An emerging HIV epidemic, concentrated in young, male, injection drug users, is responsible for increasing TB reporting rates in urban Vietnam.
In Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, reporting rates for tuberculosis (TB) are rising in an emerging HIV epidemic. To describe the HIV epidemic among TB patients and quantify its impact on rates of reported TB, we performed a repeated cross-sectional survey from 1997 through 2002 in a randomly selected sample of inner city TB patients. We assessed effect by adjusting TB case reporting rates by the fraction of TB cases attributable to HIV infection. HIV prevalence in TB patients rose exponentially from 1.5% to 9.0% during the study period. Young (<35 years), single, male patients were mostly affected; injection drug use was a potent risk factor. After correction for HIV infection, the trend in TB reporting rates changed from a 1.9% increase to a 0.4% decrease per year. An emerging HIV epidemic, concentrated in young, male, injection drug users, is responsible for increased TB reporting rates in urban Vietnam.
Patients who are co-infected with HIV and
Vietnam is listed by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a TB high-burden country and, through a strong National TB Program (NTP), has reached and exceeded the WHO targets of 70% case detection and 85% cure rates from 1997 onward (
The first case of HIV infection in Vietnam was recorded in 1990, and since then HIV infection has been mostly limited to men and high-risk groups such as injection drug users (IDUs) and commercial sex workers (
Our study objective was to describe the course of the HIV prevalence among TB patients in Ho Chi Minh City during 1997–2002. By combining our data with the NTP reporting data, we also quantified the effect of HIV on the TB reporting rates in this city.
From 1997 through 2002, we performed a repeated cross-sectional survey of HIV prevalence among TB patients in the 12 most urbanized districts (districts 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, Phu nhuan, Tan binh, Nha be, and Binh thanh) of Ho Chi Minh City. Until 1998, districts included all patients
We determined HIV status by ELISA (Genolavia Mixt, Sanofi, Paris, France, until 1999; and Genscreen, Sanofi, Paris, France, from 1999 onward) and an independent confirmatory test (Serodia; Fujirebio, Tokyo, Japan, or Vironostika, Organon, Boxtel, the Netherlands) if the first test result was positive. District TB staff collected data for each patient on TB disease (diagnostic category, treatment history), age, sex, marital and employment status, education level, and risk factors for HIV infection. Patients who owned small businesses and seasonal workers were coded as “self-employed”; civil servants and patients under contract (e.g., drivers), as “employed.” All data were entered twice in EpiInfo version 6 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA), and discrepancies were checked against the raw data. TB reporting data were obtained from NTP quarterly district reports. Sex, age, and distributions of urban and rural population size were interpolated from the results of the 1994, 1999, and 2004 census; standard exponential population growth was assumed.
For HIV trend analyses, we used 2-year blocks, increasing group size and power of the analyses. The Cuzick test for trend was used to identify monovariate time trends in HIV prevalence (
Multivariable analysis was performed by logistic regression. After transformation (squaring), time of inclusion could be entered as a continuous variable (χ2 for departure linear trend = 0.68 [df = 1], p = 0.41). Variables were included when the likelihood ratio χ2 test was significant at the 0.1 level.
We identified multivariable time trends by entering time interaction variables (time of inclusion × variable x) in our logistic model (
To describe the combined epidemic outside the known high-risk groups, we ran the final multivariable model after excluding all IDUs. The model goodness-of-fit was assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test of goodness-of-fit and by visual inspection of the distribution of the model residuals (
We used the formula
The rate of TB observed without HIV was calculated as [(1 – PAF) × current TB rate]. We restricted this part of the analysis to new smear-positive TB patients from urban districts. The diagnosis of these patients’ condition is highly standardized and the HIV/TB data came from urbanized districts, which ensured that combining the 2 datasets was as valid as possible. Exponential growth rates were estimated by using the least squares method.
