pmc10177389450217Curr ProtocCurr ProtocCurrent protocols2691-1299397912661173760810.1002/cpz1.70086NIHMS2044136ArticleModeling Malignant Mesothelioma in Genetically Engineered MiceKadariyaYuwaraj13SementinoEleonora1HuaXiang2KappesDietmar J.2TestaJoseph R.13Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USANuclear Dynamics and Cancer Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USACorresponding authors: yuwaraj.kadariya@fccc.edu; joseph.testa@fccc.edu2412202412025011202651e70086e70086

Mesothelioma is a lethal cancer of the serosal lining of the body cavities. Risk factors include environmental and genetic factors. Asbestos exposure is considered the principal environmental risk factor, but other carcinogenic mineral fibers, such as erionite, also have a causal role. Pathogenic germline (heritable) mutations of specific genes, especially BAP1, are thought to predispose to mesothelioma in about 10% of cases. Somatic mutations and deletions of specific tumor suppressor genes, particularly BAP1, CDKN2A/B, and NF2, occur frequently in human mesothelioma, and asbestos-exposed mice with heterozygous deletions of any one of these genes have been shown to develop mesothelioma more often and at an accelerated rate than in control animals. Autochthonous mesothelioma mouse models, which are genetically engineered to carry multiple genetic lesions matching those observed in the human disease counterpart, closely resemble the disease phenotype and the extensive inflammatory responses that characterize human mesothelioma. Because autochthonous mice do not require asbestos and form tumors rapidly, these models are invaluable for assessing novel therapeutic strategies in an immunocompetent setting. The overlapping genetic, epigenetic, and immune environment of the tumors observed in these genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) with those found in human primary mesothelioma specimens supports the clinical relevance of these preclinical models. This review presents protocols for studies of asbestos-induced mesothelioma in GEMMs and non-carcinogenic conditional knockout models of mesothelioma, including an example of a preclinical application. These models are invaluable for understanding the biological underpinnings of mesothelioma and for testing new therapeutics and chemoprevention or interception agents.

Basic Protocol 1: Generation of a GEMM with a Germline Bap1 Knockout Allele

Basic Protocol 2: Generation of GEMMs with Germline Bap1 Knock-in Alleles

Basic Protocol 3: Asbestos Carcinogenicity Investigations with GEMMs

Basic Protocol 4: Preclinical Chemoprevention and Chemotherapy Studies Using a GEMM with Asbestos-Induced Mesothelioma

Basic Protocol 5: Generation of a GEMM with Conditional Knockout of Bap1

Basic Protocol 6: Generation of a Conditional Knockout Model of Mesothelioma

Mesotheliomaasbestos carcinogenicityintrapleural tumorsintraperitoneal tumorsconditional knockout miceINTRODUCTION

Mesothelioma is an incurable cancer of the serosal linings of the chest, abdomen, and tunica vaginalis causally linked to asbestos exposure. Both environmental and genetic risk factors influence disease susceptibility (Carbone et al., 2019). Asbestos-induced inflammation and DNA damage play critical roles in mesothelioma pathogenesis, with a latency period of several decades. Inactivating somatic mutations and deletions of the tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) BAP1, CDKN2A/B, and NF2 are the most frequent genetic lesions in human malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Alterations of these three TSGs are frequently seen in various combinations in an MPM (Bott et al., 2011; Bueno et al., 2016). The idea that inactivation of these specific TSGs is so prevalent implies that the signaling pathways regulated by these genes are fundamental to the development of MPM (Testa & Berns, 2020).

Mesothelioma patients, MPM in particular, are often surgically inoperable and refractory to standard therapy. Immunotherapies have become a standard treatment for MPM patients. Still, the durability of most therapeutic responses remains short and ultimately results in relapse (Fennell et al., 2022). Consequently, there is an urgent need for innovative approaches to reduce the overall incidence of mesothelioma and improve therapies. In vivo models are required to investigate mesothelioma disease pathogenesis to aid in this effort and provide faithful preclinical models to identify novel therapies that might advance toward clinical trials (Testa & Berns, 2020). There is also hope that specific drugs or natural substances could be used to prevent cancer in individuals who are at high risk of developing the disease as a means of early intervention (chemoprevention) or by intervening at an early stage in the tumorigenic process before a full-blown incurable tumor develops (cancer interception) (Blackburn, 2011).

There are several recent reviews of preclinical mouse models of mesothelioma and their uses in studying disease pathogenesis and discovering and developing mesothelioma therapies (Blanquart et al., 2020; Testa & Berns, 2020; Seastedt et al., 2021; Shamseddin et al., 2021). In addition to genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), a MexTAg transgenic mouse model utilizes the mesothelin gene promoter to express SV40 large T antigen specifically in the mesothelial lining (Robinson et al., 2006, 2011). Although this model does not have any of the genetic hallmarks attributed to the human disease, gene expression profiling of mesotheliomas from MexTAg mice has been shown to exhibit a concordant set of deregulated genes compared to normal mesothelial cells that overlapped with the deregulated genes between human mesotheliomas and mesothelial cells (Robinson et al., 2015). Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, in which tumor fragments are grafted into immunodeficient recipient mice, more closely recapitulate the human disease and typically maintain their human stromal features for multiple passages. PDX models permit studies of inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity and attributes dictated by the distinct genetic features of individual tumors (Nabavi et al., 2018). In contrast, their propagation must be performed in immunodeficient mice unless expensive and technically demanding humanized host models are used. Orthotopic intrapleural models have also been reported. For example, Servais and colleagues described a murine immunocompetent orthotopic model of pleural cancer that recapitulates the human pleural setting and microenvironment and can be used in combination with bioluminescent imaging to monitor tumor burden and allow for studies of inflammation on tumor progression (Servais et al., 2011). However, for preclinical investigations of therapies targeting human antigens, immunodeficient models are required to perform studies on xenografted human cancer cell lines. The necessity to use immunodeficient mice as a host for such graft experiments complicates the assessment of immunomodulating effects.

While no single model is likely to have every desirable feature, the malignancy developing in the model should mimic at least several of the most relevant features of human mesothelioma, such as its pathology, its genetic driver alterations, its gene expression profiles, and the inflammatory phenotype that is characteristic of the disease (Testa & Berns, 2020). Ideally, the model should also exhibit a reproducible and short tumor latency period to allow for preclinical intervention studies. Given the ability of asbestos to induce inflammation that plays a role in mesothelioma pathogenesis (Wang et al., 2004; Stadlmann et al., 2006; Kadariya et al., 2016b), asbestos carcinogenicity models are also invaluable for assessing gene-environment interactions in GEMMs. Here, we present GEMM protocols used in our laboratory to investigate gene-environment interactions and gene-gene cooperativity in mesothelioma susceptibility and tumor progression.

BASIC PROTOCOL 1: GENERATION OF A GEMM WITH A GERMLINE <italic toggle="yes">Bap1</italic> KNOCKOUT ALLELE

This protocol describes how a GEMM with a heterozygous deletion of a tumor suppressor gene, e.g., Bap1, implicated in human mesothelioma pathogenesis, is generated for subsequent asbestos carcinogenicity studies. Interested investigators could use a similar approach to develop a heterozygous deletion of other tumor suppressor genes in mesothelioma as new players are implicated in future years.

To assess the susceptibility of a heterozygous mutant GEMM, e.g., Bap1+/− mice, to the carcinogenic effects of asbestos, Bap1+/− and Bap1+/+ (wild-type, WT) littermates were chronically injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with asbestos per our usual method (Altomare et al., 2005; Altomare et al., 2011; Menges et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014; Kadariya et al., 2016a, 2016b), as described in detail below. Although direct delivery of asbestos into the peritoneal cavity is an unnatural route of exposure, the pathology and growth pattern of the tumors are similar to human diffuse mesotheliomas (Marsella et al., 1997; Altomare et al., 2005). Furthermore, asbestos administration by inhalation or intratracheal injection requires special equipment, and this approach induces relatively few mesotheliomas that necessitate a much longer time to form. Using the i.p. protocol described here, asbestos-exposed mice with germline heterozygous mutations of either Bap1, Nf2, orCdkn2a alone develop mesothelioma with median survivals of 8–10 months (Altomare et al., 2005; Altomare et al., 2011; Kadariya et al., 2016a; Xu et al., 2014), whereas asbestos-exposed WT littermates showed delayed onset and fewer tumors, with median survivals of 12–14 months.

Zinc finger nuclease (ZFN) technology (Meyer et al., 2010; Cui et al., 2011) can be used to generate heterozygous Bap1 mice with knockout or knock-in alleles in an FVB genetic background. The specific method is similar to that previously reported for ZFN-mediated gene targeting in mouse embryos (Mookerjee-Basu et al., 2019). Three different heterozygous Bap1 GEMMs are described here using ZFN technology: Bap1 knockout (Bap1+/−), Bap1 “Lou” knock-in (Bap1+/L), and Bap1 “Wis” knock-in (Bap1+/W). The Bap1 knockout (Bap1+/−) is described in Basic Protocol 1.

NOTE: All protocols using live animals must first be reviewed and approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and follow officially approved procedures for the care and use of laboratory animals. Note also that while the materials and methods below have been reported already in brief (Xu et al., 2014; Kadariya et al., 2016a, 2016b; Kukuyan et al., 2019), they are presented in the “present tense” here as detailed protocols.

Materials

Zinc finger expression plasmids (Sigma-Aldrich)

NEBuffer 4, 10X (New England Biolabs, cat. no. B7004S)

100X BSA

XbaI (New England Biolabs, cat. no. R0145S)

Pipettes and tips

Nuclease free H2O

UltraPure DNase/RNase-Free distilled water (ThermoFisher, cat. no. 10977023)

MessageMAX T7 ARCA-Capped Message Transcription Kit (Cellscript, cat. no. C-MMA60710)

Poly(A) Tailing Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat. no. AM1350)

MEGAClear Transcription Clean-Up Kit (ThermoFisher, cat. no. AM1908)

100 mM DTT

DEPC-RNase-free Treated Water (ThermoFisher, cat. no. AM9915G)

PPE (disposable gown, head cover, gloves, safety glasses, N95 mask, shoe covers)

FVB/N F1 virgin females

Pregnant mare’s serum gonadotropin (PMSG; stock solution: 50 IU/ml) (Prospec HOR-272)

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (Millipore Sigma C-1063)

ALPHA-dri bedding

Natural Crinklets (SAFE Enrichment)

Nestlets (Ancare, cat. no. NES3600)

Exel International Insulin Syringes (Fisher Scientific, cat. no.14–841-31)

Wescodyne/alcohol

Stereomicroscope

M2 culture medium (Millipore Sigma M-7167)

T10E0.1 Buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.1 mM EDTA pH 8.0), (Biosolution, cat. no. OT010)

Nikon inverted microscope with DIC optics, Leitz micromanipulators, and cooling stage

Ketamine-acepromazine-xylazine cocktail (2.5 mg ketamine, 0.05 acepromazine, 0.25 xylazine

per ml); stock solution can be stored at 4°C for up to 3 months

Glass pipettes (500-micron inner diameter)

Mouse surgical set (autoclave before use)

Absorbable suture (5–0)

Stainless steel wound clips

Autoclave

Warming tray

Puregene Tissue Kit (Qiagen, cat. no. 158063)

PfuTurbo DNA Polymerase (Agilent Technologies, cat. no. 600250)

dNTP Mixture (Takara, cat. no. 4030)

QIAquick Gel DNA Extraction kit (Qiagen, cat. no. 28706)

DNA sequencing (Genewiz from Azenta Life Sciences)

Direct Mouse Genotyping kit (APExBIO, cat. no. K1025)

GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega, cat. no. M712)

Forward and Reverse primers for genotyping (Integrated DNA Technologies IDT)

rCutSmart Buffer, 10X containing recombinant albumin (New England Biolabs, cat. no. B6004S)

HpaII restriction enzyme (New England Biolabs, cat. no. R0171)

Hpy188III restriction enzyme (New England Biolabs, cat. no. R0622)

Thermal cycler (PCR machine)

Water bath (37°C)

CD-1 mice (males and pseudopregnant females)

PR1MA Agarose (Midsci, cat. no. MIDSCI-500)

Tris-Borate-EDTA buffer, 10X (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, cat. no. sc-296650)

PR1MA SmartCheck DNA Ladders (MidSci, cat. no. PR4010)

Ethidium Bromide Solution 10 mg/mL (ThermoFisher, cat. no 17898)

Generation of a <italic toggle="yes">Bap1</italic> GEMM with a Knockout Allele

Design custom ZFNs targeting a Bap1 sequence with an intronic cutting site targeting Bap1 intron 5. Use Sigma-Aldrich’s custom service to create ZFN expression plasmids. This service includes validation of the targets in mammalian Neuro-2a cells. Note that the sequence for the binding and cutting sites of the ZFNs is TGCTCCCCAGTAGTCACTGATGGCTGTGCACG, with the spacer between the binding sites underlined.

Linearize the ZFN expression plasmids cutting at the XbaI site located at the 3′ end of the FokI ORF.

Set up the following digestion for XbaI digestion and incubate at 37°C for 2 h, followed by post-digestion purification.
ZFN plasmid (20 ηg)12 μl
NEBuffer 4 (10X)10 μl
100X BSA1 μl
XbaI (20 U/μl)8 μl
Nuclease free H2O69 μl
Total volume100 μl

In vitro transcription: Prepare 5′ capped and 3′ poly(A)-tailed messenger RNAs using MessageMAX T7 ARCA-Capped Message Transcription (Cellscript) and Poly(A) Tailing (ThermoFisher) Kits and purify RNAs using a MEGAClear Transcription Clean-Up Kit (ThemoFisher), followed by incubation at 37°C for 1 h.
Plasmid DNA2 μl
10X transcription Buffer4 μl
MessageMAX T7 ARCA Cap/NTP Premix16 μl
100 mM DTT4 μl
RNase free water10 μl
MessageMAX T7 enzyme solution4 μl
Total Volume40 μl

Below is a workflow diagram of the procedures for isolating fertilized eggs, injecting pronuclear fluid, and implanting microinjected embryos (Fig. 1).

Fertilized Egg Isolation

Inject donor FVB/N F1 virgin females (4–5 weeks of age) i.p. with PMSG (pregnant mare’s serum gonadotropin 5 IU/0.1 ml) on day 1 at 4 pm and hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin 5 IU/0.1 ml) i.p. on day 3 at 3 pm, and immediately place with stud males (2–6 months of age; 1 male per female). The animals are housed on ALPHA-dri bedding with bedding enrichment such as Natural Crinklets or Nestlets to promote a favorable environment for mating.

On day 4, sacrifice the pregnant donor females by cervical dislocation. The abdomen is wiped with Wescodyne, and a mid-ventral, longitudinal incision is made through the skin and body wall. Under a stereomicroscope, remove the oviducts and place them in sterile M2 culture medium, where the fertilized eggs are flushed from the ampulla with 100 μl of M2 medium.

Pronuclear injection

Under aseptic conditions, prepare a master mix containing DNA construct (5–10 ng/μl) and ZFN mRNAs (20–40 ng/μl) in injection buffer (T10-E0.1 buffer).

Deliver an estimated 0.5–1 pL of the master mix into one (of two) pronuclei of each fertilized single-cell mouse embryo by microinjection using an inverted microscope (Nikon) equipped with DIC optics, Leitz micromanipulators and a cooling stage.

Implantation of microinjected embryos

Pseudopregnant females are obtained by mating 4–6-month-old CD-1 females to vasectomized CD-1 males overnight and then selecting for plugged CD-1 females.

Anesthetize the pseudopregnant recipient female mice (day 0.5 pc from sterile mating with vasectomized males) by i.p. injection of ketamine-acepromazine-xylazine cocktail at a dose of 100 μl per 25 g mouse.

Autoclave surgical instruments before surgery. Prepare the incision site of the recipient mice with betadine/alcohol and shave. Use a marker pen to indicate the location of the longitudinal incision that is then made through the skin at a point approximately level with the kidneys. Make a similar incision through the body wall (Fig. 2).

Expose one oviduct. Use a stereomicroscope to guide the transplant of the injected embryos into the ampulla of the oviduct using a 500-μ (inner diameter) glass pipette (Fig. 3A). Close the body wall with two sterile 5–0 absorbable sutures, and close the skin with stainless steel wound clips (Fig. 3B). All surgery is performed under aseptic conditions in a dedicated surgical area. All surgical supplies and solutions are single-use and sterile.

During recovery from surgery, house the mice on a warming tray until they display normal movement (usually for <4 h). Remove the stainless steel wound clips 7–14 days after surgery. Surgical staff should monitor the rodents for pain/distress and infection at least once daily.

Genotyping of heterozygous <italic toggle="yes">Bap1</italic> knockout mice

Within 7–10 days (check the specific number of days permitted by consulting your institution’s IACUC), clip the tails of the pups derived from the pseudopregnant mice. Tail DNA samples are obtained by digestion and purification using a Gentra Puregene tissue DNA extraction kit (Qiagen).

Genotype the tails from all pups by amplifying DNAs using forward primer, 5’-AGGCTTTGCTGCTAAATGAGA-3’; and reverse primer, 5’-CCCTGAGACCCAGAAAATCA-3’. Thermal PCR cycling conditions are 95°C (5 minutes), followed by 35 cycles at 95°C for denaturation (30 seconds), 58°C for annealing (30 seconds), and 72°C for extension (45 seconds), with a final extension at 72°C (10 minutes).
10X PfuTurbo buffer2.5 μl
dNTPs2.5 μl
Forward primer 10 μm1.0 μl
Reverse primer 10 μm1.0 μl
PfuTurbo DNA polymerase0.5 μl
Nuclease free water16.5 μl
DNA1.0 μl
Total Volume25.0 μl

Resolve the PCR products on a 1% agarose gel for 30 minutes. Extract and purify the DNA from the gel using a QIAquick Gel DNA extraction kit (Qiagen) for subsequent DNA sequence analysis.

Send the PCR amplified products for sequencing to verify correct targeting. Sequencing can be done in-house or commercially, e.g., Genewiz from Azenta Life Sciences.

After identifying positive founder pups using the above mutation-specific primers, these animals are mated to FVB/N mice to generate stable heritable knockout lines. Genotyping is performed by extracting DNA from the mouse tails of the offspring using a Direct Mouse Genotyping Kit. PCR is performed using a GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega).
2X GoTaq Green Master Mix10 μl
forward primer 10 μm1 μl
reverse primer 10μm1 μl
Nuclease free Water7 μl
DNA1 μl
Total Volume20 μl
 Thermal PCR cycling conditions are 95°C (5 minutes), followed by 29 cycles at 94°C (30 seconds), 60°C for annealing (30 seconds), and 72°C for extension (35 seconds), with a final extension at 72°C (10 minutes). Representative genotyping of mice with a germline heterozygous Bap1 knockout allele is shown in Fig. 4.

NOTE: The net effect of the Bap1 deletion of exons 6 and 7 deletion is similar, but not identical, to that observed in a human BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome (BAP1-TPS) family having an intron 6 splice site mutation in BAP1 that results in loss of exon 7 (Testa et al., 2011).

BASIC PROTOCOL 2: GENERATION OF GEMMS WITH <italic toggle="yes">Bap1</italic> KNOCK-IN ALLELES

As an alternative to generating a mouse with a germline Bap1 knockout allele, the investigator may create a mouse model with a knock-in allele of interest. For example, we created two mouse knock-in models with inactivating Bap1 mutations (Bap1+/W and Bap1+/L) identical to those observed in the first two reported mesothelioma families with germline BAP1 mutations, i.e., families Wis (from Wisconsin) and Lou (from Louisiana) (Testa et al. 2011). The investigator may use the same ZFN protocol described above but different custom ZFNs. Fertilized egg isolation, pronuclear injection, and implantation of microinjected embryos are performed as described above. The Bap1 Lou knock-in mutation in exon 16 creates the identical stop codon seen in human family L. The Bap1 Wis knock-in mutation generates an mRNA that differs from that observed in human family W (due to sequence divergence in exon 7 in human and mouse genomes). However, Bap1 Wis-encoded mRNAs lose at least a portion of exon 7, and the net result is the same as the human W mutation, i.e., a premature truncation of the predicted gene product. A schematic diagram showing the cutting sites of the ZFNs and relevant portions of the respective Bap1 knock-in alleles for the Bap1+/W and Bap1+/L mutant models is shown in Fig. 5. For the Bap1+/W knock-in model, the custom ZFNs targeted the same sequence described above with a cutting site of ZFNs targeting Bap1 intron 5. For the Bap1+/L knock-in model, we designed custom ZFNs targeting a Bap1 sequence with a cutting site of ZFNs targeting Bap1 exon 16. Sigma-Aldrich validated all these targets in mammalian cells. After the knock-in founder lines are identified, the following steps are used for genotyping the offspring.

Materials

The materials are identical to those in Basic Protocol 1, except that the ZFN expression plasmids (Sigma-Aldrich) and genotyping primers and conditions differ.

Genotyping <italic toggle="yes">Bap1</italic><sup>+/<italic toggle="yes">W</italic></sup> mice

A Direct Mouse Genotyping kit (APExBIO) is used to extract DNA for genotyping.

Amplify the DNA by PCR amplification using the forward primer using the forward primer mBap1 E6–2F: 5’-ATTTTTAGAGCAGCAAAGGATATGCAA-3’ and the reverse primer mBap1 E7–2R:5’- TCCATCCAATTCAAAGAGCCT-3’. Thermal PCR cycling conditions used are 95°C (5 minutes), followed by 35 cycles at 95°C for denaturation (30 seconds), 58°C for annealing (30 seconds), and 72°C for extension (45 seconds), with final extension at 72°C (10 minutes).
2X GoTaq Green Master Mix10 μl
mBap1 E6–2F primer 10 μm1 μl
mBap1 E7–2R primer 10 μm1 μl
Nuclease free Water7 μl
DNA1 μl
Total Volume20 μl

Subject the PCR product to enzymatic digestion using the restriction enzyme HpaII to identify the knock-in alleles.
Nuclease free water12.5 μl
10X rCutSmart Buffer2.0 μl
HpaII restriction enzyme0.5 μl
PCR product5.0 μl
Total volume20.0 μl

Incubate the reaction at 37°C for 1 h and resolve undigested and digested PCR products side by side on 2% agarose gels for 30 minutes. Fig. 6 shows an example of genotyping heterozygous Bap1+/W knock-in mice.

Genotyping <italic toggle="yes">Bap1</italic><sup>+/<italic toggle="yes">L</italic></sup> mice

Use a Direct Mouse Genotyping Kit (APExBIO) to extract DNA from individual mouse tails for genotyping.

Amplify the DNA by PCR using the forward primer LouDonor ZFN-2F. 5’-AGGTGGGTGACCCCTCTACT-3’ and the reverse primer LouDonor ZFN-2R 5’-CACTAGGTTGGCCAGCATTC-3’. The thermal cycling conditions are denaturation at 95°C (5 minutes), followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C (30 seconds), 60°C for annealing (30 seconds), 72°C for extension (30 seconds), with a final extension at 72°C (10 minutes).
2X GoTaq Green Master Mix10 μl
LouDonor ZFN-2F primer 10 μm1 μl
LouDonor ZFN-2R primer 10 μm1 μl
Nuclease free H2O7 μl
DNA1 μl
Total volume20 μl

To identify the knock-in allele, perform an enzymatic reaction on the PCR product using the restriction enzyme Hpy188III.
Nuclease free water12.5 μl
10X rCutSmart Buffer2.0 μl
Hpy188III0.5 μl
PCR product5.0 μl
Total volume20.0 μl

Incubate the reaction at 37°C for 1 h and resolve undigested and digested PCR products side by side on a 2% agarose gel for 30 minutes. Fig. 7 presents a representative genotypic analysis of heterozygous Bap1+/W knock-in mice.

BASIC PROTOCOL 3: Asbestos Carcinogenicity Investigations With GEMMS

To assess whether mice with a germline heterozygous mutation of a tumor suppressor gene such as Bap1 may have increased susceptibility to the carcinogenic effects of asbestos, it is necessary to expose a heterozygous Bap1-mutant cohort and a Bap1 wild-type (WT) cohort to asbestos and then monitor for tumor development over a sufficient amount of time for the disease to develop. To have an adequate number of animals for robust statistical analyses, the investigator should consult with a biostatistician experienced in studies of mouse models before beginning an experiment. For tumor suppressor genes known to play a significant role in mesothelioma tumorigenesis, e.g., Bap1, Nf2, and Cdkn2a, 20–30 mice per group have been sufficient to detect highly significant differences in the incidence and time of onset of mesotheliomas between mutant and WT groups, even when low doses of chrysotile of crocidolite were used (Kadariya et al., 2024).

Regarding the asbestos doses used for asbestos carcinogenicity experiments, we have followed the original protocol of Marsella and colleagues, which we have referred to as our standard total dose of 3.2.mg per mouse, with individual doses given every 21 days (Marsella et al., 1997). Lower crocidolite and chrysotile asbestos doses may also be used successfully, with individual doses modified accordingly (Kadariya et al., 2024). The original study by Marsella et al. (1997) was performed on Tp53-deficient mice; it consisted of 8 doses of 0.4 mg crocidolite given every 21 days when the initial asbestos-induced inflammation had subsided. Some of our more recent studies have been conducted with four doses of 0.8 mg every 21 days. Thus, the same total dose was used, but the time allotted to dosing was decreased. This has been necessary for investigations with compound heterozygous animals, e.g., Nf2+/−;Cdkn2a+/− mice, because some mice succumbed to tumors before all asbestos injections had been given.

Materials

PPE (disposable gown, head cover, safety glasses, N95 mask, shoe covers)

Biological Safety Cabinet

Chemical fume hood

Baking oven

Crocidolite Asbestos Analytical Standard Sample UICC (SPI Supplies, cat. no. 02704A-AB) or

Chrysotile B Canadian Asbestos Analytical Standard UICC (SPI Supplies, cat. no. 02740A-AB)

3M N95 Healthcare Particulate Respirators and Surgical Masks, 1860 Series (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 18–992)

3M Rugged Comfort 6500 Series Half Facepiece Reusable Respirator (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 19–096-912)

3M 6000 Series Cartridge/P100 Particulate Filter Combinations (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 18–999-4552)

MicroGuard MP, Microporous Coverall with attached hood & boot, elastic wrist, elastic back, open ankle (Thomas Scientific, cat. no. 21A00P353–8019)

Face Shield (Fisher Scientific, cat. no 19–181-800C)

Ansell MICROFLE SafeGri SG-375 (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 19–048-575D)

Reagent Alcohol (Denatured Alcohol), 70% (v/v) Ricca Chemical (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 2546705)

Heterozygous Bap1 mice

Econo-Cage Disposable System (irradiated) with air grommet (Lab Products, cat. no. LPI no. 72014-GI)

HBSS, no calcium, no magnesium, no phenol red (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 14–175-079)

PYREX Reusable Media Storage Bottles (Fisher Scientific, 06–423B)

Aluminum foil (Reynolds)

Magnetic stir bar

Magnetic stirrer

Ultrasonic cleaner (Branson 1510)

Earphone-type sound mufflers

BD General Use and PrecisionGlide Hypodermic Needles, 25 gauge(Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 14–826-49)

BD Slip Tip Sterile Syringes, BD 309659, 1 ml. (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 14–823-434)

BD Alcohol Swabs (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 1223K92)

Ziploc bags

Red sharps container

Autoclavable Biohazard Waste Bags 48 × 37 in (Fisher Scientific, cat. no.14–828-248)

Anti-Mesothelin polyclonal antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. no. PA5–79698)

Anti-WT1 (Wilms Tumor protein) antibody [CAN-R9(IHC)-56–2] (Abcam, cat. no ab89901)

Anti-Cytokeratin 8 antibody, clone TROMA-1 (Sigma-Aldrich MABT329M)

GraphPad Prism Software (Dotmatics)

CAUTION: Asbestos is a known human category I carcinogen, and its use in a Laboratory Animal Facility must follow standard operating procedures (SOP) in accordance with Institutional Biosafety Committee policies and approval. All personnel should complete available institutional training sessions concerning biological safety and biological waste issues and read and fully adhere to SOP for safe handling of asbestos. Personnel must wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), including a properly fitted respirator (minimum P2 filter, half face disposable particulate respirator; non-disposable particulate respirator with cartridge may be a better option, with silicon preferred versus rubber, as it fits better and not as hot). Disposable Nitrile gloves are recommended when handling asbestos. We recommend double-gloving. Safety glasses with side shields or chemical splash goggles are also required. All operations involving dry asbestos fibers must be conducted in a certified ducted Biological Safety Cabinet or a properly operating and certified chemical fume hood. In our institution, mice are maintained in disposable cages in an isolated carcinogen room to facilitate the care of the animals while reducing the risk to the staff involved in the experiments. Alternatively, disposable cages may be used when mice are first injected with asbestos fibers and kept for 7 days in the carcinogen room in the chemical fume hood, after which they can be placed in regular cages and moved out of the carcinogen room to the main colony area. Syringes used for carcinogen injections must be safety-engineered (self-sheathing syringes, luer-lock syringes, etc.). Importantly, never transfer asbestos in powder form. Dry asbestos fibers can quickly become airborne, increasing the likelihood of inhalation.

Preparation of Asbestos Solutions

Purchase UICC-grade asbestos from SPI Supplies (100 mg per container).

A fresh asbestos solution is prepared each time that mice are injected.

Unscrew the lid of the asbestos container, gently place a small bar magnet in the container, and screw back the lid, leaving it loosely covered so that the container will not crack while baking the asbestos. If the original asbestos container is too small to dissolve asbestos in the required volume, it should first be dissolved in about 5 ml of HBSS and then transferred to a larger sterile container to dilute further.

Place the whole container in a glass beaker, cover it with aluminum foil, affix indicator tape to the outside, and bake it in the oven.

Bake at 150°C for 18 h under 15 pounds of constant pressure to inactivate endotoxins that may be present in the asbestos.

The next day, let the oven cool to room temperature and check that the indicator sticker’s color has changed. This ensures that the asbestos has baked appropriately.

Place the asbestos beaker under the chemical fume hood.

Unscrew the asbestos container, add the required amount of Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS), and then mix for 30 minutes on a magnetic stirrer under the fume hood. Adding 62.5 ml of HBSS to 100 mg asbestos equals 1.6 mg/ml asbestos, and injecting 0.5 ml of this solution i.p. per mouse equals a dose of 0.8 mg.

After 30 minutes of mixing, use a sonicator or ultrasonic cleaner to dissolve the asbestos homogeneously for 40 minutes. NOTE: Wear earphone-type sound mufflers to protect your hearing while sonicating.

Place any contaminated paper towels, pipette tips, syringes, needles, gloves, asbestos containers, and vials in Ziploc bags. Double-bag them and deposit them in a red Sharps container marked “Carcinogens.”

Asbestos Injections and Follow-up

NOTE: The endpoint of the experiment may vary depending on the investigator’s goals. Our endpoint is typically tumor onset, evidence of illness, or weight loss greater than 10% of body weight (see further details below). In such cases, some animals may not succumb until more than 15 months, when the experiment will be terminated. Alternatively, the investigator may choose to terminate the experiment at a predetermined time point, e.g., 12 months, when most asbestos-exposed, untreated mice will have succumbed to mesothelioma.

Begin the study with 8−10-week-old Bap1+/− and WT littermates from the Basic Protocols detailed above to assess the tumorigenic effect of asbestos in the peritoneum. NOTE: Before the asbestos injections, mice are placed in disposable cages. Each group is assigned equal numbers of males and females.

As mentioned, asbestos injection procedures are performed under a well-ventilated fume hood. The surface area is covered with plastic-backed absorbent paper towels to prevent asbestos from contaminating the hooded area.

Using a 1-ml syringe, collect 0.5 ml from the 1.6 mg/ml stock asbestos solution to inject each mouse.

Hold the mouse gently with your left hand so it is static, with its abdomen facing you. Swipe the abdominal area, focusing on the lower right quadrant, with 70% ethanol. Use your other hand to inject the 0.5 ml asbestos solution (0.8 mg asbestos) i.p. Note: Injecting the asbestos into the right lower quadrant of the abdomen minimizes the likelihood of puncturing any organs with the needle. For our standard asbestos dose, inject i.p. each mouse with 0.8 mg of freshly prepared crocidolite fibers in 0.5 ml HBSS using a 25-G needle. The injections are repeated every 21 days for a total of (0.8 mg/injection × 4 injections = 3.2 mg/mouse). The 21-day interval between injections was selected based on previous work showing that 20 μg to 1 mg of crocidolite injected i.p. stimulates mesothelial cell proliferation for at least 21 days (Macdonald & Kane, 1997). However, when using significantly lower doses (0.0125 to 0.1 mg/injection), we found that a few female heterozygous Bap1-mutant mice develop benign spontaneous sex cord-stromal tumors before succumbing to mesothelioma (Kadariya et al., 2016a). This could complicate the interpretation of the carcinogenicity results, although these are benign tumors that usually are not lethal.

Discard the used syringe in a red bin marked “Sharps, asbestos contaminated.” Gently wipe the mouse’s injected area with a new alcohol swab to remove asbestos particles around the injection site. Return the animal to a disposable cage.

Continue injecting all mice as in steps 1–5.

Collect all used swabs, paper towels, and contaminated gloves in a Ziploc bag, double-bag them, and dispose of them in a red bag in the procedure room. Proceed to the anteroom and place all PPE in a red bag. Pack trash from the procedure room and anteroom in a cardboard box marked “asbestos-contaminated” and seal it with clear tape for disposal.

Change the disposable cages after 1 week after injection. Repeat the asbestos injections every 21 days for a total of 4 injections/mouse, totaling 3.2 mg asbestos/mouse.

After the four injections are completed, the disposable cages are changed every other week. All disposable cages, including bedding, should be packed in a red bag like other contaminated objects.

Record the body weight of each animal weekly.

Examine all mice daily and sacrifice any mouse upon evidence of labored breathing, severe weight loss (>10% of body weight), abdominal bloating, lethargic behavior, hunched back, and/or difficulty in walking, or when tumor burden was evident, following a protocol approved by the IACUC at the investigator’s institution. Mice are sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation followed by cervical dislocation.

At necropsy, histopathologically examine all organs for evidence of tumor lesions or overt malignancy. To evaluate tumor invasiveness and spreading, perform complete necropsies on all mice by examining the thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic cavities for tissue collection. Collect the tumor tissues in 10% buffered formaldehyde, fix them for 24–48 hours, and then process them for histopathologic examination by a qualified experimental pathologist. Collect a portion of each tumor and any ascitic fluids for storage at −80°C for further analysis, e.g., for molecular studies.

The presence of mesothelioma is scored based on histological and immunohistochemistry (IHC) evidence for staining with three or more mesothelioma markers (e.g., WT1, mesothelin, Troma 1). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections are subjected to heat-induced epitope retrieval for IHC. Endogenous peroxidase activity is quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide, and non-specific protein binding is blocked with goat serum before incubating the tumor sections with primary monoclonal antibodies.

To evaluate differences in the incidence and median survival of mice with mesotheliomas among experimental groups, use Fisher’s exact and log-rank tests, respectively. Kaplan–Meier curves are also prepared using GraphPad Prism software using data from Excel. An example of Kaplan–Meier survival curves in asbestos-treated Bap1+/W, Bap1+/L, and Bap1+/+ (WT) mice is shown in Fig. 8.

BASIC PROTOCOL 4: PRECLINICAL CHEMOPREVENTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY STUDIES USING A GEMM WITH ASBESTOS-INDUCED MESOTHELIOMA

For these studies, Basic Protocol 1 would be used to generate the mice and expose cohorts to asbestos before intervention with preventive or therapeutic agents. The Materials are identical to the items mentioned above except for items listed in the Materials listed below. The timing and conditions vary depending on the goals of the investigation. In general, however, the timing of the intervention should depend on pilot studies aimed at identifying when tumor onset occurs in the model. For chemoprevention studies, the investigator would seek to begin treatment with a preventive agent soon after starting the first or second (of four) asbestos injections. For early interception, one might start treatment soon after the fourth injection or when pilot studies have shown areas of the peritoneal lining with thickening of the mesothelial lining. For therapeutic studies, treatment may begin when evidence of tumor invasion is evident, based on MRI studies, if available, or sacrifice of mice at different time points. The protocol below describes how a preclinical chemoprevention trial is performed on an asbestos-exposed GEMM with a germline heterozygous mutation of Bap1.

Materials

The materials used to generate the mice are essentially the same as those in Basic Protocols 1 and 2, except for the following additional item, which is needed in Basic Protocol 3.

Reusable Animal Feeding Needles 22 gauge (Cadence Science, AFN 22g × 1”, 1.25 mm (straight), cat. no. SKU 7901)

Expand the Bap1+/mut colony that will be injected i.p. with asbestos and randomly assigned to treatment groups.

Meet with an experienced statistician to determine the number of Bap1+/mut mice required to perform a statistically meaningful three-arm study: vehicle-treated, lower-dose, and higher-dose treatment groups.

When mice are ~9 weeks old, asbestos injections are performed. The injections are given as described in Protocol 1 above (0.8 mg/injection × 4 injections every 21 days; total = 3.2 mg).

Begin drug (e.g., anakinra) treatments 2 days before the second asbestos injection and continue at intervals recommended in the literature for the drug of choice, potentially until the time of sacrifice when mice reach about 60–70 weeks of age.

Record each mouse’s weight before the first injection of crocidolite and every week after that. Keep mice in disposable cages in a procedure room designated for asbestos work if feasible. Change the cages one week after each asbestos injection. After completing the four injections, change the disposable cages every other week.

