Emerg Infect DisEmerging Infect. DisEIDEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-6059Centers for Disease Control and Prevention18217547337579606-136910.3201/eid1311.061369ResearchMycobacterium ulcerans in Mosquitoes Captured during
Outbreak of Buruli Ulcer, Southeastern AustraliaMosquitoes and Mycobacterium
ulcerans, AustraliaJohnsonPaul D.R.*†‡§AzuolasJoseph¶LavenderCaroline J.‡WishartElwyn¶StinearTimothy P.§HaymanJohn A.‡§BrownLynne#JenkinGrant A.§FyfeJanet A.M.‡Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria,
AustraliaVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory,
North Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria,
AustraliaDepartment of Primary Industries, Melbourne, Victoria,
AustraliaDepartment of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria,
AustraliaAddress for correspondence: Paul D.R. Johnson, Infectious Diseases
Department, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg 3084, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
email: paul.johnson@austin.org.au112007131116531660
Mosquitoes positive for M. ulcerans were linked to
outbreaks of Buruli ulcer in humans.
Buruli ulcer (BU) occurs in >30 countries. The causative organism,
Mycobacterium ulcerans, is acquired from the environment, but the exact
mode of transmission is unknown. We investigated an outbreak of BU in a small coastal town
in southeastern Australia and screened by PCR mosquitoes caught there. All cases of BU
were confirmed by culture or PCR. Mosquitoes were trapped in multiple locations during a
26-month period. BU developed in 48 residents of Point Lonsdale/Queenscliff and 31
visitors from January 2001 through April 2007. We tested 11,504 mosquitoes trapped at
Point Lonsdale (predominantly Aedes camptorhynchus). Forty-eight pools (5
species) were positive for insertion sequence IS2404 (maximum likelihood
estimate 4.3/1,000), and we confirmed the presence of M. ulcerans in a
subset of pools by detection of 3 additional PCR targets.
Buruli ulcer (BU), also known as Bairnsdale ulcer (1), Daintree ulcer (2), and Mossman ulcer in Australia, is an emerging disease of
skin and soft tissue with potential to cause scarring and disability (3). It is caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans
(4), an environmental pathogen that
produces a destructive polyketide toxin, mycolactone (5); the genes for the production of this toxin are encoded on
newly described plasmid pMUM001 (6). BU occurs in >30 countries worldwide, but it affects
mainly children in sub-Saharan Africa, where it is now more common than tuberculosis and
leprosy in some regions (7). This
disease occurs in people of all ages and races who live in or visit BU-endemic areas, but the
precise mode of transmission remains unknown.
Analysis of the recently sequenced M. ulcerans genome has
shown that in addition to pMUM001, there are unusually high copy numbers of 2
independent insertion sequences (IS2404 and IS2606) and a
high incidence of pseudogene formation (8). These data suggest that M.
ulcerans is unlikely to be free-living in the environment but is instead
undergoing adaptation to a specific ecologic niche in which the products of some ancestral
genes are no longer essential. One such niche may be in aquatic insects because
M. ulcerans has recently been reported to colonize the
salivary glands of carnivorous water bugs (Naucoridae) under laboratory conditions (9), and mycolactone production appears to
be necessary for this colonization (10). Studies from disease-endemic areas in Africa have reported that
farming activities near rivers (11)
and swimming in rivers or marshes (12)
may be risk factors for BU; bites from contaminated water bugs may transmit the infection.
In temperate southeastern Australia, outbreaks of M.
ulcerans infection occur in localized areas, but few patients report direct
contact with environmental water other than the ocean, which led to the proposal that aerosols
from contaminated water may cause human infections (13). However, these low-lying disease-endemic areas also harbor
large populations of mosquitoes, and some patients have reported that BU first appeared at the
site of what may have been a mosquito bite (Figure 1).
These observations, and knowledge from field studies in Africa implicating insects as either a
reservoir or mode of transmission, led us to capture and screen mosquitoes during our
investigation of a large outbreak of BU in humans in a small coastal town in southeastern
Australia (Point Lonsdale), ≈60 km south of Melbourne (Figure 2).
Ear of an 18-month-old child with culture- and PCR-confirmed Buruli ulcer who briefly
visited St. Leonards, Australia, in 2001 (Figure 2).
The initial lesion resembled a mosquito bite or that of another insect.
Map of central coastal Victoria, Australia, showing towns and places referred to in the
text or in associated references.