In 2002, the Ho Chi Minh City Council started a mandatory rehabilitation program for IDUs. Because these rehabilitation centers were not included in our surveillance, we quantified potential resulting bias by estimating how including 50% more IDUs in 2002 would affect our results.
Analyses were performed by using Stata version 8 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Excel 2003 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) was used to asses the effect of HIV on reporting rates.
A total of 5,701 patients consented to HIV testing (92% of those eligible) and were included in the study. Because of clerical error, 504 patients entered the study from July through December 1996. These were added to the subset analyzed for 1997. Apart from IDUs, patient numbers in the individual risk categories were too low to be analyzed separately and were therefore added to the category of “other.”
HIV prevalence rose exponentially from 1997 through 2002 (
| Variable | 1997–1998, % (n/N) | 1999–2000, % (n/N) | 2001–2002, % (n/N) | p value† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study population | 1.5 (38/2,476) | 2.9 (47/1,617) | 9.0 (144/1,608) | <0.001 |
| Age, y | ||||
| <24 | 0.6 (2/342) | 5.9 (14/239) | 19.9 (53/267) | <0.001 |
| 25–34 | 2.0 (14/711) | 3.1 (14/452) | 14.4 (65/450) | <0.001 |
| 35–44 | 2.4 (17/719) | 2.4 (11/460) | 3.6 (16/439) | 0.100 |
| 45–54 | 0.7 (5/704) | 1.7 (8/466) | 2.2 (10/452) | 0.020 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 2.0 (35/1,749) | 3.8 (43/1,139) | 11.6 (134/1,158) | <0.001 |
| Female | 0.4 (3/727) | 0.8 (4/478) | 2.2 (10/450) | 0.001 |
| Marital status | ||||
| Married | 1.2 (19/1,538) | 1.4 (14/989) | 4.7 (46/975) | <0.001 |
| Single | 1.8 (14/775) | 5.4 (28/521) | 15.9 (87/549) | <0.001 |
| Separated | 3.1 (5/163) | 4.7 (5/107) | 13.1 (11/84) | 0.010 |
| Education level | ||||
| Illiterate | 1.1 (3/281) | 2.0 (3/151) | 9.4 (10/106) | 0.001 |
| Primary | 1.4 (18/1298) | 3.8 (18/478) | 10.7 (55/512) | <0.001 |
| Secondary or higher | 1.9 (17/897) | 2.6 (26/988) | 8.0 (79/990) | <0.001 |
| Employment status | ||||
| Employed | 0.9 (3/334) | 2.3 (7/300) | 5.8 (21/362) | <0.001 |
| Self-employed | 1.6 (22/1376) | 2.9 (26/909) | 8.6 (84/979) | <0.001 |
| Unemployed | 1.7 (13/766) | 3.4 (14/408) | 14.6 (39/267) | <0.001 |
| Risk group | ||||
| Injection drug use | 31.3 (5/16) | 47.1 (8/17) | 95.4 (41/43) | <0.001 |
| Other | 1.3 (33/2,460) | 2.4 (39/1,600) | 6.6 (103/1,565) | <0.001 |
| Patient history | ||||
| New case | 1.6 (33/2,018) | 2.9 (39/1,338) | 9.5 (129/1,358) | <0.001 |
| Relapsed case | 0.5 (1/223) | 4.1 (5/122) | 5.0 (6/119) | 0.002 |
| Other‡ | 1.7 (4/235) | 1.9 (3/157) | 6.9 (9/131) | 0.030 |
| Tuberculosis type | ||||
| Smear-positive | 1.5 (27/1,799) | 3.3 (38/1,145) | 8.3 (91/1,100) | <0.001 |
| Smear-negative | 0.3 (1/362) | 1.5 (4/260) | 5.2 (10/194) | <0.001 |
| Extrapulmonary | 3.2 (10/315) | 2.4 (5/212) | 13.7 (43/314) | <0.001 |
*%, percentage of HIV-positive patients; n, no. HIV-infected patients; N, total no. patients. †p value for Cuzick nonparametric test for trend across time periods. ‡Includes previously treated tuberculosis patients who did not respond to treatment, defaulted, or received their first treatment outside the National TB Program.
