmission (MTCT) is targeted for 2015 and is an initiative which will require strategic improvements in service delivery.
PMTCT programs involve a cascade of interventions, which begins with HIV counseling and testing of pregnant women at initiation of antenatal care (ANC), and provision of ARVs throughout pregnancy, peripartum, and in the postpartum period to prevent vertical HIV transmission.
Most PMTCT assessments are clinic-based, and few studies sample a broader population of mothers which includes those who never accessed clinics. While clinic-based assessment is informative, this can exclude vulnerable and underserved women, overestimating PMTCT coverage and failing to adequately capture barriers to accessing PMTCT. A study from Uganda noted markedly lower estimates of antenatal HIV testing in community-based assessment than in clinic-based assessment.
Expansion of PMTCT coverage in Kenya faces persistent barriers due to social, cultural, programmatic, logistical, and policy challenges also seen in other sub-Saharan countries.
A cross-sectional community-level survey assessing knowledge and uptake of PMTCT services among women of child-bearing age was performed March – June, 2011 in the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) and US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) area in Nyanza Province, Kenya.
The HDSS covers 385 villages with a population of approximately 220,000. Three regions situated in Siaya County make up this area: Karemo, Gem and Asembo.
Women, maternal age 14 years and older (mothers 14–17 are considered emancipated minors), who were residents in the HDSS area, and had delivered a baby within the previous year (January to December 2010) were recruited. Residency was defined as having lived in the area for at least 4 consecutive months. We leveraged existing HDSS program data to identify and recruit two groups representing two target populations for prevention services: a random community sample to assess factors influencing uptake of general services (access to ANC and maternal HIV testing); and a second sample of HIV infected women, known via previous home-based testing and counseling in the region, to assess factors influencing uptake of HIV-specific services (use of ARVs and infant HIV testing). The same inclusion criteria applied to both general community and HIV-positive groups, with the addition that women in the HIV-positive group must have completed HIV-testing prior to the delivery of the infant.
Sampling was limited by the number of women meeting recruitment criteria in the HDSS database. We were able to generate a random list of 523 women from non-HBCT areas to represent a general community assessment of ANC and HIV-testing uptake. In HBCT areas, only 275 women were HIV positive, thus all HIV positive mothers who were diagnosed prior to delivery were approached.
Trained fieldworkers were assigned a list of names and locations for all selected participants. Village reporters assisted fieldworkers to locate the mother participant and introduce the study. Fieldworkers administered surveys and recorded GPS location on hand-held PDAs using electronic forms (Pendragon Software Corporation, Buffalo Grove, IL); paper forms were used as a back-up. Mothers' surveys were adapted from clinic-based surveys used previously in this region
Outcomes of interest included self-report of uptake of ANC, HIV testing, maternal ARVs for PMTCT, infant testing, and infant ARVs. Potential cofactors assessed included demographics, educational achievement, and marital status, as well as knowledge about HIV and disease transmission. Due to limitations in determining income through household surveys, asset-based indicators (ownership of goods, including mobile phones, cattle, television or refrigerator, and roof type) were used as measures of socioeconomic status.
Descriptive proportions of those accessing services in the PMTCT cascade were generated. Data analysis utilized chi-square analyses with Fisher's exact tests for comparison of proportions using STATA SE version 11 (STATACorp, College Station, Texas). Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparisons where continuous data were not normally distributed. Multivariate analysis using generalized linear models further assessed adjusted prevalence ratios of uptake. A priori covariates of age and education level were included in the model with correlates identified in univariate analyses. Variables were retained in the model if they were significantly associated with the outcome and/or if their inclusion substantially changed the estimates by 10%.
Analysis was modeled to assess key steps in the PMTCT cascade: correlates of ANC attendance were assessed among women in the community sample (n = 405); correlates of HIV testing were assessed among women attending ANC with unknown or previously negative HIV status (n = 362); and correlates of maternal and infant ARV uptake were assessed among self-identified HIV-positive women (n = 216).
Prior to study start, community engagement activities were held targeting the area senior health officials, the local community advisory board, the village reporters, chiefs and assistant chiefs. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants, both to be interviewed and also to have their data from these surveys linked to their HDSS record. In Kenya, women with pregnancy are considered emancipated and were therefore able to consent to study participation without parental assent. All study procedures, including enrollment of emancipated minors, were approved by the University of Washington Institutional Review Board (#36022) and the Kenya Medical Research Institute Ethical Review Committee (#1714). Written permission was also received from provincial medical and public health offices.
A random sample of 523 women who delivered in the previous year was identified, 437 (83.6%) were located, and 405 (92.7% of those located) agreed to participate (
Among the 405 women in the general community sample, most were married (79% monogamous and 15% polygamous) (
| n(%) or median (IQR) | n(%) or median (IQR) | |
| Age | 25 (22–30) | 29 (25–32) |
| Years of residence in village | 7.2 (3.5–12) | 9.5 (5–14) |
| Marital status | ||
| Married monogamous | 318 (78.5) | 159 (73.6) |
| Married polygamous | 60 (14.8) | 35 (16.2) |
| Single | 17 (4.2) | 7 (3.2) |
| Widowed | 10 (2.5) | 15 (6.9) |
| Occupation | ||
| Unemployed | 71 (17.5) | 39 (18.1) |
| Housewife | 163 (40.3) | 98 (45.4) |
| Salaried job or small business | 170 (42.0) | 77 (35.7) |
| Completed primary education | 184 (45.4) | 112 (51.9) |
| Cattle ownership (≥in household) | 192 (47.4) | 89 (41.2) |
| Mobile phone ownership (≥in household) | 289 (71.4) | 152 (70.4) |
| Roof type | ||
| Grass | 288 (71.1) | 120 (55.6) |
| Corrugated iron sheet or better | 116 (28.6) | 96 (44.4) |
| Number of times pregnant | 4 (3–6) | 4 (3–6) |
| Any antenatal care last pregnancy | 379 (93.6) | 209 (96.8) |
| Number of ANC visits | 3 (2–4) | 3 (3–4) |
| Timing of first ANC visit (months pregnant) | 5 (4–6) | 5 (4–6) |
| Transport time to ANC (hours) | 1 (0.5–1.5) | 1 (0.5–1.5) |
| HIV tested last pregnancy | 340 (84.0) | – |
| HIV test at first ANC visit (among those tested) | 304 (89.4) | – |
| Tested at government facility (among those tested) | (86.2) | – |
| Delivery care | ||
| Skilled attendant (nurse, doctor or midwife) | 176 (43.5) | 101 (46.8) |
| Unskilled attendant (family member or traditional birth attendant) | 145 (35.8) | 67 (31.0) |
| No assistance | 45 (20.0) | 45 (20.8) |
| Vaginal delivery (no instruments) | 383 (95.3) | 203 (94.0) |
| Is there any way to prevent HIV (yes) | 298 (73.6) | 192 (88.9) |
| Can pregnant women give HIV to baby (yes) | 261 (64.4) | 172 (79.6) |
| Can ARVs prevent MTCT of HIV (yes) | 210 (51.9) | 158 (73.2) |
*Includes 43 mothers from community sample and 173 mothers from HBTC.
Women who delivered an infant in the previous year and resided in the Demographic Health and Surveillance System Area, Nyanza Province, Kenya (2011).
Women reported a median of 4 (IQR 3-6) pregnancies. Although uptake of ANC was high (94%), most women started ANC late (median 5 months gestation at first ANC visit, IQR 4-6) and completed fewer than the recommended 4 ANC visits (median 3 visits, IQR 2-4). Uptake of skilled delivery, defined as a doctor, nurse or midwife, was 44%, with 20% reporting no assistance at all. Less than half of women reported delivering in a health facility (n = 170, 42.0%); 210 (52%) delivered at home and 14 (3.5%) delivered on the roadside while attempting to reach a health facility.
Most (94%) women from the random community sample reported attending ANC during the last pregnancy, among whom 89% reported that they were offered HIV testing and 87% reported being tested. Among women in the random sample, regardless of ANC attendance, 324 (80%) reported uptake of HIV testing, 4% were known positive, and 16% did not accept testing during the last pregnancy (
*Includes HIV+ oversample and does not reflect population HIV prevalence.
