<!DOCTYPE article
PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article"><?properties manuscript?><processing-meta base-tagset="archiving" mathml-version="3.0" table-model="xhtml" tagset-family="jats"><restricted-by>pmc</restricted-by></processing-meta><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">7705941</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">7382</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Sex Transm Dis</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Sex Transm Dis</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Sexually transmitted diseases</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0148-5717</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1537-4521</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">34475363</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">11287478</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001548</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">HHSPA2012464</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Urogenital and Extragenital <italic toggle="yes">Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> Isolates Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea and Enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 2018 to 2019</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Quilter</surname><given-names>Laura A.S.</given-names></name><degrees>MD, MPH</degrees><xref rid="A1" ref-type="aff">*</xref><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>St. Cyr</surname><given-names>Sancta B.</given-names></name><degrees>MD</degrees><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Jaeyoung</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Asbel</surname><given-names>Lenore</given-names></name><degrees>MD</degrees><xref rid="A3" ref-type="aff">&#x02021;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bautista</surname><given-names>Ilene</given-names></name><degrees>MPH</degrees><xref rid="A4" ref-type="aff">&#x000a7;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Carter</surname><given-names>Bonnie</given-names></name><degrees>MT(ASCP)</degrees><xref rid="A5" ref-type="aff">&#x000b6;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Casimir</surname><given-names>Yanick</given-names></name><degrees>APRN</degrees><xref rid="A6" ref-type="aff">||</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Denny</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name><degrees>BS</degrees><xref rid="A7" ref-type="aff">**</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ervin</surname><given-names>Melissa</given-names></name><degrees>MT</degrees><xref rid="A8" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;&#x02020;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Gomez</surname><given-names>Raquel</given-names></name><degrees>M(ASCP)</degrees><xref rid="A9" ref-type="aff">&#x02021;&#x02021;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Harvey</surname><given-names>Alesia</given-names></name><degrees>BS</degrees><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Holderman</surname><given-names>Justin L.</given-names></name><degrees>MPH</degrees><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;</xref><xref rid="A10" ref-type="aff">&#x000a7;&#x000a7;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>Kimberly</given-names></name><degrees>MS</degrees><xref rid="A11" ref-type="aff">&#x000b6;&#x000b6;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kohn</surname><given-names>Robert P.</given-names></name><degrees>MPH</degrees><xref rid="A12" ref-type="aff">||||</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Learner</surname><given-names>Emily R.</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mauk</surname><given-names>Kerry</given-names></name><degrees>MSPH</degrees><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Menza</surname><given-names>Timothy</given-names></name><degrees>MD</degrees><xref rid="A13" ref-type="aff">***</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mettenbrink</surname><given-names>Christie</given-names></name><degrees>MSPH</degrees><xref rid="A14" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;&#x02020;&#x02020;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nettleton</surname><given-names>William D.</given-names></name><degrees>MD</degrees><xref rid="A15" ref-type="aff">&#x02021;&#x02021;&#x02021;</xref><xref rid="A16" ref-type="aff">&#x000a7;&#x000a7;&#x000a7;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nicosia</surname><given-names>Karen R.</given-names></name><degrees>MPH</degrees><xref rid="A17" ref-type="aff">&#x000b6;&#x000b6;&#x000b6;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pham</surname><given-names>Cau D.</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ried</surname><given-names>Christopher</given-names></name><degrees>MD</degrees><xref rid="A18" ref-type="aff">||||||</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Schlanger</surname><given-names>Karen</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Schneider</surname><given-names>Annah</given-names></name><degrees>BS</degrees><xref rid="A19" ref-type="aff">****</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Soge</surname><given-names>Olusegun O.</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref rid="A20" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;&#x02020;&#x02020;&#x02020;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tabidze</surname><given-names>Irina</given-names></name><degrees>MD</degrees><xref rid="A21" ref-type="aff">&#x02021;&#x02021;&#x02021;&#x02021;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Taylor</surname><given-names>Stephanie N.</given-names></name><degrees>MD</degrees><xref rid="A22" ref-type="aff">&#x000a7;&#x000a7;&#x000a7;&#x000a7;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tilghman</surname><given-names>Winston</given-names></name><degrees>MD</degrees><xref rid="A23" ref-type="aff">&#x000b6;&#x000b6;&#x000b6;&#x000b6;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Toler</surname><given-names>Cindy</given-names></name><degrees>BSMT(ASCP)</degrees><xref rid="A24" ref-type="aff">||||||||</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Weinstock</surname><given-names>Hillard</given-names></name><degrees>MD</degrees><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Torrone</surname><given-names>Elizabeth A.</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref rid="A2" ref-type="aff">&#x02020;</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="A1"><label>*</label>Epidemic Intelligence Service</aff><aff id="A2"><label>&#x02020;</label>Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA;</aff><aff id="A3"><label>&#x02021;</label>Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA;</aff><aff id="A4"><label>&#x000a7;</label>Southern Nevada Health District, Las Vegas, NV;</aff><aff id="A5"><label>&#x000b6;</label>Oakland County Health Division, Pontiac, MI;</aff><aff id="A6"><label>||</label>Miami-Dade County Department of Health, Miami, FL;</aff><aff id="A7"><label>**</label>Hawaii State Department of Health, Honolulu, HI;</aff><aff id="A8"><label>&#x02020;&#x02020;</label>Columbus Health Department, Columbus, OH;</aff><aff id="A9"><label>&#x02021;&#x02021;</label>Milwaukee Health Department, Milwaukee, WI;</aff><aff id="A10"><label>&#x000a7;&#x000a7;</label>Indiana State Department of Health, Indianapolis, IN;</aff><aff id="A11"><label>&#x000b6;&#x000b6;</label>New York City Department of Mental Health and Hygiene, New York City, NY;</aff><aff id="A12"><label>||||</label>San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA;</aff><aff id="A13"><label>***</label>Oregon Health Authority, Portland, OR;</aff><aff id="A14"><label>&#x02020;&#x02020;&#x02020;</label>Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO;</aff><aff id="A15"><label>&#x02021;&#x02021;&#x02021;</label>Kalamazoo County Health and Community Services Department;</aff><aff id="A16"><label>&#x000a7;&#x000a7;&#x000a7;</label>Department of Family and Community Medicine, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI;</aff><aff id="A17"><label>&#x000b6;&#x000b6;&#x000b6;</label>Ohio Department of Health, Columbus, OH;</aff><aff id="A18"><label>||||||</label>Orange County Health Care Agency, Santa Ana, CA;</aff><aff id="A19"><label>****</label>Minnesota Department of Health, St Paul, MN;</aff><aff id="A20"><label>&#x02020;&#x02020;&#x02020;&#x02020;</label>University of Washington, Seattle, WA;</aff><aff id="A21"><label>&#x02021;&#x02021;&#x02021;&#x02021;</label>Chicago Department of Public Health, Chicago, IL;</aff><aff id="A22"><label>&#x000a7;&#x000a7;&#x000a7;&#x000a7;</label>Louisiana Office of Public Health, New Orleans, LA;</aff><aff id="A23"><label>&#x000b6;&#x000b6;&#x000b6;&#x000b6;</label>County of San Diego Health &#x00026; Human Services Agency, San Diego, CA;</aff><aff id="A24"><label>||||||||</label>Guilford County Public Health, Greensboro, NC</aff><author-notes><corresp id="CR1">Correspondence: Laura A.S. Quilter, MD, MPH, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, MS US12-2, Atlanta, GA 30329. <email>nrb2@cdc.gov</email>.</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>25</day><month>7</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>01</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>30</day><month>7</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>48</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>S111</fpage><lpage>S117</lpage><abstract id="ABS1"><sec id="S1"><title>Background:</title><p id="P1">We investigated differences in gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility by anatomic site among cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) using specimens collected through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention&#x02019;s enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project and Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea.</p></sec><sec id="S2"><title>Methods:</title><p id="P2">During the period January 1, 2018&#x02013;December 31, 2019, 12 enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project and 8 Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea sites collected urogenital, pharyngeal, and rectal isolates from cisgender MSM in sexually transmitted disease clinics. Gonococcal isolates were sent to regional laboratories for antimicrobial susceptibility testing by agar dilution. To account for correlated observations, linear mixed-effects models were used to calculate geometric mean minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), and mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to calculate the proportion of isolates with elevated or resistant MICs; comparisons were made across anatomic sites.