Emerg Infect DisEmerging Infect. DisEIDEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-6059Centers for Disease Control and Prevention21801626338155010-200410.3201/eid1708.102004DispatchMultidrug-Resistant Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Infection in Immunocompetent ChildRunning head: Multidrug-Resistant Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 in ChildEshaghiAliRezaPatelSamir N.SarabiaAliciaHigginsRachel R.SavchenkoAlexeiStojiosPeter J.LiYanBastienNathalieAlexanderDavid C.LowDonald E.GubbayJonathan B.Author affiliations: Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A. Eshaghi, S.N. Patel, R.R. Higgins, D.C. Alexander, D.E. Low, J.B. Gubbay);The Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada (A. Sarabia);University of Toronto, Toronto (A. Savchenko, P.J. Stojios, D.C. Alexander, D.E. Low, J.B. Gubbay);Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (Y. Li, N. Bastien);Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto (D.E. Low, J.B. Gubbay);The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto (J.B. Gubbay)Address for correspondence: Jonathan B. Gubbay, Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion, 101 Resources Rd, Toronto, ON M9P 3T1, Canada; email: jonathan.gubbay@oahpp.ca8201117814721474

Recent case reports describe multidrug-resistant influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus infection in immunocompromised patients exposed to neuraminidase inhibitors because of an I223R neuraminidase mutation. We report a case of multidrug-resistant pandemic (H1N1) 2009 bearing the I223R mutation in an ambulatory child with no previous exposure to neuraminidase inhibitors.

Keywords: virusesinfluenza AH1N1pandemicdrug resistantoseltamivirzanamivirdispatchexpedited

The neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) oseltamivir and zanamivir are antiviral agents approved for treatment of infections caused by pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus. Since the 2008–09 influenza season, almost all seasonal influenza (H1N1) viruses have been oseltamivir resistant because of an H275Y (histidine to tyrosine NA mutation, N1 NA numbering) mutation. Despite widespread use of oseltamivir during the 2009 pandemic, NAI resistance is rare in pandemic (H1N1) 2009 viruses (1). Zanamivir resistance is also rare in influenza viruses. A Q136K (glutamine to lysine mutation, N2 NA numbering) mutation conferring zanamivir resistance in influenza (H1N1) viruses has been described in an in vitro study but has not been detected in clinical specimens from patients (2). An influenza B strain carrying a R152K (arginine to lysine) mutation and resistant to oseltamivir and zanamivir has been reported (3). Recent case reports described multidrug-resistant pandemic (H1N1) 2009 infection in immunocompromised patients exposed to oseltamivir and zanamivir because of an I223R (isoleucine to arginine) mutation in NA (46). We report a case of infection by multidrug-resistant pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus bearing the I223R mutation in an ambulatory child with no previous exposure to NAI.

The Study

On October 30, 2009, a 15-year-old girl with a history of asthma sought treatment at an emergency department in the Greater Toronto area after 3 days of cough and rhinorrhea and 1 day of chest pain. Several children at her school also had respiratory symptoms. On arrival, she was febrile to 39.6°C and mildly dehydrated; physical examination was otherwise unremarkable. Blood count and chest radiograph showed no abnormalities. The child received intravenous rehydration in the emergency department, was discharged home with a prescription for oseltamivir therapy, and recovered uneventfully. A nasopharyngeal swab was forwarded to Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (OAHPP) for influenza testing. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 was detected by real-time reverse transcription PCR (7). Subsequently, the specimen was screened by a single-nucleotide polymorphism assay distributed by Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory and the World Health Organization pyrosequencing protocol for the presence of the H275Y mutation (8). Both assays confirmed the isolate was wild type (histidine) at aa 275 of NA.

As part of pandemic surveillance, the specimen was cultured in rhesus monkey kidney cells and whole genome sequencing was performed by using a modified World Health Organization protocol (9). Sequences were deposited into GenBank under accession nos. CY060619–CY060626. In comparison with A/California/7/2009 (H1N1), several nonsynonymous mutations were identified: I201V and E538K in polymerase; S220T, D239E, and K465R in hemagglutinin; V100I and M316I in nucleoprotein; S99P and I123V in nonstructural protein; T16I, V106I, I223R, N248D, and N369K in NA. Apart from I201V, which is of unknown significance and has not been previously documented in pandemic (H1N1) 2009, these mutations were detected in 22% to 72% of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 strains circulating in Ontario at the same time that underwent whole genome sequencing. The I223R mutation results from a 1 nucleotide substitution at codon 223 of NA. To rule out the possibility of acquisition of I223R during culture in rhesus monkey kidney cells, the NA gene of the primary sample and its first passage were sequenced. Both had 100% identical nucleotide composition.