Among 216 HIV-positive women, 82% reported receipt of maternal ARVs at any time-point (prenatal, labor and delivery, or postpartum), however uptake at all three time-points was considerably lower (54%). This was primarily driven by lower uptake during labor/delivery time-points (62% compared to 72% antenatal and 72% postpartum).
Seventy-nine percent of HIV-positive women reported administering infant ARVs for prevention of HIV transmission. Among the 81% (176/216) of infants tested for HIV, 11% of mothers reported that their infant was HIV-positive and 76% reported that the infant tested negative, 6% declined to report their child's HIV status, and 7% stated that they did not remember the test results. Timing of infant HIV diagnosis was not reported, though a national early infant diagnosis program with testing recommendations at six weeks was initiated in the previous year, December 2009. Among the 19 positive infants, 15 (79%) were reported to be receiving care and treatment for HIV, 1 child died prior to receiving treatment, and another 3 did not receive treatment because of fear of others finding out (n = 1), denial (n = 1), and being unaware of treatment (n = 2).
Factors associated with report of ANC uptake at most recent pregnancy among women in the community sample are detailed in
| Age | 27 (23–32) | 25 (22–30) | 0.17 | 24.5 (22–28) | 25 (22–30) | 0.62 |
| Years of residence in village | 9 (4–13) | 7 (3.5–11.3) | 0.34 | 7 (3.5–10.3) | 7 (3.3–11.5) | 0.91 |
| Marital status | 0.63 | 0.23 | ||||
| Married monogamous | 22 (84.6) | 296 (78.1) | 34 (70.8) | 250 (79.6) | ||
| Married polygamous | 3 (11.5) | 57 (15.0) | 12 (25.0) | 43 (13.7) | ||
| Single | 0 (0.0) | 17 (4.5) | 2 (4.2) | 15 (4.8) | ||
| Widowed | 1 (3.9) | 9 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (1.9) | ||
| Occupation | 0.62 | 0.03 | ||||
| Unemployed | 6 (23.1) | 65 (17.2) | 15 (31.3) | 47 (15.0) | ||
| Housewife | 11 (42.3) | 152 (40.2) | 17 (35.4) | 129 (41.2) | ||
| Employed | 9 (34.6) | 161 (42.6) | 16 (33.3) | 137 (43.8) | ||
| Completed primary education | 3 (12.0) | 181 (47.9) | <0.001 | 19 (39.6) | 154 (49.2) | 0.28 |
| Cattle ownership (≥1 in household) | 13 (50.0) | 179 (47.5) | 0.84 | 16 (33.3) | 154 (49.4) | 0.04 |
| Mobile phone (≥1 in household) | 15 (57.7) | 274 (72.5) | 0.12 | 24 (50.0) | 236 (75.4) | <0.001 |
| Roof type | 1.00 | 0.06 | ||||
| Grass | 19 (73.1) | 269 (71.2) | 40 (83.3) | 217 (69.3) | ||
| Corrugated iron sheet or better | 7 (26.9) | 109 (28.8) | 8 (16.7) | 96 (30.7) | ||
| Number of times pregnant | 5 (4–7) | 4 (3–6) | 0.001 | 3 (3–4.5) | 4 (3–6) | 0.23 |
| Partner tested for HIV | – | – | 16 (36.4) | 179 (60.3) | 0.003 | |
| Partner HIV positive (among tested) | – | – | 1 (6.7) | 19 (11.0) | 1.00 | |
| Is there any way to prevent HIV | 15 (60.0) | 283 (75.1) | 0.10 | 29 (61.7) | 240 (76.7) | 0.03 |
| Pregnant women can give HIV to baby | 14 (56.0) | 247 (65.3) | 0.39 | 28 (59.6) | 205 (65.3) | 0.51 |
| Can prevent MTCT of HIV | 10 (71.4) | 200 (81.3) | 0.48 | 16 (34.0) | 171 (54.6) | 0.01 |
* % women answering agree/yes to knowledge questions.
Women who delivered an infant in the previous year and reside in the Demographic Health and Surveillance System Area, Nyanza Province, Kenya (2011).
Of 362 women attending ANC whose prior HIV status was negative or unknown, 87% reported being tested for HIV, and most HIV testing (89%) occurred at the first ANC visit (
Factors associated with uptake of maternal ARVs are described in
| Age | 26 (23–33) | 29 (25–32) | 0.06 | 28 (25–32) | 29 (25–32) | 0.62 |
| Marital status | 0.71 | 0.86 | ||||
| Married monogamous | 27 (69.2) | 132 (74.6) | 71 (71.7) | 88 (75.2) | ||
| Married polygamous | 7 (18.0) | 28 (15.8) | 16 (16.2) | 19 (16.2) | ||
| Single | 2 (5.1) | 5 (2.8) | 4 (4.0) | 3 (2.6) | ||
| Widowed | 3 (7.7) | 12 (6.8) | 8 (8.1) | 7 (6.0) | ||
| Occupation | 0.27 | 0.07 | ||||
| Unemployed | 7 (18.0) | 32 (18.3) | 17 (17.4) | 22 (19.0) | ||
| Housewife | 22 (56.4) | 76 (43.4) | 53 (54.1) | 45 (38.8) | ||
| Employed | 10 (25.6) | 67 (38.3) | 28 (28.6) | 49 (42.2) | ||
| Completed primary education | 16 (41.0) | 96 (54.2) | 0.16 | 41 (41.4) | 71 (60.7) | 0.006 |
| Cattle ownership (≥1 in household) | 19 (48.7) | 70 (39.6) | 0.37 | 40 (40.4) | 49 (41.9) | 0.89 |
| Mobile phone (≥1 in household) | 27 (69.2) | 125 (70.6) | 0.85 | 64 (64.7) | 88 (75.2) | 0.10 |
| Roof type | 0.72 | 0.89 | ||||
| Grass | 23 (59.0) | 97 (54.8) | 56 (56.6) | 64 (54.7) | ||
| Corrugated iron sheet or better | 16 (41.0) | 80 (45.2) | 43 (43.4) | 53 (45.3) | ||
| Number of times pregnant | 4 (3–6) | 4 (3–6) | 0.33 | 4 (3–6) | 4 (3–6) | 0.66 |
| ANC during last pregnancy | 36 (92.3) | 173 (97.7) | 0.11 | 94 (95.0) | 115 (98.3) | 0.25 |
| Timing of first ANC (months pregnant) | 6 (5–7) | 5 (4–6) | 0.18 | 5 (4–6) | 5 (4–6) | 0.25 |
| Number of ANC visits | 3 (2–4) | 4 (3–4) | 0.002 | 3 (2–4) | 4 (3–4) | 0.23 |
| First HIV test before learned was pregnant | 11 (28.2) | 79 (44.6) | 0.07 | 37 (37.4) | 53 (45.3) | 0.27 |
| Partner tested for HIV | 18 (52.9) | 117 (75.5) | 0.01 | 59 (67.8) | 76 (74.5) | 0.33 |
| Partner HIV-positive (among tested) | 8 (44.4) | 84 (75.7) | 0.01 | 37 (63.8) | 55 (77.5) | 0.12 |
| Skilled provider at delivery | 13 (33.3) | 88 (50.6) | 0.08 | 40 (40.8) | 61 (53.0) | 0.10 |
| Is there any way to prevent HIV | 31 (81.6) | 161 (91.0) | 0.14 | 80 (81.6) | 112 (95.7) | 0.001 |
| Pregnant can women give HIV to baby | 29 (74.4) | 143 (81.3) | 0.38 | 74 (75.5) | 98 (83.8) | 0.17 |
| Can prevent MTCT of HIV | 26 (66.7) | 132 (75.4) | 0.31 | 66 (67.4) | 92 (79.3) | 0.06 |
*Defined as uptake at antenatal, peripartum, and postpartum time points.
