J EpidemiolJ EpidemiolJEJournal of Epidemiology0917-50401349-9092Japan Epidemiological Association238121023775527JE2012023210.2188/jea.JE20120232Original ArticleCancerIntake of Soy Products and Other Foods and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Prospective StudyDietary Factors and Gastric CancerKoKwang-Pil1ParkSue K.234YangJae Jeong23MaSeung Hyun23GwackJin5ShinAesun67KimYeonJu8KangDaehee23ChangSoung-Hoon9ShinHai-Rim610YooKeun-Young2Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon, KoreaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaSeoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, KoreaDepartment of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, KoreaDivision of Epidemic Intelligence Service, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Osong, KoreaNational Cancer Control Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, KoreaCancer Registration & Statistics Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, KoreaEpidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USADepartment of Preventive Medicine, Konkuk University, Chungju, KoreaNoncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion, World Health Organization Western Pacific Regional Office, Manila, PhilippinesAddress for correspondence. Keun-Young Yoo, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehangno, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea (e-mail: kyyoo@snu.ac.kr).592013296201320132353373437120131642013© 2013 Kwang-Pil Ko et al.2013Kwang-Pil Ko et alThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.Background

Gastric cancer, the most common cancer in the world, is affected by some foods or food groups. We examined the relationship between dietary intake and stomach cancer risk in the Korean Multi-Center Cancer Cohort (KMCC).

Methods

The KMCC included 19 688 Korean men and women who were enrolled from 1993 to 2004. Of those subjects, 9724 completed a brief 14-food frequency questionnaire at baseline. Through record linkage with the Korean Central Cancer Registry and National Death Certificate databases, we documented 166 gastric cancer cases as of December 31, 2008. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs.

Results

Frequent intake of soybean/tofu was significantly associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer, after adjustment for age, sex, cigarette smoking, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and area of residence (P for trend = 0.036). We found a significant inverse association between soybean/tofu intake and gastric cancer risk among women (RR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22–0.78). Men with a high soybean/tofu intake had a lower risk of gastric cancer, but the reduction was not statistically significant (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.52–1.13). There was no interaction between soybean/tofu intake and cigarette smoking in relation to gastric cancer risk (P for interaction = 0.268).

Conclusions

Frequent soybean/tofu intake was associated with lower risk of gastric cancer.

Key words: soybeandietary intakegastric cancer
INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world1 and is a major cancer in Korea.2 Therefore, prevention of gastric cancer is an important target for cancer control.

Previous epidemiologic studies suggested that dietary intake has an important role in the etiology of gastric cancer.3 Salty foods were found to increase gastric cancer risk4,5 by damaging the stomach lining and increasing formation of endogenous N-nitroso compounds that have a known carcinogenic effect on gastric mucosa.6 In addition, a high-salt diet induces gastric epithelial hyperplasia and facilitates Helicobacter pylori infection.7

Although only a few studies have assessed the association between soy consumption and gastric cancer risk, it has been suggested that high intake of soy foods decreases the risk of gastric cancer.8,9 Because soy foods contain isoflavones that have anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects, they could prevent development of gastric cancer.10 Although soybean paste is a type of soy food, it contains high levels of salt and N-nitroso compounds, which form during fermentation. Thus, soybean paste intake could be a risk factor for gastric cancer.11 Because salt could mask the beneficial effect of soybeans on the association between isoflavone and gastric cancer, it is crucial in an analysis of soy intake to separate unfermented soy foods, such as soybeans/tofu, from fermented, high-salt soy foods, such as soybean paste.

Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for gastric cancer, due to its inflammatory and oxidative effects.12,13 Because soybeans/tofu and vegetables have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects,10 there may be a combined effect of soy/tofu, vegetables, and cigarette smoking on gastric cancer risk.

Although there have been a considerable number of studies on dietary intake and gastric cancer, most epidemiologic studies were case-control studies, which can be biased by dietary recall and selection. Although there are some prospective studies of dietary intake and gastric cancer risk, the foods or food groups that affect gastric cancer risk remain unclear.

The Korean Multi-Center Cancer Cohort (KMCC), which was designed to investigate the relationships between exposures and cancer risks, enrolled 19 688 subjects between 1993 and 2004. In the present prospective study, we examined the association between dietary intake and the risk of gastric cancer, with a focus on soy products, and assessed the combined effects of soybeans/tofu, vegetables, and cigarette smoking on gastric cancer risk in Korean adults.