The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for oseltamivir carboxylate and zanamivir, determined by chemiluminescent NAI assay (NA-Star; Applied Biosystems Ltd., Foster City, California, USA) at OAHPP, were 9.49 (SD ± 2.19) nmol and 2.46 (SD ± 0.30) nmol, respectively (Table 1, Table 2) (oseltamivir carboxylate and zanamivir supplied by Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd [Basel, Switzerland] and GlaxoSmithKline [Brentford, UK], respectively). Compared with a wild-type control, the I223R mutant exhibited 28- and 12-fold increases in IC50s for oseltamivir and zanamivir, respectively. The oseltamivir IC50 of the I223R strain was elevated, but not as much as observed in an H275Y control, which had a 168-fold IC50 elevation compared to the wild-type strain and was 6× higher than that of the I223R strain when tested in parallel. Similar results were obtained when the sample was retested at the National Microbiology Laboratory (Table 1, Table 2).

Susceptibility of I223R mutant and control pandemic (H1N1) 2009 strains to oseltamivir carboxylate in the chemiluminescent NA inhibition assay, Canada, 2010*
Virus strain
NA mutation†
Susceptibility
OAHPP testing

NML testing
Mean IC50 ± SD, nmol
-fold increase
Mean IC50 ± SD, nmol
-fold increase
A/Ontario/313762/2009I223R9.49 ± 2.19‡2810.95 ± 2.5‡22
A/California/07/2009-like controlWild type0.34 ± 0.14§0.49 ± 0.31§
Oseltamivir-resistant controlH275Y57.1 ± 21.48¶16881.42 ± 24.1¶166

*NA, neuraminidase; OAHPP, Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion; NML, National Microbiology Laboratory; IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration.
†Mutations presented in N1 numbering.
‡For 7 and 4 experiments done by OAHPP and NML, respectively.
§For 17 and 1,446 experiments done by OAHPP and NML, respectively.
¶For 13 and 14 experiments done by OAHPP and NML, respectively.

Susceptibility of I223R mutant and control pandemic (H1N1) 2009 strains to zanamivir in the chemiluminescent NA inhibition assay, 2010*
Virus strain
NA mutation
Susceptibility
OAHPP testing

NML testing
Mean IC50 ± SD, nmol
-fold increase
Mean IC50 ± SD, nmol
-fold increase
A/Ontario/313762/2009I223R2.46 ± 0.30†126.84 ± 1.3†9
A/California/07/2009-like controlWild type0.20 ± 0.11‡0.79 ± 0.45‡
Oseltamivir-resistant -controlH275Y0.20 ± 0.05§0.76 ± 0.35§

*NA, neuraminidase; OAHPP, Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion; NML, National Microbiology Laboratoy; IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration.
†For 7 and 4 experiments done by OAHPP and NML, respectively.
‡For 15 and 1,446 experiments done by OAHPP and NML, respectively.
§For 9 and 14 experiments done by OAHPP and NML, respectively.

The clinical significance of the I223R mutation is poorly understood because the IC50s for oseltamivir and zanamivir are well below achievable serum levels when administered at recommended doses. Oral oseltamivir at a dose of 75 mg 2×/d resulted in a maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of 348 ng/mL (1,115 nmol). Repeated inhalation of 10 mg of the dried powder formulation of zanamivir produced a Cmax of 39 to 54 ng/mL (117.5–162.7 nmol) at 1 to 2 h postdose, with an elimination half life of 4–5 h (10). Intravenous zanamivir at a dose of 600mg resulted in a Cmax of 32,000–39,000 ng/mL (96,300–117,360 nmol).

I223 is recognized as one of the framework residues responsible for stabilizing the NAI active site; type-specific mutations at these residues have resulted in reduced susceptibility to NAIs (11,12). Although the exact mechanism by which mutations at the framework residue alter susceptibility to particular NAIs is not clear, simulation studies suggest that the NA electrostatic potential plays a major role in the interaction and stabilization of NAIs within the NA cavity (13). Nonhomologous substitution of a nonpolar hydrophobic amino acid, isoleucine, with the positively charged (polar) hydrophilic amino acid, arginine (I223R), seems to be a key point in alteration of the NA cavity. These changes most likely result in active site endpoint interactions affecting drug binding affinity and could disturb the proposed electrostatic binding funnel instrumental in directing NAIs into and out of binding sites on NA (14).

Three independent case reports described infections caused by multidrug-resistant pandemic (H1N1) 2009 in immunocompromised patients who received prolonged treatment with oseltamivir followed by zanamivir; 2 of the infections were fatal. In 2 patients, infection developed (H275Y followed by I223R alone with simultaneous reversion to wild type at position 275) (4,5); dual H275Y/I223R mutations developed in the third patient (6). Our patient is unique because she was immunocompetent, had no prior exposure to NAIs, and had an uneventful recovery. A similar resistance profile was seen in the published case exhibiting I223R alone, where IC50s for oseltamivir, zanamivir, and peramivir were elevated by 45-, 10-, and 7-fold, respectively (4). The origin of the multiresistant isolate in this patient’s case could not be established. The I223R mutation may have occurred spontaneously in our patient. Alternatively, she acquired infection in the ambulatory setting, possibly as part of a school outbreak. Resistance may have evolved following random mutation, or during NAI therapy in another patient. We could not investigate this further because no samples were submitted from contacts. Using reverse genetics, it has been recently shown that an I223V NA change increased oseltamivir and peramivir resistance in pandemic (H1N1) 2009 and also restored NA substrate affinity and replication fitness in vitro (15).