All women reporting HIV-positive status: including 43 from random sample and 173 from HBCT sample, Nyanza Province, Kenya (2011).
| Age | 1.02 (1.00–1.03) | |||
| Occupation | ||||
| Unemployed | Ref | |||
| Housewife | 1.16 (1.00–1.35) | |||
| Employed | 2.73 (1.00–1.22) | |||
| Completed primary education | 1.09 (1.04–1.15)¥ | 1.37 (1.06–1.79) | ||
| Cattle ownership (one or> in household) | 1.08 (1.01–1.17) | |||
| Mobile phone ownership (one or> in household) | 1.13 (1.00–1.26) | 1.19 (0.88–1.62) | ||
| Roof type | ||||
| Grass | Ref | |||
| Corrugated iron sheet or better | 1.12 (1.04–1.20)‡ | |||
| Number of times pregnant | 0.94 (0.89–0.99) | |||
| Number of ANC visits | 1.08 (1.03–1.13)‡ | |||
| Partner tested for HIV | 1.13 (1.03–1.24)‡ | 1.16 (0.97–1.39) | ||
| Skilled provider at delivery | 1.10 (0.96–1.26) | 1.16 (0.94–1.49) |
Samples for each column described in previous tables; all variables in final adjusted models presented.
*Prevalence ratios for continuous and ordinal variables are for each one unit change in the variable.
p<0.05, ‡p<0.01, ¥p<0.001.
Administration of infant ARVs for PMTCT was highly correlated with maternal ARV uptake. While 160 of 174 (92%) women who took ARVs also administered them to their infant, 10 out of 39 (26%) women who did not take ARVs gave their infants ARVs (p<0.001).
Among women known to be HIV infected through previous home-based counseling and testing, 14 (5.7%) declined to answer questions about their HIV status and 60 (24.3%) reported to our field workers that they were HIV-negative. In a sensitivity analysis attempting to account for the low self-report among known HIV-positive women, in which we considered the most liberal (that all known HIV-positive women who did not self-report HIV-positive status
| Age (years) | 29 (25–33) | 25.5 (23–29.5) | 0.003 | |
| Age category (years) | 0.01 | 0.53 (0.32–0.86) | ||
| 15–20 | 7 (4.1) | 9 (15.0) | ||
| 21–34 | 137 (79.2) | 45 (75.0) | ||
| 35–46 | 29 (16.8) | 6 (10.0) | ||
| Marital status | 0.24 | |||
| Married monogamous | 128 (74.0) | 44 (73.3) | ||
| Married polygamous | 28 (16.2) | 9 (15.0) | ||
| Single | 7 (4.1) | 6 (10.0) | ||
| Widowed | 10 (5.8) | 1 (1.7) | ||
| Occupation | 0.59 | |||
| Unemployed | 30 (17.5) | 7 (11.9) | ||
| Housewife | 80 (46.8) | 31 (52.5) | ||
| Employed | 61 (35.7) | 21 (35.6) | ||
| Completed primary education | 95 (54.9) | 30 (50.0) | 0.55 | |
| Skilled provider at delivery | 71 (41.5) | 23 (38.3) | 0.76 | |
| Is there any way to prevent HIV | 155 (89.6) | 51 (85.0) | 0.35 | |
| Pregnant can women give HIV to baby | 138 (79.8) | 47 (78.3) | 0.85 | |
| Can prevent MTCT of HIV | 128 (74.0) | 42 (71.2) | 0.73 |
Comparison of characteristics of women known to be HIV infected who disclosed or denied HIV status to field interviewers.
In this community-based study of women in western Kenya with a pregnancy during the prior calendar year, we observed high rates of accessing antenatal care at least once, with most reporting HIV testing offered at the first ANC visit. Using a community lens, our study suggests that facilities in this region serve almost all pregnant women at some point, and almost 90% of women with previously unknown HIV status reported receiving HIV testing during their pregnancy. Most (>80%) HIV infected women reported using ARVs for PMTCT. Because a large proportion of HIV infected women did not disclose their status to the field workers, complete ascertainment of ARV use was not possible. The denial of HIV status by some women to interviewers was unexpected and posed a challenge to complete ascertainment of ARV use in this community survey. It also suggests that acceptance of HIV testing in the home may not readily translate to subsequent disclosure of HIV status and access to HIV services. To account for this possibility, we presented the ranges of uptake in sensitivity analyses to compensate for women who did not self-disclose their HIV status. With the most conservative scenario assuming that none of these women accessed PMTCT, at least 60% of HIV-infected women would have received some pregnancy ARVs.
