Species-related differences in clinical response and duration and extent of viral shedding exist between North American ducks and gulls infected with H5N1 HPAI viruses.
Since 2002, H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses have been associated with deaths in numerous wild avian species throughout Eurasia. We assessed the clinical response and extent and duration of viral shedding in 5 species of North American ducks and laughing gulls (
Free-living birds in the orders Anseriformes (ducks, geese, swans) and Charadriiformes (gulls, terns, shore birds) have traditionally been considered the natural reservoirs for avian influenza viruses (AIVs) (
In 2002, a substantial number of deaths associated with H5N1 HPAI virus infection were reported in captive ducks, geese, and flamingos housed within 2 waterfowl parks in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China (
Five species of indigenous North American ducks were used in this study: mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), northern pintail (Anas acuta), blue-winged teal (Anas crecca), redhead (Aythya americana), and wood duck (Aix sponsa). Species were selected to represent the diverse habitat and behavior of ducks in North America and included important AIV reservoirs (mallard), long-distant migrants (northern pintail and blue-winged teal), diving ducks (redhead), and birds that breed in both northern and southern areas of the United States (wood duck). All ducks used in this study were captive-bred and acquired at 10 to 16 weeks of age (Howell's Exotic Waterfowl, Muldrow, OK, USA). This age is consistent with premigration staging in the late summer or early fall when AIV prevalence peaks in wild waterfowl (
Wild-caught gulls used in this investigation were acquired through the Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, University of Georgia (UGA), under federal permit. Nestling laughing gulls (Larus atricilla) were hand-caught in McIntosh County, Georgia, by personnel from the Georgia Department of Natural Resources and maintained at the College of Veterinary Medicine, UGA. At 12 weeks of age the gulls were transported to biosafety level 3–agriculture (BSL-3-Ag) facilities at the Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory (SEPRL), Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).
All birds used in this study were cared for in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, as outlined in the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching (
Two viruses were used in this study: A/Whooper Swan/Mongolia/244/05 (H5N1) (Mongolia/05) and A/Duck Meat/Anyang/01 (H5N1) (Anyang/01). The Mongolia/05 isolate was obtained from a dead whooper swan (Cygnus cygnus) and was chosen because of its known lethality in wild waterfowl. The Anyang/01 isolate was chosen on the basis of results from previous experimental infections of Pekin white ducks (Anas platyrhyncos), which did not result in illness or death (
Individual stocks of both AIVs used in this study were produced by second passage in 9-day-old embryonated chicken eggs. Allantoic fluid from the inoculated eggs was diluted in brain-heart infusion (BHI) medium to yield a final titer of 106 embryo 50% infectious doses (EID50) per 0.1 mL (single bird inoculum). A sham inoculum was prepared by diluting sterile allantoic fluid 1:30 in BHI.
Preinoculation serum was collected from each bird to confirm they were serologically naïve to influenza A viral antigens by agar gel precipitin test (AGP) and to H5 influenza by specific hemagglutination inhibition (HI) testing by using standard procedures (
Tissues samples collected at necropsy were preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin. After fixation, the tissues were routinely processed and embedded in paraffin. Sections were cut at a thickness of 5 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Duplicate sections were immunohistochemically stained by using a mouse-derived monoclonal antibody (P13C11) specific for type A influenza virus nucleoprotein antigen as the primary antibody (SEPRL, Athens, GA, USA). Procedures used to perform the immunohistochemical testing followed those previously described (
Oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs and tissue samples collected at necropsy were stored at -70°C until virus isolations and titrations were performed. Isolation of virus from swabs and tissues was performed by using embryonated chicken eggs (