METHODSStudy population and data collection

The Korean Multi-Center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) is a community-based prospective cohort study established in 4 urban and rural Korean areas (Haman, Chungju, Uljin, and Youngil) from 1993 through 2004.14 It consists of male and female voluntary participants and includes a questionnaire, anthropometric measurements, blood sampling, and spot urine sampling. Data on general lifestyle, physical activity, diet, reproductive factors, and agricultural exposures were obtained through interviews, using a structured questionnaire. The 9724 subjects with no gastric cancer completed the food frequency questionnaire until 2004. Anthropometric measurements and some clinical laboratory findings were also collected. Serum and buffy coat samples were stored at −70°C, and urine samples were stored at −20°C.

As of December 31, 2008, 166 cases of gastric cancer were identified through record linkage with the Central Cancer Registry and the National Death Certificate databases; 8 cases were identified by death certificate only among the 166 incident cases. Informed consent was obtained from participants at the interviews. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of Seoul National University Hospital and the National Cancer Center of Korea.

Dietary assessment

A self-administered food frequency questionnaire was used to monitor consumption of 14 food items among participants from Haman and Chungju, beginning in 1995. The 14 food items included vegetables, fruits, soy/tofu, soybean paste, seaweed, mushrooms, meat, dairy products, fresh fish, salted fish, eggs, instant food, fried food, and coffee. Soy/tofu includes unfermented soy foods, and soybean paste is a fermented soy food with a high salt content.

For each food item, participants were asked to report the average frequency of consumption, using 4 categories (almost never, 1–4 times/month, 1–4 times/week, ≥1 time/day).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS version 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs for gastric cancer incidence, as compared with the “almost never” group, for each food intake-frequency category. The analysis was adjusted for age (continuous variable), sex, cigarette smoking, body mass index (BMI, [continuous variable]), alcohol drinking, and area of residence. Because the effect of isoflavones as a phytoestrogen differs between men and women, we assessed the association of soy food consumption with gastric cancer risk by sex. We also assessed the interaction of soy food intake and cigarette smoking in relation to gastric cancer risk, according to frequency of dietary intake and cigarette smoking status.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) age of study subjects was 57.6 (11.2) years. Age ranged from 30 to 90 years. The mean (SD) follow-up period was 8.5 (3.7) years. The incidence of gastric cancer and characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. Among men and women, age significantly differed between those who did and did not develop gastric cancer. Both residence area and BMI marginally differed between men who developed gastric cancer and those who did not.

Baseline characteristics of the study cohort
VariableMenWomen


Incident cases(n = 116)Non-cases(n = 3598)P valueIncident cases(n = 50)Non-cases(n = 5960)P value
n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
Age (years)  <0.001  0.002
 <506 (5.2)821 (22.8) 3 (6.0)1573 (26.4) 
 50–5933 (28.5)944 (26.2) 14 (28.0)1666 (28.0) 
 ≥6077 (66.4)1833 (50.9) 33 (66.0)2721 (45.6) 
Residence area  0.056  0.816
 Chungju (urban)52 (44.8)1936 (53.8) 28 (56.0)3435 (57.6) 
 Haman (rural)64 (55.2)1662 (46.2) 22 (44.0)2525 (42.4) 
Smoking status  0.193  0.754
 Never-smoker16 (13.8)736 (20.5) 45 (90.0)5406 (91.1) 
 Ex-smoker33 (28.5)889 (24.8) 1 (2.0)110 (1.8) 
 Current smoker67 (57.8)1967 (54.8) 4 (8.0)421 (7.1) 
Alcohol status  0.358  0.141
 Never-drinker26 (22.4)957 (26.7) 39 (78.0)4673 (78.9) 
 Ex-drinker17 (14.7)398 (11.1) 3 (6.0)122 (2.1) 
 Current drinker73 (62.9)2228 (62.2) 8 (16.0)1124 (19.0) 
Body mass index (kg/m2)  0.071  0.949
 <2367 (60.9)1738 (50.1) 17 (36.2)2144 (37.6) 
 23–24.923 (20.9)837 (24.2) 11 (23.4)1386 (24.3) 
 ≥2520 (18.2)891 (25.7) 19 (40.4)2174 (38.1) 

The associations of consumption of selected food items with gastric cancer risk are presented in Table 2. We found a significant inverse association between soy/tofu intake more than 3 to 4 times a week and gastric cancer risk (RR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34–0.98), after adjustment for potential confounders. In addition, frequent intake of fried food increased risk of gastric cancer, with a dose-response relationship (P for trend = 0.028). Increased intake of green vegetables decreased risk of gastric cancer, and increased intake of soybean paste increased risk of gastric cancer, although not significantly so.

