Prev Chronic DisPreventing Chronic Disease1545-1151Centers for Disease Control and Prevention175729541955402PCDv43_06_0108Original ResearchPeer ReviewedQuality of Life for Obese Women and Men in TurkeySaraçFuldenMDEge University Hospital
fuldensarac@yahoo.comDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 5th Floor, Ege University Hospital, Bornova, Izmir, 35100 Turkey90 (232) 373-7701
ParýldarSebnemMDDepartment of Psychiatry, Ege University, Izmir, TurkeyDumanErdalMDDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ege University Hospital, Izmir, TurkeySaygýlýFusunMDDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ege University Hospital, Izmir, TurkeyTüzünMehmetMDDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ege University Hospital, Izmir, TurkeyYýlmazCandegerMDDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
72007156200743A502007Introduction

Obesity is a complex, multifaceted disease that is widespread and growing in the developing world. People who are obese experience health-related quality-of-life impairments.

Methods

We administered the SF-36 Health Survey questionnaire to 1752 obese adults and 400 normal-weight adults in Izmir City, Turkey. We then compared the mean scores of the two groups by sex in eight quality-of-life domains.

Results

Differences in scores between obese women and normal-weight women were statistically significant in seven of eight SF-36 domains; differences in scores between obese men and normal-weight men were statistically significant in six of eight domains. Obese women were significantly more impaired than obese men in four of eight domains. Among obese women, 45.0% experienced a reduced quality of life, compared with only 13.2% of normal-weight women. Similarly, 41.3% of obese men experienced a reduced quality of life, compared with only 9.3% of normal-weight men.

Conclusion

Obesity is associated with poor levels of health, particularly poor levels of physical and social well-being.

Introduction

Obesity is a complex, multifaceted disease that is widespread and growing in the developing world. People who are obese experience health-related quality-of-life impairments. Impairment in an obese individual's capacity to live as fully and actively as he or she desires may be as serious a consequence of obesity as its adverse effects on morbidity and mortality (1). Both physical and psychosocial functioning have been shown to be negatively affected by excess weight; greater impairments have been associated with greater degrees of obesity (2).

In 1947, the World Health Organization defined health as both the absence of disease and infirmity and the presence of physical, mental, and social well-being (3). Health-related quality of life refers to well-being in the physical, psychological, and social domains; well-being in each domain can be assessed by measuring an individual's objective functioning and subjective perceptions of health. Quality-of-life assessments can be used to measure and compare the effectiveness of different treatments and to evaluate the impact of a treatment on how patients feel and function in their everyday lives (4).

Until recently, there has been little standardization of quality-of-life measures among people who are obese; many researchers have simply developed their own set of nonvalidated questions. The field of quality-of-life research has grown, however, and standards for developing and validating quality-of-life instruments have been proposed (4-11). The SF-36 Health Survey (QualityMetric Inc, Lincoln, RI) has been used to study obesity because it is comprehensive, brief, psychometrically sound, and consistent with current guidelines for health-related quality-of-life instruments (4,11-15).

Our aim in this study was to compare the health-related quality of life of obese and normal-weight adults in Turkey. In addition, we sought to describe the conditions contributing to poor health-related quality of life among obese patients. We hypothesized that obesity negatively affects both physical and psychosocial functioning.

MethodsStudy population 

The study population consisted of two groups of adults aged 20 to 65: an obese group of 1752 (254 men and 1498 women) and a normal-weight group of 400 (150 men and 250 women). The obese participants were all patients at an obesity clinic operated by the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Ege University in Izmir City, Turkey; patients with associated comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular disease were excluded from the study. The group of normal-weight men and women were recruited from the general outpatient population of the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Ege University.

Diagnosis of obesity was determined by measurement of body mass index (BMI [weight in kg/height in m2]). Those in the obese group had a BMI greater than or equal to 30.0; those in the normal-weight group had a BMI less than 25.0. All participants signed an informed consent form, and the Ege University Hospital ethics committee approved the study.

Study design 

To assess participants' health-related quality of life, we used the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) developed by Ware et al (12). We translated the questionnaire into the Turkish language. Responses were included in the analysis only if all domains of the questionnaire were answered in full. The questionnaire took an average of 20 minutes to complete (range, 15–45 min). The survey was conducted from November 2004 through December 2005.

