Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder that is associated with significant morbidity. Veterans may be at an elevated risk for OSA because of increased prevalence of factors associated with the development and progression of OSA. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical characteristics, comorbidities, polysomnographic findings, and response to treatment of veterans with OSA.
We performed a retrospective chart review of 596 patients undergoing polysomnography at the Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center from February 2005 through December 2007. We assessed potential correlations of clinical data with polysomnography findings and response to treatment.
Polysomnography demonstrated OSA in 76% of patients; 30% had mild OSA, 23% moderate OSA, and 47% severe OSA. Increasing body mass index, neck circumference, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, hypertension, congestive heart failure, and type 2 diabetes correlated with increasing OSA severity. Positive airway pressure treatment was initiated in 81% of veterans with OSA, but only 59% reported good adherence to this treatment method. Of the patients reporting good adherence, a greater proportion of those with severe OSA (27%) than with mild or moderate disease (0%-12%) reported an excellent response to treatment.
The prevalence of metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities increased with increasing OSA severity. Only 59% of treated patients reported good adherence to treatment with positive airway pressure, and response to treatment correlated with OSA severity.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a condition characterized by repeatedly interrupted breathing during sleep, occurs frequently in adults (
OSA is diagnosed by polysomnography and measured by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). An AHI of more than 5 events per hour (
We reviewed the records of 596 patients who underwent polysomnography during 3 years at the Cincinnati Veteran Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). Patients were evaluated on the basis of their AHI, OSA severity, clinical characteristics (eg, neck circumference, BMI), comorbidities, and response to treatment. This protocol was approved by the research and development committee of the Cincinnati VAMC and reviewed by the University of Cincinnati institutional review board, which waived the need for consent.
Health care providers throughout the Cincinnati VAMC referred veterans with suspected sleep disorders to our sleep clinic, where a standardized sleep evaluation was performed and polysomnography scheduled. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and polysomnography reports of 748 veterans who completed evaluation and testing for sleep-disordered breathing in the Cincinnati VAMC from February 2005 through December 2007. From this chart review, we selected for our study group 596 patients who completed the evaluation and polysomnography testing. We excluded 152 patients with previously diagnosed OSA who returned for therapeutic (CPAP/bilevel titration) studies and patients who did not complete testing, terminated the test prematurely, or achieved insufficient or no sleep. All patients who were referred for polysomnography completed a pretest assessment and questionnaire with assistance from the sleep study technologist. Information abstracted from this questionnaire included age, measured weight, self-reported height, smoking history, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score (a measure of sleep propensity) (
We used a Sandman Elite sleep system for polysomnography studies (Sandman Elite, version 8.0, Nellcor Puritan Bennett [Melville] Ltd, Kanata, Ontario, Canada). Monitored channels included bilateral oculograms, 4 electroencephologram channels, electrocardiogram, bilateral anterior tibialis electromyograms (EMG), chin EMG, body position, video channel, PAP level and flow, and snoring microphone. Nasal/oral and PAP airflow were measured by thermocouple, thoracic and abdominal respiratory effort by piezoelectric method, and oxygen saturation (SpO2) by pulse oximetry. We analyzed and scored data according to criteria of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (
Abstracted polysomnography data included total sleep time; sleep latency; REM latency; percentage of sleep achieved in stages 1, 2, 3-4, and REM; number of central, obstructive, and mixed apneas; number of hypopneas; REM-related AHI; and minimal SpO2. If treatment was initiated, we reviewed these same values as well as AHI at optimal treatment pressure. We obtained patient medical history and information on comorbid conditions (ie, hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular accidents, and transient ischemic attacks) from the Cincinnati VAMC electronic medical record. We reviewed all clinical reports from postpolysomnography encounters to assess the patient's adherence to treatment and response to therapy. We graded adherence according to the following criteria: "good," patient reported use of positive pressure equipment for 3 or more nights weekly; "partial," patient reported use of equipment for fewer than 3 nights weekly; "not adherent," no use of equipment; and "not specified/no data," patient had not returned to the sleep clinic for follow-up or there were no comments regarding adherence in other clinical notes. For veterans with good adherence, we graded the response to treatment according to the following criteria: "excellent, "complete or near complete relief of pretreatment sleep-related symptoms, greatly improved energy and alertness, and more restful sleep; "moderate," relief of most sleep-related symptoms but persistent daytime somnolence or fatigue and inconsistently restorative sleep; "no change," persistence of nearly all sleep-related symptoms; and "not specified/no data," patients had not returned to the sleep clinic for follow-up or there were no comments regarding sleep-disordered breathing in records of other clinical encounters.