Relative risk (RR) and 95% CI of gastric cancer incidence for each food type assessed in the study cohort
Food itemsFrequency of food intakeP for trend

Almost never1–4 times/month1–4 times/week≥1 time/day




Cases/person-yearsCases/person-yearsRRa (95% CI)Cases/person-yearsRRa (95% CI)Cases/person-yearsRRa (95% CI)
Vegetables5/166311/51960.80 (0.28–2.29)31/16 2860.66 (0.25–1.70)105/51 7940.68 (0.27–1.68)0.484
Fruit11/600843/21 1101.12 (0.58–2.18)83/36 3631.42 (0.75–2.68)29/18 8981.10 (0.55–2.22)0.592
Soybean/tofu22/867079/33 0320.92 (0.57–1.48)37/24 9630.57 (0.34–0.98)27/15 4550.68 (0.38–1.21)0.036
Soybean paste2/18707/38231.93 (0.40–9.31)41/24 4321.70 (0.41–7.06)115/52 1292.01 (0.52–8.50)0.181
Seaweed27/14 26465/31 9811.17 (0.75–1.84)56/27 3721.27 (0.80–2.03)18/86821.50 (0.82–2.76)0.170
Mushrooms89/42 99658/25 6901.10 (0.79–1.54)13/11 0200.67 (0.37–1.22)5/23501.15 (0.46–2.84)0.641
Meat19/13 332100/44 5301.40 (0.85–2.29)43/22 4711.05 (0.60–1.84)4/20080.88 (0.30–2.60)0.545
Dairy products61/34 22445/20 3441.15 (0.78–1.70)33/15 3461.25 (0.82–1.92)27/12 4581.30 (0.83–2.06)0.191
Eggs58/28 06364/32 1140.97 (0.68–1.39)31/18 2680.85 (0.54–1.32)12/38551.23 (0.65–2.31)0.922
Fresh fish39/20 89776/35 4961.12 (0.76–1.66)43/23 6390.95 (0.61–1.47)7/23471.46 (0.65–3.28)0.904
Salted fish43/20 80869/36 2560.89 (0.60–1.32)46/22 5690.90 (0.58–1.39)8/27121.24 (0.58–2.64)0.990
Instant food70/37 50456/29 6700.88 (0.61–1.25)33/12 9371.09 (0.71–1.67)6/18861.31 (0.56–3.06)0.655
Fried food105/55 90145/20 4561.27 (0.90–1.81)12/48711.51 (0.82–2.77)4/10042.31 (0.85–6.30)0.028
Coffee57/33 02435/11 3331.58 (1.04–2.42)27/10 6761.35 (0.85–2.15)46/27 3170.94 (0.63–1.41)0.756

aAdjusted for age, sex, cigarette smoking, body mass index, alcohol drinking, and area of residence.

The associations of consumption of selected food items with gastric cancer risk according to sex are presented in Table 3. Food frequencies were classified into low and high intakes by using the median. We found a significant inverse association between soybean/tofu intake and gastric cancer risk among women (RR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22–0.78). Among men, high soybean/tofu intake reduced gastric cancer risk, but not significantly so (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.52–1.13).

Relative risk (RR) and 95% CI of gastric cancer incidence for each food type, according to sex
Food itemsMenWomen