The SF-36 questionnaire 

The SF-36 questionnaire is a self-evaluation instrument consisting of 36 items, including 35 items in eight domains that provide a scaled assessment of respondents' quality of life during the previous 4 weeks. Ten items address the domain of physical functioning, defined as limitations in physical activities such as bathing or dressing because of health problems; four items address the domain of role-physical limitations, defined as limitations in usual activities such as work or other daily activities because of physical health problems; two items address the domain of bodily pain; five items address the domain of general health; four items address the domain of vitality (energy and fatigue); two items address the domain of social functioning, defined as limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; three items address the domain of role-emotional limitations, defined as limitations in usual activities such as work or other daily activities because of emotional problems; and five items address the domain of general mental health. The single unscaled item asks respondents about their general health compared with 1 year ago.

SF-36 scoring rules and statistical analysis

Each of the 36 items was scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the most favorable state of health. We then summarized the scores for each item and averaged the scores for items within each domain to produce domain scores. All scoring was performed by a psychiatrist using the scoring algorithm developed by Ware et al (12).

We used a two-tailed t test to compare domain scores of the obese and normal-weight groups and considered differences to be significant at α = .05. In addition, we defined a decrease in quality of life for an individual as an average score of less than 50 for the eight SF-36 domains. We calculated the percentage of individuals within each group who scored less than 50.

Results

All individuals surveyed completed the questionnaire in full. Table 1 shows the mean age and BMI by sex for each participant group.

Table 2 shows the mean scores by sex for obese participants and normal-weight participants in each of the eight SF-36 domains. Differences in scores between obese women and normal-weight women were statistically significant in seven of eight domains; the sole exception was for vitality. Differences in scores between obese men and normal-weight men were statistically significant in six of eight domains; the two exceptions were for role-emotional and vitality.

We found that obese women were significantly more impaired than obese men in four of eight domains: role–emotional (P = .05), vitality (P = .03), bodily pain (P = .04), and general health perception (P = .001).

Among obese women, 45.0% (674/1498) experienced a reduced quality of life, compared with only 13.2% (33/250) of normal-weight women. Similarly, 41.3% (105/254) of obese men experienced a reduced quality of life, compared with 9.3% (14/150) of normal-weight men.

Table 3 shows how each participant group responded to each SF-36 question.

Discussion

Obesity is a major public health problem associated with increased health risks (1,3,15-18). The results of our study showed that obesity was related to role-emotional limitations and physical problems. People with obesity uniformly perceive their general health as poorer than healthy-weight people perceive their health (3,18,19). Moreover, a continuum has been observed between mildly, moderately, and severely (morbidly) obese individuals and worsening perceived health status. Some studies found obesity to be associated with compromised quality of life and mental well-being (4,9,18,20,21). Obese people have also been shown to have poorer psychological profiles than other chronically ill people (16), and BMI levels have been found to be positively correlated with reports of self-harm and psychiatric illness (17,22). Investigators also found that higher waist-to-hip ratios are associated with lower socioeconomic status, work problems, unemployment, and increased sedentary behavior among men and women (4,23,24).

Fontaine et al administered the SF-36 questionnaire to 334 people seeking outpatient weight-loss treatment and found that they scored significantly worse than population norms in eight domains; they also found that a morbidly obese subgroup scored significantly worse in six of the eight scales (17). On the other hand, some studies found little difference between obese and nonobese groups in their scores on standard psychological tests (23-25).

Obesity is no doubt, however, associated with some loss of quality of life, particularly in physical well-being (22,26-29). In a population sample of 3443 men and women from the Netherlands, Seidell et al found that BMI was positively associated with the number of health complaints (20). Similarly, Richards et al compared the functional status of 345 sibling pairs, one classified as severely obese (BMI ≥35.0) and the other classified as normal weight (24). All SF-36 functional status and emotional well-being scores were significantly lower among the severely obese participants than among their normal-weight siblings. Furthermore, those who were severely obese perceived their general health to be poorer and more likely to get worse than did their normal-weight siblings (24).