</p></sec><sec id="S3"><title>Results:</title><p id="P3">Participating clinics collected 3974 urethral, 1553 rectal, and 1049 pharyngeal isolates from 5456 unique cisgender MSM. There were no significant differences in the geometric mean MICs for azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline by anatomic site. For cefixime and ceftriaxone, geometric mean MICs for pharyngeal isolates were higher compared with anogenital isolates (<italic toggle="yes">P</italic> &#x0003c; 0.05). The proportion of isolates with elevated ceftriaxone MICs (&#x02265;0.125 &#x003bc;g/mL) at the pharynx (0.67%) was higher than at rectal (0.13%) and urethral (0.18%) sites (<italic toggle="yes">P</italic> &#x0003c; 0.05).</p></sec><sec id="S4"><title>Conclusions:</title><p id="P4">Based on data collected from multijurisdictional sentinel surveillance projects, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of <italic toggle="yes">Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> isolates may differ among MSM at extragenital sites, particularly at the pharynx. Continued investigation into gonococcal susceptibility patterns by anatomic site may be an important strategy to monitor and detect the emergence of antimicrobial resistant gonorrhea over time.</p></sec></abstract></article-meta></front><body><p id="P5"><italic toggle="yes">Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> has been designated as an urgent antibiotic resistance threat-level pathogen in the United States since 2013.<sup><xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref></sup> The organism&#x02019;s ability to acquire antimicrobial resistance has complicated the treatment and control of <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic>.<sup><xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="R4" ref-type="bibr">4</xref></sup> In the United States, the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) functions as the national surveillance system to monitor susceptibility trends in <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> strains,<sup><xref rid="R5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref></sup> providing critical data to inform the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines.<sup><xref rid="R6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref></sup></p><p id="P6">Data from GISP are based on isolates collected from men presenting with gonococcal urethritis in selected public STD clinics, with the assumption that the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among male urethral isolates are representative of all circulating strains in the United States.<sup><xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref></sup> Although this sampling strategy was practical given the high culture yield of urethral gonorrhea, gonococcal infections at extragenital anatomic sites (i.e., rectum and pharynx) may have different susceptibility patterns. It is important to note that extragenital infections may facilitate the acquisition or development of resistance mutations.<sup><xref rid="R8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref></sup> Notably, the pharynx may serve as an incubator of resistance owing to genetic reassortment and plasmid uptake of resistance genes between <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> and other <italic toggle="yes">Neisseria</italic> species that colonize the pharynx.<sup><xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref></sup> Furthermore, gonococcal infections at the pharynx are predominantly asymptomatic and, compared with urogenital and rectal infections, are more difficult to eradicate because of poor bioavailability at the pharynx, such that they may provide an optimal setting for selection of resistance mutations.<sup><xref rid="R16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R19" ref-type="bibr">19</xref></sup></p><p id="P7">Rates of gonorrhea have been increasing among men in the United States, including gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM), and high rates of resistance and elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) have been observed historically in GISP and continue today among gonococcal isolates from MSM.<sup><xref rid="R5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>,<xref rid="R20" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R24" ref-type="bibr">24</xref></sup> Extragenital gonococcal infections are common among MSM; however, data comparing antimicrobial susceptibilities of urogenital and extragenital <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> isolates are limited.<sup><xref rid="R25" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R30" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>,<xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">31s</xref></sup> Characterizing antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of gonococcal isolates among MSM is critical to ensure the development of adequate treatment approaches and ultimately to reduce the spread of antimicrobial-resistant <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic>. The CDC&#x02019;s enhanced GISP (eGISP) and Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea (SURRG) expand antimicrobial-resistant <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> surveillance by collecting specimens from multiple anatomic sites from persons attending STD clinics. In this analysis, we describe the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of urogenital and extragenital isolates collected from cisgender MSM who attended participating STD clinics in 2018 to 2019 and investigate differences in susceptibility across anatomic sites.</p><sec id="S5"><title>METHODS</title><sec id="S6"><title>Study Design and Population</title><p id="P8">We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of cisgender MSM who attended participating STD clinics in 12 eGISP and 8 SURRG jurisdictions in 2018 to 2019 (<xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplemental Text</xref>, <ext-link xlink:href="http://links.lww.com/OLQ/A748" ext-link-type="uri">http://links.lww.com/OLQ/A748</ext-link>). We included MSM with a positive gonococcal culture obtained from any anatomic site (urogenital, rectal, pharyngeal) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) performed by agar dilution. We restricted isolate collection to consecutive MSM who had related clinical and epidemiologic data submitted to CDC and whose records contained a unique patient ID. For the purpose of this analysis, MSM were defined as a patient who self-identified as male gender and reported having any male gender sex partners within the past 3 months; consequently, patients with self-reported female gender, transgender persons, and patients who reported only female, nonbinary, or unknown gender sex partners were excluded.</p></sec><sec id="S7"><title>Isolate Collection</title><p id="P9">Per the eGISP protocol, urethral gonococcal isolates were collected from male patients presenting with symptomatic urethritis, and pharyngeal and rectal isolates from patients who reported sexual exposure at oral and/or rectal anatomic sites with a <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> nucleic acid amplification test performed.<sup><xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref></sup> Per the SURRG protocol, urethral, pharyngeal, and rectal isolates were collected from patients who reported sexual exposure at urogenital, pharyngeal, and/or rectal anatomic sites with a <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> nucleic acid amplification test performed. For eGISP, per participating clinic, collection was limited to the first 25 isolates from male patients with symptomatic urethritis and the first 25 pharyngeal and rectal isolates from patients who reported sexual exposure at oral or rectal anatomic sites. There was no maximum collection limit for clinics participating in SURRG. There were no minimum monthly isolate contributions required by participating clinics in either project.</p></sec><sec id="S8"><title>Laboratory Procedures</title><p id="P10">Specimens collected for <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> isolation were inoculated on selective media and incubated at 36&#x000b0;C &#x000b1; 1&#x000b0;C in 5% CO<sub>2</sub> by local laboratory staff. Gonococcal isolates were subcultured on noninhibitory medium (e.g., chocolate agar) with 1% IsoVitalex to obtain a pure culture of the isolate and for subsequent species identification. For eGISP, local laboratories were only required to do presumptive identification; whereas, for SURRG, local laboratories also used matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and API-NH assay for identification of <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic>.<sup><xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">32s</xref>,<xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">33s</xref></sup> After 18 to 20 hours of incubation, growth from the pure culture was suspended in trypticase soy broth containing 20% (vol/vol) glycerol and frozen to &#x02212;70&#x000b0;C, and shipped monthly to 1 of 4 participating Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network (ARLN) regional laboratories. Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network regional laboratories performed <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> AST by agar dilution. Antimicrobials tested included azithromycin (0.008&#x02013;16 &#x003bc;g/mL), cefixime (0.002&#x02013;1 &#x003bc;g/mL), ceftriaxone (0.001&#x02013;1 &#x003bc;g/mL), ciprofloxacin (0.001&#x02013;32 &#x003bc;g/mL), penicillin (0.008&#x02013;64 &#x003bc;g/mL), and tetracycline (0.06&#x02013;64 &#x003bc;g/mL). Isolates with a cefixime MIC of &#x02265;1 &#x003bc;g/mL, ceftriaxone MIC of &#x02265;1 &#x003bc;g/mL, or azithromycin MIC of &#x02265;16 &#x003bc;g/mL were shipped to the CDC and tested to the end point MIC at the CDC Division of STD Prevention laboratory. All isolates were tested for &#x003b2;-lactamase activity using the nitrocefin test by the regional ARLN laboratories. Isolates with azithromycin MICs of &#x02265;2 &#x003bc;g/mL, cefixime MICs of &#x02265;0.25 &#x003bc;g/mL, or ceftriaxone MICs of &#x02265;0.125 &#x003bc;g/mL were shipped from regional laboratories to the CDC for confirmatory AST. To ensure the accuracy of agar dilution AST results, control <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> strains (F18/ATCC 49226, WHO L and WHO U) with known MICs were included for each susceptibility test run at both the regional ARLN laboratories and at the CDC Division of STD Prevention laboratory.