Spina bifida is a malformation of the neural tube and is the most common of neural tube defects (NTDs). The etiology of spina bifida is largely unknown, although it is thought to be multi-factorial, involving multiple interacting genes and environmental factors. Mutations in transcriptional co-activator genes-
Data and biological samples from 297 spina bifida cases and 300 controls were derived from a population-based case-control study conducted in California. 37 SNPs within
Several SNPs showed increased or decreased risk, including
Modest associations were observed in
Studies using genetically modified mouse models have contributed a great deal to our understanding of molecular mechanisms that govern critical embryonic development processes, such as neural tube closure. Among the over 200 existing mouse models for neural tube defects (NTDs), several harbor mutations in genes encoding transcriptional activators or co-activators, such as
CREB binding protein (CREBBP; CBP) was originally identified as a protein that binds to the phosphorylated form of the CREB transcription factor and increases the expression of genes containing CRE elements. It is closely related to the adenovirus E1A-associated protein p300. CBP and p300 are functionally redundant histone deacetylases essential for proliferation and embryonic development [
The methylation of the Crebbp/p300 complex is catalyzed by co-activator-associated arginine methyltransferase (CARM1). This process disables the recruitment of cAMP response element binding protein (CREB). Thus, CARM1 functions as a co-repressor in the cAMP signaling pathway, via its methyltransferase activity [
CITED2 is a nuclear co-activator that binds to CBP/p300. Disruption of the
CART1 is a paired-class homeobox-containing transcription factor regulated by CBP/p300 acetylation of a highly conserved lysine residue that increases the interaction between CBP/p300 and CART1, ultimately enhancing its transcriptional activation [
Data and biological samples were obtained from a case-control study conducted by the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program (CBDMP). The CBDMP is an active, population-based surveillance system for collecting information on infants and fetuses with structural congenital malformations, which has been described elsewhere [
The 6 candidate genes and SNPs genotyped are listed in Table
Characteristics of all genotyped SNPs
| Gene | Marker | Chromosome | Chromosome position | RefSNP alleles | Call Rate | MAF* | HWE P | MAF | HWE** P | MAF | HWE P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs11608773 | 12 | 84229006 | A/G | 100.0 | 0.229 | 0.435 | 0.274 | 0.478 | 0.217 | 0.391 | |
| rs4761130 | 12 | 84226396 | C/T | 99.8 | 0.421 | 0.286 | 0.358 | 0.154 | 0.401 | 0.465 | |
| rs7295242 | 12 | 84222948 | A/G | 100.0 | 0.161 | 0.781 | 0.074 | 0.557 | 0.159 | 0.358 | |
| rs11667234 | 19 | 10880581 | A/C | 99.8 | 0.021 | 0.010 | 0.039 | 0.071 | 0.016 | 0.934 | |
| rs11670365 | 19 | 10865833 | C/T | 100.0 | 0.056 | 0.918 | 0.084 | 0.754 | 0.045 | 0.702 | |
| rs1529711 | 19 | 10884434 | A/G | 99.7 | 0.097 | 0.492 | 0.161 | 0.932 | 0.081 | 0.519 | |
| rs1541596 | 19 | 10848013 | A/G | 99.5 | 0.475 | 0.326 | 0.497 | 0.969 | 0.408 | 0.957 | |
| rs17616105 | 19 | 10883159 | C/T | 100.0 | 0.189 | 0.732 | 0.235 | 0.365 | 0.152 | 0.072 | |