Two days before the second asbestos injection, randomize the mice into three treatment groups. The rationale for giving one dose of asbestos before starting treatment with the chemopreventive agent is that establishing chronic inflammation in the mouse peritoneal cavity would mimic the situation in humans, who will likely enter a clinical chemoprevention protocol after having some prior asbestos exposure. Control mice will receive vehicle (e.g., sterile H2O). Drug treatments may be administered orally by gavage daily or several days per week (e.g., M, W, F) and continue until the time of sacrifice.

Examine the mice daily. Euthanize via CO2 asphyxiation, followed by cervical dislocation, when palpable or visible masses arise or upon visible signs of distress, including extreme fatigue and labored breathing, or when mice exhibit a 15% change in body weight (humane endpoint). Euthanize the mice when their body weight increases by 15% (due to ascites or tumor) or decreases due to cachexia caused by tumor burden.

Upon sacrifice, the mice should be grossly examined for the presence of a solid tumor. Collect tumors, with one half used to prepare an FFPE sample for histopathological evaluation and the other half snap frozen for molecular biological analyses. All mice should also have all major internal organs collected, fixed in formalin, and subjected to histopathological assessments for evidence of mesothelioma dissemination. Other vital organs (liver, kidneys, pancreas, spleen, heart) should be examined grossly and histologically for potential damage indicative of drug toxicity as well as for tumor dissemination. The tumor tissue should be evaluated histopathologically to determine each treatment arm’s incidence and histopathological type of mesothelioma. Survival of each mouse with mesothelioma is recorded for Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. All tumors should be processed for histological assessment and immunohistochemistry (IHC), including staining for WT1 and mesothelin to help verify mesothelioma diagnosis.

Fisher’s exact and log-rank tests are used to assess the statistical significance of differences among mouse treatment groups regarding mesothelioma incidence and median survival, respectively.

BASIC PROTOCOL 5: GENERATION OF A GEMM WITH CONDITIONAL KNOCKOUT OF <italic toggle="yes">Bap1</italic>

This protocol describes how to generate a GEMM with floxed (f) alleles of Bap1 via Cre-mediated somatic site-specific recombination to circumvent potential problems such as embryonic lethality due to germline homozygous deletion of the gene (Akagi et al., 1997). Using this Cre-LoxP system, the locotemporal knockout of a gene of interest is accomplished by injecting adenoviruses expressing Cre recombinase (Akagi et al., 1997). To generate a loss of a TSG such as Bap1, specifically in the mesothelial lining of the pleura or peritoneum, adenovirus expressing Cre recombinase (Ad5CMVCre, adeno-Cre) is injected into the pleural or peritoneal space, respectively, of mice harboring floxed Bap1 alleles.

The protocol below describes how we generated a CKO of the Bap1 gene using ZFN technology. As new TSGs are implicated in mesothelioma in the future, a similar approach could be used to design an appropriate knockout model for these other genes.

Materials

Custom ZFNs targeting the Bap1 gene(Sigma-Aldrich)

Adenovirus (Ad5CMVCre)(Viral Vector Core, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, cat. no. VVC-U of Iowa-5)

FVB/N one-cell embryos

CD-1 mice

Tris-Borate-EDTA buffer, 10X (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, cat. no. sc-296650)

Agarose: PR1MA Agarose (Midsci, cat. no. MIDSCI-500)

SmartCheck DNA Ladders (MidSci, cat. no. PR4010)

Ethidium Bromide Solution 10 mg/mL (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat.no 17898)

Alcohol swabs (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 1223K92)

Gentra Puregene Tissue Kit (Qiagen, cat. no. 158063)

PfuTurbo DNA Polymerase (Agilent Technologies cat. no. 600250)

dNTP Mixture (Takara, cat. no. 4030)

Bap1 forward and reverse targeting primers (Integrated DNA Technologies IDT)

Thermal cycler

QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, cat. no. 28704)

DNA sequencing (Genewiz, Azenta Life Sciences)

Direct Mouse Genotyping kit (APExBIO, cat. no. K1025)

mBAP1-E6–1F (forward) and mBAP1-I7–4R (reverse) genotyping primers

GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega, cat. no. M712)

Exel International Insulin Syringes (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 14–841-31)

PPE (disposable gown, head cover, gloves, safety glasses, N95 mask, shoe covers)

3M N95 Healthcare Particulate Respirators and Surgical Masks, 1860 Series (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 18–992)

MicroGuard MP, Microporous Coverall with attached hood & boot, elastic wrist, elastic back, open ankle (Thomas Scientific, cat . no. 21A00P353–8019)

Face Shield (Fisher Scientific, cat. no 19–181-800C)

Ansell MICROFLEX SafeGrip SG-375 (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 19–048-575D)

Ketamine-acepromazine-xylazine cocktail

Design custom ZFNs targeting the Bap1 gene. This step is identical to that described in Basic Protocol 1, step 1. Specifically, the custom ZFNs target a Bap1 sequence with an intronic cutting site in intron 5 of Bap1. As in Basic Protocol 1, use Sigma-Aldrich’s custom service to create the ZFN expression plasmids. The sequence for the binding and cutting sites of the ZFNs is TGCTCCCCAGTAGTCACTGATGGCTGTGCACG, with the spacer between the binding sites underlined. Sigma-Aldrich will validate the targets in mammalian cells.

Design a donor DNA construct containing LoxP sites in Bap1 introns 6 and 7, such that adenovirus-mediated expression of Cre recombinase results in deletion of Bap1 exon 7.

Combine ZFN mRNAs and donor DNA, inject into the pronucleus of one-cell embryos of FVB/N mice, and transfer those embryos into pseudopregnant females.

Clip the pups’ tails from the pseudopregnant mice and isolate and purify DNA from the tail tips using a Puregene Tissue Kit (Qiagen).

Perform a PCR and gene sequencing analysis to verify correct gene targeting. For PCR, use forward primer Bap1f/f 1062: 5′-AGGCTTTGCTGCTAAATGAGA-3′ and reverse primer Bap1f/f 1063: 5′-CCCTGAGACCCAGAAAATCA-3′.
10X PfuTurbo buffer2.5 μl
dNTPs2.5 μl
Forward primer 1062 10 μm1.0 μl
Reverse primer 1063 10 μm1.0 μl
PfuTurbo DNA polymerase0.5 μl
Nuclease Free Water16.5 μl
DNA (100 ηg/μl)1.0 μl
Total Volume25.0 μl

Perform PCR as follows: 95°C (5 minutes), followed by 30 cycles at 95°C for denaturation (30 seconds), 60°C for annealing (30 seconds), and 72°C for extension (45 seconds), with a final extension at 72°C (10 minutes).

Resolve PCR products on a 1% agarose gel for 1 h and extract DNA from the gel using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen). The product size of the WT allele is 634 bp, and the size for the floxed allele is 702 bp. (Fig. 9A). The 702 bp fragment is gel-purified for Sanger sequencing to identify founder mice with integrated LoxP sites.

After sequence analysis, founder mice with LoxP sites were identified and integrated into the Bap1 locus, one of which is described here.

After identifying the founder line, genotype the offspring by extracting DNA from mouse tails using a Direct Mouse Genotyping Kit (APExBIO). To genotype Bap1f/f mice, we now use a new set of primers for PCR that results in a smaller product better suited for differentiating between the WT and floxed alleles: mBAP1-E6–1F (forward): 5’-GAACTGGCCAAGGCACATAA-3’ and mBAP1-I7–4R (reverse): 5’-ACCCAGAAAATCAGAAGGAAGCAT-3’.
2X GoTaq Green Master Mix10 μl
mBap1-E6–1F primer 10 μm1 μl
mBap1-I7–4R primer 10μm1 μl
Nuclease free water7 μl
DNA1 μl
Total Volume20 μl

Thermal PCR cycling conditions with the new primers are 95°C (5 minutes), followed by 29 cycles of 95°C for denaturation (30 seconds), 60°C for annealing (30 seconds), and 72°C for extension (30 seconds) with a final extension at 72°C (5 minutes). The product size of the wt allele is 307 bp, and the size for the floxed allele is 375 bp. (Fig. 9B).

BASIC PROTOCOL 6: GENERATION OF A CONDITIONAL KNOCKOUT MODEL OF MESOTHELIOMA

This protocol describes how a GEMM with floxed (f) alleles of two or more TSGs, e.g., Bap1, Nf2, and Cdkn2a, implicated in human mesothelioma pathogenesis is generated to induce a high incidence of mouse mesotheliomas in the absence of carcinogenic exposure to asbestos (Jongsma et al., 2008; Sementino et al., 2018; Kukuyan et al., 2019; Badhai et al., 2020). Using the Cre-LoxP system, the locotemporal knockout of multiple TSGs of interest is accomplished by injecting adenovirus expressing Cre recombinase (adeno-Cre) into a target tissue site (Akagi et al., 1997). To induce mesothelioma, adeno-Cre is injected into the pleural or peritoneal space of mice with floxed alleles. In their seminal report, Berns and colleagues demonstrated a high frequency of pleural mesotheliomas after injecting adeno-Cre into the pleural space of conditional knockout (CKO) mice with either homozygously floxed Nf2 and Tp53 or Nf2 and Cdkn2a, with median survival times of about 30 and 20 weeks, respectively (Jongsma et al., 2008). These and subsequent GEMMs with the additional knockout of Bap1 (Kukuyan et al., 2019; Badhai et al., 2020), now known to be the most frequently mutated gene in human mesothelioma, closely mimic the phenotype of human pleural mesothelioma. Moreover, injecting adeno-Cre into the pleural space of Bap1ff;Nf2ff;Cdkn2aff mice (Kukuyan et al., 2019) or Bap1ff;Nf2ff;Cdkn2ab−/− mice (Badhai et al., 2020) each exhibited a high penetrance (≥ 85%) of mesotheliomas with median survival times of about 12 weeks. Thus, such CKO models provide a rapid model system for preclinical testing of novel targeted therapies and new drug combinations, including immunotherapies, without the need for asbestos.