Body-image dissatisfaction (19) and binge-eating disorder (18,30) are both more common among obese people than among normal-weight people (22). Although few obese patients have clinically significant problems with body image, binge-eating disorder is associated with high rates of psychopathology, particularly depression (25). Some obese people suffer from clinically significant psychopathology that requires treatment. Research is needed to examine factors that may increase the risk for psychopathology among the heterogeneous obese population. A recent study suggested that gender may modify the psychological risk of obesity. In a general population sample, excess weight among women was associated with an increased risk for major depression, suicidal thoughts, and suicide attempts (11,28), whereas excess weight among men was associated with a decreased risk for depression and suicidal behavior (28). Similarly, Sullivan et al found that the psychosocial consequences of obesity were greater among women with a BMI greater than 34.0 than among men with a BMI greater than 38.0 (29).

Mathias et al reported that obese patients scored worse than normal-weight individuals on ratings of overweight distress, physical appearance, and health-state preferences (31). Doll et al found a strong inverse relationship between BMI and quality of life (32). In our study, we found obesity to be associated with both poorer quality of life and decreased mental well-being, compared with normal weight. For example, we found that 25.9% of obese women and 16.2% of obese men reported difficulty bathing or dressing themselves; only 7.8% of normal-weight women and no normal-weight men found difficulty with this task. This finding shows that obesity affects physical well-being and the ability to perform daily activities.

Evidence of a negative correlation between obesity and psychological quality of life is equivocal, and it is much weaker than evidence of a negative correlation between obesity and physical quality of life. Earlier studies found few or no differences between obese and normal-weight people in psychological functioning (1,2). Similarly, recent population-based studies demonstrated marked differences between obese and nonobese people in their physical quality of life but few differences between them in their psychological or social quality of life. Nevertheless, there is some good evidence that obesity does negatively affect psychological quality of life (4,32,33).

Studies of self-reported health status show that women are more likely than men to report impaired health (28,30,31,33,34). Similarly, women are more likely than men to report impaired body image or body satisfaction, and obese women are more likely than obese men to report impaired health-related quality of life (35). In our study, we found that obese women were significantly more impaired than obese men in four of the eight quality-of-life domains. The results of our study add to the substantial body of evidence that obesity is associated with poor levels of health status, particularly with poor levels of physical and social well-being.

