Food insecurity is positively linked to risk of hypertension; however, it is not known whether this relationship persists after adjustment for socioeconomic position (SEP). We examined the association between food insecurity and self-reported hypertension among adults aged 35 or older (N = 58,677) in 12 states that asked the food insecurity question in their 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System questionnaire. After adjusting for SEP, hypertension was more common among adults reporting food insecurity (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.19–1.36). Our study found a positive relationship between food insecurity and hypertension after adjusting for SEP and other characteristics.
Food security is a social determinant of health characterized by availability of and access to adequate food (
We analyzed data from 12 states (Alabama, Arkansas, California, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Wisconsin) that asked the food insecurity question in the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). BRFSS is a state-based, random-digit–dialed telephone survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized adult US population. The sample was restricted to Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, and non-Hispanic white adults aged 35 or older (N = 58,677) because of the low prevalence of hypertension among younger adults (
Food insecurity was measured by asking, “How often in the past 12 months would you say you were worried or stressed about having enough money to buy nutritious meals?” Respondents answering “always,” “usually,” or “sometimes” were categorized as insecure; those answering “rarely” or “never” were categorized as secure. The food insecurity item, which measures stress-related food insecurity, was validated by the US Department of Agriculture’s Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement, a 10-item food security scale (
Hypertension was measured by asking, “Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or health professional that you have high blood pressure?” Respondents answering yes were categorized as having hypertension; those answering no or indicating borderline high blood pressure or prehypertension were categorized as nonhypertensive. Data on women reporting pregnancy-induced hypertension were excluded from analysis (
SEP was measured by level of education (<high school, high school graduate or GED [general education development], or any college) and a household’s relationship to the federal poverty level (ie, income as a percentage of the federal poverty level, or income-to-poverty ratio).
Significant differences between subgroups were assessed using χ2 tests for categorical variables and Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel trend tests for ordinal variables. Prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between food insecurity and hypertension were calculated using logistic regression. PRs were adjusted for SEP and other potential confounders between food insecurity and hypertension: age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, percentage federal poverty level, health insurance coverage, marital status, and current smoking status (
Of the 58,677 adults included in the analysis, 47,734 (81.4%) were non-Hispanic white, 36,757 (62.6%) were women, and 21,248 (36.2%) were 65 or older. The prevalence of food insecurity was 17.3% (95% CI, 16.5%–18.1%) overall and varied among racial/ethnic groups — highest among Hispanics (30.3%; 95% CI, 27.1%–33.7%), lower among non-Hispanic blacks (26.7%; 95% CI, 24.5%–29.0%), and lowest among non-Hispanic whites (13.0%; 95% CI, 12.4%–13.6%) (
| Sociodemographic Characteristic | n | Food Insecurity | Self-Reported Hypertension | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence, % (95% CI) |
| Prevalence, % (95% CI) |
| |||
|
| 58,677 | 17.3 (16.5–18.1) | — | 37.4 (36.5–38.3) | — | |
|
| ||||||
| Hispanic | 4,067 | 30.3 (27.1–33.7) | <.001 | 33.7 (30.7–36.8) | <.001 | |
| Non-Hispanic black | 6,876 | 26.7 (24.5–29.0) | 52.3 (49.6–55.0) | |||
| Non-Hispanic white | 47,734 | 13.0 (12.4–13.6) | 36.4 (35.6–37.2) | |||
|
| ||||||
| Male | 21,920 | 14.5 (13.3–15.7) | <.001 | 38.2 (36.8–39.6) | .09 | |
| Female | 36,757 | 19.8 (18.8–20.8) | 36.7 (35.6–37.7) | |||
|
| ||||||
| 35–44 | 8,846 | 22.2 (20.4–24.0) | <.001 | 19.8 (18.2–21.5) | <.001 | |
| 45–54 | 13,619 | 20.3 (18.8–21.9) | 30.8 (29.1–32.5) | |||
| 55–64 | 14,964 | 15.8 (14.4–17.4) | 45.1 (43.2–46.9) | |||
| ≥65 | 21,248 | 9.4 (8.6–10.3) | 59.0 (57.5–60.5) | |||
|
| ||||||
| Married/unmarried couple | 34,423 | 14.2 (13.3–15.1) | <.001 | 33.6 (32.6–34.7) | <.001 | |