Low intake(Cases/person-years)High intake(Cases/person-years)RRa (95% CI)Low intake(Cases/person-years)High intake(Cases/person-years)RRa (95% CI)
Vegetables34/880473/19 1370.91 (0.60–1.49)13/14 34232/32 6581.08 (0.55–2.13)
Fruit39/10 13577/20 4131.04 (0.92–1.19)15/16 98435/34 8481.11 (0.90–1.36)
Soybean/tofu66/15 32649/15 0910.77 (0.52–1.13)35/26 37715/25 3270.41 (0.22–0.78)
Soybean paste35/10 82280/19 6771.06 (0.93–1.21)15/19 30335/32 4521.10 (0.90–1.34)
Seaweed65/18 41351/12 0941.08 (0.95–1.22)27/27 83323/23 9601.01 (0.83–1.22)
Mushrooms61/15 14954/15 2301.00 (0.89–1.14)28/27 84622/23 8311.00 (0.83–1.22)
Meat78/17 80738/12 7070.91 (0.80–1.03)41/40 0559/11 7720.97 (0.76–1.24)
Dairy products41/11 74975/18 7831.05 (0.92–1.19)20/22 47630/29 3661.10 (0.91–1.33)
Eggs34/848381/22 0171.01 (0.89–1.16)24/19 58026/32 2200.92 (0.76–1.11)
Fresh fish78/19 19337/11 3110.96 (0.84–1.09)37/37 20013/14 6751.02 (0.82–1.26)
Salted fish74/19 65042/10 8621.02 (0.90–1.16)38/37 41512/14 4190.97 (0.78–1.21)
Instant food40/10 34975/20 0251.00 (0.88–1.14)30/27 15420/24 4680.95 (0.79–1.16)
Fried food73/20 04943/10 4301.10 (0.97–1.26)32/35 85218/15 9011.14 (0.93–1.39)
Coffee57/13 82058/16 6781.00 (0.88–1.13)35/30 53715/21 3150.92 (0.75–1.13)

Low and high intake were determined by using the median intake for each food item.

aAdjusted for age, cigarette smoking, body mass index, alcohol drinking, and area of residence.

The combined effect of diet and cigarette smoking on gastric cancer risk among men is shown in Table 4. Among smokers, soybean/tofu intake reduced gastric cancer risk, but no significantly so (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.36–1.09). Among nonsmokers, soybean/tofu intake was not associated with gastric cancer risk (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.43–1.57). There was no interaction between soybean/tofu intake and cigarette smoking in relation to gastric cancer risk (P for interaction = 0.268). There was no interaction of soybean paste, vegetables, or fried food with cigarette smoking in relation to gastric cancer risk.

Association of soy foods, vegetables, soybean paste, and fried food consumption with gastric cancer risk among men, according to current smoking status
Food itemsSmokersNonsmokersP forinteraction


No. of CasesPerson-yearsRRa (95% CI)No. of CasesPerson-yearsRRa (95% CI)
Soybean/tofu      0.268
 Low intake4311 8971.002334091.00 
 High intake2312 0250.63 (0.36–1.09)2630440.82 (0.43–1.57) 
Soybean paste      0.608
 Low intake2183691.001424251.00 
 High intake4515 6330.99 (0.58–1.68)3540301.31 (0.69–2.48) 
Vegetables       
 Low intake1971221.001516661.000.992
 High intake4514 7260.83 (0.48–1.45)2843851.02 (0.52–1.99) 
Fried food       
 Low intake4315 9431.003040811.000.983
 High intake2480981.35 (0.79–2.30)1923141.18 (0.64–2.20) 

Low and high intake were determined by using the median intake for each food item.

aAdjusted for age, body mass index, alcohol drinking, and area of residence.

Because the smoking rate among women was low, we could not assess the interaction between soybean/tofu intake and cigarette smoking in relation to gastric cancer risk.

DISCUSSION

We studied whether dietary habits affected gastric cancer risk. Our results showed that dietary soybean/tofu intake decreased the risk of gastric cancer and that the beneficial effect of soybean/tofu was stronger among women than among men. However, there was no interaction between soybean/tofu intake and cigarette smoking, with respect to gastric cancer risk.

Epidemiologic studies have only rarely investigated the relationship between soy product intake and gastric cancer. In a case-control study in Korea, a group with a high intake of soy products had a lower risk of gastric cancer than a group with a low intake of soy products.15 In a case-control study of Japanese adults, both soybean paste and tofu appeared to be related to gastric cancer, but the results were not statistically significant.16 However, in a cohort study of Japanese subjects, soybean paste and tofu did not affect gastric cancer risk.17 In a case-control study of Chinese adults, fermented soy products increased the risk of gastric cancer, but there was no link between unfermented soy products and gastric cancer risk.18

Most previous investigations were case-control studies and failed to show consistent results. The present study is a prospective cohort study and used dietary information from people without gastric cancer. As compared with case-control studies, our results are less likely to be affected by bias regarding dietary information. A recent prospective study showed that soy product intake decreased gastric cancer mortality.9