FontaineKRBartlettSJ199836170Estimating health-related quality of life in obese individualsDis Manage Health OutcomesHiggsMLWadeTCescatoMAtchisonMSlvotinekAHigginsB2041997391405Differences between treatment seekers in an obese population: medical intervention vs. dietary restrictionJ Behav Med92984371947World Health OrganizationGeneva (CH)Constitution of the World Health OrganizationKolotkinRMeterKWilliamsGR242001219229Quality of life and obesityObes Rev12119993Le PenCLevyELoosFBanzetMNBasdevantA5271998445450"Specific" scale compared with "generic" scale: a double measurement of the quality of life in a French community sample of obese subjectsJ Epidemiol Community Health9799879LeanMEHanTSSeidellJC15981999837843Impairment of health and quality of life using new US federal guidelines for the identification of obesityArch Intern Med10219929McHorneyCAWareJEJrRaczekAE3131993247263The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructsMed Care8450681AydemirOOzdemirCKorogluE3622005136141The impact of co-morbid conditions on the SF-36: a primary-care-based study among hypertensivesArch Med Res15847946MashebRMGriloCM932004194199Quality of life in patients with binge eating disorderEat Weight Disord15656013GuyattGHFeenyDHPatrickDL11881993622629Measuring health-related quality of lifeAnn Intern Med8452328KolotkinRLCrosbyRDKosloskiKDWilliamsGR922001102111Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesityObes Res11316344WareJESnowKKKosinskiMGandekB1993Boston (MA)The Health Institute of New England Medical CenterSF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guideKushnerRFFosterGD16102000947952Obesity and quality of lifeNutrition11054600HanTSTijhuisMALeanMESeidellJC8812199818141820Quality of life in relation to overweight and body fat distributionAm J Public Health9842379KatzDAMcHorneyCAAtkinsonRL15112000789796Impact of obesity on health-related quality of life in patients with chronic illnessJ Gen Intern Med11119171Sarlio-LahteenkorvaSStunkardARissanenA1995S1S519Suppl 6Psychosocial factors and quality of life in obesityInt J Obes Relat Metab Disord8581113FontaineKRCheskinLJBarofskyI4331996265270Health-related quality of life in obese persons seeking treatmentJ Fam Pract8797754RienerRSchindlerKLudvikB742006309314Psychosocial variables, eating behavior, depression, and binge eating in morbidly obese subjectsEat Behav17056406PadgettJBiroFM1662003349354Different shapes in different cultures: body dissatisfaction, overweight, and obesity in African-American and Caucasian femalesJ Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol14642955SeidellJCVisscherTL200054S33S39Suppl 3Body weight and weight change and their health implications for the elderlyEur J Clin Nutr11041073WareJEJrSherbourneCD3061992473483The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selectionMedical Care1593914RosmondRBjorntorpP651998338345Psychiatric ill-health of women and its relationship to obesity and body fat distributionObes Res9738549TestaMASimonsonDC334131996835840Assessment of quality-of-life outcomesN Engl J Med8596551RichardsMMAdamsTDHuntSC100120006775Functional status and emotional well-being, dietary intake, and physical activity of severely obese subjectsJ Am Diet Assoc10646007RobertsREKaplanGAShemaSJStrawbridgeWJ15222000163170Are the obese at greater risk for depression?Am J Epidemiol10909953KaukuaJPekkarinenTSaneTMustajokiP279200310721080Health-related quality of life in obese outpatients losing weight with very-low-energy diet and behaviour modification: a 2-y follow-up studyInt J Obes Relat Metab Disord12917713DevlinMJZhuAJ2861720012159msJAMA: body image in the balanceJAMA11694160CarpenterKMHasinDSAllisonDBFaithMS9022000251257Relationships between obesity and DSM-IV major depressive disorder, suicide ideation, and suicide attempts: results from a general population studyAm J Public Health10667187SullivanMKarlssonJSjostromLBackmanLBengtssonCBouchardC1791993503512Swedish obese subjects (SOS) — an intervention study of obesity. Baseline evaluation of health and psychosocial functioning in the first 1743 subjects examinedInt J Obes Relat Metab Disord8220652SpitzerRLDevlinMWalshBTHasinDWingRRMarcusMD199411191203Binge eating disorder: a multisite field trial of the diagnostic criteriaInt J Eat DisordMathiasSDWilliamsonCLColwellHHCisternasMGPastaDJStolshekBS641997311322Assessing health-related quality-of-life and health state preference in persons with obesity: a validation studyQual Life Res9248313DollHAPetersenSEStewart-BrownSL822000160170Obesity and physical and emotional well-being: associations between body mass index, chronic illness, and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 questionnaireObes Res10757202MoreiraPPadraoP732006220228Educational, economic and dietary determinants of obesity in Portuguese adults: a cross-sectional studyEat Behav16843224StunkardAJWaddenTA552 Suppl1992524S532SPsychological aspects of severe obesityAm J Clin Nutr1733121FriedmanMABrownellKD11711995320Psychological correlates of obesity: moving to the next research generationPsychol Bull7870862Tables

Mean (SD) Age and Body Mass Index (BMI) of Participants in Study of Quality of Life Among Obese and Normal-Weight Men and Women, Turkey, 2005

CategoryNo. ParticipantsAge, yBMI
Obese (BMI ≥30.0)
Men25440.3 (3.9)33.7 (3.4)
Women149843.3 (4.4)36.3 (9.4)
Normal weight (BMI <25.0)
Men15044.6 (6.0)23.3 (4.4)
Women25041.1 (8.0)22.1 (3.8)

Mean Scores (SD) of Obese and Normal-Weight Men and Women on the Eight Quality-of-Life Domains Measured by the SF-36 Survey, Turkey, 2005a