| rs7254708 | 19 | 10863579 | A/G | 100.0 | 0.071 | 0.043 | 0.123 | 0.116 | 0.059 | 0.441 | |
| rs1131431 | 6 | 139735527 | A/G | 100.0 | 0.153 | 0.273 | 0.200 | 0.624 | 0.121 | 0.948 | |
| 6 | 139737486 | ||||||||||
| rs11076783 | 16 | 3722706 | C/T | 100.0 | 0.154 | 0.638 | 0.116 | 0.142 | 0.139 | 0.802 | |
| 16 | 3730187 | ||||||||||
| rs11076786 | 16 | 3751597 | C/T | 100.0 | 0.077 | 0.441 | 0.046 | 0.637 | |||
| rs129986 | 16 | 3744242 | C/T | 100.0 | 0.023 | 0.530 | 0.032 | 0.590 | 0.020 | 0.735 | |
| rs130003 | 16 | 3768173 | A/G | 99.8 | 0.015 | 0.792 | 0.032 | 0.711 | 0.010 | 0.967 | |
| rs130008 | 16 | 3721953 | C/G | 99.8 | 0.011 | 0.838 | 0.032 | 0.752 | 0.001 | 1.000 | |
| rs17136507 | 16 | 3740546 | C/T | 100.0 | 0.178 | 0.536 | 0.110 | 0.229 | 0.227 | 0.449 | |
| rs886528 | 16 | 3751557 | C/T | 99.7 | 0.383 | 0.590 | 0.390 | 0.986 | 0.368 | 0.839 | |
| rs9392 | 16 | 3715170 | A/G | 99.8 | 0.189 | 0.566 | 0.223 | 0.625 | 0.138 | 0.700 | |
| rs17002284 | 22 | 39826792 | A/G | 100.0 | 0.265 | 0.220 | 0.313 | 0.745 | 0.217 | 0.522 | |
| rs17433014 | 22 | 39829768 | A/G | 99.8 | 0.018 | 0.769 | 0.029 | 0.793 | 0.019 | 0.834 | |
| rs2230111 | 22 | 39851949 | A/G | 99.8 | 0.002 | 0.977 | 0.006 | 0.959 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
| rs4820428 | 22 | 39867535 | A/G | 100.0 | 0.329 | 0.822 | 0.419 | 0.667 | |||
| rs4820429 | 22 | 39868057 | C/G | 100.0 | 0.159 | 0.382 | 0.258 | 0.040 | 0.124 | 0.471 | |
| rs4822006 | 22 | 39849308 | C/T | 100.0 | 0.247 | 0.844 | 0.355 | 0.587 | 0.185 | 0.740 | |
| rs5758246 | 22 | 39871792 | A/G | 100.0 | 0.030 | 0.635 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.012 | 0.934 | |
| rs9611502 | 22 | 39861182 | C/T | 100.0 | 0.014 | 0.838 | 0.019 | 0.918 | 0.013 | 0.867 | |
| rs10456013 | 6 | 10506548 | G/T | 100.0 | 0.032 | 0.592 | 0.048 | 0.670 | 0.026 | 0.735 | |
| rs1621700 | 6 | 10528084 | A/G | 99.7 | 0.288 | 0.671 | 0.252 | 0.081 | 0.357 | 0.773 | |
| rs303050 | 6 | 10511169 | C/T | 100.0 | 0.257 | 0.061 | 0.165 | 0.259 | 0.262 | 0.267 | |
| rs303055 | 6 | 10527462 | C/T | 100.0 | 0.353 | 0.150 | 0.435 | 0.569 | 0.335 | 0.025 | |
| rs303056 | 6 | 10528467 | C/G | 100.0 | 0.159 | 0.229 | 0.094 | 0.477 | 0.126 | 1.000 | |
| rs3798691 | 6 | 10519381 | C/G | 100.0 | 0.112 | 0.021 | 0.042 | 0.011 | 0.134 | 0.111 | |
| rs3798694 | 6 | 10516743 | A/G | 100.0 | 0.062 | 0.122 | 0.087 | 0.225 | 0.059 | 0.293 | |
| rs533558 | 6 | 10503558 | A/G | 100.0 | 0.441 | 0.848 | 0.361 | 0.955 | 0.481 | 0.858 | |
| rs537112 | 6 | 10503192 | A/G | 100.0 | 0.180 | 0.571 | 0.103 | 0.754 | 0.195 | 0.255 | |
*MAF: minor allele frequency; **HWE: Hardy-Weinberg Disequilibrium
DNA was extracted from blood spots using the Gentra Puregene DNA Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the standard protocol. Prior to genotyping, genomic DNA was amplified using a commercially available multiple displacement amplification (MDA) kit, GenomiPhi DNA Amplification kit (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ). The whole genome amplification (WGA) product was then quantified using RNase P assay (AppliedBiosystems, Foster City, CA). 200 ng of WGA product was used for the SNPlex assay containing the 37 SNPs. All genotyping assays were performed blinded to subjects' case or control status.