Although the results of previous studies were inconsistent, it is possible to posit general mechanisms by which soybean products could protect against gastric cancer. The benefits of soybean intake could be due to isoflavones such as genistein and daidzein, which have anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects mediated by inhibition of protein-tyrosine kinases, DNA topoisomerases, and ribosomal S6 kinase.10,19 In addition, evidence from several experimental studies suggests that soy product intake decreases gastric cancer risk. In those studies, apoptosis of human gastric carcinoma cells was induced by genistein20 and H pylori growth was clearly inhibited by genistein.21

However, epidemiologic studies have shown an association between increased risk of gastric cancer and high intake of fermented soybean paste.22,23 Fermented soybean pastes contain high levels of salt and nitrate, due to fermentation.11 Nitrate is endogenously reduced to nitrite by oral bacteria, leading to formation of carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds, which can induce gastric carcinogenesis.24 Fermented soybean pastes contain considerable salt and activate H pylori colonization and development of atrophic gastritis.7 The differing associations of soybean/tofu and soybean paste with gastric cancer are consistent with those noted in a recent meta-analysis.25

In our study, the beneficial effect of soybean/tofu on gastric cancer was more prominent among women than among men. We hypothesize that female sex hormones might protect against gastric cancer by increasing apoptosis and regulating growth and clonal expansion of human gastric cancer cells.26,27 A recent meta-analysis showed that longer exposure to either endogenous or exogenous estrogen decreased the risk of gastric cancer.28 Because soybean products contain isoflavones—which are a type of phytoestrogen and act as estrogen agonists or antagonists, depending on endocrine estrogenic levels—the beneficial effect of soybean/tofu may differ by sex.

Soybean products have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, while smoking has inflammatory and oxidative effects.10,13 Antioxidant deficiency, either due to dietary deficiencies or the increase in antioxidant requirements caused by smoking, may be a factor in gastric cancer development.29 In our study, although the beneficial effects of soybean/tofu for gastric cancer were more prominent among smokers than among nonsmokers, intake of soybean/tofu and smoking did not synergistically affect gastric cancer risk.

Previous studies found that vegetable and fruit intake decreased the risk of gastric cancer. Nevertheless, a meta-analysis that assessed the relationship between vegetable intake and gastric cancer among a prospective cohort found no association.30 Riboli et al conducted a meta-analysis of cohort studies and showed that vegetable and fruit intake lowered the incidence of gastric cancer; however, the strength of the association was lower than that observed in a meta-analysis of case-control studies.31 A possible reason why the strength of the association was higher for case-control studies than for cohort studies is that recall bias and selection bias are more likely in case-control studies.31 Another possible explanation for inaccurate measurements of exposures is that the limited variability of dietary intake was underestimated.31

In our study, there was no evidence that vegetable and fruit intake decreased the risk of gastric cancer. Koreans tend to eat cooked vegetables with salt instead of fresh vegetables, which is not the case among white populations, so it is difficult to draw conclusions regarding the beneficial effects of vegetable intake, due to limited information on cooking methods.

The study of the association between fried food consumption and gastric cancer risk requires more research. Frying at high temperatures produces potential carcinogens such as heterocyclic amines and acrylamide.32 A recent case-control study in northwest Iran reported a positive association between fried food consumption and gastric cancer risk.33

Our study had several limitations. First, as in other studies, the food frequency questionnaire may not have accurately measured dietary intake. In addition, only information on frequency of food intake was available, which made it difficult to calculate total food intakes in our study. In our previous nested case-control study, however, we measured serum isoflavone concentrations and found an inverse association between isoflavone concentration and gastric cancer.34 The results of the present study using a food-frequency questionnaire are consistent with those of a previous study using isoflavone biomarkers. The correlation coefficient between frequency of soybean intake and serum isoflavone concentration was 0.10. Second, there was no information on cooking methods. In some studies, different cooking methods, such as broiling and pan-frying, resulted in varying rates of gastric cancer risk, and pickled vegetables were associated with a higher gastric cancer risk than were unpickled vegetables.23 In the present analysis, however, we could not distinguish pickled from unpickled vegetables and salted from fresh fish. In our study, salted and fresh fish were categorized by salt level before cooking. However, because Koreans add considerable salt to fresh fish during cooking, the association of fresh fish with gastric cancer might be similar to that observed for salted fish. Third, the recruitment period was rather long, and the effects of food consumption could vary between generations. However, we conducted an analysis stratified by recruitment period (early vs late recruitment) and found no difference in the results (P for heterogeneity > 0.05). Fourth, we had no information on H pylori infection, which is an important factor in gastric cancer among Koreans.

