We examined differences in knowledge and socioeconomic factors associated with 3 types of breast cancer screening (breast self-examination, clinical breast examination, and mammogram) among African American, Arab, and Latina women.
Community health workers used a community-based intervention to recruit 341 women (112 Arab, 113 Latina, and 116 African American) in southeastern Michigan to participate in a breast cancer prevention intervention from August through October 2006. Before and after the intervention, women responded to a previously validated 5-item multiple-choice test on breast cancer screening (possible score range: 0 to 5) in their language of preference (English, Spanish, or Arabic). We used generalized estimating equations to analyze data and to account for family-level and individual correlations.
Although African American women knew more about breast cancer screening at the baseline (pretest median scores were 4 for African American, 3 for Arab and 3 for Latina women), all groups significantly increased their knowledge after participating in the breast cancer prevention intervention (posttest median scores were 5 for African American and 4 for Arab and Latina women). Generalized estimating equations models show that Arab and Latina women made the most significant gains in posttest scores (
Racial/ethnic differences in knowledge of breast cancer screening highlight the need for tailored information on breast cancer screening for African American, Arab, and Latina women to promote adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines.
Despite growing interest in factors associated with cancer-related disparities and interventions to reduce disparities, information is still limited regarding differences in screening practices by geographic location and effective tailored interventions for specific racial/ethnic groups. African American and Latina women have disproportionately higher death rates due to breast cancer yet nationally lower incidence rates than those of their non-Hispanic white counterparts (
As women's screening rates for breast cancer increase nationally, barriers to screening remain for African American, Arab, and Latina women from poor backgrounds. Multiple factors are associated with breast cancer screening rates among these groups of women, including socioeconomic status, health insurance coverage, usual source of care, perceptions and fears about breast cancer, race, ethnicity, age, and knowledge of breast cancer screening (
A special edition of the Michigan Cancer Behavioral Risk Factor Survey (BRFS) conducted in 2006 (
We studied differences in knowledge of and socioeconomic factors associated with breast cancer screening and assessed baseline and postintervention test scores on the knowledge of breast cancer screening practices among African American, Arab, and Latina women who participated in the Kin Keeper Cancer Prevention Intervention, a family-focused educational intervention for women (
The Michigan State University institutional review board approved this study. The locations of the community-based study were southeastern Michigan, in the cities of Detroit and Dearborn. Detroit is the largest city in Michigan and the 11th most-populated city in the United States. Approximately 80% of the residents are African American and 5% are Latino/a, according to the 2000 US Census. The 2006-2008 US Department of Treasury American Community Survey data for Michigan indicates that the city's median annual household income is $29,526 compared with Dearborn's $44,650. Nearly 33% of the residents in Dearborn are Arab; the city has the largest Arab population outside of the Middle East.
Study participants came from 1 of 3 community-based organizations affiliated with the Detroit Department of Health and Wellness Promotion: 1) Village Health Worker Program, 2) Community Health and Social Services (CHASS), and 3) the Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS). Although the health department serves all racial/ethnic groups, for the purposes of this study, it was asked to recruit only African American and Latina women through its healthy lifestyle program. CHASS, known for its specialized services to Latinos/as in Detroit, recruited Latinas from the REACH Detroit Partnership (a diabetes prevention and complications program). ACCESS, which is located in Dearborn, recruited Arab women from its healthy lifestyle program. The organizations had credibility in the community and employed community health workers (CHWs). We used the Kin Keeper model to recruit women and deliver breast cancer education in the homes of a family member (the kin keeper) (
The Kin Keeper Cancer Prevention Intervention is community-based; it uses CHWs to educate groups of female family members about breast or cervical cancer or both (
This model has a unique recruitment method: CHWs recruit clients/kin keepers and kin keepers recruit female family members. It begins with cross-training CHWs (from their respective noncancer-related public health programs) in the basics of breast and cervical cancer prevention and control and recruitment of clients into the study (
Each family unit received 2 home visits. At the first home visit, participants signed informed consent forms and completed pre-intervention (baseline) sociodemographic forms and a 16-item assessment of breast cancer literacy. Both the sociodemographic and the cancer literacy assessments were administered orally; participants followed as the CHW read in the preferred language. Latina and Arab CHWs were bilingual and at some visits had to read in both English and the preferred language, which allowed us to measure participants' actual knowledge about screening for breast cancer regardless of their ability to read and comprehend the assessment items. From the second home visits, 333 women were retained (114 African Americans, 112 Latinas, and 107 Arabs), resulting in an overall sample retention rate of approximately 98%.
The 16-item assessment tool for breast cancer literacy has 3 domains: 1) cancer awareness, 2) knowledge and screening, and 3) prevention and control. It uses a multiple-choice and true-or-false format, and has been validated (English: Cronbach α, 0.99; Spanish: Cronbach α, 0.99; and Arabic: Cronbach α, 0.81) (
Distribution of pretest scores by race/ethnicity in the Kin Keeper Cancer Prevention Intervention, Dearborn and Detroit, Michigan, August through October 2006. The pretest evaluated baseline knowledge of breast cancer screening methods. The highest possible score on the pretest was 5.
| African American | 0 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 36 | 31 |
| Latina | 0 | 12 | 20 | 27 | 36 | 5 |
| Arab | 1 | 14 | 18 | 36 | 23 | 9 |
After completing the intervention pretest to assess breast cancer literacy, participants received the education followed by a posttest. The home visit lasted 1.5 to 2 hours. CHWs who needed to speak in 2 languages took longer. At the end of the first home visit, the second home visit was scheduled for 1 to 3 weeks later. At the second home visit, the second posttest was administered before the second educational session. During the second educational session, CHWs cleared up myths, answered questions, and reviewed basic points. Then they administered a third posttest and worked with participants to complete a personal action plan.
We analyzed 5 binary outcome variables in this study, each corresponding to a response on the knowledge and screening domain of the assessment tool for breast cancer literacy (1 if correct and 0 if incorrect). We used baseline and postintervention responses (ie, repeated measures) to compare racial/ethnic differences in knowledge of breast cancer screening, which allowed us also to assess changes in knowledge of breast cancer screening for each race/ethnicity.
We graphed the distributions of the pretest and posttest scores and computed descriptive statistics for the whole sample and by racial/ethnic group. Sociodemographic characteristics were analyzed by race/ethnicity. Two-sided χ2 and Fisher exact tests were performed to test for categorical association. For these preliminary analyses, familial association was ignored. We used SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, North Carolina) to perform all statistical tests and modeling. Statistical significance was set at
To analyze differences in women's knowledge of breast cancer screening by race/ethnicity and across time, we considered generalized estimating equations (GEE) models (
The probability of answering each question correctly was modeled separately, controlling for age, income, highest level of education attained, marital status, employment status, and health insurance status. The basic GEE regression model for the binary outcome w
Equation
,
[Description of this equation: Logarithm to base 10 of the product of the ratio of the probability that parameter w sub kfij equals 1, to the difference between 1 and the probability that parameter w sub kfij equals 1. This quantity equals the sum of beta sub jk plus gamma cap C sub kfij.]
Let w
Sociodemographic characteristics differed significantly by race/ethnicity (
Distribution of posttest scores attained by race/ethnicity in the Kin Keeper Breast Cancer Prevention Intervention, Dearborn and Detroit, Michigan, August through October, 2006. The posttest evaluated knowledge of breast cancer screening methods after the intervention. The highest possible score on the posttest was 5
| African American | 0 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 23 | 53 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latina | 3 | 3 | 10 | 18 | 62 | 5 |
| Arab | 0 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 67 | 12 |
In the pretest, Arab women had lower odds of correctly answering the first question (who does a breast self-examination?) than did African American women (odds ratio [OR], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.89), adjusted for other sociodemographic variables (
For Latinas, pretest results were somewhat similar to those of Arabs. The GEE-based analysis showed that Latinas had lower odds of correctly answering each question in the pretest than African Americans, except for questions 3, 4, and 5, in which the GEE-based odds were not significant. Latinas had significantly lower odds of knowing the differences between breast self-examination, clinical breast examination, and mammogram than did African Americans.
Posttest GEE estimates show that, compared with African American women, Arab women had lower odds of correctly answering questions 1 and 4, whereas Latina women had significantly lower odds of correctly answering question 4.
To our knowledge this is the first study to empirically compare knowledge of breast cancer screening types among African American, Arab, and Latina women. It yielded 3 major findings: 1) knowledge of breast cancer screening practices was highly associated with race/ethnicity; 2) Arabs and Latinas had similar patterns of knowledge and lower levels of education and insurance coverage compared with African American women; and 3) knowledge of breast cancer screening significantly increased for Latinas and Arabs after community-based intervention, as evidenced by posttest scores.
Overall, the results show that, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, Arab and Latina women had lower pretest and posttest scores for breast cancer screening knowledge compared with African American women, despite significantly improving their scores in the posttest. Respondents did not fully understand the differences in breast cancer screening types.
African American women's socioeconomic characteristics were highly associated with their higher knowledge levels. Overall, women with higher education levels had higher baseline knowledge of breast cancer screening and reported higher levels of breast cancer screening regardless of race/ethnicity. This finding is consistent with the results of previous studies that show education and access to health care are major predictors of cancer screening knowledge and practices (
The higher scores on knowledge of breast cancer screening among African American women may also be a result of benefits they received from earlier cancer disparities research that focused on African Americans and breast cancer screening awareness campaigns conducted in English. For non–English-speaking Latinas and Arabs, breast cancer awareness campaigns using Spanish and Arabic messages and materials (
Irrespective of a woman's education level, posttest scores increased among the 3 groups; Latina and Arab women achieved the largest gains in knowledge of breast cancer screening. These findings demonstrate that information on breast cancer screening can be effectively provided when interventions address barriers. The Kin Keeper intervention mitigated 3 barriers: low education levels, literacy, and limited English language proficiency (
For Arab women, community-based interventions are necessary to reduce disparities, given that they are more likely than non-Hispanic white women to have irregular screenings and cancer that is detected at later stages (
Although CHWs completed the same training (
Methodologic cautions are warranted in terms of instrument and identification of populations. As observed, future research needs to include definitions of medical screening procedures for women to ensure their understanding of survey questions being administered, particularly for low-income women with limited proficiency in English. A community-based study, by design, represents the unique needs of a particular geographic area and designated population groups. Therefore, the results are not meant to be applicable to the general US population. Other limitations include lack of longitudinal data to report knowledge retention and length of residency status of Latinas and Arabs who selected a language other than English.
The inclusion of Arab women presented several challenges. Although the Arab world comprises various countries, including 10 in Africa (
Because of the complexity of cancer disparities, education interventions must be developed that are appropriate to the linguistic, health literacy, and cultural needs of participants. Population-specific materials need to be administered in conjunction with community-based participants such as CHWs. Increasing women's knowledge about breast cancer screening is an important first step, but moving women in the direction of adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines and assuring their access to health care services would reduce disparities in breast cancer death and illness.
This project was funded by Susan G. Komen for the Cure DISPO705760. We gratefully acknowledge and express appreciation to the CHWs from the Detroit Department of Health and Wellness Promotion's Village Health Worker Program; the Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services; and the Community Health and Social Services Center, Inc, who participated and made this study possible.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
A health care provider in a clinic or doctor's office, once a year.
An X-ray technician, once a year.
A woman in her home every month.
An X-ray technician, once a year.
A woman in her home every month.
A health care provider in a clinic or doctor's office, once a year.
Breast self-examination and clinical breast examination.
Clinical breast examination and mammogram.
Mammogram and breast self-examination.
All are the same.
Breast self-examinations can be done monthly by all women.
Clinical breast examinations can be done yearly by a health care provider.
Mammograms can be done yearly beginning at age 40, by an X-ray technician.
None of these statements are true.
Note: The correct responses are italicized.
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Women Participating in the Kin Keeper Breast Cancer Prevention Intervention, Dearborn and Detroit, Michigan, August-October 2006
| Characteristics | African American, No. (%) | Arab American, No. (%) (n = 112) | Latina, No. (%) (n = 113) | Total, No. (%) (N = 341) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-39 | 45 (39) | 34 (30) | 52 (46) | 131 (38) | .03 |
| 40-49 | 23 (20) | 38 (34) | 24 (21) | 85 (25) | |
| ≥50 | 48 (41) | 40 (36) | 36 (32) | 124 (36) | |
| I would prefer not to answer | 9 (8) | 30 (27) | 36 (32) | 75 (22) | <.001 |
| <10,000 | 7 (6) | 31 (28) | 19 (17) | 57 (17) | |
| 10,000-19,999 | 36 (31) | 17 (15) | 36 (32) | 89 (26) | |
| 20,000-39,999 | 47 (40) | 25 (22) | 13 (12) | 85 (25) | |
| ≥40,000 | 17 (15) | 9 (8) | 9 (8) | 35 (10) | |
| Some college or higher | 61 (53) | 26 (23) | 33 (30) | 120 (34) | <.001 |
| High school graduate or GED | 52 (45) | 27 (24) | 33 (29) | 112 (33) | |
| Less than high school or GED | 3 (32) | 59 (53) | 46 (41) | 108 (33) | |
| Married | 29 (25) | 75 (67) | 73 (65) | 177 (52) | <.001 |
| Widowed/separated/divorced | 42 (36) | 24 (22) | 26 (23) | 92 (27) | |
| Single/never married | 43 (37) | 10 (9) | 13 (12) | 66 (19) | |
| Full-time/self-employed | 75 (65) | 16 (14) | 46 (41) | 137 (40) | <.001 |
| Part-time | 10 (9) | 17 (15) | 19 (17) | 46 (13) | |
| Unemployed | 27 (23) | 73 (65) | 14 (12) | 114 (33) | |
| Retired/not working because of disability | 4 (3) | 4 (4) | 33 (29) | 41 (12) | |
| Have health insurance | 110 (95) | 46 (41) | 51 (45) | 207 (61) | <.001 |
| Do not have health insurance | 6 (5) | 60 (54) | 61 (54) | 127 (37) | |
| English | 116 (100) | 36 (32) | 28 (25) | 180 (53) | NA |
| Spanish | 0 | 0 | 85 (75) | 85 (25) | |
| Arabic | 0 | 76 (68) | 0 | 76 (22) | |
Abbreviation: GED, general equivalency diploma; NA, not applicable.
