Emerg Infect DisEmerging Infect. DisEIDEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-6059Centers for Disease Control and Prevention21529396332176010-091610.3201/eid1705.100916DispatchDispatchHuman Intraocular Filariasis Caused by Dirofilaria
sp. Nematode, BrazilRunning title: Filariasis Caused by
Dirofilaria sp. NematodeOtrantoDomenicoDinizDaniel G.Dantas-TorresFilipeCasiraghiMauriziode AlmeidaIzabela N.F.de AlmeidaLuciana N.F.Nascimento dos SantosJeannieFurtadoAdriano PenhaSobrinhoEdmundo F. de AlmeidaBainOdileAuthor affiliations: Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari,
Italy (D. Otranto, F. Dantas-Torres);Universidade Federal do Pará, Pará, Brazil (D.G. Diniz,
I.N.F. de Almeida, J. Nascimento dos Santos, A. Penha Furtado, E.F. de Almeida
Sobrinho);Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy (M.
Casiraghi);Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil (L.N.F.
de Almeida);Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France (O.
Bain)Address for correspondence: Domenico Otranto, Dipartimento di
Sanità Pubblica e Zootecnia, Facoltà di Medicina Veterinaria,
Università degli Studi di Bari, Strada Provinciale per Casamassima km 3,
70010 Valenzano, Bari, Italy; e-mail: d.otranto@veterinaria.uniba.it52011175863866
A case of human intraocular dirofilariasis is reported from northern Brazil. The
nematode was morphologically and phylogenetically related to Dirofilaria
immitis but distinct from reference sequences, including those of
D. immitis infesting dogs in the same
area. A zoonotic Dirofilaria species infesting wild mammals in
Brazil and its implications are discussed.
Zoonotic filariases are caused by nematodes of the superfamily Filarioidea and are
transmitted by blood-feeding arthropods. Within this taxonomic group, nematodes of the
genus Dirofilaria are among the most common agents infecting humans
(1–5). The 2 main species of zoonotic concern are
Dirofilaria immitis, which causes canine cardiopulmonary disease,
and D. repens, which is usually found in subcutaneous
tissues. In addition, zoonotic subcutaneous infections with D.
tenuis in raccoons and D. ursi in
bears have been reported less frequently in North America (3). Dirofilaria spp. infections in
humans have been detected mostly in subcutaneous tissue and lungs (3), and 1 intraocular case of infection with
D. repens was reported from Russia (1). D.
immitis and D. repens are the
main causes of human dirofilariasis in the Americas (4,6) and Old World (2,5), respectively.
Morphologic identification of Dirofilaria spp. is based on the body
cuticle, which is smooth in D. immitis (subgenus
Dirofilaria) and has external longitudinal ridges in
D. repens and other species of the subgenus
Nochtiella. However, in many reported cases of zoonotic
dirofilariasis, specific identification was not adequately addressed (5). Twenty-eight cases of human
dirofilariasis in the Old World attributed to D.
immitis have been reviewed recently and attributed to
D. repens (5). On the basis of this information, the suggestion
was made that D. immitis populations have different
infective capabilities for humans in the Old and New Worlds (5). However, this hypothesis was not supported by
recent genetic comparisons of specimens from the Old World (Italy and Japan) and New
World (United States and Cuba) (7; M. Casiraghi, unpub. data).
We report a case of human intraocular dirofilariasis in which a live male
Dirofilaria sp. worm was recovered from the anterior chamber of a
patient’s eye. Morphologic and molecular studies suggested that this zoonotic
case of dirofilariasis was caused by a Dirofilaria sp. closely related
to D. immitis.
The Study
On September 16, 2008, a 16-year-old boy came to the Clínica de Olhos do
Pará in Pará, Brazil, with low visual acuity (0.54 m), an intraocular
pressure of 44 mm Hg, and pain in the left eye. Ophthalmologic examination showed a
nematode (Video) in the anterior chamber of
the left eye. The patient reported no travel history in recent months preceding the
onset of symptoms. Corneal edema (Figure 1,
panel A) and episcleral hyperemia in the left eye were observed, and surgery for
removal of the nematode was recommended. After peribulbar anesthesia, the eye was
clipped and the cornea was incised with a crescent Beaver corneal knife, and the
nematode was extracted with forceps and Fukasacu hook (Video). A live filarial nematode was removed from the anterior
eye chamber. The patient recovered without complications after surgery.
Surgical removal of a Dirofilaria sp. nematode from the left
eye of a 16-year-old boy, Brazil. VA, visual acuity; CF, count fingers; IOP,
intraocular pressure. A portion of the material in this video was previously
published in the journal Parasites and Vectors (http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/pdf/1756-3305-4-41.pdf).