<sup><xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">34s</xref>,<xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">35s</xref></sup> For additional quality assurance, ARLN regional laboratories participated in external quality assessment by testing a panel of 15 unidentified <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> strains (provided by the CDC) twice yearly.</p></sec><sec id="S9"><title>Interpretation of AST Results</title><p id="P11">Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results were reported as MIC for antigonococcal antimicrobials. The results were interpreted according to the criteria recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for penicillin resistance (MIC &#x02265;2 &#x003bc;g/mL or &#x003b2;-lactamase positive), ciprofloxacin resistance (MIC &#x02265;1.0 &#x003bc;g/mL), and tetracycline resistance (MIC &#x02265;2.0 &#x003bc;g/mL).<sup><xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">34s</xref></sup> The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute has not established the criteria for resistance to azithromycin, cefixime, and ceftriaxone. Therefore, the breakpoints used in these analyses to define elevated MIC for these antimicrobials include those previously described by the CDC GISP: azithromycin MIC &#x02265;2.0 &#x003bc;g/mL, cefixime MIC &#x02265;0.25 &#x003bc;g/mL, and ceftriaxone MIC &#x02265;0.125 &#x003bc;g/mL.<sup><xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">36s</xref></sup></p></sec><sec id="S10"><title>Demographic, Epidemiologic, and Clinical Variables</title><p id="P12">Clinical and demographic data documented at the time of visit were abstracted from medical records by local clinic staff. Patients and each of their specimens were assigned a unique ID such that multiple specimens contributed by a single patient could be identified for a single visit and/or tracked across multiple clinic visits. In addition to anatomic site of infection, the following additional variables were included in this analysis: gender of sex partners (MSM exclusively; men who have sex with men and women), age, race/Hispanic ethnicity, and HIV status (self-reported and/or per medical chart). Given possible geographic differences in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, we additionally categorized each clinic site by US census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West) for stratified analyses.</p><p id="P13">Demographic, clinical, and epidemiologic data were linked to AST results at the CDC.</p></sec><sec id="S11"><title>Data Analysis</title><p id="P14">We calculated frequencies of demographic and epidemiologic characteristics of cisgender MSM from whom <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> isolates were collected. To describe antimicrobial susceptibility across anatomic sites, we calculated the MIC range, geometric mean MICs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each antimicrobial by anatomic site, and the number and proportion of isolates with elevated or resistant MICs. We calculated the MIC distributions (percentage of isolates by MICs) by antimicrobial for pharyngeal, rectal, and urethral isolates. To account for correlated observations (i.e., multiple isolates provided by the same patients either at the same visit or across visits), we used linear mixed-effects models to calculate geometric mean MICs and mixed-effects logistic regression models to calculate the proportion of isolates with elevated or resistant MICs across anatomic sites. We used the likelihood ratio test to assess any MIC difference across anatomic sites (overall test); if the overall <italic toggle="yes">P</italic> value was less than 0.05, we performed post hoc pairwise comparisons among anatomic site pairs. We used the Holm-Bonferroni method (Holm&#x02019;s sequential Bonferroni procedure) to control the family-wise error rate for the multiple comparisons. We also assessed geometric mean MICs and proportion with elevated or resistant MICs across anatomic sites of infection for each antimicrobial by geographic location using the statistical models described previously.</p><p id="P15">Analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and R version 3.6.3. software (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). Data were collected as sentinel surveillance activities and were exempt from CDC institutional review board review.</p></sec></sec><sec id="S12"><title>RESULTS</title><sec id="S13"><title>Characteristics of Population That Contributed Isolates</title><p id="P16">From January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, 13,363 isolates were collected from cisgender men attending participating STD clinics. Of these, 12,585 (94%) isolates were collected from men with known gender of sex partners; 6576 (49%) isolates were collected from 5456 unique cisgender MSM and are included in the analysis. Most participants contributed one isolate only (n = 4570; 83.8%). Among all participants, 13.1% (n = 714) contributed 2 isolates, 2.4% (n = 129) contributed 3 isolates, and &#x0003c;1% (n = 43) contributed more than 3 isolates. Most participants had only 1 clinic visit (n = 4964; 91.0%); the maximum number of clinic visits by any one MSM was 5 visits over the 2 years (n = 1).</p><p id="P17">Of the 6576 isolates, 3974 were urethral, 1553 were rectal, and 1049 were pharyngeal isolates (<xref rid="T1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>). There was variation in the geographic distribution of isolates across anatomic sites. Most pharyngeal and rectal isolates (62.3% and 60.4%, respectively) were contributed by participants in the West, whereas most urethral isolates were collected in the Northeast (40.4%) and West (40.0%) regions. Across anatomic sites, more than 90% of isolates were collected from MSM who only identified recent male sex partners. There was some variation in the distribution of ages and race/Hispanic ethnicity of MSM from whom isolates were collected across anatomic sites. For example, 16.9% of urethral isolates were from MSM aged 20 to 24 years, whereas 22.7% of pharyngeal isolates were from MSM aged 20 to 24 years. Overall, 17.5% of isolates were collected from MSM who had a positive HIV status documented at the time of isolate collection; this varied according to anatomic site of infection (e.g., 19.4% of urogenital isolates vs. 11.1% of pharyngeal isolates).</p></sec><sec id="S14"><title>Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibilities Across Anatomic Sites of Infection</title><p id="P18">The MIC distributions by antimicrobial for pharyngeal, rectal, and urethral isolates were unimodal across antimicrobials, with the exception of ciprofloxacin, which was bimodal (<xref rid="F1" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). There were no significant differences in the geometric mean MICs for azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline across anatomic sites (<xref rid="T2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>). For cefixime, there were differences in the geometric mean MICs across anatomic sites (<italic toggle="yes">P</italic> &#x0003c; 0.05); the geometric mean MIC for pharyngeal isolates (geometric mean MIC, 0.0192 &#x003bc;g/mL) was higher compared with rectal isolates (geometric mean MIC, 0.0181 &#x003bc;g/mL; adjusted <italic toggle="yes">P</italic> &#x0003c; 0.05) and urethral isolates (geometric mean MIC, 0.0176 &#x003bc;g/mL; adjusted <italic toggle="yes">P</italic> &#x0003c; 0.05). The rectal geometric mean MIC for cefixime was not significantly different from the urethral geometric mean MIC. For ceftriaxone, there were also differences in the geometric mean MICs across anatomic sites (overall, <italic toggle="yes">P</italic> &#x0003c; 0.05); the geometric mean MIC for pharyngeal isolates (geometric mean MIC, 0.0108 &#x003bc;g/mL) was higher compared with rectal isolates (geometric mean MIC, 0.00987 &#x003bc;g/mL; adjusted <italic toggle="yes">P</italic> &#x0003c; 0.05) and urethral isolates (geometric mean MIC, 0.0098 &#x003bc;g/mL; adjusted <italic toggle="yes">P</italic> &#x0003c; 0.05). The rectal geometric mean MIC for ceftriaxone was not significantly different from the urethral geometric mean MIC.</p><p id="P19">There were no differences in the proportion of isolates with elevated or resistant MICs across anatomic sites for azithromycin, cefixime, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline; however, for ceftriaxone, the proportion of isolates with elevated MICs at the pharynx was higher than the proportion with elevated MICs at the rectum or urethra (<italic toggle="yes">P</italic> &#x0003c; 0.05). For ceftriaxone, 0.67% (7 of 1049; 95% CI, 0.32&#x02013;1.4) of pharyngeal isolates had elevated MICs compared with 0.18% (7 of 3974; 95% CI, 0.08&#x02013;0.37) of urethral isolates and 0.13% (2 of 1553; 95% CI, 0.03&#x02013;0.51) of rectal isolates.</p></sec><sec id="S15"><title>Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibilities Across Anatomic Sites of Infection and Geographic Region</title><p id="P20">In some geographic regions, there were differences in geometric mean MICs for azithromycin, cefixime, and ceftriaxone across anatomic sites of infection (<xref rid="SD2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Table S1</xref>, <ext-link xlink:href="http://links.lww.com/OLQ/A749" ext-link-type="uri">http://links.lww.com/OLQ/A749</ext-link>). For azithromycin, the geometric mean MIC differed across anatomic sites in the Northeast with higher pharyngeal geometric mean MIC (<italic toggle="yes">P</italic> &#x0003c; 0.05) compared with rectal and urethral. For cefixime and ceftriaxone, the geometric mean MICs differed across anatomic sites in the Midwest with higher pharyngeal geometric mean MICs than rectal and urethral geometric mean MICs (<italic toggle="yes">P</italic> &#x0003c; 0.05). There were no significant differences in the geometric mean MICs for ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline according to anatomic site by geographic region.