In this protocol, Bap1f/f mice (Basic Protocol 5) are crossed to Nf2f/f;Cdkn2af/f mice for studies of tumorigenic cooperativity of critical driver genes in mesothelioma pathogenesis. Nf2f/f;Cdkn2af/f mice (Jongsma et al., 2008) were a gift from Anton Berns (Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Although Dr. Berns has retired, the mice are available through a material transfer agreement (MTA) from the Netherlands Cancer Institute’s Office of Knowledge Transfer & Contracting (Frank Hoorn, Office Manager, f.hoorn@nki.nl). Floxed Cdkn2a mice (B6.129P2-Cdkn2atm2Brn/A), developed in Anton Berns’ laboratory, are also available commercially from Taconic Biosciences. Our mice were maintained in a mixed FVB/N × 129/Sv background. The LoxP sites in the Cdkn2a locus of these mice permit the excision of exon 2, which results in the inactivation of both of its gene products, p16Ink4a and p19Arf. Nf2f/f;Cdknaf/f and Bap1f/f mice were crossed to generate cohorts with the following genotypes: Bap1f/f, Nf2f/f, Cdkn2af/f, Bap1f/f;Nf2f/f, Bap1f/f;Cdkn2af/f, Nf2f/f;Cdkn2af/f, and Bap1f/f;Nf2f/f;Cdkn2af/f.

Materials

Bap1f/f mice

Nf2f/f mice

Cdkn2af/f mice

mBAP1-E6–1F (forward) and mBAP1-I7–4R (reverse) genotyping primers (Integrated DNA Technologies, IDT)

Genotyping primers for Nf2f/f mice (Integrated DNA Technologies)

Genotyping primers for Cdkn2af/f mice (Integrated DNA Technologies)

Thermal cycler

GoTaq Green Master Mix

Adenovirus (Ad5CMVCre) (Viral Vector Core, University of Iowa, cat. no. VVC-U of Iowa-5)

Econo-Cage Disposable System (irradiated) with air grommet (Lab Products, cat. no. LPI no. 72014-GI)

Tris-Borate-EDTA buffer, 10X (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, cat.no. sc-296650)

Agarose: PR1MA Agarose (Midsci, cat. no. MIDSCI-500)

SmartCheck DNA Ladders (MidSci, cat. no. PR4010)

Ethidium Bromide Solution 10 mg/mL (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat. no. 17898)

Alcohol swabs (ThermoScientific, cat. no. 1223K92)

Direct Mouse Genotyping kit (APExBIO, cat. no. K1025)

GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega, cat. no. M712)

Exel International Insulin Syringes (Fisher Scientific, cat. no 14–841-31)

PPE (disposable gown, head cover, gloves, safety glasses, N95 mask, shoe covers)

3M N95 Healthcare Particulate Respirators and Surgical Masks, 1860 Series (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 18–992)

MicroGuard MP, Microporous Coverall with attached hood & boot, elastic wrist, elastic back, open ankle (Thomas Scientific, cat. no. 21A00P353–8019)

Face Shield (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 19–181-800C)

Ansell MICROFLEX SafeGrip SG-375 (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 19–048-575D)

Ketamine-acepromazine-xylazine cocktail

10% buffered formaldehyde

Tissue-Plus O.C.T. Compound (Fisher Healthcare, cat. no. 23–730-571)

RNAlater Solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific)

Anti-Mesothelin Polyclonal Antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. no PA5–79698),

Anti-Wilms Tumor Protein (WT1) antibody [CAN-R9(IHC)-56–2] (Abcam, cat. no. ab89901)

Anti-Cytokeratin 8 antibody, clone TROMA-1 (Sigma-Aldrich MABT329M)

GraphPad Prism Software (Dotmatics)

Genotyping of mice with floxed alleles of <italic toggle="yes">Nf2 and Cdkn2a</italic>

Nf2f/f1048 (forward): 5′-CTT CCC AGA CAA GCA GGG TTC-3′ and Nf2f/f 1049 (reverse): 5′-GAA GGC AGC TTC TTC CTT AAG TC-3′ with the following PCR reagents.
2X GoTaq Green Master Mix10 μl
Nf2f/f 1048 primer 10 μm1 μl
Nf2f/f 1049 primer 10μm1 μl
Nuclease free water7 μl
DNA1 μl
Total Volume20 μl

Thermal PCR cycling conditions used are 95°C (5 minutes), followed by 29 cycles of 95°C for denaturation (30 seconds), 60°C for annealing (30 seconds), and 72°C for extension (30 seconds), with final extension at 72°C (5 minutes). The product size for the wild-type allele is 305 bp, and the size for the floxed allele is 442 bp. The PCR reaction is as follows, and a representative example of the genotyping is shown in Fig. 10A.

Cdkn2af/f 1025 (forward): 5′-GCA GTG TTG CAG TTT GAA CCC-3′ and Cdkn2af/f 1026 (reverse): 5′-TGT GGC AAC TGA TTC AGT TGG-3′ with the following reagents.
2X GoTaq Green Master Mix10 μl
Cdkn2af/f 1025 primer 10 μm1 μl
Cdkn2af/f 1026 primer 10μm1 μl
Nuclease free water7 μl
DNA1 μl
Total Volume20 μl

Thermal PCR cycling conditions used are 95°C (5 minutes), followed by 29 cycles at 95°C for denaturation (30 seconds), 60°C for annealing (30 seconds), and 72°C for extension (40 seconds) with a final extension at 72°C (5 minutes). The product size for the wild-type allele is 490 bp, and the size for the floxed allele is 600 bp. The PCR reaction is as follows, and a representative example of the genotyping is shown in Fig. 10B.

Genotyping of mice with floxed alleles of Bap1 is performed as in Basic Protocol 5, Step 9, using primers mBap1-E6–1F and mBap1-I7–4R.

Intrapleural injections of adeno-Cre and follow-up of mice

To excise floxed alleles of Bap1, Nf2, and Cdkn2a, specifically in the mesothelial lining of the pleural cavity, inject adeno-Cre (Ad5CMVCre, VVC-U of Iowa-5) virus into the pleural cavity. The adenovirus can be obtained from the Viral Vector Core of the University of Iowa (Iowa City, IA). This adenovirus expresses Cre recombinase, which excises targeted alleles by cutting at the LoxP sites surrounding the specific gene(s) of interest. Depending on the study, cohorts of mice with different combinations of floxed alleles may be used. In the protocol below, Bap1f/f;Nf2f/f;Cdkn2af/f mice are used.

Discuss the study details with a biostatistician to determine the specific controls and number of mice per experimental arm needed to address the study goals.

Breeding is carried out so that equivalent numbers of male and female Bap1f/f;Nf2f/f;Cdkn2af/f mice, 8–10 weeks of age, will be available to begin the experiment, which may occur batched, if necessary.

Draw a 50 μL solution containing 3–6 × 1010 PFU viral particles into a 1 ml insulin injection syringe with a needle, then place on an alcohol swab.

Sedate the mouse temporarily using an i.p. injection of ketamine: xylazine mixture (200 μL per 20 g mouse).

When sedated, hold the mouse in the left hand, supporting its back with the thumb and placing the forefinger behind the head to fix the chest.

Clean the injection site (right chest) with an alcohol swab (70% ethanol), and carefully insert the needle between the ribs and no more than 2–3 mm inside the chest cavity, followed by injection of the 50 μL viral particle suspension.

After the injection, place the animal in a regular cage and monitor it until it is fully recovered from the sedative agents. On the cage, place a biohazard card marked “Adeno-Cre injected.”

Repeat steps 3–7 for the remaining mice.

Dispose of all used syringes and needles in a red bin with a cover.

After a week, change the cages and bedding. The used supplies, including any disposable cages and bedding, should be disposed of in a red biohazard bag packed in a cardboard box for incineration.

Monitor all mice daily and euthanize animals upon signs of distress, including extreme fatigue, labored breathing, abdominal bloating, hunched back, difficulty walking, or when mice exhibit a 10% change in body weight. Collect tissues of all organs of the pleural and peritoneal cavities from sacrificed mice in 10% buffered formaldehyde, fix for 24–48 hours, and subject tumor specimens to histopathologic and IHC analysis. Place portions of tumors in an embedding medium (Fisher Healthcare Tissue-Plus O.C.T. Compound and RNAlater Solution and immediately freeze at −80°C.

The histopathologic procedures used are the same as described above in Basic Protocol 3, Step 13. In brief, mesothelioma diagnosis is based on histological and IHC evidence for staining with mesothelioma markers, WT1, mesothelin, and Troma 1. FFPE tumor sections are subjected to heat-induced epitope retrieval for IHC. Endogenous peroxidase activity is quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide, and non-specific protein binding is blocked with goat serum before incubating the tumor sections with primary monoclonal antibodies.

To evaluate differences in the incidence and median survival of mice with mesotheliomas among experimental groups, use Fisher’s exact and log-rank tests, respectively. Kaplan–Meier curves are also prepared.

CAUTION: There is a mortality risk due to the needle’s accidental rupture of the visceral layer of the pleura. However, the risk is very low if the injection procedure is carefully performed.