Direct Link: http://streaming.cdc.gov/vod.php?id=b35b57a52f8e7b3e41b59328391c90b020110426172643263
Corneal edema and episcleral hyperemia in the left eye of a 16-year-old boy
from Brazil and a free-swimming filarid in the anterior chamber. A)
Macroscopic view. B) Five pairs of ovoid pre-cloacal papillae (arrows) and 1
postcloacal caudal papillae (arrowhead). Scale bar = 50 µm. C) Small
(arrowhead) and large (arrow) spicules. Scale bar = 40 µm. D)
Longitudinal ridges of the area rugosa. Scale bar = 50 µm.
The parasite (deposited at the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle,
Parasitologie Comparée, Paris, France; accession no. 143 YU) was a male
filarial nematode (length 106 mm, width 400 µm). It had large caudal alae,
several pairs of pedunculated papillae (Figure
1, panel B), unequal spicules, a short and thick tail, and an esophagus
with a wider glandular region.
Narrow hypodermal lateral chords and the 2 lateral internal cuticular crests are
typical for Dirofilaria spp (8). The specimen was not D.
repens or a Nochtiella species because of the
smooth body cuticle. The left spicule (length 378 µm), with a handle and
lamina of equal length, was similar to that of D.
immitis (Figure 1, panel
C). Other measurements were similar to those of D.
immitis (esophagus length 1,200 µm; right spicule length
170 µm; tail length 110 µm; width at the anus 110 µm) (8).
To confirm morphologic identification, a DNA barcoding approach was used (7). A small piece (≈3
mm) of the nematode was used for DNA extraction and amplification of cytochrome c
oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) and 12S rDNA gene fragments as described
(9). Sequences were
deposited in the European Molecular Biology Laboratory Nucleotide Sequence Database
(accessions nos. HQ540423 and HQ540424). In accordance with morphologic
identification, BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) analysis of both genes showed overall
highest nucleotide similarity with those of D.
immitis available in GenBank (12S rDNA, accession nos. AM779770
and AM779771; cox1, accession nos. AM749226 and AM749229).
Phylogenetic analysis using cox1 sequences by MEGA 4.0 (www.megasoftware.net), a neighbor-joining algorithm, and Kimura
2-parameter correction confirmed that 143 YU clustered with D.
immitis from different countries, including Australia (GenBank
accession no. DQ358815) and Italy (other sequences in Figure 2). The cox1 sequence of D.
immitis from a dog in Pará, Brazil, was identical with
those of the same species in GenBank. Topology of 12S rDNA sequences was identical
with that of cox1 sequences. However, comparison of nematode
sequences with those in GenBank showed large differences in nucleotide similarities
(5% and 6% for 12S rDNA and cox1, respectively).
Phylogeny of filarial nematodes based on cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1
(cox1) gene sequences. Thelazia spp.
species were used as outgroup. Bootstrap confidence values (100 replicates)
are shown at the nodes only for values >50%. Solid diamond indicates
nematode isolated in this study. Numbers in parentheses are GenBank
accession numbers. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per
site.
Morphologic comparison with male worms isolated from dogs (1 from People’s
Republic of China and 1 from Japan, Muséum National d’Histoire
Naturelle accession nos. 63 SE and 169 YU) showed that the area rugosa (ventral
ornamentation of the posterior region) was similar among all specimens examined and
was composed of ≈8 longitudinal crests, each containing aligned segments
(length 15–30 µm) extending 1–8 mm from the tail tip (Figure 1, panel D). Arrangement and number of
caudal papillae were also similar (10). The preesophageal cuticular ring was present
in D. immitis reference specimens but was not
present in the specimen from Brazil. In addition, the deirids were more anterior in
the worm from Brazil than in reference specimens. This finding might be caused by
less growth of the nematode found in the patient from Brazil.
Similar morphologic features (small size and anterior deirids) have been reported in
a D. immitis male worm from a dog in Cayenne,
French Guiana (11). However,
a D. spectans worm from an otter in Brazil had a
similar body size and location of deirids as the worm 143 YU but a different pattern
of juxtacloacal papillae.
Conclusions
In Brazil, human pulmonary dirofilariasis caused by D.
immitis has been reported sporadically (12), mainly in southeastern Brazil, where the
prevalence of heartworm in dogs ranges from 2.2% to 52.5% (13). The patient in this study came from a
region in Brazil where canine dirofilariasis caused by D.
immitis is endemic and in which the prevalence of
microfilaremic dogs is <32.5% (14). Morphologic features and overall high
identity of 12S rDNA and cox1 gene sequences compared with the
reference DNA sequences confirmed that the worm recovered was similar to
D. immitis. However, nucleotide similarity
differences in comparison with other sequences of D.
immitis available in GenBank (including 1 from Brazil) were 5%
and 6% for 12S rDNA and cox1 genes, respectively, which are higher
than the range of intraspecific variation (<0.8%) reported for
D. immitis originating from the United States,
Italy, and Japan (7). Such
variation (>5%) has not been reported for a Dirofilaria species.