Although we noted excellent PMTCT coverage, there were several key opportunities for improvement. For example, entry into ANC, was often late, and uptake of a complete course of ARVs for PMTCT was low (54%). These numbers may be even lower considering the high number of known HIV-positive women who declined to reveal their status. This highlights challenges in engagement throughout the cascade, which are especially important since late uptake of ARVs for PMTCT is associated with a higher risk of transmission.
Knowledge of HIV prevention and PMTCT were associated with uptake of HIV testing and maternal ARVs. Given the cross-sectional study design, it is impossible to know whether the knowledge or uptake came first. In our survey, only 52% of women reported that they thought MTCT of HIV could be prevented. Among HIV infected women, PMTCT knowledge was higher at 73%. Women who knew that ARVs could decrease MTCT were more likely to report having taken a complete ARV course than those who did not. This suggests that investing more in early counseling regarding PMTCT ARVs in clinics will be useful to support sustained adherence to ARVs. Community-based activities that stress the effectiveness of PMTCT in preventing new infections will be important to fully realize benefits of PMTCT.
Socioeconomic indicators correlated with uptake of interventions throughout the PMTCT cascade. Maternal education was associated with ANC attendance and maternal ARVs; and higher socioeconomic status also correlated with uptake of HIV testing and ARVs. These associations may reflect easier access to care among women with higher socioeconomic status, or a better understanding of the benefit of HIV testing or ARVs. Approximately 70% of women reported having mobile phone availability, the majority of which were shared within the household. Mobile phones are being assessed as a tool (
The association between awareness of partner HIV testing and uptake of maternal HIV testing and ARVs in our study is consistent with previous studies, which have noted associations between partner disclosure,
Consistent with other national surveys, fewer than half of the women in this survey accessed a skilled provider for assistance during delivery.
This analysis had several strengths in that it utilized a community-based approach to assess uptake of health services. Regional home-based counseling and testing in the HDSS further allowed for increased sampling of HIV-positive women and verification of self-reported status.
Community based approaches, such as the existing HDSS household annual surveys, provide a tool to efficiently assess interventions received by women during their most recent pregnancy and sample women attending a variety of clinics or not accessing any clinical services. In demographic surveys that include routine HIV surveillance, it is possible to rapidly sample women who should have received PMTCT ARVs to understand whether women access PMTCT programs and systems are effectively providing PMTCT services.
In contrast to studies from Uganda and a multi-national study (Cameroon, Cote d'Ivoire, Zambia),
Each of the possible approaches for assessing population-level uptake and health impact of HIV prevention services poses methodological challenges. Facility-based surveys may fail to assess outcomes of women who never access clinic-based services, while community-based approaches may fail to reach women who deny HIV status or decline HIV testing. Even with biological testing, 15% of respondents in the KAIS PMTCT surveys refused HIV testing. Furthermore, program indicators of uptake, while important in understanding issues related to engagement in care, are not equivalent to measures of program effectiveness. Findings from the PEARL Study demonstrated that program data in Cote D'Ivoire suggested markedly different rates of reported uptake of nevirapine (41%) compared to presence of nevirapine cord-blood samples collected from infants (16%).
This household-based survey complements Kenyan facility-based assessments and observed similarly high PMTCT coverage estimates. However, although most HIV infected women received ARVs, fewer received a complete course, many started ANC late, and a surprising number of women declined to reveal their status. Involving partners or utilizing mobile phones may enhance PMTCT delivery, though care should be taken to avoid marginalization of women without supportive partners or access to mobile phone technology. Efforts specifically targeting stigma reduction around disclosure of HIV status and provision of ARVs during the labor and delivery period are necessary. Community driven strategies that encourage early uptake of ANC and skilled attendance at delivery, and that emphasize education about the effectiveness of PMTCT, may facilitate completion of ARVs and subsequent reductions in perinatal HIV transmission.
Authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Dr. Martina Morris, Dr. Barbara Richardson, Dr. Nancy Woods, and Dr. Lisa Manhart; the UW Center for Integrated Health of Women, Adolescents, and Children (Global WACh); and the Kenya Health Demographic Surveillance System team.
Published with the approval of the Director, Kenya Medical Research Institute. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of their institutions, including the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention and Kenya Medical Research Institute.
Findings were presented at the XIX International AIDS Conference, July 22–27, 2012 in Washington DC, USA.