</p><p id="P21">The proportion of pharyngeal isolates with elevated or resistant MICs for ceftriaxone was higher than the other anatomic sites in each geographic region; however, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportion with elevated or resistant MICs for azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline according to anatomic site of infection by geographic region (<xref rid="SD2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Table S2</xref>, <ext-link xlink:href="http://links.lww.com/OLQ/A749" ext-link-type="uri">http://links.lww.com/OLQ/A749</ext-link>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="S16"><title>DISCUSSION</title><p id="P22">In this analysis of gonococcal isolates collected from cisgender MSM attending STD clinics participating in multijurisdiction sentinel surveillance projects, we detected differences in MICs to antigonococcal antimicrobials across anatomic sites of infection. Cefixime and ceftriaxone geometric mean MICs were higher among pharyngeal isolates compared with rectal and urethral isolates, and the proportion of isolates with elevated ceftriaxone MICs was higher at the pharynx compared with those with elevated MICs at the rectum and urethra. Furthermore, we detected differences in MICs across anatomic sites of infection for azithromycin, cefixime, and ceftriaxone in some geographic regions, reflecting geographic heterogeneity. Collectively, our findings suggest differential antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> at the pharynx.</p><p id="P23">This is the first combined report from 2 multijurisdiction sentinel surveillance projects; combining results was facilitated by use of similar protocols and AST conducted by the same regional laboratories. This is the largest study to date using standardized protocols to investigate differences in antimicrobial susceptibility of <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> by anatomic site. Previous studies comparing antimicrobial susceptibilities of urogenital and extragenital gonococcal isolates are limited. Similar to Kidd et al.,<sup><xref rid="R28" ref-type="bibr">28</xref></sup> which examined susceptibility patterns among MSM by anatomic site using isolates collected in 2011 to 2013 from men seeking care in 5 STD clinics, we found a difference in cefixime geometric mean MICs between pharyngeal and rectal isolates; however, we also detected a difference in geometric mean MICs between pharyngeal and urethral isolates. Given the smaller sample size included in the analysis of Kidd et al. (only 205 pharyngeal isolates included), it may not have been powered to detect small differences between anatomic sites. An earlier study by Hottes et al.<sup><xref rid="R30" ref-type="bibr">30</xref></sup> identified a higher prevalence of elevated azithromycin, cefixime, and ceftriaxone MICs among rectal and pharyngeal isolates than among urethral isolates; however, this study did not control for sex of sex partners, and this difference may have been more reflective of the higher prevalence of gonococcal strains with elevated MICs circulating within MSM sexual networks as compared with heterosexual networks. When looking at associations between antimicrobial susceptibility and anatomical site of infection, a recent study found that resistance to cefixime and resistance combined with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone was associated with urogenital infections.<sup><xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">31s</xref></sup> However, this study used combined data from multiple counties with varying levels of reporting and differing AST methods, highlighting the need for additional studies using standardized methodology. Preliminary analyses of eGISP and SURRG data were suggestive of differences by anatomic site; however, they were not weighted to account for the geographic variation in distribution of isolates or modeled to account for clustering by patient.<sup><xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">37s</xref>,<xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">38s</xref></sup></p><p id="P24">Although cefixime and ceftriaxone geometric mean MICs across anatomic sites in our analysis were very low and within the antimicrobial susceptibility range, the pattern of higher MICs at the pharynx suggests that susceptibility patterns may be different at the pharynx compared with anogenital sites and supports concerns that the pharynx may serve as an anatomic niche that fosters <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> resistance. Studies suggest that <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> may acquire resistance genes, such as <italic toggle="yes">penA</italic>, associated with cephalosporin resistance, from oropharyngeal commensal <italic toggle="yes">Neisseria</italic> species.<sup><xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref></sup> Furthermore, studies of cefixime pharmacokinetics have shown variation in absorption and protein binding that contributes to poor bioavailability and negligible cefixime drug concentrations in pharyngeal fluid.<sup><xref rid="R18" ref-type="bibr">18</xref></sup> In addition, tonsillar concentrations of ceftriaxone have also been lower than anticipated,<sup><xref rid="R19" ref-type="bibr">19</xref></sup> suggesting lower drug penetration at the pharynx that could foster antimicrobial resistance. Rectal gonococcal infections and exposure to fecal lipids provide selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance mutations<sup><xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">39s&#x02013;42s</xref></sup>; however, in our analysis, the rectal geometric mean MICs for cefixime and ceftriaxone were not significantly different from the urethral geometric mean MICs and were lower than the pharyngeal geometric mean MICs. This may be due to in vivo selection for transmissible antimicrobial resistance in the pharynx given the longer duration of untreated pharyngeal gonococcal infections compared with other anatomic sites.<sup><xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">43s</xref></sup></p><p id="P25">Interestingly, although differences were identified in cefixime and ceftriaxone geometric mean MICs across anatomic site, differences across anatomic sites were not identified for other antimicrobials. This may be due to already circulating gonococcal strains with high levels of antimicrobial resistance to those other antimicrobial classes (e.g., penicillins, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline) at all anatomic sites. Because cephalosporin resistance is still emerging in the United States and may develop at different anatomic sites, these surveillance systems may have been able to identify small differences in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns across anatomic sites for ceftriaxone and cefixime. In addition, we may have been underpowered to detect small differences in the antimicrobial classes with a higher prevalence of resistance across anatomic sites. Furthermore, when looking at the proportion of isolates with elevated or resistant MICs, we identified a higher proportion of isolates with elevated ceftriaxone MICs at the pharynx compared with other anatomic sites, a pattern not seen for other antimicrobials. However, the proportion of isolates with elevated ceftriaxone MICs at the pharynx was small (0.67%), suggesting that ceftriaxone remains an effective treatment of pharyngeal gonococcal infections.</p><p id="P26">The GISP was established in 1986 to monitor the antimicrobial susceptibility trends in <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> strains and to inform treatment recommendations with the assumption that male urethral isolates are reflective of all circulating strains. If the goal remains to monitor <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> susceptibility at a population level and antimicrobial resistance is thought to emerge at the same rate at both urogenital and extragenital sites, then limiting sentinel surveillance to circulating strains at the urethra may be sufficient for monitoring national susceptibility patterns. However, if resistance emerges faster at extragenital sites, particularly the pharynx, compared with urogenital sites, routine monitoring of <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> susceptibility at extragenital sites may be important for identifying new resistant strains and for monitoring resistance emergence trends over time.</p><p id="P27">In our analysis, we found differences in geometric mean MICs across anatomic sites of infection in some geographic regions, such as azithromycin in the Northeast and cefixime and ceftriaxone in the Midwest. There were no significant differences between the proportions of isolates with elevated or resistant MICs across anatomic sites by geographic region. Gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility patterns overall are known to vary by geographic region, and our historical understanding has been that antimicrobial-resistant <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> strains (such as fluoroquinolone-resistant and penicillinase-producing <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic>) are often imported from Asia, with early cases detected in the Pacific and West Coast, before spreading east in the United States.<sup><xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">44s</xref>,<xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">45s</xref></sup> The finding of differences across anatomic sites in some geographic regions suggest that resistance/elevated MICs in isolates may develop and emerge in different geographic regions.<sup><xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">46s</xref></sup> Furthermore, this may be reflective of diverse gonococcal strains circulating in different geographic sexual networks possibly because of sexual behavioral or antimicrobial-use patterns that may vary geographically.