UNDERSTANDING OF RESULTS:

As shown in the Kaplan–Meier survival curves presented in Fig. 8, asbestos-treated Bap1-mutant mice succumb to disease earlier than asbestos-treated WT littermates, with a median survival of 46 and 48 weeks from the time of the first asbestos injection in Bap1+/L and Bap1+/W mice, respectively, compared to 60 weeks in WT mice (p < 0.01). The deaths due to peritoneal mesothelioma were 74% in Bap1+/W mice and 71% in Bap1+/L mice compared to 35% of WT animals, which was highly significant (p < 0.01).

As noted above, when asbestos experiments are performed on mice harboring compound heterozygous mutations or deletions, the timing may be relatively short because the mice develop rapid, aggressive tumors. Such compound heterozygous mice are better suited for preclinical chemotherapeutic, or potentially cancer interception, studies than long-term chemoprevention studies. In a chemoprevention experiment, Nf2+/−;Cdkn2a+/− mice exposed to asbestos in the presence of anakinra, an IL1 receptor antagonist, showed a marked delay in the median time of mesothelioma onset compared with similarly exposed mice given vehicle control (33.1 weeks vs. 22.6 weeks, respectively) (Fig. 11) (Kadariya et al., 2016b). However, despite the delayed onset of mesothelioma in anakinra-treated mice, all of the animals in this accelerated model of mesothelioma also died of the disease. Thus, a less aggressive model for chemoprevention experiments, e.g., asbestos-exposed heterozygous Bap1-mutant mice, would be preferable, as the test agent might be more likely to prevent some mesotheliomas from forming.

COMMENTARYCritical Parameters:

In Basic Protocols 1, 2 and 5, the assistance of a dedicated institutional transgenic mouse facility is essential for fertilized egg isolations, pronuclear injections, and implantation of microinjected embryos. As noted above, specific factors can influence the protocol, and special attention to details should be paid to obtain robust results. First, staff performing asbestos work (Basic Protocols 3 and 4) must be adequately trained, and workers must be precise because asbestos is carcinogenic. SOPs and an isolated carcinogen room are essential to protect the staff and others who might use the same room. Training is necessary to minimize the chance that the injected asbestos enters the peritoneal space, not a vital organ.

In Basic Protocols 5 and 6, experiments performed with CKO mice must also be carried out by well-trained staff according to SOPs. Sufficient hands-on training is required to minimize the chance that the needle used to inject adeno-Cre does not cause pneumothorax via rupture of the visceral layer of the pleura.

Time Considerations:

Asbestos carcinogenicity experiments can be lengthy if the GEMM has a heterozygous lesion in only a single TSG. The experiment can take a full year in many cases, but it is the primary way to demonstrate that a single gene can influence susceptibility to mesothelioma. Such a model may also be invaluable for chemoprevention studies, as a germline mutation in a single TSG, such as Bap1, mimics the situation in humans with a hereditary tumor susceptibility syndrome. The timing may be short when asbestos experiments are performed on mice with compound heterozygous mutations or deletions. For example, asbestos-induced mesotheliomas in Nf2+/−;Cdkn2a+/−mice have a median survival of about 22 weeks (Menges et al., 2014).

Time considerations for experiments with CKO models of mesothelioma can vary depending on the number of excised genes and alleles, but they may generally be completed in 3–6 months.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by NCI grants CA175691, R03 CA280410, and CA06927, NCI contracts 6U24OH009077 and 75N91019D00022/Task Order 75N91023F00003, and by the Local #14 Mesothelioma Fund of the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers. The authors also wish to acknowledge the following Fox Chase Cancer Center shared resources that have assisted our work on mesothelioma mouse models over the years: Laboratory Animal, Transgenic Mouse, Histopathology, and Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facilities.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

J.R. Testa has a patent for BAP1 mutation testing and has also provided legal consultation regarding genetic aspects of mesothelioma. The remaining authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare regarding the publication of this work.

LITERATURE CITEDAkagiK, SandigV, VooijsM, Van der ValkM, GiovanniniM, StraussM, BernsA (1997). Cre-mediated somatic site-specific recombination in mice. Nucleic Acids Research,25, 1766–1773.9108159 AltomareDA, MengesCW, XuJ, PeiJ, ZhangL, TadevosyanA, Neumann-DomerE, LiuZ, CarboneM, ChudobaI, Klein-SzantoAJ, TestaJR (2011). Losses of both products of the Cdkn2a/Arf locus contribute to asbestos-induced mesothelioma development and cooperate to accelerate tumorigenesis. PLoS One, 6, e18828.21526190 AltomareDA, VasletCA, SkeleKL, De RienzoA, DevarajanK, JhanwarSC, McClatcheyAI, KaneAB, TestaJR (2005).A mouse model recapitulating molecular features of human mesothelioma. Cancer Research, 65, 8090–8095.16166281 BadhaiJ, PandeyGK, SongJY, KrijgsmanO, BhaskaranR, ChandrasekaranG, KwonMC, BombardelliL, MonkhorstK, GrassoC, ZevenhovenJ, van der VlietJ, CozijnsenM, KrimpenfortP, PeeperD, van LohuizenM, BernsA (2020). Combined deletion of Bap1, Nf2, and Cdkn2ab causes rapid onset of malignant mesothelioma in mice. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 217(6), e20191257.32271879 BlackburnEH (2011). Cancer interception. Cancer Prevention Research(Phila), 4, 787–792.21636545 BlanquartC, JaurandMC, JeanD (2020). The biology of malignant mesothelioma and the relevance of preclinical models. Frontiers in Oncology, 10, 388.32269966 BottM, BrevetM, TaylorBS, ShimizuS, ItoT, WangL, CreaneyJ, LakeRA, ZakowskiMF, RevaB, SanderC, DelsiteR, PowellS, ZhouQ, ShenR, OlshenA, RuschV, LadanyiM (2011). The nuclear deubiquitinase BAP1 is commonly inactivated by somatic mutations and 3p21.1 losses in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Nature Genetics, 43, 668–672.21642991 BuenoR, StawiskiEW, GoldsteinLD, DurinckS, De RienzoA, ModrusanZ, GnadF, NguyenTT, JaiswalBS, ChirieacLR, SciaranghellaD, DaoN, GustafsonCE, MunirKJ, HackneyJA, ChaudhuriA, GuptaR, GuilloryJ, ToyK, HaC, ChenYJ, StinsonJ, ChaudhuriS, ZhangN, WuTD, SugarbakerDJ, de SauvageFJ, RichardsWG, SeshagiriS (2016). Comprehensive genomic analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma identifies recurrent mutations, gene fusions and splicing alterations. Nature Genetics, 48, 407–416.26928227 CarboneM, AdusumilliPS, AlexanderHRJr., BaasP, BardelliF, BononiA, BuenoR, Felley-BoscoE, Galateau-SalleF, JablonsD, MansfieldAS, MinaaiM, de PerrotM, PesaventoP, RuschV, SeversonDT, TaioliE, TsaoA, WoodardG, YangH, ZaudererMG, PassHI (2019). Mesothelioma: Scientific clues for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. CA: A Cancer Journalfor Clinicians, 69, 402–429.CuiX, JiD, FisherDA, WuY, BrinerDM, WeinsteinEJ (2011). Targeted integration in rat and mouse embryos with zinc-finger nucleases. Nature Biotechnology, 29, 64–67.FennellDA, DullooS, HarberJ (2022). Immunotherapy approaches for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 19, 573–584.JongsmaJ, van MontfortE, VooijsM, ZevenhovenJ, KrimpenfortP, van der ValkM, van de VijverM, BernsA (2008) A conditional mouse model for malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Cell, 12, 261–271.KadariyaY, CheungM, XuJ, PeiJ, SementinoE, MengesCW, CaiKQ, RauscherFJ, Klein-SzantoAJ, TestaJR (2016a).Bap1 is a bona fide tumor suppressor: Genetic evidence from mouse models carrying heterozygous germline Bap1 mutations. Cancer Research, 76, 2836–2844.26896281 KadariyaY, MengesCW, TalarchekJ, CaiKQ, Klein-SzantoAJ, PietrofesaRA, Christofidou-SolomidouM, CheungM, MossmanBT, ShuklaA, TestaJR (2016b). Inflammation-related IL1beta/IL1R signaling promotes the development of asbestos-induced malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Prevention Research, 9, 406–414.26935421 KadariyaY, SementinoE, RuanM, CheungM, HadikhaniP, OsmanbeyogluHU, Klein-SzantoAJ, CaiK, TestaJR (2024). Low exposures to amphibole or serpentine asbestos in germline Bap1-mutant mice induce mesothelioma characterized by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Cancer Research Communications, 4, 1004–1015.38592450 KukuyanAM, SementinoE, KadariyaY, MengesCW, CheungM, TanY, CaiKQ, SlifkerMJ, PeriS, Klein-SzantoAJ, RauscherFJIII, TestaJR (2019). Inactivation of Bap1 cooperates with losses of Nf2 and Cdkn2a to drive the development of pleural malignant mesothelioma in conditional mouse models. Cancer Research, 79, 4113–4123.31151962 MarsellaJM, LiuBL, VasletCA, KaneAB (1997). Susceptibility of p53-deficient mice to induction of mesothelioma by crocidolite asbestos fibers. Environmental Health Perspectives, 105, 1069–1072.9400702 MacdonaldJL, KaneAB (1997). Mesothelial cell proliferation and biopersistence of wollastonite and crocidolite asbestos fibers. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 38, 173–183.9299191 MengesCW, KadariyaY, AltomareD, TalarchekJ, Neumann-DomerE, WuY, XiaoGH, ShapiroIM, KolevVN, PachterJA, Klein-SzantoAJ, TestaJR (2014). Tumor suppressor alterations cooperate to drive aggressive mesotheliomas with enriched cancer stem cells via a p53-miR-34a-c-Met axis. Cancer Research, 74,1261–1271.24371224 MeyerM, de AngelisMH, WurstW, KühnR (2010). Gene targeting by homologous recombination in mouse zygotes mediated by zinc-finger nucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A, 107, 15022–15026.Mookerjee-BasuJ HuaX, GeL, NicolasE, LiQ, CzyzewiczP, ZhongpingD, PeriS,FuxmanBassJI, WalhoutAJM, KappesDJ (2019). Functional conservation of a developmental switch in mammals since the Jurassic Age. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 36, 39–53.30295892 NabaviN, WeiJ, LinD, CollinsCC, GoutPW, WangY (2018) Pre-clinical models for malignant mesothelioma research: From chemical-induced to patient-derived cancer xenografts. Frontiers in Genetics, 9, 232.30022998 RobinsonC, DickIM, WiseMJ, HollowayA, DiyagamaD, RobinsonBWS, CreaneyJ, LakeRA (2015). Consistent gene expression profiles in MexTAg transgenic mouse and wild type mouse asbestos-induced mesothelioma. BMC Cancer, 15, 983.26680231 RobinsonC, van BruggenI, SegalA, DunhamM, SherwoodA, KoentgenF, RobinsonBWS, LakeRA (2006). A novel SV40 TAg transgenic model of asbestos-induced mesothelioma: Malignant transformation is dose dependent. Cancer Research, 66, 10786–10794.17108115 RobinsonC, WalshA, LarmaI, O’HalloranS, NowakAK, LakeRA (2011) MexTAg mice exposed to asbestos develop cancer that faithfully replicates key features of the pathogenesis of human mesothelioma. European Journal of Cancer, 47, 151–161.20850297 SeastedtKP, PruettN, HoangCD (2021). Mouse models for mesothelioma drug discovery and development. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 16, 697–708.33380218 SementinoE, MengesCW, KadariyaY, PeriS, XuJ, LiuZ, WilkesRG, CaiKQ, RauscherFJ3rd, Klein-SzantoAJ, TestaJR (2018) Inactivation of Tp53 and Pten drives rapid development of pleural and peritoneal malignant mesotheliomas. Journal of Cell Physiology, 233, 8952–8961.ServaisEL, ColovosC, KachalaSS, AdusumilliPS (2011). Pre-clinical mouse models of primary and metastatic pleural cancers of the lung and breast and the use of bioluminescent imaging to monitor pleural tumor burden. Current Protocols in Pharmacology, 54, 14.21.1–18.ShamseddinM, ObaczJ, GarnettMJ, RintoulRC, FranciesHE, MarciniakSJ (2021). Use of preclinical models for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Thorax, 76, 1154–1162.33692175 StadlmannS, PollheimerJ, RennerK, ZeimetAG, OffnerFA, AmbergerA (2006). Response of human peritoneal mesothelial cells to inflammatory injury is regulated by interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 14, 187–194.16630108 TestaJR, BernsA (2020) Preclinical models of malignant mesothelioma. Frontiers in Oncology, 10, 101.32117751 TestaJR, CheungM, PeiJ, BelowJE, TanY, SementinoE, CoxNJ, DoganAU, PassHI, TrusaS, HesdorfferM, NasuM, PowersA, RiveraZ, ComertpayS, TanjiM, GaudinoG, YangH, CarboneM (2011). Germline BAP1 mutations predispose to malignant mesothelioma. Nature Genetics, 43, 1022–1025.21874000 WangY, FauxSP, HalldenG, KirnDH, HoughtonCE, LemoineNR, PatrickG (2004). Interleukin-1beta and tumour necrosis factor-alpha promote the transformation of human immortalised mesothelial cells by erionite. International Journal of Oncology, 25, 173–178.15202003 XuJ, KadariyaY, CheungM, PeiJ, TalarchekJ, SementinoE, TanY, MengesCW, CaiKQ, LitwinS, PengH, KararJ, RauscherFJ, TestaJR (2014). Germline mutation of Bap1 accelerates development of asbestos-induced malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Research, 74, 4388–4397.24928783