Because of the high prevalence of severe OSA, we performed further comparisons to determine whether patients with ultrasevere OSA (AHI >60 events/h, 1 respiratory event/min) could be distinguished from those with less severe OSA (AHI 31-60 events/h).
We calculated mean, standard deviation (SD), standard error of the mean, and confidence intervals for continuous variables. Differences between the categorical OSA groups and continuous variables were analyzed by using 1-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons. We calculated categorical variables as frequencies or proportions and analyzed them using χ2 testing with the Marascuilo procedure for multiple comparisons. We defined significant differences as
Patients were predominantly male (559 of 596 [94%]), with a mean (SD) age of 56.0 (11.6) years. Polysomnography demonstrated OSA in 76% of patients; 30% had mild OSA, 23% moderate OSA, and 47% severe OSA. Increasing BMI, neck circumference, ESS scores, hypertension, congestive heart failure, and type 2 diabetes correlated with increasing OSA severity (
Among the OSA patients, the REM-related AHI rose and the SpO2 declined as OSA severity increased (
Treatment was initiated for 81% of the patients with OSA; 73% of patients received CPAP and 27% received bilevel therapy. With CPAP, the proportion of patients with REM rebound increased with increasing OSA severity; one-third of patients with severe OSA experienced REM rebound (
Follow-up information about adherence to treatment was available for 291 of the 368 treated patients (79%). Of the 291, 172 patients (59%) reported using their CPAP or bilevel equipment at least 3 nights weekly, and 27 of 100 (27%) patients with severe OSA reported an excellent response compared with 0 of 40 patients with mild OSA (
Patients with more than 30 AHI events per hour (n = 211) were divided into less severe (n = 99) and ultrasevere (n = 112) categories. More patients with ultrasevere OSA reported a history of observed apnea events, a higher BMI, and concurrent coronary artery disease and pulmonary hypertension than did patients with less severe OSA. Although the minimal SpO2 was less in the ultrasevere group, other polysomnographic findings, treatments, adherence, and outcomes were similar in the 2 groups.
In our study group of 596 patients who underwent complete diagnostic polysomnography testing, 76% had OSA. Of these, 30% had mild, 23% moderate, and 47% severe OSA. BMI, neck circumference, and ESS score increased with worsening OSA severity, as did cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities. Most patients were treated for OSA, but only 59% reported good adherence with positive pressure therapy. More adherent patients with severe OSA than with mild or moderate disease reported an excellent response to treatment. Finally, despite a higher proportion of patients with severe OSA, we were unable to determine clinical or polysomnographic features that distinguished less severe OSA from ultrasevere OSA.
Previous studies within the VHA have shown that 34% to 47% of veterans attending outpatient clinics are at increased risk for OSA (
Based on previous estimates of the proportion of the veteran population that is at increased risk of OSA (34%-47%) (
Previous population-based studies suggest that 15% to 32% of men in the general American population have OSA and that the prevalence of severe OSA is approximately 5% (
In our study, BMI, neck circumference, and ESS score correlated positively with AHI. Participants in the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) who had an AHI of 15 or more were significantly more likely to have an increased BMI, neck circumference, and breathing-pause frequency (
In 118,105 veterans diagnosed with OSA, metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities occurred frequently: diabetes in 32.9%, obesity in 30.5%, hypertension in 60.1%, cardiovascular disease in 27.6%, congestive heart failure in 13.5%, and cerebrovascular accident in 5.7% (
The minimal measured SpO2 declined with increasing OSA severity. Various indices of nocturnal oxygen saturation have been shown to correlate with and predict AHI (
For many patients, apneas and hypopneas can be more prominent during REM sleep (
Our study showed that patients with severe OSA were slightly more likely to adhere to CPAP treatment, a finding similar to that of other investigations (
This study was a retrospective review of polysomnography studies at a single center, the Cincinnati VAMC sleep center. Patients with more severe sleep-related symptoms may have been preferentially referred for sleep evaluation, resulting in higher prevalence and severity of OSA. Only completed diagnostic polysomnography studies were analyzed; including patients who did not complete testing and may not have had OSA would reduce the OSA diagnosis rate. In most of the patients we studied, we used a split-night polysomnography protocol that may have underestimated the presence and severity of OSA. Another limitation was the use of self-reporting for adherence assessment. Although patients' CPAP and bilevel units were examined for the numbers of hours used per night, this evaluation was not performed consistently, and there were insufficient data for analysis. Finally, the severity of hypertension and treatment for hypertension at the time of the polysomnography study were not documented. Only the presence or absence of a hypertension diagnosis was noted.