</p><p id="P28">Strengths of our analysis include the large, population-based sample; ability to account for clustering by individual and for heterogeneity by geographic site; and completeness of gender of sex partners data such that we could restrict the study to MSM. However, we note limitations. First, our isolates may not be representative of all circulating strains of gonococcal infections because of the population that underwent specimen collection and the known challenges with isolating <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic>. This may have differed by anatomic site because gonococcal culture at extragenital sites has much lower sensitivity compared with the urethral site.<sup><xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">47s&#x02013;49s</xref></sup> In addition, collection of urethral cultures in eGISP is limited to MSM presenting with symptomatic urethritis, whereas extragenital cultures are collected from MSM who report sexual exposure at the anatomic site, regardless of presence of symptoms. Therefore, our findings would be biased if gonococcal strains associated with symptomatic infection or improved culture growth are more likely to have differing antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from those associated with asymptomatic infection or decreased ability to grow in culture. Second, our study was limited to cisgender MSM attending STD clinics participating in eGISP and SURRG, and our results may not be representative of gonorrhea antimicrobial susceptibility patterns across anatomic sites in other populations. For example, a prior study examining <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> antimicrobial susceptibility patterns across women and men who have sex with women only did not find differences in MICs according to anatomic site, although this study may not have been sufficiently powered.<sup><xref rid="R23" ref-type="bibr">23</xref></sup> Finally, although our overall sample size was large, when stratified by geographic regions, sample size was reduced, potentially limiting our ability to identify significant differences by anatomic site&#x02014;particularly for antimicrobials with a low frequency of elevated MICs (e.g., cefixime and ceftriaxone).</p><p id="P29">In conclusion, we identified differences in MICs across anatomic sites of gonococcal infection with higher cefixime and ceftriaxone geometric mean MICs and a higher proportion of isolates with elevated ceftriaxone MICs among isolates from the pharynx. Continued investigation into antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of gonococcal isolates at extragenital sites may be an important strategy to detect and monitor the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> strains over time. Ensuring adequate treatment and eradication of pharyngeal gonococcal infections may be important to reducing the spread of antimicrobial-resistant <italic toggle="yes">N. gonorrhoeae</italic> in communities.<sup><xref rid="SD3" ref-type="supplementary-material">50s</xref></sup></p></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="SM1"><title>Supplementary Material</title><supplementary-material id="SD1" position="float" content-type="local-data"><label>Supplemental 1</label><media xlink:href="NIHMS2012464-supplement-Supplemental_1.docx" id="d67e782" position="anchor"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="SD2" position="float" content-type="local-data"><label>Supplemental 2</label><media xlink:href="NIHMS2012464-supplement-Supplemental_2.docx" id="d67e785" position="anchor"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="SD3" position="float" content-type="local-data"><label>Supplemental 3</label><media xlink:href="NIHMS2012464-supplement-Supplemental_3.docx" id="d67e788" position="anchor"/></supplementary-material></sec></body><back><ack id="S17"><title>Acknowledgments:</title><p id="P30">This article was written on behalf of the Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea and the enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project collaborators and other public health staff who contributed to the data collection, management, and implementation of these projects. The authors thank Lindley Barbee, Robert Kirkcaldy, Jose Bazan, Aaron Hoogenboom, Rebecca Harrison, Elesi Quaye, Southern Nevada Public Health Laboratory of Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD), SNHD Sexual Health Clinic, and SNHD Office of Epidemiology and Disease Surveillance, as well as the patients and providers who contributed data to these projects.</p><p id="P31">The Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea and enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project activities described in this article were supported by Federal Antibiotic Resistance Initiative funding and administered through the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention&#x02019;s (CDC) Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Cooperative Agreement (CK19&#x02013;1904).</p></ack><fn-group><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="FN1"><p id="P32">Conflict of Interest and Sources of Funding: None declared.</p></fn><fn id="FN2"><p id="P33">Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC.</p></fn><fn id="FN3"><p id="P34">Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text, and links to the digital files are provided in the HTML text of this article on the journal&#x02019;s Web site (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.stdjournal.com/" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.stdjournal.com</ext-link>).</p></fn></fn-group><ref-list><title>REFERENCES</title><ref id="R1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><collab>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</collab>. <article-title>Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019</article-title>. <source>Atlanta, GA: CDC, 2019</source>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf</ext-link>.</comment>
<comment>Accessed</comment>
<date-in-citation>February 21, 2021</date-in-citation>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><collab>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</collab>. <article-title>Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2013</article-title>. <source>Atlanta, GA: CDC, 2013</source>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf</ext-link>.</comment>
<comment>Accessed</comment>
<date-in-citation>February 21, 2021</date-in-citation>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Bolan</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Sparling</surname><given-names>PF</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Wasserheit</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name>. <article-title>The emerging threat of untreatable gonococcal infection</article-title>. <source>N Engl J Med</source>
<year>2012</year>; <volume>366</volume>:<fpage>485</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>487</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22316442</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Unemo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Golparian</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Eyre</surname><given-names>DW</given-names></name>. <article-title>Antimicrobial resistance in <italic toggle="yes">Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> and treatment of gonorrhea</article-title>. <source>Methods Mol Biol</source>
<year>1997</year>; <volume>2019</volume>:<fpage>37</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>58</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="webpage"><collab>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</collab>. <source>Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2018</source>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats18/STDSurveillance2018-full-report.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats18/STDSurveillance2018-full-report.pdf</ext-link>.</comment>
<comment>Accessed</comment>
<date-in-citation>February 21, 2021</date-in-citation>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Workowski</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Bachmann</surname><given-names>LH</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021</article-title>. <source>MMWR Recomm Rep 2021</source>; <volume>70</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>187</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><collab>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</collab>. <article-title>Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) and Enhanced GISP, 2020</article-title>. <source>Atlanta, GA: CDC, 2020</source>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.cdc.gov/std/gisp/GISP_eGISP_Protocol_January_2020.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.cdc.gov/std/gisp/GISP_eGISP_Protocol_January_2020.pdf</ext-link>.</comment>
<comment>Accessed</comment>
<date-in-citation>February 21, 2021</date-in-citation>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Shafer</surname><given-names>WM</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Balthazar</surname><given-names>JT</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Hagman</surname><given-names>KE</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Missense mutations that alter the DNA-binding domain of the MtrR protein occur frequently in rectal isolates of <italic toggle="yes">Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> that are resistant to faecal lipids</article-title>. <source>Microbiology</source>
<year>1995</year>; <volume>141</volume>:<fpage>907</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>911</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7773394</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Morse</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Lysko</surname><given-names>PG</given-names></name>, <name><surname>McFarland</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Gonococcal strains from homosexual men have outer membranes with reduced permeability to hydrophobic molecules</article-title>. <source>Infect Immun</source>
<year>1982</year>; <volume>37</volume>:<fpage>432</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>438</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6811431</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>McFarland</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Mietzner</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Knapp</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Gonococcal sensitivity to fecal lipids can be mediated by an Mtr-independent mechanism</article-title>. <source>J Clin Microbiol</source>