DomainWomenMen

Obese (n = 1498)Normal Weight (n = 250)PbObese (n = 254)Normal Weight (n = 150)Pb
Physical functioning63.7 (10.5)85.4 (13.3).0369.9 (8.5)90.3 (13.7).004
Role–physical44.4 (5.4)90.5 (13.8).00345.3 (8.4)89.4 (14.6)<.001
Social functioning64.3 (7.3)85.8 (14.4).0364.4 (13.7)86.8 (8.3).003
Role–emotional43.9 (4.6)87.3 (10.9).00776.8 (14.5)88.3 (10.9).73
Mental health54.7 (8.4)70.5 (14.6).0459.6 (9.3)74.4 (13.4).04
Vitality53.8 (14.4)60.3 (5.8).5465.3 (10.3)70.3 (10.7).09
Bodily pain50.3 (14.3)84.3 (13.4).0369.3 (11.4)80.3 (9.4).004
General health perception43.0 (9.7)75.9 (16.4).00464.3 (13.3)79.3 (8.3).004

Obese is defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥30.0; normal weight, as a BMI <25.0.

P values were determined by two-tailed t test.

SF-36 Survey Results (%) Among Participants in Study of Quality of Life Among Obese and Normal-Weight Men and Women, Turkey, 2005

Survey ItemObeseNormal Weight

Women (n = 1498)Men (n = 254)Women (n = 250)Men (n = 150)
In general, health is
Excellent9.010.325.429.8
Very good11.118.630.134.1
Good25.715.128.720.1
Fair20.729.910.113.6
Poor33.526.15.72.4
General health compared with 1 year ago
Much better2.44.910.715.3
Somewhat better9.28.718.617.3
About the same30.726.137.839.1
Somewhat worse34.939.820.915.9
Much worse22.820.612.012.4
Vigorous activities, such as running, lifting heavy objects, participating in strenuous sports
Yes, limited a lot54.949.143.945.7
Yes, limited a little34.342.747.143.0
No, not limited at all10.88.29.011.3
Moderate activities, such as moving a table, pushing a vacuum cleaner, bowling, or playing golf
Yes, limited a lot44.941.335.930.3
Yes, limited a little46.340.547.151.0
No, not limited at all8.718.217.018.7
Climbing several flights of stairs
Yes, limited a lot27.713.12.94.0
Yes, limited a little38.418.17.13.0
No, not limited at all33.968.890.093.0
Climbing one flight of stairs
Yes, limited a lot20.619.819.115.3
Yes, limited a little35.134.132.327.6
No, not limited at all44.346.147.657.1
Walking several blocks
Yes, limited a lot35.133.929.721.0
Yes, limited a little38.448.451.951.1
No, not limited at all26.617.718.427.8
Walking one block
Yes, limited a lot28.630.630.731.0
Yes, limited a little45.151.743.551.1
No, not limited at all26.317.726.817.8
Walking more than a mile
Yes, limited a lot40.733.128.327.5
Yes, limited a little25.145.940.046.9
No, not limited at all34.222.031.726.6
Lifting or carrying groceries
Yes, limited a lot21.19.94.42.0
Yes, limited a little33.913.810.88.0
No, not limited at all45.076.384.890.0
Bending, kneeling, or stooping
Yes, limited a lot20.220.03.02.0
Yes, limited a little30.020.02.61.1
No, not limited at all49.860.094.496.9
Bathing or dressing
Yes, limited a lot10.64.13.70
Yes, limited a little15.312.14.10
No, not limited at all74.183.892.2100.0
Difficulty performing work or other activities
Yes65.960.959.860.6
No34.139.140.238.4
Limited in the kind of work or other activities
Yes65.650.154.947.1
No34.449.946.152.9
Accomplished less than would like at work or other activities (as a result of physical problems)
Yes39.640.320.317.5
No60.459.779.782.5
Cut down on time spent on work or other activities (as a result of physical problems)
Yes46.630.321.617.9
No53.469.778.482.1
During the past 4 weeks, accomplished less than would like at work or other activities (as a result of emotional problems)
Yes49.640.323.819.8
No50.459.776.280.2
Didn't do work or other activities as carefully as usual (as a result of emotional problems)
Yes31.420.211.36.1
No68.679.888.793.9
Cut down on time spent on work or other activities (as a result of emotional problems)
Yes46.630.129.618.5
No53.469.970.481.5
During the past 4 weeks, physical or emotional problems have interfered with social activities
Not at all15.419.440.143.7
Slightly18.630.628.630.2
Moderately53.331.123.313.3
Quite a bit10.69.77.512.0