On the basis of our data and on previous surveys of the prevalence of patients at high risk for OSA within the VHA, we estimate the prevalence of OSA to be 26% to 36% of veterans cared for by the VHA, and the prevalence of severe OSA to be 12% to 17%. Metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities occurred frequently in veterans with OSA, and the prevalence of these disorders increased with OSA severity. Only 59% of treated patients at the Cincinnati VAMC reported good adherence with CPAP treatment, and within this group, response to therapy increased as OSA severity worsened.
Ms Samson was supported by a research grant from the National Review Committee for the Medical Student Training in Aging Research (MSTAR) Program of the American Federation for Aging Research.
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.
Clinical Characteristics of Veterans (N = 596) With Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2005-2007
| Characteristic | Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None (n = 144) | Mild (n = 136) | Moderate (n = 105) | Severe(n = 211) | ||
| 54.0 (13.1) | 55.6 (11.9) | 56.9 (9.4) | 57.1 (11.3) | .07 | |
| 124 (86.1) | 128 (94.1) | 101 (96.2) | 206 (97.6) | <.001 | |
| Morning headaches, n (%) | 52 (38.9) | 52 (30.4) | 41 (44.6) | 75 (39.7) | .69 |
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale | 11.5 (5.7) | 12.2 (5.1) | 11.7 (5.8) | 14.0 (5.4) | <.001 |
| Self-reported snoring, n (%) (n = 535) | 122 (99.0) | 122 (100) | 93 (98.9) | 192 (98.0) | .19 |
| Self-reported apneas, n (%) (n = 413) | 78 (87.6) | 86 (95.5) | 71 (87.6) | 153 (93.9) | .09 |
| BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 | 31.3 (5.8) | 34.7 (7.2) | 35.9 (7.4) | 37.4 (8.5) | <.001 |
| Neck circumference, mean (SD), in | 16.9 (1.6) | 17.9 (1.7) | 17.7 (1.8) | 18.1 (1.6) | <.001 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 89 (61.8) | 106 (77.9) | 81 (77.1) | 172 (81.5) | <.001 |
| Coronary artery disease, n (%) | 34 (23.6) | 36 (26.5) | 27 (25.7) | 55 (26.1) | .38 |
| Congestive heart failure, n (%) | 13 (9.0) | 14 (10.3) | 6 (5.7) | 33 (15.6) | .04 |
| Atrial fibrillation, n (%) | 5 (3.5) | 9 (6.6) | 5 (4.8) | 10 (4.7) | .82 |
| Pulmonary hypertension, n (%) | 3 (2.1) | 6 (4.4) | 3 (2.9) | 6 (2.8) | .40 |
| Type 2 diabetes, n (%) | 33 (22.9) | 69 (50.7) | 44 (41.9) | 98 (46.4) | <.001 |
| Cardiovascular accidents, n (%) | 9 (6.3) | 7 (5.1) | 5 (4.8) | 15 (7.1) | .43 |
| Transient ischemic attacks, n (%) | 1 (0.1) | 3 (2.2) | 0 | 2 (0.9) | .67 |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 54 (37.5) | 30 (22.0) | 39 (37.1) | 62 (29.3) | .02 |
| Never smoked, n (%) | 20 (13.9) | 24 (17.6) | 20 (19.0) | 46 (21.8) | .09 |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index.
None, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) <5; mild, AHI 5-14; moderate, AHI 15-30; severe, AHI >30.
ANOVA with Bonferonni correction was used to compare continuous values and χ2 test with Marasculio procedure was used to compare proportional variables.
None vs severe.
Johns (
None vs severe, mild vs severe, moderate vs severe.
Data were not available for all patients; n = number of patients with this information.
None vs mild, moderate, and severe.