The SNPs selected for analyses were submitted to Applied Biosystems to create a unique SNPlex assay. The SNPlex™ genotyping system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) is based on a universal multiplexed oligonucleotide ligation assay (OLA)/PCR and drag chute mobility modifier technology. The resulting genotype data were analyzed using GeneMapper™ v4.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
Analyses were performed for the overall study group as well as for specific ethnic/race groups. Hispanic infants were further subdivided into those whose mothers were born in the United States, or native-born (Hisp-NB) and those whose mothers were not, or foreign-born (Hisp-FB), as it has been shown that these two groups are different with respect to ethnic composition and social economic status [
Demographic characteristics of the cases and controls are listed in Table
Demographic distribution of malformed cases and non-malformed controls, California 1990-1999
| Variable | Spina Bifida | |
|---|---|---|
| Cases | Controls | |
| Maternal Race/Ethnicity | ||
| White, non-Hispanic | 59 (19.9) | 96 (32.0) |
| Hispanic, Native Born | 33 (11.1) | 33 (11.0) |
| Hispanic, Foreign Born | 166 (55.9) | 115 (38.3) |
| Black | 17 (5.7) | 20 (6.7) |
| Asian | 9 (3.0) | 25 (8.3) |
| Other | 9 (3.0) | 11 (3.7) |
| Maternal age at delivery (years) | ||
| 13-24 | 128 (43.1) | 123 (41.0) |
| 25-29 | 80 (26.9) | 71 (23.7) |
| 30-34 | 47 (15.8) | 64 (21.3) |
| 35-55 | 39 (13.1) | 42 (14.0) |
| Maternal education | ||
| Less than high school | 158 (53.2) | 110 (36.7) |
| High School | 65 (21.9) | 81 (27.0) |
| Greater than High school | 71 (23.9) | 109 (36.3) |
| Parity | ||
| 0 | 120 (40.4) | 114 (38.0) |
| 1 | 88 (29.6) | 101 (33.7) |
| ≥ 2 | 86 (29.0) | 84 (28.0) |
| Plurality | ||
| Singleton | 287 (96.6) | 293 (97.7) |
| Multiple births | 8 (2.7) | 7 (2.3) |
| Infant Sex | ||
| Male | 146 (49.2) | 149 (49.7) |
| Female | 151 (50.8) | 151 (50.3) |
1Percentages may not equal 100 owing to missing data or rounding.
Genotyping of 37 SNPs was performed using a custom-made Applied Biosystems SNPlex panel. Due to low call rates, two SNPs, rs7775752 (45.1%) and rs11076785 (46.6%), were excluded from analysis. Departure from HWE in the controls (
Allele associations (P < 0.05) among subgroups
| SNP | Gene | Ethnicity | refSNP alleles | Minor Allele | Ratio Counts | P value | Odds Ratio | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs129986 | white | C/T | T | 118:0, 182:10 | 0.008* | n/a | n/a | |
| rs17616105 | white | C/T | C | 101:17, 136:56 | 0.003 | 2.45 | 1.34-4.46 | |
| rs303056 | white | C/G | C | 16:102, 13:179 | 0.046 | 2.16 | 1.00-2.15 | |
| rs3798691 | Hispanic | C/G | C | 65:333, 29:267 | 0.013 | 1.80 | 1.13-2.87 | |
| Hispanic-FB | C/G | C | 52:280, 22:208 | 0.036 | 1.76 | 1.03-2.98 | ||
| rs533558 | Hispanic-NB | A/G | G | 36:30, 24:42 | 0.036 | 2.10 | 1.05-4.22 | |
| rs4820428 | All subjects | A/G | G | 276:240, 229:259 | 0.038 | 1.30 | 1.01-1.67 | |
Genotype associations (P < 0.05) among subgroups under different modes of inheritance
| Marker | Gene | Ethnicity | Mode of Inheritance | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs17002284 | All subjects | 0.012 | Recessive | |||
| rs4820428 | All subjects | 0.011 | Additive [(Dd) vs (dd)] | |||
| [(DD) vs (Dd)] | 1.18 (78, 61; 132, 122) | 0.78 - 1.79 | ||||
| All subjects | 0.012 | Dominant | ||||
| rs4820429 | All subjects | 0.046 | Dominant | |||
| White | 0.041 | Dominant | ||||
| rs1621700 | All subjects | 0.041 | Additive [(Dd) vs (dd)] | 1.30 (131, 118; 138, 161) | 0.92 - 1.81 | |