>Percentages may not total 100% because of rounding.
The χ2 statistic was used to calculate
Baseline Knowledge of Breast Cancer Screening Methods by Race/Ethnicity, Kin Keeper Breast Cancer Prevention Intervention, Dearborn and Detroit, Michigan, August-October 2006
| Pretest Questions | African American, No. (%) (n = 116) | Arab, No. (%) (n = 112) | Latina, No. (%) (n = 113) | Total, No. (%) N = 341 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incorrect | 7 (6) | 32 (29) | 38 (34) | 77 (23) | <.001 |
| Correct | 109 (94) | 77 (71) | 74 (66) | 260 (77) | |
| Incorrect | 3 (3) | 28 (26) | 24 (21) | 55 (16) | <.001 |
| Correct | 113 (97) | 81 (74) | 88 (79) | 282 (84) | |
| Incorrect | 10 (9) | 27 (26) | 34 (31) | 71 (21) | <.001 |
| Correct | 106 (91) | 79 (74) | 77 (69) | 262 (79) | |
| Incorrect | 72 (63) | 94 (86) | 92 (82) | 258 (77) | <.001 |
| Correct | 42 (37) | 15 (14) | 20 (18) | 77 (23) | |
| Incorrect | 32 (28) | 46 (44) | 35 (32) | 113 (34) | .04 |
| Correct | 83 (72) | 59 (56) | 76 (68) | 218 (66) | |
Percentages may not total 100% because of rounding.
Answer choices are given in the Appendix.
The 2-sided Fisher exact χ2 statistic was used to calculate
Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Probabilities of Answering Each Pretest and Posttest Question Correctly, Kin Keeper Breast Cancer Prevention Intervention, Dearborn and Detroit, Michigan, August-October 2006
| Questions (No. of Answers) | Arab American | Latina | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest AOR (95% CI) | Posttest AOR (95% CI) | Pretest AOR (95%CI) | Posttest AOR (95% CI) | |
| Question 1: Who does a breast self-examination? (n = 324) | 0.27 (0.08-0.89) | 0.78 (0.03-3.10) | 0.25 (0.08-0.74) | 0.56 (0.19-1.69) |
| Question 2: Who does a clinical breast examination? (n = 324) | 0.11 (0.02-0.48) | 0.52 (0.15-1.75) | 0.14 (0.04-0.54) | 0.39 (0.13-1.18) |
| Question 3: Who does a mammogram? (n = 320) | 0.49 (0.17-1.43) | 0.93 (0.31-2.73) | 0.40 (0.16-1.01) | 0.98 (0.37-2.58) |
| Question 4: Which of these commonly used screening practices are the same? (n = 322) | 0.34 (0.12-0.92) | 0.22 (0.09-0.56) | 0.37 (0.13-1.00) | 0.11 (0.04-0.30) |
| Question 5: Which of these statements is true? (n = 320) | 0.43 (0.16-1.17) | 1.95 (0.70-5.45) | 0.69 (0.29-1.64) | 1.40 (0.58-3.36) |
Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio, CI, confidence interval.
Adjusted odds ratios were simultaneously adjusted for age, income, highest level of education attained, marital status, employment status, and health insurance status. African American women are the reference group.
Answer choices are given in the Appendix.