The 12 districts did not differ significantly in HIV prevalence during the study period (χ2 = 38.1 [df = 33], p = 0.25) (data not shown). HIV prevalence in reported IDUs rose to 95% in 2001–2002, which accounted for 28% of all HIV-infected patients.
In the multivariable analysis, when time trends and other interactions were disregarded, HIV infection among TB patients was associated with age <45 years, male sex, not being married or employed, and being an IDU (
| Variable | Crude OR† (95% CI) | p value‡ | Adjusted OR§ (95% CI) | p value‡ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year of inclusion | 5.78 (4.2–7.9) | <0.001 | 5.80 (4.1–8.2) | <0.001 |
| Age, y | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 6.16 (3.8–9.9) | 5.15 (2.9–9.3) | |||
| 25–34 | 4.25 (2.7–6.8) | 4.16 (2.5–7.0) | ||
| 35–44 | 1.94 (1.2–3.2) | 1.96 (1.1–3.4) | ||
| >45 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Sex | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Male | 5.33 (3.2–8.8) | 5.79 (3.4–9.9) | ||
| Female | 1 | 1 | ||
| Marital status | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Married | 1 | 1 | ||
| Single | 3.3 (2.4–4.3) | 1.67 (1.2–2.4) | ||
| Separated | 2.7 (1.7–4.5) | 3.93 (2.2–7.0) | ||
| Employment status | 0.18 | 0.020 | ||
| Employed | 1 | 1 | ||
| Self-Employed | 1.31 (0.9–2.0) | 1.62 (1.1–2.5) | ||
| Unemployed | 1.49 (1.0–2.3) | 1.97 (1.2–3.2) | ||
| Risk category | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Injection drug use | 76.44 (45.5–128.3) | 46.06 (25.3–84.0) | ||
| Other | 1 | 1 |
*OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. †Monovariate ORs. ‡p-value for likelihood ratio χ2 test for excluding variable from the model. §ORs adjusted for all variables in multivariable model.
| Variable | OR† (95% CI) | p value‡ |
|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 0.001 | |
| 4.49 (1.3–15.3) | ||
| 25–34 | 2.82 (0.9–8.6) | |
| 35–44 | 0.67 (0.2–2.3) | |
| >44§ | 1 | |
| Risk category | 0.005 | |
| IDU | 10.56 (1.6–66.6) | |
| Non-IDU§ | 1 |
*OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IDU, injection drug user. †OR from time × variable in model; OR>1 indicates a faster rise in HIV prevalence in that category than in the baseline category. ‡p value for likelihood ratio χ2 test for excluding variable from model. §Baseline category.
When IDUs were excluded, the multivariable model predicted the data less well (–2 log likelihood with IDUs = –686.7, without = –660.2), but this exclusion affected neither the direction of the ORs nor their size in a relevant way (data not shown). Also, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test of goodness-of-fit remained nonsignificant in both models (p = 0.72 with IDUs, p = 0.69 without). Although IDUs and non-IDU HIV-infected patients did not differ relevantly in age, sex, or marital status (χ2 test, p = 0.93, 0.53, and 0.78 respectively), they did differ in their employment status and level of education (χ2 test, p = 0.05 and <0.001, respectively).
PAF calculations show that 0.7%, 1.5%, 1.3%, 6.7%, 9.5%, and 9.7% of reported new smear-positive TB cases were attributable to HIV in 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, respectively. After these cases were excluded from analysis, the rising trend in TB reporting rates reversed to a mild decline (
Trends in notification rates of new smear-positive tuberculosis (TB) cases in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, observed and after correction for proportion of cases attributable to HIV infection. Total population (A), sex (B), and age specific (C). Correction of notification rates based on population attributable fraction to HIV infection assuming a risk ratio (RR) of 5 for risk for TB among HIV-infected compared with non–HIV-infected populations. *Error bars indicate corrected rates based on assumption that RR = 2 (top) or RR = 10 (bottom). †Exponential annual change (expressed as percentage) of TB notification rates.