Conclusions

Although the I223 residue is highly conserved across pandemic (H1N1) 2009 strains, the global distribution of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 was made possible by the virus adapting for stable circulation through genetic changes contributing to fitness and facilitating transmissibility from person to person. This report of community acquisition of a multidrug-resistant strain of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 reinforces the need to continue close monitoring for the emergence of resistant viruses and incorporation of screening for newly discovered resistance mutations into clinical diagnostics.

Suggested citation for this article: Eshaghi A, Patel SN, Sarabia A, Higgins RR, Savchenko A, Stojios PJ, et al. Multidrug-resistant pandemic (H1N1) 2009 infection in immunocompetent child. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2011 Aug [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1708.102004

Phenotypic resistance testing was partially funded by a research grant provided to Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (J.B.G. and D.E.L.) by GlaxoSmithKline Inc.

Dr Eshaghi is a research technologist in the Molecular Research department at The Public Health Laboratories, Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion. His research interests focus on molecular evolution and characterization of respiratory viruses, including emergence of resistance in influenza viruses.

ReferencesWorld Health Organization. Weekly update on oseltamivir resistance to influenza H1N1 (2009) viruses. 2010 [cited 2010 Nov 8]. http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/weekly_update_oseltamivir_resistant_20101108.pdfHurt AC, Holien JK, Parker M, Kelso A, Barr IG. Zanamivir-resistant influenza viruses with a novel neuraminidase mutation. J Virol. 2009;83:1036673 10.1128/JVI.01200-0919641000Gubareva LV, Matrosovich MN, Brenner MK, Bethell RC, Webster RG. Evidence for zanamivir resistance in an immunocompromised child infected with influenza B virus. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:125762 10.1086/3144409780244van der Vries E, Stelma FF, Boucher CA. Emergence of a multidrug-resistant pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:13812 10.1056/NEJMc100374920879894Le Goff J, Rousset D, Abou-Jaoude G, Scemla A, Mercier-Delaurue S, Caro V, Emergence of cross-resistance to oseltamivir and zanamivir in pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus. 2010 Interscience Conference on Antimicrobials and Chemotherapy. 2010.Nguyen HT, Fry AM, Loveless PA, Klimov AI, Gubareva LV. Recovery of a multidrug-resistant strain of pandemic influenza A 2009 (H1N1) virus carrying a dual H275Y/I223R mutation from a child after prolonged treatment with oseltamivir. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:9834 10.1086/65643920858074Duncan C, Guthrie JL, Tijet N, Elgngihy N, Turenne C, Seah C, Analytical and clinical validation of novel real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction assays for the clinical detection of swine-origin H1N1 influenza viruses. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 In press 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.09.02021251560World Health Organization. Influenza A (H1N1) NA-H274 detailed pyrosequencing protocol for antiviral susceptibility testing. 2009 May 13 [cited 2010 Dec 3]. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/swineflu/NA_DetailedPyrosequencing_20090513.pdfWorld Health Organization. Global Alert and Response. Sequencing primers and protocol. Global Alert and Response Information resources. 2009 May 12 [cited 2009 Nov 18]. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/swineflu/GenomePrimers_20090512.pdfElliott M. Zanamivir: from drug design to the clinic. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;356:188593 10.1098/rstb.2001.102111779388Ilyushina NA, Seiler JP, Rehg JE, Webster RG, Govorkova EA. Effect of neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant mutations on pathogenicity of clade 2.2 A/Turkey/15/06 (H5N1) influenza virus in ferrets. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000933 10.1371/journal.ppat.100093320523902Abed Y, Baz M, Boivin G. Impact of neuraminidase mutations conferring influenza resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors in the N1 and N2 genetic backgrounds. Antivir Ther. 2006;11:971617302366Amaro RE, Cheng X, Ivanov I, Xu D, McCammon JA. Characterizing loop dynamics and ligand recognition in human- and avian-type influenza neuraminidases via generalized born molecular dynamics and end-point free energy calculations. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:47029 10.1021/ja808564319296611Le L, Lee EH, Hardy DJ, Truong TN, Schulten K. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that electrostatic funnel directs binding of Tamiflu to influenza N1 neuraminidases. PLOS Comput Biol. 2010;6:e1000939 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100093920885781Pizzomo A, Bouhy X, Abed Y, Boivin G. Generation and characterization of recombinant pandemic influenza A(H1N1) viruses resistant to neuraminidase inhibitors. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:2531 10.1093/infdis/jiq01021148493