| Widowed | 9,625 | 15.8 (14.2–17.5) | 61.1 (58.9–63.2) | |||
| Divorced/separated | 9,832 | 29.8 (27.7–31.9) | 41.5 (39.3–43.8) | |||
| Never married | 4,619 | 25.9 (22.5–29.6) | 39.1 (35.6–42.6) | |||
|
| ||||||
| <High school | 5,792 | 36.0 (32.4–39.7) | <.001 | 44.1 (40.8–47.4) | <.001 | |
| High school graduate/GED | 17,855 | 20.3 (19.0–21.8) | 41.6 (40.0–43.2) | |||
| Any college | 34,841 | 12.4 (11.7–13.1) | 34.2 (33.2–35.2) | |||
|
| ||||||
| <130 | 9,374 | 42.2 (39.5–44.9) | <.001 | 45.1 (42.5–47.6) | <.001 | |
| 130 to <200 | 6,147 | 25.4 (22.9–28.0) | 38.4 (35.6–41.2) | |||
| 200 to <400 | 20,308 | 11.9 (11.0–12.9) | 33.9 (32.6–35.2) | |||
| ≥400 | 15,251 | 4.4 (3.9–5.1) | 34.6 (33.2–36.0) | |||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 53,001 | 14.5 (13.8–15.2) | <.001 | 37.9 (37.0–38.8) | .01 | |
| No | 5,581 | 38.6 (35.3–42.1) | 33.7 (30.5–37.0) | |||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 9,247 | 29.8 (27.5–32.1) | <.001 | 37.4 (35.2–39.7) | .97 | |
| No | 49,228 | 15.1 (14.2–15.8) | 37.4 (36.4–38.3) | |||
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Alabama, Arkansas, California, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Wisconsin.
Defined as a response of “always,” “usually,” or “sometimes” to the question “How often in the past 12 months would you say you were worried or stressed about having enough money to buy nutritious meals?”
Defined as a response of yes to the question “Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that you have high blood pressure?”
Sample sizes may vary because some respondents did not answer all questions.
General educational development (GED) is a high school equivalency credential.
In the unadjusted model for the overall sample, food insecurity was associated with an increased likelihood of reporting hypertension (PR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15–1.30) (
| Characteristic | Unadjusted Prevalence Ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted Prevalence Ratio |
|---|---|---|
|
| 1.22 (1.15–1.30) | 1.27 (1.19–1.36) |
|
| ||
| Hispanic | 1.39 (1.13–1.71) | 1.41 (1.15–1.73) |
| Non-Hispanic black | 1.13 (1.02–1.25) | 1.13 (1.01–1.26) |
| Non-Hispanic white | 1.17 (1.11–1.25) | 1.26 (1.19–1.34) |
|
| ||
| Male | 1.28 (1.16–1.42) | 1.35 (1.22–1.50) |
| Female | 1.19 (1.11–1.28) | 1.22 (1.13–1.31) |
|
| ||
| 35–44 | 1.78 (1.49–2.14) | 1.70 (1.41–2.05) |
| 45–54 | 1.50 (1.33–1.70) | 1.36 (1.19–1.55) |
| 55–64 | 1.30 (1.17–1.44) | 1.16 (1.02–1.32) |
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Alabama, Arkansas, California, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Wisconsin.
Defined as a response of “always,” “usually,” or “sometimes” to the question “How often in the past 12 months would you say you were worried or stressed about having enough money to buy nutritious meals?”
Defined as a response of yes to the question “Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that you have high blood pressure?”
Adjusted for race/ethnicity, sex, age, marital status, education, percentage federal poverty level, health insurance coverage, and current smoking status.
Our study shows a positive relationship between stress associated with accessing adequate food — one dimension of food insecurity — and hypertension, after adjustment for education, percentage federal poverty level, and other characteristics. Our findings suggest that food insecurity is associated with hypertension regardless of demographic group, thus, reinforcing previous research (
The BRFSS has some limitations. BRFSS data are self-reported and cross-sectional and thus are subject to issues inherent in self-reported data and do not allow explorations of causality. Second, the BRFSS assesses lifetime prevalence of hypertension and 12-month prevalence of food insecurity. Thus, if food security occurred more than 12 months before the survey, survey data may underestimate the association between hypertension and food insecurity. Finally, the generalizability of the findings is limited because only 12 states used the food security question in their BRFSS. However, our study sample (adults aged 35 or older who were asked the food insecurity question) represents 30% of the US population aged 35 or older (
Addressing the relationship between food insecurity and hypertension or other cardiovascular diseases enhances our understanding of effects associated with the stress of attempting to meet one’s basic needs. Whether food insecurity is caused by limited socioeconomic access, physiological stress, or overconsumption of nutrient-poor, high-sodium food (
No financial support was received for this work.
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions.