The study took place in Benin, West Africa. The BU control activities are organized by a National Control Programme. Five BU Detection and Treatment Centers (CDTUB) are distributed throughout the BU-endemic regions. The detection, referral, and follow-up of BU cases rely heavily on community-based surveillance teams composed of village volunteers and 1 or 2 teachers and supervised by health workers from the nearest health facility.

The BU02 form acts as a triple registry. A trained nurse registers each case on the form. Each quarter, the completed first sheet is sent to the national level. The second sheet is sent to the regional level, and the third is kept at the CDTUB for local analysis. A training workshop is performed annually for the surveillance team. At the national level, data are computerized for analysis and mapping, and feedback is provided annually at a review meeting with all BU management participants.

With the use of this system, from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2005, a total of 2,598 new and recurrent cases were reported and treated in Benin (Tables 1 and 2). The rates of disease recurrence (6%) were much lower than the figures reported in other countries, e.g., 16% in Ghana (4,5). Euverte found a rate of 3% recurrence among 103 patients treated with streptomycin and rifampin in Oueme, Benin, in 2005 (6). During the same period, the total numbers of leprosy and tuberculosis cases were 1,163 and 8,556, respectively. Thus, BU has become the second most important mycobacterial disease after tuberculosis in some endemic countries, including Benin (3) and Ghana (7).

Consistent with other studies (10), our study found that 51% of the 2,598 cases were in children <15 years of age. Cases were equally distributed between male (49.7%) and female (50.3%) patients.

Of the total case-patients, 1,644 (63.3%) reported lesions on their lower limbs; 524 (20.2%), lesions on their upper limbs; 231 (8.9%), lesions on their head, neck, or trunk; 19 (0.7%), lesions in the perineal region; and 160 (6.2%), lesions in multiple areas. The location of a lesion was not noted on the BU02 form for 20 (0.8%) case-patients.

Many researchers believe that because legs and arms are the most exposed parts of the body they are more likely to be injured or to be bitten by an insect that may be associated with transmission of M. tuberculosis. However, why some lesions occur in the perineum, which is the least exposed area, remains unclear. In some villages, persons take baths in the swamps while carrying out domestic activities such as washing clothes or dishes. Lesions around the head, neck, and trunk were present in 9% of patients and in the perineum in almost 1%. Although these percentages are small, managing the technical and cosmetic aspects of lesions in the head, neck (11), and perineal regions (12) is difficult in Benin, where plastic surgeons are not available.

Nonulcerative early lesions (nodule, edema, and plaques) occurred in 27% of the total cases. Ulcers and mixed forms (an ulcer and some other form of the disease) occurred in 72% of the cases, and single ulcerative lesions occurred in 54%. The clinical form was not properly recorded for 2% of cases. Our figure of 72% is lower than the 94% rate reported elsewhere for Benin from 1989 through 1996 (13). The real challenge in Benin is how to further reduce the percentage of ulcers and sustain such surveillance efforts.

Regarding infection involving bone, Debacker et al. (3) reported a rate of 13% among 1,700 patients treated at CDTUB Zagnanado from 1997 through 2001. However, our results showed that bone involvement occurred in 6% of cases. Bone infection is a consequence of late disease (14). As progress is made in reducing late disease, bone lesions should be reduced.

Laboratory confirmation of BU is not frequently performed before treatment is begun. Although WHO strongly recommends laboratory confirmation of cases, in practice not all cases require it. Our study shows that 50% of cases are confirmed by at least 1 laboratory method under routine conditions.

The geographic distribution of cases shows that the BU-endemic areas are confined to the southern half of the country, Most BU-endemic villages occur along the Oueme and Couffo Rivers (Appendix Figure 1, and Appendix Figure 2).

The Mono Region has the lowest incidence of BU in southern Benin. By contrast, the other BU-endemic regions are around rivers. This observation cannot be due to insufficiency of reporting because there is a CDTUB in the area and surveillance is good (Appendix Figure 1). Unlike previous reports from Benin, our results suggest that the Oueme Region is now the most endemic for BU, not the Zou Region (Appendix Figure 1). We believe that this finding may be due to the active community-level detection and antimicrobial drug treatment conducted by the new BU center established in the Ouémé/Plateau region in April 2004.

The data provided by Benin’s BU surveillance system that used the BU02 form enabled the BU Program in Benin to reliably describe the epidemiologic situation, evaluate the results of actions, measure the results of the centers, and plan future interventions. The collected data are ≈98% complete. We conclude that the BU surveillance system is useful to the BU Program in Benin. Because the BU02 form has 3 parts, data can be submitted from the field without the difficulties of photocopying the pages of the register or entering the data in a computer, which may be problematic at a rural facility level. However, training and supervision of health workers are required.