<year>1983</year>; <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>121</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>127</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6411761</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Furuya</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Onoye</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kanayama</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of Neisseria subflava from the oral cavities of a Japanese population</article-title>. <source>J Infect Chemother</source>
<year>2007</year>; <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>302</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>304</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17982718</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Nakayama</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Huruya</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Analysis of mutations within multiple genes associated with resistance in a clinical isolate of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with reduced ceftriaxone susceptibility that shows a multidrug-resistant phenotype</article-title>. <source>Int J Antimicrob Agents</source>
<year>2006</year>; <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>20</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>26</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16318912</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Ameyama</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Onodera</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Takahata</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Mosaic-like structure of penicillin-binding protein 2 gene (penA) in clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with reduced susceptibility to cefixime</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</source>
<year>2002</year>; <volume>46</volume>:<fpage>3744</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3749</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12435671</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Ito</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Deguchi</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Mizutani</surname><given-names>KS</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Emergence and spread of <italic toggle="yes">Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> clinical isolates harboring mosaic-like structure of penicillin-binding protein 2 in Central Japan</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</source>
<year>2005</year>; <volume>49</volume>:<fpage>137</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>143</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15616287</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Knapp</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Zenilman</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>High-level tetracycline resistance resulting from TetM in strains of <italic toggle="yes">Neisseria</italic> spp., <italic toggle="yes">Kingella denitrificans</italic>, and <italic toggle="yes">Eikenella corrodens</italic></article-title>. <source>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</source>
<year>1988</year>; <volume>32</volume>:<fpage>765</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>767</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3134850</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Morris</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Klausner</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Buchbinder</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Prevalence and incidence of pharyngeal gonorrhea in a longitudinal sample of men who have sex with men: The EXPLORE study</article-title>. <source>Clin Infect Dis</source>
<year>2006</year>; <volume>43</volume>: <fpage>1284</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1289</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17051493</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Moran</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name>. <article-title>Treating uncomplicated Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections: Is the anatomic site of infection important?</article-title>
<source>Sex Transm Dis</source>
<year>1995</year>; <volume>22</volume>:<fpage>39</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>47</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7709324</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Barbee</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Nayak</surname><given-names>SU</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Blumer</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>A phase 1 pharmacokinetic and safety study of extended-duration, high-dose cefixime for cephalosporin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the pharynx</article-title>. <source>Sex Transm Dis</source>
<year>2018</year>; <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>677</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>683</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29624558</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Blumer</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Reed</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kaplan</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Explaining the poor bacterio-logic eradication rate of single-dose ceftriaxone in group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: A reverse engineering solution using pharmacodynamic modeling</article-title>. <source>Pediatrics</source>
<year>2005</year>; <volume>116</volume>:<fpage>927</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>932</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16199703</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Weston</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kirkcaldy</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Stenger</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Narrative review: Assessment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections among men who have sex with men in national and sentinel surveillance systems in the United States</article-title>. <source>Sex Transm Dis</source>
<year>2018</year>; <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>243</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>249</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29465702</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Barbee</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Soge</surname><given-names>OO</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Katz</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Increases in Neisseria gonorrhoeae with reduced susceptibility to azithromycin among men who have sex with men in Seattle, King County, Washington, 2012&#x02013;2016</article-title>. <source>Clin Infect Dis</source>
<year>2018</year>; <volume>66</volume>:<fpage>712</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>718</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29045604</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Kirkcaldy</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Zaidi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Hook EW</surname><given-names>III</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance among men who have sex with men and men who have sex exclusively with women: The Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 2005&#x02013;2010</article-title>. <source>Ann Intern Med</source>
<year>2013</year>; <volume>158</volume>(<issue>5 Pt 1</issue>): <fpage>321</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>328</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23460055</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Kidd</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Moore</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kirkcaldy</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility of urogenital Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates obtained from women and men</article-title>. <source>Sex Transm Dis</source>
<year>2015</year>; <volume>42</volume>:<fpage>434</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>439</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26165435</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><collab>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)</collab>. <article-title>Increases in fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae among men who have sex with men&#x02014;United States, 2003, and revised recommendations for gonorrhea treatment, 2004</article-title>. <source>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep</source>
<year>2004</year>; <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>335</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>338</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15123985</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Robinette</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Montgomery</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Extragenital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A review of the literature</article-title>. <source>Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol</source>
<year>2016</year>; <volume>2016</volume>:<fpage>5758387</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27366021</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Johnson Jones</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Chapin-Bardales</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Bizune</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>, <etal/>, <article-title>National HIV Behavioral Surveillance Sexually Transmitted Infection Study Group. Extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea among community venue&#x02013;attending men who have sex with men&#x02014;Five cities, United States</article-title>, <year>2017</year>. <source>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019</source>; <volume>68</volume>:<fpage>321</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>325</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Abara</surname><given-names>WE</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Llata</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Schumacher</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Extragenital gonorrhea and chlamydia positivity and the potential for missed extragenital gonorrhea with concurrent urethral chlamydia among men who have sex with men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics&#x02014;Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance Network, 2015&#x02013;2019</article-title>. <source>Sex Transm Dis</source>