AGP and HI tests were performed on the pre- and postinoculation serum by using standard procedures (
In addition to the 2 H5N1 viruses used in this study, A/chicken/Hong Kong/220/97 (H5N1) (Hong Kong/97) was included in the phylogenetic analysis because it is the only other H5N1 HPAI virus evaluated in multiple avian species by experimental inoculation (
Morbidity and mortality data are summarized in
| Virus/Host | No. sick/total (‡) | No. dead/total (§) | Virus isolation (oral swab) | Virus isolation (cloacal swab) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence, no. positive/total | Duration, days | AMT¶ (log10 EID50/mL) | Prevalence, no. positive/total | Duration, days | AMT (log10 EID50/mL) | |||
| Mongolia/05 | ||||||||
| BWT | 0/3 | 0/3 | 3/3 | 2 | 3.8 | 1/3 | 1 | 1.0 |
| RD | 0/3 | 0/3 | 3/3 | 1–4 | 2.8 | 2/3 | 1 | 1.2 |
| WD | 2/3 (5) | 2/3 (7,8) | 3/3 | 4–6 | 4.6 | 2/3 | 2,3 | 3.8 |
| MD | 0/3 | 0/3 | 3/3 (1) | 1–3 | 3.1 | 1/3 (1) | 1 | 1.0 |
| NP | 0/3 | 0/3 | 3/3 | 1–2 | 1.5 | 1/3 | 1 | 1.0 |
| LG | 3/3 (2–5) | 2/3 (7,8) | 3/3 | 7–8 | 4.2 | 3/3 | 4–7 | 2.6 |
| Anyang/01 | ||||||||
| BWT | 0/3 | 0/3 | 2/3 | 1,2 | 2.0 | 0/3 | – | – |
| RD | 0/3 | 0/3 | 2/3 | 4 | 4.0 | 0/3 | – | – |
| WD | 2/3 (6) | 1/3 (8) | 3/3 | 7 | 5.0 | 2/3 | 4,5 | 2.8 |
| MD | 0/3 | 0/3 | 3/3 | 1–2 | 2.1 | 1/3 | 1 | 1.0 |
| NP | 0/3 | 0/3 | 2/3 | 1,4 | 1.1 | 0/3 | – | – |
| LG | 3/3 (3–5) | 2/3 (9–10) | 3/3 | 6–10 | 5.0 | 3/3 | 3–6 | 2.0 |
*Intranasally sham-inoculated control birds for each avian species lacked clinical, serologic, virologic, and pathologic evidence of avian influenza virus infection. †HPAI, highly pathogenic avian influenza; BWT, blue-winged teal; RD, redhead; WD, wood duck; MD, mallard; NP, northern pintail, LG, laughing gull; Mongolia/05, A/Whooper Swan/Mongolia/244/05; Anyang/01, A/Duck Meat/Anyang/01. ‡No. in parentheses indicates the first day postinoculation that clinical disease was apparent. §No. in parentheses indicates day of death. ¶Average maximum titer (AMT) is the average peak titer for birds that shed virus (log10 50% embryo infective dose/mL).
A female wood duck with severe neurologic clinical signs of disease after intranasal inoculation with an Asian strain of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus.
All 3 Mongolia/05-inoculated laughing gulls exhibited severe clinical signs consisting of cloudy eyes, ruffled feathers, weakness, and incoordination, torticollis, or both. Two of these gulls died. The remaining gull clinically improved and stabilized over 6 days, but retained a head-tilt for the remainder of the trial. Severe clinical signs developed in all Anyang/01-inoculated gulls, similar to those seen in Mongolia/05-inoculated gulls. The disease progressed to death in 2 of these gulls. The remaining gull exhibited clinical signs for 8 days but gradually recovered until it showed no clinical symptoms.
Viral-induced lesions were found only in the wood ducks and laughing gulls that exhibited clinical signs. Lesions were mild in birds that recovered but were severe and widespread in birds that died or were humanely killed due to severe illness. For each species, the severity and distribution of lesions were the same for both H5N1 viruses, with the following exception described below.
Gross lesions were not present in any of the recovered birds. Wood ducks that died had multiple petechial hemorrhages in the pancreas, whereas laughing gulls had more widely distributed petechial hemorrhages in the ventriculus, apex of the heart, cerebrum, and pancreas.
On histopathologic examination, wood ducks that died had severe, diffuse neuronal necrosis in the cerebrum (
Photomicrographs of visceral organs from a wood duck that died after intranasal inoculation with a highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus. A) Brain with severe, multifocal to coalescing neuronal necrosis. Note the numerous necrotic neurons (arrowheads). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stain; bar =100 μm. B) Brain. Note the viral antigen (red) detected in the nucleus of several neurons. The unaffected brain tissue is blue. Immunohistochemical stain with hematoxylin counterstain; bar = 200 μm. C) Adrenal gland with necrotizing adrenalitis. Note the multiple foci of necrosis (n) surrounded by normal adrenal parenchyma (a). HE stain; bar = 200 μm. D) Pancreas with necrotizing pancreatitis. Note the 2 well-demarcated areas of necrosis (n) within the normal pancreatic tissue (p).