Polysomnographic Findings and Treatment of Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea (N = 596), Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2005-2007
| Findings/Treatment | Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None (n = 144) | Mild (n = 136) | Moderate (n = 105) | Severe (n = 211) | ||
| Pretreatment AHI, mean (SD), events/h | 1.5 (1.9) | 9.2 (2.9) | 21.3 (4.3) | 66.9 (27.5) | NA |
| Pretreatment REM-related AHI, mean (SD), events/h | 5.5 (13.2) | 29.7 (22.9) | 44.0 (32) | 54.1 (34.5) | <.001 |
| Minimum SpO2, mean (SD), % | 88.4 (4.5) | 83.4 (6.3) | 81.9 (8.1) | 78.4 (9.3) | <.001 |
| Patients receiving CPAP treatment, n (%) | NA | 82 (60.3) | 56 (53.3) | 129 (61.1) | .60 |
| CPAP pressure, mean (SD), cm H2O | NA | 8.2 (2.3) | 8.3 (1.9) | 9.9 (2.5) | <.001 |
| Patients receiving bilevel treatment, n (%) | NA | 21 (15.4) | 21 (20.0) | 59 (28.0) | .02 |
| Bilevel pressure inspiration, mean (SD), cm H2O | NA | 12.0 (2.5) | 13.3 (2.7) | 14.5(3.2) | .002 |
| Bilevel pressure expiration, mean (SD), cm H2O | NA | 7.8 (2.5) | 9.2 (2.6) | 10.2 (3.0) | .003 |
| Did not tolerate CPAP or bilevel treatment, n (%) | NA | 13 (9.6) | 17 (16.2) | 17 (8.0) | .08 |
| REM rebound, n (%) (n = 435) | NA | 12 (8.8) | 21 (20.0) | 64 (33.0) | <.001 |
| Posttreatment AHI, mean (SD), events/h | NA | 3.0 (5.1) | 3.6 (4.7) | 5.6 (9.5) | .04 |
Abbreviations: AHI, apnea-hypopnea index; SD, standard deviation; NA, not applicable; REM, rapid eye movement; SpO2, pulse oximetry oxygen saturation; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure.
None, AHI <5; mild, AHI 5-14; moderate, AHI 15-30; severe, AHI >30.
ANOVA with Bonferonni correction was used to compare continuous values, and χ2 test with Marasculio procedure was used to compare proportional variables.
Mild vs moderate and severe.
Mild vs severe, moderate vs severe.
Treatment data are only for patients with OSA.
Mild vs severe.
REM rebound was defined as 20% of sleep time in REM; no. is the number of patients with data concerning REM rebound. Data were not available for all patients; n = number of patients with this information.
Adherence of Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea (n = 368) Treated With Positive Airway Pressure and Response in Patients with Good Adherence to Treatment (n = 172), Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2005-2007
| Adherence/Response | Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity, | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild (n = 103) | Moderate (n = 77) | Severe (n = 188) | ||
| Good | 40 (39) | 32 (42) | 100 (53) | .09 |
| Partial | 20 (19) | 12 (16) | 21 (11) | |
| Not adherent | 18 (17) | 12 (16) | 36 (19) | |
| Not specified/no data | 25 (24) | 21 (27) | 31 (16) | |
| Excellent | 0 | 4 (12) | 27 (27) | .01 |
| Moderate | 25 (62) | 17 (53) | 49 (49) | |
| No change | 1 (2) | 0 | 2 (2) | |
| Not specified/no data | 14 (35) | 11 (34) | 22 (22) | |
None, AHI <5; mild, AHI 5-14; moderate, AHI 15-30; severe, AHI >30.
χ2 test with Marasculio procedure was used to compare proportional variables.
Good, self-reported use of positive pressure equipment for ≥3 nights weekly; partial, self-reported use of equipment <3 nights weekly; not adherent, no use of equipment; not specified/no data, patient did not return to the sleep clinic for follow-up or there were no comments regarding adherence in other clinical notes.
Excellent, complete or near complete relief of pretreatment sleep-related symptoms, greatly improved energy and alertness, and more restful sleep; moderate, relief of most sleep-related symptoms but persistent daytime somnolence or fatigue and inconsistently restorative sleep; no change, persistence of nearly all sleep-related symptoms; not specified/no data, patients did not return to the sleep clinic for follow-up or there were no comments regarding sleep disordered breathing in other clinical notes.
Mild vs severe.