MethodsOutbreak Investigation
M. ulcerans infection has become increasingly common in
the southern Australian state of Victoria since the early 1990s (14,15) and characteristically causes localized outbreaks (16). In 1995, a research group at the
Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne developed an IS2404 PCR to
improve speed and accuracy of diagnosis of BU (17). This method has now become the initial diagnostic method
of choice in Australia and elsewhere (18). All PCR- and culture-positive cases of M.
ulcerans infection in Victoria have been unofficially reported to the
Victorian Department of Human Services (DHS) since the 1990s, and investigators from DHS
began to routinely contact and interview all new reported case-patients in 2000. All new
cases of M. ulcerans infection were made legally
reportable in Victoria in January 2004 (19).
Case Definition
For this study, a case of BU was defined as a patient with a suggestive clinical lesion
from which M. ulcerans was identified by PCR or culture
from a swab or tissue biopsy specimen from January 2002 through April 2007; the patient
must have been either a resident of, or a visitor to, Point Lonsdale or Queenscliff
(adjacent coastal towns on the Bellarine Peninsula) who did not report a recent history of
contact with another known BU-endemic area. Australian Bureau of Statistics data derived
from the 2001 Australian Census for Point Lonsdale/Queenscliff (postcode 3225) were used
to obtain the resident population numbers and age distribution in the outbreak area (20).
Mosquito Trapping
A total of 8–13 overnight mosquito traps were placed at Point Lonsdale on 22
occasions from December 2004 through January 2007. Adult mosquito sampling was conducted
with CO2-baited miniature light traps (21). Traps were 2-L, cylindrical, insulated containers
designed to hold CO2 pellets that continuously produce CO2, which
then diffuses through holes in the bottom of the container. A small electric light and fan
at the base of the container deflected attracted mosquitoes into a holding container. The
traps were set before dusk and then retrieved several hours after dawn the next morning.
The catches were transported to Primary Industries Research in Attwood, Victoria, where
they were counted, sorted, and pooled by sex and species. Mosquito species were identified
by using the key of Russell (22).
All captured mosquitoes were tested except in February–March 2005 and again in
October 2005 when recent rains led to large spikes in mosquito numbers.
Screening of Mosquitoes by PCR
DNA was extracted from pools of <15 individual mosquitoes
(occasional pools had <23 mosquitoes) of the same sex and
species by using the FastDNA Kit (revision no. 6540-999-1D04) and the FastPrep Instrument
(Qbiogene Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We
adapted fluorescence-based real-time PCR technology to screen mosquitoes for 3
M. ulcerans–specific DNA sequences as described
(23). Briefly, oligonucleotide
primers and TaqMan MGB probes (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) labeled with
fluorescent dyes 6FAM or VIC were designed that targeted 3 independent high-copy number
repetitive sequences (IS2404 and IS2606 [24] and the ketoreductase B domain
[KR] from pMUM001 [6]). The copy number of these targets per bacterial cell in the
published sequenced of M. ulcerans, to which the
outbreak strain is phylogenetically closely related, is 213 for IS2404,
91 for IS2606, and 30 for KR (8). Assays were conducted with an ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence
Detection System (Applied Biosystems).
Each pool was first tested for IS2404 with an internal positive control
to test for PCR inhibition and separate negative and positive controls. Samples were
considered positive for a given target when they had a result above a previously
determined critical threshold (23). Pools that were positive for IS2404 were
then screened in duplicate with confirmatory assays to detect IS2606 and
KR. For pools with sufficiently high signal strength, amplification and sequencing of
variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) locus 9 were conducted by using a nested PCR. The
first round PCR used 2 primers, MUVNTR9NF (5′-ACTGCCCAGACATGGCGA-3′) and
MUVNTR9NR (5′-ACGCGAGGTGGAACAAAGC-3′), designed to flank the published VNTR
locus 9 primer. First-round PCR products were used as template for a second-round PCR
performed as described by Ablordey et al. (25). PCR products of the expected size were sequenced by
using the BigDye Terminator version 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Precipitated reaction products were
tested in a 3730S Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) (23). The maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) per 1,000
mosquitoes tested (bias corrected MLE) was calculated by using software recommended for
this purpose by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA) (26).
ResultsDescription of Outbreak
The climate in Point Lonsdale is temperate with a mean daily maximum temperature of
12.8°C in July (winter) and 22.4°C in January (summer). Average annual
rainfall is 660 mm and is spread throughout the year (e.g., average 41.3 mm in January and
59.1 mm in July) (27). Most of the
town is low-lying and close to sea level, and there are several natural and human-made
swamps and water features in the vicinity (Figure 3).
Natural vegetation includes dense clumps of coastal tea trees (Leptospermum
laevigatum).
Map of Point Lonsdale/Queenscliff, Australia (postcode 3225), showing location of
houses of affected permanent residents, mosquito traps, and other features mentioned
in the text. Not all traps yielded PCR-positive mosquitoes during the trapping period.
Neg, negative; pos, positive.
Point Lonsdale shares a beach with Queenscliff (Figure
3), a neighboring town 4 km to the east. Point Lonsdale and Queenscliff (postcode
3225) were included in the 2001 Australian Bureau of Statistics Census and had a resident
population of 3,851 at that time, but there are also large numbers of visitors to this
scenic area during summer holiday periods (e.g., 54,000 people visited the Queenscliff
Visitor Information Centre in 2005; pers. comm.).
M. ulcerans infection was not found in the area before
2002. From January 2002 through April 2007, BU developed in 79 persons (48 residents and
31 visitors). Initially, all patients were local residents, but in 2004 the outbreak
increased in intensity and began to include visitors as well as residents (Figure 4). All case-patients who could be accurately
located either lived in or visited Point Lonsdale and the western edge of Queenscliff, and
none were linked solely to the main township of Queenscliff.
Epidemic curve of cases of Buruli ulcer linked to Point Lonsdale/Queenscliff,
Australia, by resident/visitor status and month of reporting, 2002–2007.
Most case-patients were adults and many were elderly (Figure 5), although 14 of the 79 were children <18
years of age. Among visitors, there was a bimodal age distribution, with relatively low
numbers of adults 20–50 years of age. An estimate of the age-specific attack rate
for residents of Point Lonsdale/Queenscliff was obtained with reference to the 2001
Australian census. Because census data were not available for the 2 towns separately, the
calculation assumes that the age distribution of Point Lonsdale and Queenscliff is
similar. A similar analysis for visitors was not performed because appropriate
denominators could not be determined. The risk appeared to increase strongly with age and
was ≈7× higher for those >55 years of age than in
those <55 years of age (p<0.001) (Figure
6).
Cases of Buruli ulcer epidemiologically linked to Point Lonsdale, Australia, by
resident/visitor status, age, and sex. Dashed lines are medians.
Estimated age-specific attack rates of Buruli ulcer for residents of Point
Lonsdale/Queenscliff, Australia (postcode 3225). Values above the bars are cases per
total no. residents in each age group.
The incubation period for residents and for most visitors could not be assessed because
exposure to the BU-endemic area occurred repeatedly over a prolonged period. However, in
2006, one patient reported a 1-week contact history with Point Lonsdale (P.D.R. Johnson,
unpub. data). Her case was diagnosed and reported 7 months after this exposure.
Mosquito Testing
A total of 23,692 mosquitoes were captured in Point Lonsdale during a 25-month period;
96% were Aedes camptorhynchus (Thomson). Twelve other species comprised
the remaining 4% (Table 1). Of 11,504 mosquitoes
tested, 48 pools were positive for IS2404; of these, 13 pools were also
positive for KR and IS2606. Forty-one of 48 pools were female
Ae. camptorhynchus, 4 were positive pools of
Coquillettidia linealis (Skuse), and 1 each were Anopheles
annulipes (Walker s.l.), Culex australicus (Dobrotworsky and
Drummond), and Ae. notoscriptus (Skuse). For 2 positive
pools with particularly high M. ulcerans DNA
concentrations, VNTR locus 9 was amplified and the sequence was identical to that of the
local outbreak strain cultured from case-patients (23).
Maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) per 1,000 mosquitoes trapped in Point Lonsdale,
Australia, and tested by PCR for insertion sequence IS2404 of
Mycobacterium ulcerans
Species
No. mosquitoes
No. positive pools/no. pools
tested
MLE*
95% Confidence interval
Aedes camptorhynchus
10,558
41/757
3.98
2.90–5.35
Coquillettidia
linealis
480
4/57
8.53
2.80–20.34
Ae.
notoscriptus
221
1/49
4.47
0.26–21.37
Culex australicus
76
1/27
12.78
0.77–59.74
Ochlerotatus
alboannulatus
52
0/16
0
0.00–58.19
Anopheles annulipes s.
l.
49
1/18
22.44
1.24–115.30
Cx.
globocoxitus
43
0/20
0
0–76.19
Cx.
annulirostris
10
0/2
0
0–161.60
Cx.
molestus
6
0/6
0
0–390.33
Cx.
quinquefasciatus
5
0/2
0
0–319.26
Oc.
australis
3
0/2
0
0–499.14
Cx. pipiens
gp.
1
0/1
0
0–793.45
Total
11,504
48/957
4.28
3.20–5.62
*MLE bias was corrected when >1 pool was positive;
otherwise uncorrected.
Thirty-five IS2404-positive pools did not contain
IS2606 and KR. However, the cycle threshold (Ct) values for
IS2404 were lower for those pools that did have IS2606
and KR, which suggested that failure to detect KR and IS2606 in some
pools was caused by low DNA concentration, rather than lack of specificity for
M. ulcerans. This finding is consistent with known
differences in copy number per cell of targets used for PCR screening and confirmation
(23). A total of 124 pools of
mosquitoes that were negative for IS2404 by PCR were screened with probes
for KR and IS2606. None were positive, which indicated that these 2 loci
are consistently linked to IS2404 and do not occur independently.
The MLE (bias corrected) for all mosquitoes over the entire testing period at Point
Lonsdale was 4.3 M. ulcerans PCR-positive
mosquitoes/1,000 tested (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2–5.6). However, mosquito
numbers varied widely between trappings, as did proportions of positive pools. On 1
occasion, only 269 mosquitoes were trapped, but 6 of the pools were positive (December
2005; MLE 22.4, 95% CI 10.3–50.3). Most PCR-positive pools had relatively high Ct
values for IS2404 PCR, which indicated low numbers of contaminating
M. ulcerans cells. With reference to spiking
experiments under laboratory conditions, ≈10–100 M.
ulcerans were likely to have been present per contaminated mosquito
(23).
Mosquito Numbers, Proportion PCR Positive, and Reporting of BU
Trapping was conducted at Point Lonsdale between December 2004 and January 2007. Mosquito
numbers varied during the period, and traps were not set when local reports suggested low
mosquito numbers (Appendix Figure). There appeared to be a qualitative relationship
between PCR-positive mosquitoes in spring and summer (September–February) and
reporting of new cases of human disease in autumn and winter (March–August). The
exposure-to-reporting interval is typically longer than the actual incubation period
because patients do not always seek medical assistance immediately and doctors do not
always diagnose BU when a patient is first seen (28).
Mosquitoes Caught at Other Locations in Victoria
To test that the observed association between M.
ulcerans and mosquitoes only occurs in outbreak areas, we tested 3,385
mosquitoes from several inhabited areas with lower BU endemicity than Point Lonsdale. From
October 2005 through January 2007, a total of 2,119 mosquitoes (89% Ae.
camptorhynchus) were trapped in townships on the Bellarine Peninsula
where 30 cases of BU have been reported in the past 5 years; 3 pools of
Ae. camptorhynchus were positive by
IS2404 PCR. In January and June 2006, a total of 795 mosquitoes (82%
Ae. camptorhynchus) were trapped in the Bass Coast
Shire, which includes Phillip Island, a region that has previously been endemic for
M. ulcerans (14) but has only reported 2 cases in the past 5 years. One
pool of Ae. notoscriptus was positive for
IS2404. From February through April 2006, 471 mosquitoes were captured
from inhabited areas in northern and central Victoria where no human cases of
M. ulcerans have been reported. Ten different species
were trapped, including 226 Ae. camptorhynchus (48%),
but all pools were negative for IS2404. When analyzed together, an
association was observed between degree of endemicity and probability of trapping
mosquitoes that are positive by PCR for M. ulcerans (Table 2), but this association did not show statistical
significance (p = 0.07).
Relationship between cases of Buruli ulcer, mosquitoes tested, and maximum
likelihood estimate (MLE) per 1,000 mosquitoes trapped in Victoria, Australia, and
tested by PCR for insertion sequence IS2404 of Mycobacterium
ulcerans*
Region
No. cases past 5 y
No. mosquitoes tested (%
Aedes camptorhynchus)†
No. pools positive
MLE (95% CI)
Point Lonsdale
79
11,504 (91.8)
48
4.2 (3.08–5.53)
Bellarine Peninsula (excluding Point
Lonsdale)
30
2,119 (88.7)
3
1.42 (0.37–3.85)
Bass coast Shire including Phillip
Island
2
795 (82.1)
1
1.25 (0.07–6.03)
Central and northern Victoria (Mildura,
Swan Hill, Moira, Shepparton)
0
471 (48.0)
0
0 (0–7.34)
Total
111
14,889 (89.4)
52
3.57 (2.70–4.64)
*MLE bias was corrected when >1 pool was positive,
otherwise uncorrected. CI, confidence interval †p value = 0.07
(χ2: 4 × 2 table; pools positive/no. tested).
Discussion
To our knowledge, the outbreak of BU in Point Lonsdale is the largest ever recorded in
Australia and has now caused more than twice as many cases as the well-described outbreak at
Phillip Island a decade earlier (16,29). A
striking feature of both outbreaks is their intensely localized nature. We identified 79
cases that were epidemiologically linked to Point Lonsdale and the western edges of
Queenscliff, but the town of Queenscliff, only 4 km to the east along the same beach, has so
far remained disease free. The cumulative attack rate for both towns is estimated to be 1.2%
of the resident population, but it could be up to twice as high if only the population of
Point Lonsdale, where all transmission appears to have occurred, were considered. Although
Queenscliff remains unaffected, the nearby towns of Barwon Heads and Ocean Grove, ≈12
km west of Point Lonsdale, began reporting their first cases in 2005.
The first case at Point Lonsdale was reported in January 2002. In 2004, the outbreak
increased in intensity and began to involve visitors as well as residents, which suggested
that environmental contamination with M. ulcerans has
steadily increased over 5 years. Among local residents, we found a higher attack rate in the
elderly, with 3.7% of residents of Point Lonsdale/Queenscliff >75 years of age with BU.
The reasons for this age distribution are not known, but increasing risk with age could be
caused by an age-related immune defect or an unrecognized behavioral factor. Among visitors,
there was a pronounced bimodal age distribution, which probably represents a skewing of the
exposed population (e.g., young children going to stay with their retired grandparents over
the summer while their parents stayed at work) but may also reflect increased susceptibility
in young persons. This bimodal pattern, which included increased incidence in young persons
and the elderly, has also been reported in Africa (30).
During our investigations at Point Lonsdale, we focused initially on several marshy areas
and obtained positive PCR results for plant material from 2 small ornamental lakes and soil
from storm water drains (23).
However, case-patients did not report direct contact with these lakes or drains (these
sources of water are not used for swimming or wading). Thus, how people were exposed is not
clear. In an outbreak in Phillip Island, many cases were clustered around a newly formed
wetland and a golf course irrigation system, and we proposed transmission from these sites
by aerosol (16,29). However, this hypothesis may not be supported by
our new evidence, which suggests that M. ulcerans may not
be free-living in the environment but may have adapted to specific niches within aquatic
environments, including salivary glands of some insects. Thus, we investigated whether
M. ulcerans could be detected in mosquitoes, which had
been reported in higher than usual numbers at Point Lonsdale. We also investigated behavior
in a case-control study (the subject of a separate report), which found that being bitten by
mosquitoes increased the odds of having BU (31).
A total of 14,889 mosquitoes obtained over a 25-month period (11,504 from Point Lonsdale)
were tested for M. ulcerans by using a highly sensitive
and specific real-time PCR (23). We
used PCR because direct culture of M. ulcerans from the
environment is extremely difficult and was only achieved when IS2404 PCR
screening of environmental samples accurately directed researchers to specific
microenvironments that include water insects and aquatic plants (32). Although IS2404,
IS2606, and the mycolactone-producing virulence plasmid have been
detected in mycobacteria other than M. ulcerans (33–35), identification of these targets in expected
relative proportions and the VNTR locus 9 sequence identical to that of the outbreak strain
in a subset of mosquito pools with sufficiently high DNA concentrations confirms that we
identified the outbreak strain (23).
We also demonstrated that over a 2-year cycle at Point Lonsdale absolute numbers of
mosquitoes and PCR-positive mosquitoes increased in spring and summer followed by a cluster
of new human cases in autumn and winter. This pattern is consistent with recent point
estimates that suggest the incubation period for BU in Australia is 3–7 months (2
cases) (36) and 1–4 months (3
cases) (28), and that an additional
1–6 weeks may elapse before cases are diagnosed and reported (28).
The predominant species trapped was Ae. camptorhynchus;
however, identification of M. ulcerans in 4 other species
suggests that M. ulcerans contamination of mosquitoes is
not species specific. Ae. camptorhynchus is a salt marsh
species, an aggressive biter, and a major pest in coastal areas of southeastern Australia
that has been linked to transmission of Ross River virus. The mosquito appears in large
numbers after rain as minimum temperatures begin to increase, with a lag time of ≈1
month (37). Of the other species
from which at least 1 PCR-positive pool was identified, An.
annulipes and Cq. linealis are fresh
water species (38).
Ae. notoscriptus is a peridomestic species that breeds
in containers (e.g., in roof gutters) (39), can transmit dog hookworm, and has a limited flight range
(e.g., <200 m) (40). In contrast,
Cx. australicus may have a flight range of many
kilometers (41). A limited number of
other biting or aquatic insects were also tested and none were positive for
M. ulcerans. However, larger numbers must be screened
before it can be concluded that they do not transmit M.
ulcerans.
Our results do not demonstrate viability or transmissibility of M.
ulcerans at the time mosquitoes were captured, and the method we used
does not answer questions about location of M. ulcerans
within the insect. Because M. ulcerans is an environmental
pathogen, PCR-positive mosquitoes may only be indicators of its presence in the environment
and not linked to transmission. The Ct values obtained for mosquito pools suggest that only
10–100 organisms were present per positive pool, which is more consistent with
organisms being acquired on outer surfaces of mosquitoes when resting or feeding in storm
water drains (23), rather than
mosquitoes being a true productive reservoir and vector. However, if some bacterial cells
were present on the proboscis, they could have been injected beneath the keratin layer
during feeding. Although the inoculum size required to cause a human infection is unknown,
the long incubation period suggests a low initial inoculum. Our findings do not demonstrate
that mosquitoes are responsible for transmission, but this possibility should be
investigated. Studies are underway to artificially infect mosquito larvae with
M. ulcerans and initiate infection in a mouse model, as
has been conducted with naucorids (9).
Although our findings may not apply to the situation in Africa, the close genetic
relationship of Australian isolates of M. ulcerans with
strains from humans with BU in Africa (35) should encourage similar search on M.
ulcerans in mosquitoes from the primary BU-endemic regions of West
Africa. We have shown that a small proportion of mosquitoes of 5 species captured in a
BU-endemic area during an intense human outbreak of BU can carry M.
ulcerans; PCR-positive mosquitoes are likely present at times of peak
transmission and mosquitoes captured in areas with few human cases appear less likely to be
positive for M. ulcerans. We hypothesize that transmission
by mosquitoes offers a partial explanation for the outbreak at Point Lonsdale and possibly
at other sites in southeastern Australia.
Supplementary Material
Appendix Figure
Relationship between reporting of cases of Buruli ulcer (BU) and mosquitoes tested from
Point Lonsdale, Australia, December 2004-January 2007. Increased mosquito activity in
spring and summer (September-February) appears to be followed by a wave of new reports
in autumn and winter (March-August). A) No. mosquitoes tested by month at Point Lonsdale
(traps were not set when local reports suggested low mosquito activity). B) Proportion
of tested mosquitoes positive by PCR for Mycobacterium ulcerans by month. C) No. of new
cases of BU epidemiologically linked to Point Lonsdale by month.
Suggested citation for this article: Johnson PDR, Azuolas J, Lavender
CJ, Wishart E, Stinear TP, Hayman JA, et al. Mycobacterium ulcerans in
mosquitoes captured during outbreak of Buruli ulcer, southeastern Australia. Emerg Infect
Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2007 Nov [date cited]. Available from
http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/13/11/1653.htm
This study was supported by the Victorian State Government Department of Human Services
Public Health research grant (2004-7).
Dr Johnson is deputy director of the Infectious Diseases Department at Austin Health, a
University of Melbourne teaching hospital. His research interests include epidemiology,
transmission, and treatment of M. ulcerans infections, drug resistance in
Staphylococcus aureus, and hospital infection control.
ReferencesAlsopDGThe Bairnsdale
ulcer.Aust N Z J Surg.
1972;41:317–94554345JenkinGA, SmithM, FairleyM, JohnsonPDAcute, oedematous
Mycobacterium ulcerans infection in a farmer from far north
Queensland.Med J Aust.
2002;176:180–111915879JohnsonPD, StinearTP, SmallPL, PluschkeG, MerrittRW, PortaelsF, Buruli ulcer (Mycobacterium ulcerans): new insights, new
hope for disease control.PLoS Med. 2005;2:e10810.1371/journal.pmed.002010815839744MacCallumP, TolhurstJC, BuckleG, SissonsHAA new mycobacterial
infection in man.J Pathol Bacteriol.
1948;60:93–12210.1002/path.170060011118876541GeorgeKM, ChatterjeeD, GunawardanaG, WeltyD, HaymanJ, LeeR, Mycolactone: a polyketide toxin from Mycobacterium
ulcerans required for virulence.Science.