Wood ducks that died during the study had viral antigen in numerous organs, including the brain (
The virus isolation results are summarized in
| Host virus | Brain | Heart | Lung | Skeletal muscle | Kidney |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WD-Anyang | 3.7‡ | 3.5 | 5.1 | ND§ | 2.9 |
| WD-Mongolia | 6.6 | 2.7 | 7.1 | 2.5 | 6.7 |
| LG-Anyang | 4.8 | 4.7 | 5.2 | 2.5 | 4.2 |
| LG-Mongolia | 6.3 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 2.5 |
*No virus was isolated from the internal organs of the other 4 avian species inoculated with H5N1 viruses and all of the sham-inoculated control birds. †HPAI, highly pathogenic avian influenza; WD, wood duck; LG, laughing gull; Anyang, A/Duck Meat/Anyang/01; Mongolia, A/Whooper Swan/Mongolia/244/05. ‡log10 mean 50% embryo infectious dose per gram (log10EID50/g). §Not detected.
Serologic testing results are summarized in
| Virus/host | AGP serology | HI serology | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prechallenge, no. positive/total | Postchallenge, no. positive/total | Prechallenge, no. positive/total (GMT†) | Postchallenge, no. positive/total (GMT†) | |
| Mongolia/05 | ||||
| BWT | 0/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 | 3/3 (13) |
| RD | 0/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 | 3/3 (26) |
| WD | 0/3 | 1/1 | 1/3 (8) | 1/1 (128) |
| MD | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 1/3 (64) |
| NP | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 |
| LG | 0/3 | 1/1 | 1/3 (8) | 1/1 (64) |
| Anyang/01 | ||||
| BWT | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 3/3 (10) |
| RD | 0/3 | 1/3 | 0/3 | 3/3 (20) |
| WD | 0/3 | 2/2 | 0/3 | 2/2 (64) |
| MD | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 2/3 (16) |
| NP | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 2/3 (8) |
| LG | 0/3 | 1/1 | 0/3 | 1/1 (32) |
*HPAI, highly pathogenic avian influenza virus; AGP, agar gel precipitin; HI, hemagglutinationinhibition; BWT, blue-winged teal; RD, redhead; WD, wood duck; MD, mallard; NP, northern pintail; LG, laughing gull; Anyang/01, A/Duck Meat/Anyang/01; Mongolia/05, A/Whooper Swan/Mongolia/244/05. †GMT, geometric mean titer.
In comparing the 3 viruses (Hong Kong/97, Anyang/01, and Mongolia/05) genetically, the hemagglutinin genes are all clearly in the Goose/Guandong/96 lineage. At the amino acid (aa) level they vary by 3.5%–4.8%. They all have the HA cleavage compatible with an HPAI phenotype. The cleavage site is the same for Hong Kong/97 and Anyang/01, but the Mongolia/05 virus has 2 aa changes at the cleavage site. Phylogenetically, Hong Kong/97 and the Anyang/01 are in or close to clade 3, and the Mongolia/05 strain is in clade 2 (
Comparison of the other 7 gene segments demonstrates evidence of reassortment. The viruses from the 1997 outbreak in Hong Kong have a unique subtype-1 neuraminidase gene compared with any of the other H5N1 viruses. The Anyang/01 and Mongolia/05 N1 genes are from the same lineage, and both have an identical 20 aa stalk deletion. For the other 6 internal genes, the Anyang/01 and Mongolia/05 viruses in general were more closely related to each other than to the Hong Kong/97 virus. Except for the H5 gene, the Hong Kong/97 and viruses isolated in Hong Kong in the same year appear to be a unique constellation of genes that has not been seen again. Although the Anyang/01 and Mongolia/05 viruses were more closely related, the internal genes are most likely the result of reassortment with other influenza viruses and not the result of progressive sequence in a single lineage of viral genes.