<year>2020</year>; <volume>47</volume>:<fpage>361</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>368</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32413018</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Kidd</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Zaidi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Asbel</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibilities of pharyngeal, rectal, and urethral <italic toggle="yes">Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> isolates among men who have sex with men</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</source>
<year>2015</year>; <volume>59</volume>:<fpage>2588</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2595</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25691638</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Fagan</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
<article-title>Comparison of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from homosexual and heterosexual men</article-title>. <source>Genitourin Med</source>
<year>1985</year>; <volume>61</volume>:<fpage>363</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>366</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3936775</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Hottes</surname><given-names>TS</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Lester</surname><given-names>RT</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Hoang</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Cephalosporin and azithromycin susceptibility in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates by site of infection, British Columbia, 2006 to 2011</article-title>. <source>Sex Transm Dis</source>
<year>2013</year>; <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>46</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>51</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23250301</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back><floats-group><fig position="float" id="F1"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><p id="P35">Minimum inhibitory concentration distribution by antimicrobial and anatomic site of gonococcal infection among men who have sex with men: eGISP and SURRG, 2018 to 2019. The MIC distributions (percentage of isolates by MICs) by each antimicrobial (azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, and penicillin) were calculated for pharyngeal, rectal, and urethral isolates.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="nihms-2012464-f0001" position="float"/></fig><table-wrap position="float" id="T1" orientation="landscape"><label>TABLE 1.</label><caption><p id="P36">Descriptive Characteristics of Men Who Have Sex With Men From Whom <italic toggle="yes">Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> Isolates Were Collected by Anatomic Site of Gonococcal Infection: eGISP and SURRG, 2018 to 2019</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup span="1"><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total Isolates (n = 6576), n (Col %)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Urethral (n = 3974), n (Col %)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Rectal (n = 1553), n (Col %)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pharyngeal (n = 1049), n (Col %)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Region<xref rid="TFN1" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Northeast</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2103 (32.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1606 (40.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">290 (18.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">207 (19.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Midwest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1003 (15.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">620 (15.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">236 (15.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">147 (14.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;South</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">281 (4.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">160 (4.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">60 (3.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">61 (5.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;West</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3189 (48.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1588 (40.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">967 (62.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">634 (60.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Gender of sex partners</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Men only</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5976 (90.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3560 (89.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1462 (94.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">954 (90.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Men and women</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">600 (9.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">414 (10.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">91 (5.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">95 (9.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Age, y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;&#x0003c;20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">306 (4.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">158 (4.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">94 (6.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">54 (5.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;20&#x02013;24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1242 (18.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">672 (16.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">332 (21.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">238 (22.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;25&#x02013;29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1886 (28.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1132 (28.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">440 (28.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">314 (30.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;30&#x02013;34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1301 (19.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">795 (20.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">307 (19.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">199 (19.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;35&#x02013;39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">668 (10.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">437 (11.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">137 (8.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">94 (9.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;40&#x02013;44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">395 (6.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">264 (6.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">81 (5.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">50 (4.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;&#x02265;45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">778 (11.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">516 (13.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">162 (10.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">100 (9.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Race/Hispanic ethnicity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Non-Hispanic Asian</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">379 (5.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">164 (4.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">143 (9.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">72 (6.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Non-Hispanic Black</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1804 (27.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1354 (34.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">234 (15.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">216 (20.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Hispanic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1474 (22.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">783 (19.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">426 (27.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">265 (25.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Non-Hispanic White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2390 (36.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1349 (34.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">633 (40.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">408 (38.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Non-Hispanic other<xref rid="TFN2" ref-type="table-fn">&#x02020;</xref></td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">340 (5.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">220 (5.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">68 (4.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">52 (5.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Unknown</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">189 (2.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">104 (2.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">49 (3.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">36 (3.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">HIV status at time of clinic visit for gonorrhea<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">&#x02021;</xref></td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1150 (17.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">765 (19.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">270 (17.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">115 (11.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4759 (72.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2893 (73.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1084 (70.