Nevertheless, our study had several strengths. The cohort study design allowed us to prospectively investigate the association between dietary intake and gastric cancer among Koreans, and we analyzed associations between gastric cancer and foods that have not been sufficiently researched, such as mushrooms and seaweed. Our study subjects were Asians who consumed many soy and soybean products. Average daily isoflavone intake is 0.6 to 1.6 mg and 35 mg among Western and Asian populations, respectively, which suggests that epidemiologic studies of soy product intake among Asian populations would be more effective.35

In conclusion, the findings of this cohort study suggest that frequent consumption of soy products reduces the risk of stomach cancer. To obtain further reliable evidence on the relationship between soy products and gastric cancer, it will be necessary to understand dietary habits and design studies with efficient research methods.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by a research grant from the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology, a grant from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare (0520140), and a grant from the Korea Research Foundation (KRF-2007-313-E00175).

Conflicts of interest: None declared.

REFERENCESFerlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM. Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. GLOBOCAN2002: IARC Press; 2004.Lee WC Breast, stomach and colorectal cancer screening in Korea. J Med Screen. 2006;13Suppl 1:S202 Epub 2007/01/1817227637Chyou PH, Nomura AM, Hankin JH, Stemmermann GN A case-cohort study of diet and stomach cancer. Cancer Res. 1990;50(23):75014 Epub 1990/12/012253198Honjo S, Kono S, Yamaguchi M Salt and geographic variation in stomach cancer mortality in Japan. Cancer Causes Control. 1994;5(3):2856 Epub 1994/05/01 10.1007/BF018302508061178Friedman GD, Parsonnet J Salt intake and stomach cancer: some contrary evidence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1992;1(7):6078 Epub 1992/11/011302576Correa P The biological model of gastric carcinogenesis. IARC Sci Publ. 2004;(157):30110 Epub 2004/04/0215055303Fox JG, Dangler CA, Taylor NS, King A, Koh TJ, Wang TC High-salt diet induces gastric epithelial hyperplasia and parietal cell loss, and enhances Helicobacter pylori colonization in C57BL/6 mice. Cancer Res. 1999;59(19):48238 Epub 1999/10/1610519391Wu AH, Yang D, Pike MC A meta-analysis of soyfoods and risk of stomach cancer: the problem of potential confounders. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9(10):10518 Epub 2000/10/2511045787Nagata C, Takatsuka N, Kawakami N, Shimizu H A prospective cohort study of soy product intake and stomach cancer death. Br J Cancer. 2002;87(1):316 Epub 2002/06/27 10.1038/sj.bjc.660034912085252Sarkar FH, Li Y Mechanisms of cancer chemoprevention by soy isoflavone genistein. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2002;21(3–4):26580 Epub 2003/01/29 10.1023/A:102121091082112549765Seel DJ, Kawabata T, Nakamura M, Ishibashi T, Hamano M, Mashimo M, N-nitroso compounds in two nitrosated food products in southwest Korea. Food Chem Toxicol. 1994;32(12):111723 Epub 1994/12/01 10.1016/0278-6915(94)90127-97813983Trédaniel J, Boffetta P, Buiatti E, Saracci R, Hirsch A Tobacco smoking and gastric cancer: review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 1997;72(4):56573 Epub 1997/08/07 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970807)72:4<565::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO;2-O9259392Shimoyama T, Everett SM, Fukuda S, Axon AT, Dixon MF, Crabtree JE Influence of smoking and alcohol on gastric chemokine mRNA expression in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54(4):3324 Epub 2001/04/18 10.1136/jcp.54.4.33211304855Yoo KY, Shin HR, Chang SH, Lee KS, Park SK, Kang D, Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort Study including a Biological Materials Bank (KMCC-I). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2002;3(1):8592 Epub 2003/04/3012718614Kim HJ, Chang WK, Kim MK, Lee SS, Choi BY Dietary factors and gastric cancer in Korea: a case-control study. Int J Cancer. 2002;97(4):5315 Epub 2002/01/22 10.1002/ijc.1011111802218Ito LS, Inoue M, Tajima K, Yamamura Y, Kodera Y, Hirose K, Dietary factors and the risk of gastric cancer among Japanese women: a comparison between the differentiated and non-differentiated subtypes. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(1):2431 Epub 2003/01/28 10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00269-712547482Sauvaget C, Lagarde F, Nagano J, Soda M, Koyama K, Kodama K Lifestyle factors, radiation and gastric cancer in atomic-bomb survivors (Japan). Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16(7):77380 Epub 2005/09/01 10.1007/s10552-005-5385-x16132787Nan HM, Song YJ, Yun HY, Park JS, Kim H Effects of dietary intake and genetic factors on hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(25):383441 Epub 2005/07/0215991278Liggins J, Bluck LJ, Runswick S, Atkinson C, Coward WA, Bingham SA Daidzein and genistein content of fruits and nuts. J Nutr Biochem. 2000;11(6):32631 Epub 2000/09/27 10.1016/S0955-2863(00)00085-111002128Zhou HB, Chen JM, Cai JT, Du Q, Wu CN Anticancer activity of genistein on implanted tumor of human SG7901 cells in nude mice. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(4):62731 Epub 2008/01/19 10.3748/wjg.14.62718203299Verdrengh M, Collins LV, Bergin P, Tarkowski A Phytoestrogen genistein as an anti-staphylococcal agent. Microbes Infect. 2004;6(1):8692 Epub 2004/01/24 10.1016/j.micinf.2003.10.00514738897Nan HM, Park JW, Song YJ, Yun HY, Park JS, Hyun T, Kimchi and soybean pastes are risk factors of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(21):317581 Epub 2005/06/0215929164Ahn YO Diet and stomach cancer in Korea. Int J Cancer. 1997;Suppl 10:79 Epub 1997/01/01 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(1997)10+<7::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO;2-C9209012Tannenbaum SR Diet and exposure to N-nitroso compounds. Princess Takamatsu Symp. 1985;16:6775 Epub 1985/01/013916205Kim J, Kang M, Lee JS, Inoue M, Sasazuki S, Tsugane S Fermented and non-fermented soy food consumption and gastric cancer in Japanese and Korean populations: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(1):23144 Epub 2010/11/13 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01770.x21070479Chandanos E, Lagergren J Oestrogen and the enigmatic male predominance of gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(16):2397403 Epub 2008/08/30 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.07.03118755583Pricci M, Linsalata M, Russo F, Messa C, Amati L, Caradonna L, Effects of 17beta-estradiol administration on apoptosis and polyamine content in AGS cell line. Anticancer Res. 2001;21(5):321520 Epub 2002/02/1911848475Camargo MC, Goto Y, Zabaleta J, Morgan DR, Correa P, Rabkin CS Sex hormones, hormonal interventions, and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(1):2038 Epub 2011/10/27 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-083422028402Phull PS, Green CJ, Jacyna MR A radical view of the stomach: the role of oxygen-derived free radicals and anti-oxidants in gastroduodenal disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995;7(3):26574 Epub 1995/03/017743310Lunet N, Lacerda-Vieira A, Barros H Fruit and vegetables consumption and gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Nutr Cancer. 2005;53(1):110 Epub 2005/12/15 10.1207/s15327914nc5301_116351501Riboli E, Norat T Epidemiologic evidence of the protective effect of fruit and vegetables on cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78(3Suppl):559S69S Epub 2003/08/2612936950Jägerstad M, Skog K Genotoxicity of heat-processed foods. Mutat Res. 2005;574(1–2):15672 Epub 2005/05/26 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.03015914214Pakseresht M, Forman D, Malekzadeh R, Yazdanbod A, West RM, Greenwood DC, Dietary habits and gastric cancer risk in north-west Iran. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(5):72536 Epub 2011/02/25 10.1007/s10552-011-9744-521347819Ko KP, Park SK, Park B, Yang JJ, Cho LY, Kang C, Isoflavones from phytoestrogens and gastric cancer risk: a nested case-control study within the Korean Multicenter Cancer Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(5):1292300 Epub 2010/05/08 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-100420447921Sirtori CR, Arnoldi A, Johnson SK Phytoestrogens: end of a tale?Ann Med. 2005;37(6):42338 Epub 2005/10/06 10.1080/0785389051004458616203615