Data from this study indicate that wood ducks and laughing gulls are highly susceptible to infection with H5N1 HPAI viruses as evidenced by widespread microscopic lesions, prolonged and highly concentrated viral shedding, and seroconversion. In addition, these species are likely to exhibit clinical disease or death associated with H5N1 virus infection. In a previous study, 2- to 3-week-old laughing gulls inoculated with A/chicken/Hong Kong/220/97 (H5N1) and A/tern/South Africa/61 (H5N3) did not exhibit illness or death (
Traditionally, ducks asymptomatically shed high concentrations of wild-type AIVs in their feces (
An efficient surveillance system is central to any preparedness program aimed to detect H5N1 in North America. Our data indicate that wood ducks and laughing gulls would be sensitive indicators of the presence of H5N1 circulating in wild birds. Wild avian species have previously been included in monitoring programs for other infectious diseases, for example, crow deaths for detection of West Nile virus (
In relation to wood ducks and laughing gulls, the remaining 4 duck species were much less susceptible to H5N1 HPAI virus infection and were refractory to disease. Although these species may possibly contribute to viral transmission in wild avian populations, their role in the spread or maintenance of H5N1 HPAI virus is probably minimal. However, our experimental results are based on small sample sizes (n = 3) that are inadequate to fully evaluate potential individual bird variation in response to H5N1 challenge.
Illness, deaths, and viral shedding were less in our study than what has previously been reported for experimental inoculation of ducks with H5N1 HPAI virus. Possible explanations for the reduced pathogenicity include the age of birds used in the study and the variability between different H5N1 HPAI viruses. An age-dependent reduction in lethality was present between 2- and 4-week-old ducks inoculated intranasally with H5N1 HPAI virus (
One wood duck and 1 laughing gull reacted positively for preinoculation antibodies to AIV by the HI test. However, both of these birds were positive at the lowest detectable limit of this test, and these results may have been false-positive due to nonspecific hemagglutination. The wood duck did not become sick after inoculation with the Mongolia/05 isolate. The laughing gull did become ill after inoculation with the Anyang/01 virus, but completely recovered. If these serologic results are true positives, it is possible that the low antibody titers provided some immunologic resistance for these birds.
Serologic techniques commonly used in domestic poultry have limitations in ducks. The results of this study suggest variation between wild duck species in the ability of the AGP and HI tests to detect antibodies to type A influenza virus and H5 AIVs, respectively. Although the HI test was more sensitive than the AGP in detecting antibodies in our study, both serologic tests did not detect antibodies to AIV in some postinoculation serum samples from experimentally infected ducks. Furthermore, when duck erythrocytes were used in place of chicken erythrocytes for the HI test, antibodies were not detected in some of the duck samples (J. Brown, unpub.data). Surveillance systems that rely on these serologic techniques to detect H5N1 HPAI virus in ducks may substantially underestimate the prevalence of virus. In addition, false-positive results are possible if HI testing is used in H5N1 surveillance because positive results for H5 AIVs indicate previous infection with H5N1 HPAI virus or any other H5 wild-type AIV. Further information is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of these serologic assays in other wild avian species to allow correct interpretation of serologic field data.
The genetic sequence information indicated that all 3 evaluated H5N1 HPAI viruses were genetically distinct from each other, although the Anyang/01 and Mongolia/05 viruses were overall more closely related to each other than to Hong Kong/97. The only gene segment that all 3 viruses shared as part of a single viral lineage was the hemagglutinin gene. All 3 viruses had cleavage sites compatible with HPAI viruses, and experimental inoculation showed them to be extremely virulent in chickens (
The results of this study indicate that there is significant species-related variation in susceptibility, clinical disease, and antibody response to H5N1 virus infection in wild birds. Predicting this susceptibility beyond the species examined in this study is not possible. Wood ducks and laughing gulls were highly susceptible to H5N1 HPAI viruses with substantial illness and death. If H5N1 were introduced into North America, these species may serve as effective indicator species in a surveillance program.
We thank Kevin Keel for professional assistance; Jay Cumbee and the Georgia Department of Natural Resources for providing the laughing gulls used in this study; and James Doster and Kira Moresco for technical assistance.
The Mongolia H5N1 HPAI virus was obtained through a joint expedition of the Wildlife Conservation Society (Billy Karesh, Martin Gilbert, Damien O. Joly, and Peter I. Zahler), the Food and Agricultural Organization (Juan Lubroth and Les Sims), the State Central Veterinary Laboratory/Ministry of Agriculture, Mongolia (R. Sodnomdarjaa) and the Department of Veterinary Services, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Mongolia (S. Sugar and D. Orgil). Funding for this work was provided by the United States Egg and Poultry Association, the Morris Animal Foundation, and USDA-ARS.
Dr Brown is a graduate student in the Department of Veterinary Pathology and a wildlife disease diagnostician at the Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia. His research interests include the epidemiology and pathology of wildlife diseases.