| [(DD) vs (Dd)] | 1.33 (28, 19; 131, 118) | 0.70 - 2.50 | ||||
| rs3798691 | Hispanic | 0.015 | Additive [(Dd) vs (dd)] | |||
| [(DD) vs (Dd)] | 1.40 (9, 3; 47, 22) | 0.35 - 5.70 | ||||
| Hispanic | 0.022 | Dominant | ||||
| Hispanic-FB | 0.049 | Dominant | ||||
| rs533558 | Hispanic-NB | 0.038 | Additive [(Dd) vs (dd)] | 3.00 (18, 14; 6, 14) | 0.92 - 9.80 | |
| [(DD) vs (Dd)] | 1.40 (9, 5; 18, 14) | 0.38 - 5.12 | ||||
| Hispanic-NB | 0.032 | Dominant | ||||
| rs17616105 | Hispanic | 0.0 | Recessive | n/a (6, 0; 193, 148) | n/a | |
| White | 0.004 | Additive [(Dd) vs (dd)] | 0.48 (15, 36; 43,50) | 0.23 - 1.00 | ||
| [(DD) vs (Dd)] | 0.24 (1,10; 15,36) | 0.03 - 2.04 | ||||
| White | 0.010 | Dominant | ||||
| rs1131431 | White | 0.027 | Recessive | |||
| rs129986 | All subjects | 0.005 | Additive [(Dd) vs (dd)] | |||
| [(DD) vs (Dd)] | n/a (0, 0; 6, 21) | n/a | ||||
| All subjects | 0.003 | Dominant | ||||
| White | 0.014 | Additive [(Dd) vs (dd)] | n/a (0, 10; 59, 86) | n/a | ||
| [(DD) vs (Dd)] | n/a (0, 0; 0, 10) | n/a | ||||
| White | 0.010 | Dominant | n/a (0, 10; 59, 86) | n/a | ||
Only one of the two SNPs genotyped was fully analyzed. SNP rs1131431 showed a genotypic association (OR = 5.32, 95% CI: 1.04~27.30) based on a recessive mode of inheritance, specifically in the White population. It is noteworthy that the confidence interval had a wide range, suggesting that the estimate may be imprecise due to the small number of White cases and controls with the variant. This SNP, however, was previously associated with a modest increase in risk for spina bifida and congenital heart defects [
Among the 8 SNPs analyzed, the G allele of SNP rs4820428 was over-represented in spina bifida cases (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.01~1.67) in all subjects. Analyses showed that rs4820428 was associated with spina bifida risk under a dominant model (OR = 1.54 95%CI: 1.10~2.17). The minor allele of rs4820429 (C) showed a reduced risk in the Whites (OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26~0.50) and in the whole dataset (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49~0.99) under a dominant model. Minor allele of rs17002284 (G) also showed a reduced risk (OR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.22~0.84), but under a recessive model. These three SNPs were in linkage disequilibrium. Subsequent analysis showed that haplotype ACGG (rs17002284-rs4822006-rs4820428-rs4820429) accounted for 50.3% of all haplotypes in the Whites and was over-represented in the white cases (OR = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.01~1.67). It is noteworthy that this high risk haplotype contains the high risk alleles for rs17002284 (A), rs4820428 (G) as well as rs4820429 (G) (Table
Haplotype associations (only significant associations are shown)
| Haplotype Block | Frequency | P Value | Odds Ratio (case, control) | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GATGG | 0.516 | 0.2019 | 0.82 (197.0 : 201.0, 161.0 : 135.0) | 0.61-1.11 |
| GGTGG | 0.201 | 0.8135 | 0.96 (78.9 : 319.1, 60.8 : 235.2) | 0.66-1.39 |
| GGCAG | 0.058 | 0.4974 | 1.26 (25.0 : 373.0, 15.0 : 281.0) | 0.65-2.43 |
| AGCGG | 0.041 | 0.3207 | 0.69 (13.9 : 384.1, 14.8 : 281.2) | 0.33-1.45 |
| GGCGG | 0.028 | 0.6568 | 0.81 (10.1 : 387.9, 9.2 : 286.8) | 0.33-2.00 |
| AGTGG | 0.021 | 0.9639 | 0.97 (8.1 : 389.9, 6.2 : 289.8) | 0.34-2.79 |
| GCAG | 0.245 | 0.1665 | 0.82 (117.0 : 399.0, 129.0 : 359.0) | 0.61-1.09 |
| ATAC | 0.163 | 0.054 | 0.72 (73.0 : 443.0, 91.0 : 397.0) | 0.51-1.00 |
| ATAG | 0.072 | 0.8074 | 1.06 (38.0 : 478.0, 34.0 : 454.0) | 0.66-1.72 |
| ACAG | 0.015 | 0.2348 | 1.91 (10.0 : 506.0, 5.0 : 483.0) | 0.65-5.63 |