Flow diagram of the procedures involved in the fertilized egg isolation, pronuclear injection, and implantation of microinjected embryos portion of Basic Protocol 1.

Sequential images of an anesthetized, shaved pseudopregnant mouse (left) in which the surgical site has been disinfected and covered by 3M Tegaderm protective film and incision site marked (middle), and incision is then made (right).

After making the incision in the recipient pseudopregnant mouse (Fig. 1), the mouse body wall muscle is cut, and the ovary and oviduct complexes are exposed using forceps (A). The embryos are then implanted into the oviduct using a glass capillary tube, and the skin wound is closed by sutures and surgical clips (B).

A) Representative genotyping of tail DNA from mice with a germline heterozygous Bap1 knockout (KO) allele (+/−) and littermates that are wild-type (WT, +/+) for Bap1. The size of the WT allele is 634 bp, whereas the size of the KO allele is 158 bp. B) A 100-bp DNA size marker ladder (PR1MA SmartCheck) was used for PCR analysis in panel A.

Schematic diagrams showing cutting sites of the ZFNs and for Bap1+/W (A) and Bap1+/L (B) mutant mice. Asterisks (*) indicate splice site mutation in intron 6 of Bap1+/W and nonsense mutation in exon 16 of Bap1+/L mice, respectively. Modified from Kadariya et al., 2016a.

Genotyping of heterozygous Bap1+/W knock-in mice. Genotyping of WT (+/+) and heterozygous (+/W) Bap1 mice, the latter harboring a splice site mutation in intron 6. The PCR product size of both WT and mutant (knock-in) Bap1 is ~290 bp. To detect the allele with the knock-in mutation, the PCR products are digested with HpaII restriction enzyme, which results in two additional smaller restriction fragment bands in heterozygous (+/W) Bap1 mice.

Genotyping of the heterozygous Bap1+/L knock-in mice. Genotyping of WT (+/+) and heterozygous (+/L) Bap1 mice, the latter harboring a nonsense mutation in exon 16. PCR products of tail DNA from both WT and Bap1+/L mice is 351 bp. To detect the Bap1-mutant allele with the knock-in mutation, the PCR products are digested with Hpy188III restriction enzyme, which produces two restriction fragment bands in the heterozygous (+/L) Bap1 mice and only one fragment band in the WT mice.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrating markedly decreased survival of asbestos-exposed Bap1-mutant knock-in cohorts than in asbestos-exposed WT littermates. Survival differences were highly significant (p < 0.01 for WT mice vs. each Bap1+/W mice; p <0.008 for WT vs. Bap1-mutant knock-in cohort). The percentage of deaths due to peritoneal mesothelioma was 74% in Bap1+/W mice and 71% in Bap1+/L mice compared to 35% of WT animals, which was highly significant (p < 0.01). From Kadariya et al., 2016a.

Genotyping of mice with floxed allele(s) of Bap1. (A) PCR analysis with Bap1 primers 1062 (forward) and 1063 reverse yielded products of the following sizes: Bap1 wt allele (634 bp) and Bap1 floxed (f) allele (red arrow, 702 bp). These primer pairs amplify both LoxP sites flanking exon 7 of the mouse Bap1 gene (LoxP sites were inserted into introns 6 and 7.) Genotyping of presentative wild type (wt, +/+), heterozygous (+/f), and homozygous (f/f) conditional KO mice are shown. (B) Genotyping of mice with floxed allele(s) of Bap1 using a new set of primers for PCR that provide smaller products better suited for differentiating between the wt and floxed allele. Representative genotyping of Bap1+/+, Bap1+/f, and Bap1f/f mice are shown. The size of the Bap1 wt allele is 307 bp, whereas the size of the Bap1 floxed (f) allele (red arrow) is 375 bp.

Genotyping of mice with floxed alleles of Nf2 and Cdkn2a. (A) Representative genotyping of homozygously floxed (f/f) Nf2 conditional KO mice and wild-type (wt) littermates. The size of the Nf2 wt allele is 305 bp, and the size of the floxed Nf2 allele (red arrow) is 442 bp. (B) Representative genotyping of homozygous Cdkn2a conditional KO mice and wt mice. The size of the Cdkn2a wt allele is 490 bp, whereas the floxed Cdkn2a floxed allele (red arrow) is ~590 bp.

To investigate the efficacy of anakinra as a chemopreventive agent, Nf2+/−;Cdkn2a+/− mice were injected i.p. with 800 μg of crocidolite every 21 days × 4 injections, as in Basic Protocol 4. Anakinra (Kineret, Amgen), a human recombinant IL-1R antagonist, was dissolved in citrate buffer and diluted to 100 μg/100 μl in citrate buffer. Anakinra was injected i.p. at a concentration of 5 mg/kg body weight 6 h before the first asbestos injection. After each asbestos injection, anakinra was given every third day at the same concentration. In parallel, control Nf2+/−;Cdkn2a+/− mice were injected i.p. with 100 μl of citrate buffer. A small gauge needle (21G for asbestos; 26G for anakinra or citrate buffer) and different injection sites were used so that one mouse area did not become overly sensitized. In this accelerated mouse model of mesothelioma, mice were followed for up to 50 weeks. Thirty-two Nf2+/−;Cdkn2a+/− mice per arm were exposed to asbestos in the presence or absence of the IL-1R antagonist. The figure is modified from Kadariya et al., 2016b.