Extremely2.19.20.50.8
How much bodily pain during the past 4 weeks?
None16.120.832.025.1
Very mild28.125.633.641.9
Mild26.937.110.817.1
Moderate24.314.319.615.5
Severe4.62.14.00.3
Pain interfered with normal work
Not at all10.124.640.250.1
A little bit15.043.830.025.3
Moderately66.320.320.310.9
Quite a bit8.011.09.013.0
Extremely0.70.30.50.7
Felt full of pep
All of the time6.17.610.18.9
Most of the time15.013.520.910.8
A good bit of the time24.325.331.320.8
Some of the time9.313.826.230.7
A little of the time45.030.010.615.9
None of the time0.39.80.912.9
Have been a happy person
All of the time7.614.630.124.1
Most of the time15.023.820.028.6
A good bit of the time16.125.321.315.8
Some of the time50.333.827.027.0
A little of the time8.92.01.64.0
None of the time2.10.500.5
Have felt tired
All of the time5.14.94.93.1
Most of the time4.96.95.07.1
A good bit of the time20.530.122.912.0
Some of the time44.329.714.515.6
A little of the time25.128.417.121.9
None of the time0035.640.3
Have been a very nervous person
All of the time4.17.82.93.9
Most of the time5.59.76.69.0
A good bit of the time10.420.111.322.0
Some of the time34.339.314.512.9
A little of the time25.013.137.132.5
None of the time20.710.027.619.7
Have felt calm and peaceful
All of the time24.527.932.930.1
Most of the time25.519.126.629.0
A good bit of the time10.317.911.812.5
Some of the time20.819.38.19.7
A little of the time9.012.115.35.8
None of the time9.93.75.312.9
Have felt downhearted and blue
All of the time14.119.512.319.5
Most of the time19.419.117.715.8
A good bit of the time20.923.419.631.2
Some of the time22.015.911.118.4
A little of the time15.712.118.88.2
None of the time7.910.020.56.9
Have felt down in the dumps
All of the time10.59.810.99.4
Most of the time15.519.113.68.0
A good bit of the time10.115.614.822.8
Some of the time24.329.315.917.9
A little of the time25.013.016.912.5
None of the time14.613.227.929.4
Have a lot of energy
All of the time5.53.818.915.1
Most of the time8.517.613.623.9
A good bit of the time20.117.117.827.1
Some of the time34.329.330.921.5
A little of the time28.323.014.810.0
None of the time3.39.24.02.4
Have felt worn out
All of the time7.18.99.910.1
Most of the time14.910.69.612.9
A good bit of the time21.819.411.829.1
Some of the time25.932.840.916.0
A little of the time19.120.624.830.8
None of the time11.27.73.01.1
During the past 4 weeks, how much of the time has physical health or emotional problems interfered with social activities?
All of the time13.611.57.13.6
Most of the time18.117.414.15.9
A good bit of the time18.520.318.119.7
Some of the time23.125.221.922.9
A little of the time17.219.924.831.8
None of the time9.55.714.016.1
Health to get worse
Definitely true7.56.95.12.1
Mostly true32.130.112.66.0
Don't know22.829.931.342.5
Mostly false28.725.338.139.4
Definitely false8.97.812.910.0
Get sick a little easier than other people
Definitely true15.31.57.08.0
Mostly true28.923.110.711.0
Don't know35.839.921.315.5
Mostly false12.926.438.639.4
Definitely false7.19.122.426.1
As healthy as anybody I know
Definitely true31.240.121.718.4
Mostly true20.620.515.412.0
Don't know21.818.425.123.1
Mostly false12.311.318.322.5
Definitely false14.19.719.524.0
Health is excellent
Definitely true10.410.621.828.9
Mostly true33.421.825.323.8
Don't know30.128.721.323.9
Mostly false11.427.415.411.3
Definitely false14.711.516.212.1

Some categories do not add to 100% because of rounding.

Obese is defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥30.0; normal weight, as a BMI <25.0.

The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.

Suggested citation for this article: Saraç F, Parýldar S, Duman E, Saygýlý F, Tüzün M, Yýlmaz C. Quality of life for obese women and men in Turkey. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2007 Jul [date cited]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2007/jul/06_0108.htm