Among the 9 SNPs analyzed, rs303056 (C), rs3798691 (C), rs533558 (G) showed allelic association with spina bifida risk in Hispanics. Genotypic association analysis showed that rs3798691 was associated with spina bifida risk under a dominant model in Hispanics (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.13~2.87). SNP rs533558 also showed an association under a dominant model, but only in native-born Hispanics (OR = 3.32, 95%CI: 1.08~10.18). Subsequent haplotype analysis predicted two haplotype blocks in Hispanics. Haplotype AGCGC of block1 (rs537112- rs533558-rs303050-rs3798694-rs3798691) had an average frequency of 0.133 and was associated with an increased risk, OR = 1.73 (1.08-2.77) compared to all other haplotypes. Since no high risk SNP has been discovered, these high risk blocks will be thoroughly sequenced to search for other variants (Table
Among the 8 SNPs analyzed, the heterozygous status of SNP rs129986 (TC) was associated with a reduced risk in all subjects (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.11~0.69). The homozygous status of the minor allele, CC, was not observed. The TC genotype was observed in only 6 cases and they were all Hispanics.
6 SNPs were genotyped. In Whites, the minor allele (C) of rs17616105 showed a reduced risk with OR = 0.41 (95%CI: 0.22~0.75). Genotype analysis showed that this effect followed a dominant inheritance model (ORCC+CT = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.20~0.40), and was not observed in the Hispanics.
3 SNPs were genotyped. No association was observed between any SNP and spina bifida risk. It is known that the
To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating human
The strengths of this study include its population-based ascertainment of cases and controls and its evaluation of race/ethnicity as potential modifiers of risk in the presence of variant genotypes and haplotypes. A major limitation of our study was the small sample size, which reduced the statistical power of analyses. Replication of some of the modest findings in a larger sample set may be warranted.
We have observed modest associations with risk of spina bifida in
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. WL performed and supervised most of the experiments, and also performed part of the statistical analysis. ARG and CJC performed most of the experiments and helped with manuscript writing. WY performed part of the statistical analysis and helped with the manuscript writing. GMS contributed to the study design and authorized the use of CBDMP samples. RMG and MMP contributed to candidate gene selection and study. RHF contributed to the study design and laboratory instruction of the molecular biology experiments. EJL reviewed and confirmed the clinical diagnosis of study subjects. HZ contributed to the overall study design, quality assurance of genotyping experiments, statistical analysis and most of the manuscript writing.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:
This research was supported in part by funds from NIH grants R01 NS050249 (GMS), R01 HD053509 (RMG), P20 RR017702 from the COBRE program of the National Center for Research Resources (RMG), as well as a contract from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center of Excellence Award UO1/DD000491. We thank the California Department of Public Health Maternal Child and Adolescent Health Division for providing biological samples and data for these analyses. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the California Department of Public Health. The authors thank Ms. Consuelo Vega for her technical assistance.