Therefore, existence of a closely related species (e.g., D.
spectans from otters, but also reported from a human in Brazil)
(15) should be
considered. Further investigations of filarial nematodes from dogs and wild mammals
in Brazil are required to elucidate the identity of this
Dirofilaria species and its primary hosts and vectors.
Suggested citation for this article: Otranto D, Diniz DG,
Dantas-Torres F, Casiraghi M, de Almeida INF, de Almeida LNF, et al. Human
intraocular filariasis caused by Dirofilaria sp. nematode,
Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2011 May [date
cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1705.100916
Acknowledgments
We thank G. Testini, R.P. Lia, M. Barbuto, and A. Galimberti for assistance with
laboratory work and data analysis and S. Uni for providing specimens of
D. immitis from Japan.
This work is dedicated to Silvio Pampiglione, who enthusiastically conducted several
studies in the field of human parasitology, including dirofilariasis. His exchange
of ideas with D.O. and O.B. contributed to discussions in the conclusions of this
report.
The Annual Meeting Program Committee awarded the video presented in this report
“Best of Show” for the 2010 Joint Meeting of the American Academy of
Ophthalmology and Middle East Africa Council of Ophthalmology, Chicago, Illinois,
USA, October 16–19, 2010.
Dr Otranto is a professor in the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari,
Bari, Italy. His research interests include biology and control of arthropod
vector-borne diseases of animals and humans.
ReferencesBeaverPC. Intraocular
filariasis: A brief review.Am J Trop Med Hyg.
1989;40:40–52644857PampiglioneS, Canestri
TrottiG,
RivasiF. Human
dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria
(Nochtiella) repens in Italy: a review
of word literature.Parassitologia.
1995;37:149–938778658OrihelTC,
EberhardML. Zoonotic
filariasis.Clin Microbiol Rev.
1998;11:366–819564568McCallJW,
GenchiC,
KramerLH,
GuerreroJ,
VencoL. Heartworm disease
in animals and humans.Adv Parasitol.
2008;66:193–28510.1016/S0065-308X(08)00204-218486691PampiglioneS,
RivasiF,
GustinelliA. Dirofilarial
human cases in the Old World, attributed to Dirofilaria
immitis: a critical analysis.Histopathology.
2009;54:192–20410.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03197_a.x19207944OrihelTC,
AshLR. Parasites in human tissues.
Chicago: American Society of Clinical Pathology Press;
1995FerriE,
BarbutoM,
BainO,
GalimbertiA,
UniS,
GuerreroR, Integrated taxonomy: traditional approach and DNA barcoding for
the identification of filarioid worms and related parasites
(Nematoda).Front Zool.
2009;6:110.1186/1742-9994-6-119128479AndersonRC,
BainO. Diplotriaenoidea, Aproctoidea
and Filarioidea. In: Anderson RC, Chabaud AG, Willmott S, editors. Keys to the
nematode parasites of vertebrates. Farnham Royal (UK): Commonwealth Agricultural
Bureaux; 1976 p. 59–116.CasiraghiM,
BazzocchiC,
MortarinoM,
OttinaE,
GenchiC. A simple
molecular method for discriminating common filarial nematodes of dogs
(Canis familiaris).Vet Parasitol.
2006;141:368–7210.1016/j.vetpar.2006.06.00616857318FuellebornF. Zur morphologie
der Dirofilaria immitis Leydi (sic)
1856.Zentralbl Bakt Parasitenk Orig.1912;65:341–9DesportesC. Nouvelle
description de l’extrémité céphalique de
l’adulte de Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy
1856).Ann Parasitol.1940;17:405–14Rodrigues-SilvaR,
MouraH,
DreyerG,
ReyL. Human pulmonary
dirofilariasis: a review.Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo.
1995;37:523–3010.1590/S0036-466519950006000098731266LabartheN,
GuerreroJ. Epidemiology of
heartworm: what is happening in South America and Mexico?Vet Parasitol.
2005;133:149–5610.1016/j.vetpar.2005.04.00616198820FurtadoAP, Do
CarmoES,
GieseEG,
VallinotoAC,
LanfrediRM,
SantosJN. Detection of dog
filariasis in Marajo Island, Brazil by classical and molecular
methods.Parasitol Res.
2009;105:1509–1510.1007/s00436-009-1584-919693539VicenteJJ,
RodriguesHO,
GomesDC,
PintoRM.
Nematóides do Brasil. Parte V: nematóides de
mamíferos.Rev Bras Zool.1997;14(Suppl
1):1–45210.1590/S0101-81751997000500001