1999;283:854–710.1126/science.283.5403.8549933171StinearTP, Mve-ObiangA, SmallPL, FriguiW, PryorMJ, BroschR, Giant plasmid-encoded polyketide synthases produce the macrolide toxin of
Mycobacterium ulcerans.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2004;101:1345–910.1073/pnas.030587710114736915DebackerM, AguiarJ, SteunouC, ZinsouC, MeyersWM, GuedenonA, Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Buruli ulcer) in rural
hospital, Southern Benin, 1997–2001.Emerg Infect Dis.
2004;10:1391–815496239StinearTP, SeemannT, PidotS, FriguiW, ReyssetG, GarnierT, Reductive evolution and niche adaptation inferred from the genome of
Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli
ulcer.Genome Res.
2007;17:192–20010.1101/gr.594280717210928MarsollierL, RobertR, AubryJ, Saint AndreJP, KouakouH, LegrasP, Aquatic insects as a vector for Mycobacterium
ulcerans.Appl Environ Microbiol.
2002;68:4623–810.1128/AEM.68.9.4623-4628.200212200321MarsollierL, AubryJ, CoutanceauE, AndreJP, SmallPL, MilonG, Colonization of the salivary glands of Naucoris cimicoides
by Mycobacterium ulcerans requires host plasmatocytes and a macrolide
toxin, mycolactone.Cell Microbiol.
2005;7:935–4310.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00521.x15953026MarstonBJ, DialloMO, HorsburghCRJr, DiomandeI, SakiMZ, KangaJM, Emergence of Buruli ulcer disease in the Daloa region of Côte
d’Ivoire.Am J Trop Med Hyg.
1995;52:219–247694962AigaH, AmanoT, CairncrossS, AdomakoJ, NanasOK, ColemanSAssessing water-related risk
factors for Buruli ulcer: a case-control study in Ghana.Am J Trop Med Hyg.
2004;71:387–9215516631HaymanJPostulated epidemiology of
Mycobacterium ulcerans infection.Int J Epidemiol.
1991;20:1093–810.1093/ije/20.4.10931800409JohnsonPD, VeitchMG, LeslieDE, FloodPE, HaymanJAThe emergence of
Mycobacterium ulcerans infection near Melbourne.Med J Aust.
1996;164:76–88569576JohnsonPD, HaymanJA, QuekTY Fyfe JA, Jenkin GA, Buntine JA, et al.
Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and control of
Mycobacterium ulcerans infection (Bairnsdale or Buruli ulcer) in
Victoria, Australia.Med J Aust.
2007;186:64–817223765VeitchMGK, JohnsonPDR, FloodPE, LeslieDE, StreetAC, HaymanJAA large localized outbreak
of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection on a temperate southern Australian
island.Epidemiol Infect.
1997;119:313–810.1017/S09502688970082739440434RossBC, MarinoL, OppedisanoF, EdwardsR,
Robins-BrowneRM, JohnsonPDDevelopment of a PCR assay
for the rapid diagnosis of Mycobacterium ulcerans
infection.J Clin Microbiol.
1997;35:1696–7009196176PhillipsR, HorsfieldC, KuijperS, LarteyA, TettehI, EtuafulS, Sensitivity of PCR targeting the IS2404 insertion sequence
of Mycobacterium ulcerans in an assay using punch biopsy specimens for
diagnosis of Buruli ulcer.J Clin Microbiol.
2005;43:3650–610.1128/JCM.43.8.3650-3656.200516081892Victorian Department of Human Services
Notifications of infectious diseases: Summary reports [cited 2007 Aug 18]. Available from
http://www.health.vic.gov.au/ideas/downloads/daily_reports/rptvictoriansummary.pdfAustralian Bureau of Statistics 2001 census
[cited 2007 Aug 28]. Available from http://www.abs.gov.auRoheDL, FallRPA miniature battery powered
CO2 baited light trap for mosquito-borne encephalitis
surveillance.Bulletin of the Society of Vector Ecology.1979;4:24–7RussellRC A colour photo atlas of mosquitoes of
southeastern Australia. 1996 [cited 2007 Aug 17]. Available from http://medent.usyd.edu.au/mosqkey/mosquito_key.htm#8aFyfeJA, LavenderCJ, JohnsonPD, GlobanM, SieversA, AzuolasJ, Development and application of two multiplex real-time PCR assays for the
detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans in clinical and environmental
samples.Appl Environ Microbiol.