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">782 (75.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Unknown</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">605 (9.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">289 (7.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">178 (11.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">138 (13.3)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="TFN1"><label>*</label><p id="P37">Northeast Region: Philadelphia (PA), New York City (NY); Midwest Region: Columbus (OH), Indianapolis (IN), Chicago (IL), Milwaukee (WI), Minneapolis (MN), Pontiac (MI), Kalamazoo (MI); South Region: Miami (FL), New Orleans (LA); Greensboro (NC); West Region: Portland (OR), Las Vegas (NV), San Diego (CA), Orange County (CA), Seattle (WA), San Francisco (CA), Denver (CO), Honolulu (HI).</p></fn><fn id="TFN2"><label>&#x02020;</label><p id="P38">Other: American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and other Pacific Islander, multirace, or other race indicated.</p></fn><fn id="TFN3"><label>&#x02021;</label><p id="P39">HIV status at the time of clinic visit for gonorrhea by self-report and/or per medical chart.</p></fn><fn id="TFN4"><p id="P40">eGISP indicates enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project; SURRG, Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap position="float" id="T2" orientation="landscape"><label>TABLE 2.</label><caption><p id="P41">Comparison<xref rid="TFN5" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref> of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Distribution by Antimicrobial and Anatomic Site of Gonococcal Infection Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: eGISP and SURRG, 2018 to 2019</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup span="1"><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Antimicrobial and Measured Parameter<sup><xref rid="TFN6" ref-type="table-fn">&#x02020;</xref></sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pharyngeal (n = 1049)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Rectal (n = 1553)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Urethral (n = 3974)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Azithromycin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;MIC range, &#x003bc;g/mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.008&#x02013;16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.008&#x02013;16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.008&#x02013;16</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Geometric mean MIC (95% CI)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.32 (0.30&#x02013;0.34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.31 (0.29&#x02013;0.33)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.30 (0.29&#x02013;0.31)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;No. (%) [95% CI] with elevated MIC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">124/1049 (11.2) [9.4&#x02013;13.3]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">182/1553 (11.3) [9.8&#x02013;13.1]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">420/3974 (10.2) [9.3&#x02013;11.3]</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Cefixime</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;MIC range, &#x003bc;g/mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.002&#x02013;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.002&#x02013;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.002&#x02013;0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Geometric mean MIC (95% CI)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0192 (0.0185&#x02013;0.020)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0181 (0.0175&#x02013;0.0187)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0176 (0.0173&#x02013;0.018)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;No. (%) [95% CI] with elevated MIC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3/1049 (0.29) [0.09&#x02013;0.88]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8/1553 (0.52) [0.26&#x02013;1.0]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11/3974 (0.28) [0.15&#x02013;0.50]</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Ceftriaxone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;MIC range, &#x003bc;g/mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.001&#x02013;0.125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.001&#x02013;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.001&#x02013;0.125</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Geometric mean MIC (95% CI)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0108 (0.0103&#x02013;0.0113)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00987 (0.0095&#x02013;0.0102)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0098 (0.0096&#x02013;0.0101)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;No. (%) [95% CI] with elevated MIC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7/1049 (0.67) [0.32&#x02013;1.4]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2/1553 (0.13) [0.03&#x02013;0.51]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7/3974 (0.18) [0.08&#x02013;0.37]</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Ciprofloxacin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;MIC range, &#x003bc;g/mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.001&#x02013;32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.001&#x02013;32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.001&#x02013;32</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Geometric mean MIC (95% CI)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.12 (0.10&#x02013;0.15)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.11 (0.09&#x02013;0.13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.12 (0.10&#x02013;0.13)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;No. (%) [95% CI] with resistant MIC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">450/1049 (42.7) [39.5&#x02013;46.0]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">649/1553 (41.6) [38.9&#x02013;44.2]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1701/3974 (42.6) [40.9&#x02013;44.3]</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Penicillin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;MIC range, &#x003bc;g/mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.008&#x02013;64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.008&#x02013;64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.008&#x02013;64</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Geometric mean MIC (95% CI)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.63 (0.58&#x02013;0.68)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.60 (0.57&#x02013;0.65)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.66 (0.63&#x02013;0.69)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;No. (%) [95% CI] with resistant MIC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">140/1049 (13.0) [11.0&#x02013;15.2]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">200/1553 (12.6) [11.0&#x02013;14.4]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">603/3974 (14.8) [13.7&#x02013;16.0]</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tetracycline</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;MIC range, &#x003bc;g/mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06&#x02013;64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06&#x02013;64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06&#x02013;64</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Geometric mean MIC (95% CI)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.55 (1.44&#x02013;1.68)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.48 (1.39&#x02013;1.58)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.47 (1.40&#x02013;1.53)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;No. (%) [95% CI] with resistant MIC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">377/1049 (35.7) [32.7&#x02013;38.8]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">512/1553 (32.9) [30.5&#x02013;35.4]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1377/3974 (34.5) [32.9&#x02013;36.1]</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="TFN5"><label>*</label><p id="P42">We fitted overall models with and without &#x0201c;anatomic sites&#x0201d; and compared the 2 models to get the overall <italic toggle="yes">P</italic> value; if the overall <italic toggle="yes">P</italic> value was statistically significant (&#x0003c;0.05), we conducted post hoc testing to adjust for multiple tests using the Holm adjustment. Linear mixed-effects model was used for geometric mean MICs, and mixed-effects logistic regression model was used for the proportion of isolates with elevated or resistant MICs across anatomic sites, respectively, to account for the multiple isolates provided by the same patients. All geometric mean MICs were not statistically significant (<italic toggle="yes">P</italic> &#x0003c; 0.05) except for cefixime and ceftriaxone; all proportions with elevated or resistant MICs were not statistically significant except for ceftriaxone.</p></fn><fn id="TFN6"><label>&#x02020;</label><p id="P43">The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute has not established the criteria for resistance to azithromycin, cefixime, and ceftriaxone; breakpoints used to define &#x0201c;elevated MIC&#x0201d; for these antimicrobials include the following: azithromycin MIC of &#x02265;2.0 &#x003bc;g/mL, cefixime MIC of &#x02265;0.25 &#x003bc;g/mL, and ceftriaxone MIC of &#x02265;0.125 &#x003bc;g/mL. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results were interpreted according to the criteria recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for penicillin resistance (MIC &#x02265;2 &#x003bc;g/mL or &#x003b2;-lactamase positive), ciprofloxacin resistance (MIC &#x02265;1.0 &#x003bc;g/mL), and tetracycline resistance (MIC &#x02265;2.0 &#x003bc;g/mL). Tested ranges for antimicrobials (&#x003bc;g/mL): azithromycin (0.008&#x02013;16), cefixime (0.002&#x02013;1), ceftriaxone (0.001&#x02013;1), ciprofloxacin (0.001&#x02013;32), penicillin (0.008&#x02013;64), tetracycline (0.06&#x02013;64).</p></fn><fn id="TFN7"><p id="P44">CI, confidence interval; eGISP, enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; SURRG, Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></article>