Online J Public Health InformOnline J Public Health InformOJPHIOnline Journal of Public Health Informatics1947-2579University of Illinois at Chicago Library3692930ojphi-05-81ISDS 2012 Conference AbstractsMalaria Trends in Six Outpatient Sites in Uganda, 2008—2011NassaliRuth K.*1MpimbazaArthur1KakeetoStella1SserwangaAsadu1KizitoFred1RubahikaDenis2MilesMelody3ChangMichelle3DorseyGrant4KamyaMoses1Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda;National Malaria Control Program, Kampala, Uganda;Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, USA;Univeristy of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USARuth K. Nassali, E-mail: ruth.nassali@yahoo.com442013201351e81©2013 the author(s)2013This is an Open Access article. Authors own copyright of their articles appearing in the Online Journal of Public Health Informatics. Readers may copy articles without permission of the copyright owner(s), as long as the author and OJPHI are acknowledged in the copy and the copy is used for educational, not-for-profit purposes.Objective

To estimate trends in malaria morbidity at six sentinel sites in Uganda.

Introduction

Over the past five years, efforts to control malaria have been intensified in Uganda (1). With the intensification of these efforts, accurate and timely data are needed to monitor impact of the interventions and guide malaria control program planning (2, 3). We present data on trends in malaria burden over four years from six out-patient health facilities located in regions of varying malaria endemicity in Uganda.

Methods

The study utilized data from the on-going malaria sentinel surveillance program involving six level IV outpatient health facilities: Aduku, Nagongera, Walukuba, Kasambya, Kihihi and Kamwezi. Major malaria control interventions between 2008 and 2010 in sub-counties where these sites are located included Indoor residual spraying (IRS) conducted in Aduku; insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) distributed in Nagongera and Kamwezi. There has been no major control intervention(s) in sub-counties where Walukuba, Kasambya and Kihihi are located. Treatment with artemisinin-combination therapies have however been deployed nationally. Patient information; demographics, malaria test results and diagnosis are recorded on a standardized patient record. The test positivity rate (TPR) defined as the number of persons testing positive for malaria divided by the total number of persons tested was calculated by year from 2008 to 2011 for two age categories (< 5 years and > 5 years).

Results

A total of 560,586 patients were seen, of which 25% were <5 years. Over 325,500 patients were suspected to have malaria, with the proportion of these having a confirmatory test done increasing from 62% in 2008 to 98% in 2011. Between 2008 and 2011, the proportion of the <5 years testing positive for malaria significantly decreased from 66% to 34% in Aduku, from 61% to 41% in Nagongera, and from 54% to 24% in Kamwezi. However, significant increases were seen in Kasambya and Kihihi from 41% to 51% and from 28% to 44% respectively. The TPR at Walukuba remained stable (41% to 45%). Similar trends were seen in the > 5 years.

Conclusions

Sentinel site surveillance has been a reliable and timely method/tool for monitoring trends in malaria morbidity thereby informing and guiding the Uganda malaria control program.

SurveillanceMalariaTrends

Acknowledgments to NMCP Team/MOH, CDC/PMI, UMSP Team, Health Facility Staff.

ReferencesYekaAGasasiraAMpimbazaAAchanJMalaria in Uganda: challenges to control on the long road to elimination: I. Epidemiology and current control effortsActa Trop.20123121318495Epub 2011 Mar 21.21420377BremanJGHollowayCNMalaria surveillance countsAm J Trop Med Hyg200777364718165473BryceJRoungouJBNguyen-DinhPNaimoliJFBremanJGEvaluation of national malaria control programmes in AfricaBull World Health Organ199472371818062394