2007;73:4733–4010.1128/AEM.02971-0617526786StinearT, RossBC, DaviesJK, MarinoL,
Robins-BrowneRM, OppedisanoF, Identification and characterization of IS2404 and
IS2606: two distinct repeated sequences for detection of
Mycobacterium ulcerans by PCR.J Clin Microbiol.
1999;37:1018–2310074520AblordeyA, SwingsJ, HubansC, ChemlalK, LochtC, PortaelsF, Multilocus variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium
ulcerans.J Clin Microbiol.
2005;43:1546–5110.1128/JCM.43.4.1546-1551.200515814964BiggerstaffB Software for mosquito surveillance. Atlanta:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [cited 2007 Aug 17]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/software.htmAustralian Bureau of Meteorology [cited 2007 Aug 17].
Available from http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_087100.shtmlQuekTY, HenryMJ, PascoJA,
O’BrienDP, JohnsonPD, HughesA, Mycobacterium ulcerans infection: factors influencing
diagnostic delay.Med J Aust. In pressRossBC, JohnsonPDR, OppedisanoF, MarinoL, SieversA, StinearT, Detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans in environmental
samples during an outbreak of ulcerative disease.Appl Environ Microbiol.
1997;63:4135–89327583DebackerM, AguiarJ, SteunouC, ZinsouC, MeyersWM, ScottJT, Mycobacterium ulcerans disease: role of age and gender in
incidence and morbidity.Trop Med Int Health.
2004;9:1297–30410.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01339.x15598261QuekTYJ, AthanE, HenryMJ, PascoJA,
Redden-HoareJ, HughesA, Risk factors for Mycobacterium ulcerans infection,
southeastern Australia.Emerg Infect Dis.
2007;13:1661–618217548MarsollierL, StinearT, AubryJ, Saint AndreJP, RobertR, LegrasP, Aquatic plants stimulate the growth of and biofilm formation by
Mycobacterium ulcerans in axenic culture and harbor these bacteria in
the environment.Appl Environ Microbiol.
2004;70:1097–10310.1128/AEM.70.2.1097-1103.200414766593RhodesMW, KatorH, McNabbA, DeshayesC, ReyratJM,
Brown-ElliottBA, Mycobacterium pseudoshottsii sp. nov., a slowly growing
chromogenic species isolated from Chesapeake Bay striped bass (Morone
saxatilis).Int J Syst Evol Microbiol.
2005;55:1139–4710.1099/ijs.0.63343-015879246RangerBS, MahrousEA, MosiL, AdusumilliS, LeeRE, ColorniA, Globally distributed mycobacterial fish pathogens produce a novel
plasmid-encoded toxic macrolide, mycolactone F.Infect Immun.
2006;74:6037–4510.1128/IAI.00970-0616923788YipMJ, PorterJL, FyfeJA, LavenderCJ, PortaelsF, RhodesM, Evolution of Mycobacterium ulcerans and other
mycolactone-producing mycobacteria from a common Mycobacterium marinum
progenitor.J Bacteriol.
2007;189:2021–910.1128/JB.01442-0617172337LavenderCJ, SenanayakeSN, FyfeJA, BuntineJA, GlobanM, StinearTP, First case of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Bairnsdale
or Buruli ulcer) acquired in New South Wales.Med J Aust.
2007;186:62–317223764BartonPS, AbertonJG, KayBHSpatial and temporal
definition of Ochlerotatus (Aedes)
camptorhynchus (Thomson) (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Gippsland Lakes
system of eastern Victoria.Aust J Entomol.
2004;43:16–2210.1111/j.1440-6055.2004.00405.xRussellRC, CloonanMJ, WellsPJ, ValeTGMosquito (Diptera:
Culicidae) and arbovirus activity on the south coast of New South Wales, Australia, in
1985–1988.J Med Entomol.
1991;28:796–8041685192MontgomeryBL, RitchieSARoof gutters: a key
container for Aedes aegypti and Ochlerotatus (Aedes)
notoscriptus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australia.Am J Trop Med Hyg.
2002;67:244–612408662WatsonTM, SaulA, KayBHAedes
notoscriptus (Diptera: Culicidae) survival and dispersal estimated by
mark-release-recapture in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.J Med Entomol.
2000;37:380–410.1603/0022-2585(2000)037[0380:ANDCSA]2.0.CO;215535581KayBH, FarrowRAMosquito (Diptera:
Culicidae) dispersal: implications for the epidemiology of Japanese and Murray Valley
encephalitis viruses in Australia.J Med Entomol.
2000;37:797–80110.1603/0022-2585-37.6.79711126532