Our results show that Ho Chi Minh City is faced with a combined HIV/TB epidemic that is concentrated and expanding rapidly in young men; injection drug use is a high-risk factor. By 2002, 1 in 10 TB patients was HIV infected, and 1 in 5 men <35 years of age was HIV infected. Even after taking into account the effect of HIV, TB case-reporting rates do not show the decline that is expected if directly observed therapy short course (DOTS) targets are met.
Although the observed trends in HIV infection among TB patients are cause for concern, they are not unexpected. Since 1996, HIV rates have been rising in Vietnam (
The relatively low proportion (28%) of HIV-infected patients who reported injection drug use leaves 72% of HIV-infected TB patients without a clear risk factor. This finding would suggest that HIV has moved beyond the established risk groups and into the general population. However, the strong social stigma associated with injection drug use in Vietnam increases the chance of underreporting; the reported 28% may be lower than actual drug use. The lack of difference in multivariable models with and without reported injection drug use, as well as the similar age, sex, and marital status distributions of IDU and non-IDU HIV-infected patients, supports this possibility.
Under the assumption of a causal relationship between infection with HIV and the risk for active TB (
The relevance of our data goes beyond the explanation of increasing TB reporting rates in Ho Chi Minh City. Dye et al. predicted that in settings with no HIV, reaching the WHO targets for DOTS would result in an annual decrease of
Other explanations for the lack of decline in TB reporting rates in Ho Chi Minh City include private sector involvement (
Apart from underreporting of risk factors, other limitations may have affected our results. For patients in the districts included in this surveillance, TB may have been diagnosed outside the surveillance project, e.g., in the city’s TB referral hospital or the private sector, which predominantly diagnose smear-negative and extrapulmonary TB. These diagnoses were reported for 29% of the patients in our study compared with 35% of all patients reported in Ho Chi Minh City over the study period. Our data may therefore underrepresent patients with smear-negative and extrapulmonary TB and may have underestimated or overestimated the HIV infection prevalence among them. Our estimates of the impact of HIV infection on TB reporting rates, however, will not be subject to such bias because these were based on new smear-positive patients only.
We have no data on levels of CD4+ lymphocytes and could not stage immune depletion in HIV-infected patients. Whether a case of TB in an HIV-infected patient was due to advanced immune depletion or would have occurred regardless of HIV infection is thus unknown. We have dealt with this possible bias by applying the PAF, which measures excess cases only (
The withdrawal of IDUs from regular surveillance in 2002 may also have caused bias. But as our simulations showed, the absence of 50% of IDUs reduced the size of the effect but not its direction.
We recommend that in Ho Chi Minh City all TB patients be tested for HIV because detection of HIV infections can help prevent some of the excess deaths in this population (cotrimoxazole preventive treatment and antiretroviral therapy) (
Ho Chi Minh City is now faced with a combined HIV/TB epidemic, predominantly among young men, which reduces the success of TB control. However, HIV alone does not fully explain the lack of a strong decline in TB reporting rates.
We thank Nguyen Viet Co, Le Ba Tung, and Jaap Broekmans for their involvement in setting up the HIV/TB surveillance project. This study could not have been performed without the help of the staff at the district TB units and Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital, who collected and managed the data. Finally, we thank Frank van Leth and Nico Nagelkerke for fruitful discussions on statistical issues.
This study was supported financially by KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation.
Dr Buu is an epidemiologist with the National Tuberculosis Control Program in the southern part of Vietnam. His research interests include effect of control efforts on tuberculosis epidemiology, especially with regard to HIV, drug resistance, and genotype.