Emerg Infect DisEmerging Infect. DisEIDEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-6059Centers for Disease Control and Prevention15496255332039803-078410.3201/eid1008.030784DispatchDispatchHuman Escherichia coli O157:H7 Genetic Marker in Isolates of Bovine OriginEscherichia coli O157:H7 Genetic MarkerLeJeuneJeffrey T.*AbedonStephen T.*TakemuraKaori*ChristieNicholas P.*SreevatsanSrinand*Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USAAddress for correspondence: Jeffrey T. LeJeune, 1680 Madison Ave, Wooster, OH 44691, USA; fax: 330-2633-677; email: lejeune.3@osu.edu8200410814821485
The antiterminator Q gene of bacteriophage 933W (Q933) was identified upstream of the stx2 gene in 90% of human disease–origin Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates and in 44.5% of bovine isolates. Shiga toxin production was higher in Q933-positive isolates than Q933-negative isolates. This genetic marker may provide a useful molecular tool for epidemiologic studies.
Keywords: E. coli O157Shiga-toxin productionstx2-encoding phagesdispatch
Escherichia coli O157 is recognized worldwide as an important cause of diarrheal disease, which in some patients is followed by hemolytic uremic syndrome and death (1). A primary virulence factor of this pathogen is the prophage-encoded Shiga toxin (2). Greater Shiga toxin production per bacterium is associated with increasing severity of human disease (3,4). Because of its location in the phage genome, the stx-gene variant dubbed stx2 is under similar regulatory control as other phage late-genes, as it is governed by the interaction of the transcription antiterminator Q with the late promoter PR´ (5).
Although cattle and other ruminants appear to be the natural reservoir for E. coli O157 and other Shiga toxin–producing E. coli (STEC), only a small fraction of STEC serotypes routinely present in cattle are frequently isolated from human patients. Mounting evidence suggests that considerable genetic, phenotypic, and pathogenic diversity exists among these pathogens (6–8). Furthermore, genetic subtypes or lineages of E. coli O157 do not appear to be equally distributed among isolates of bovine and human origin (7). The purpose of this study was to examine the distribution of specific sequences upstream of the stx2 gene among E. coli O157:H7 of human and bovine origin, along with corresponding magnitudes of Shiga toxin production.
The Study
A total of 158 stx2-encoding E. coli O157:H7 isolates were assayed, 91 isolates of bovine origin and 67 originally isolated from ill persons (Tables A1 and A2). All isolates demonstrated unique banding patterns on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). For polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, 5 µL of DNA obtained from boiled stationary-phase bacteria was added to a 50-µL PCR master mix containing a final concentration of 1.5 (Q933) or 2.5 (Q21) mmol MgCl2, 200 µmol/L each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 1 U Taq polymerase, 0.6 pg/µL of primer 595 (5´-CCGAAGAAAAACCCAGTAACAG-3´) (9), and 0.6 pg/µL of either primer Q933 (5´-CGGAGGGGATTGTTGAAGGC-3´;QStxf) (9) or primer Q21 (5´-GAAATCCTCAATGCCTCGTTG-3´; this study). PCR consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 52°C (Q933) or 55°C (Q21) for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; and a final 10-min extension step at 72°C. E. coli strain 933 or FAHRP88 was used as a positive control and master mix alone as a negative control. All PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis (100 V) in 1% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized by using UV illumination.
Shiga toxin production was determined by using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Premiere EHEC, Meridian Diagnostics, Cincinnati, OH). Briefly, log-phase cells from Luria-Bertani broth enrichments were diluted to 0.6 optical density (OD) at 600 nm, subsequently pelleted, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline, and induced by exposure to UV light (240 nm) for 3 s (10). A 1:9 volume of a 10x concentrate of brain heart infusion broth was added to each culture and shaken at 37°C for 2.5 h. Replicate cultures that were not exposed to UV light (noninduced controls) were maintained at 4°C. Two hundred microliters of each induced and noninduced enrichment was subsequently used as the specimen in the EHEC ELISA, as described (11). OD results were recorded for each isolate both with and without UV induction. The relative change in Shiga toxin production after induction was calculated for each isolate; (ODinduced)/ODnoninduced). E. coli O157 (EDL933) and a toxin-negative control isolate were assayed as positive and negative controls each time the assay was repeated.
E. coli O157 isolates were classified on the basis of the presence or absence of bands of the predicted size on the Q933-595 and Q21-595 PCR reactions (Figure). A chi-square test was used to determine whether different PCR genotypes were equally distributed among isolates of bovine and human origin. Likewise, a chi-square test was used to assess the equality of distribution of PCR genotypes among bovine isolates from different countries. One-way analysis of variance for nonparametric data (Kruskal-Wallis test) was used to identify differences in ranked-transformed toxin production among noninduced and induced E. coli O157 isolates as well as to determine significant differences in the percent increase in toxin following induction.
Ethidium bromide–stained gel of the amplification products obtained from Q933-595 and Q21-595 polymerase chain reactions. aEDL933, human isolate (ATCC43895). Obtained from the STEC Center, Michigan State University. bFAHRP88, isolated from Ohio dairy cow. cFAHRP39, human isolate (E29962) (12).
Previously, Kim et al. described a nonrandom distribution of E. coli O157 subtypes among cattle and humans by using an octamer-based genome-scanning method (7). We tested several of the isolates that had been previously characterized. Nine had been previously identified as belonging to the lineage I genotype and seven isolates as belonging to the lineage II genotype. We found that all nine lineage I isolates consistently amplified the Q933 target, regardless of species of origin. All four bovine isolates classified as lineage II by Kim et al. amplified the Q21 target. One lineage II human isolate (NE015) amplified the Q933 target, and another lineage II isolate (NE037) produced no amplicons in either PCR reaction. One human isolate classified as lineage II (ATCC 43889) amplified both target sequences, presumably because of polylysogeny.
The distribution of the specific Q-gene alleles found upstream of the prophage stx region among bovine isolates may have a geographic component. The distribution of E. coli O157 phage genotypes collected from healthy cattle from diverse geographic areas is consistent with the variable incidences of human disease in different countries (Table 1). For example, six (75%) of eight Scottish bovine isolates examined amplified the Q933 target, the same target that is frequently present in human isolates of human disease origin. Scotland reports some of the highest incidence rates of human E. coli O157–related diseases and hemolytic uremic syndrome (13). In contrast, none of the seven Australian E. coli O157 bovine isolates amplified the 1750-bp fragment. Contrary to the situation in Scotland and the United States, E. coli O157 infection of humans is rarely reported in Australia (14).
Distribution of polymerase chain reaction results from bovine Escherichia coli O157 isolates based on geographic origina
Country of origin
No. tested
Q allele
933
21
Both
N (%)
N (%)
N (%)
USA
46
20 (44)
25 (54)
1 (2)
Scotland
8
– (0)
2 (25)
6 (75)
Australia
7
– (0)
7 (100)
– (0)
Japan
17
3 (18)
14 (82)
– (0)
Total
78
23 (29)
48 (62)
7 (9)
a–, not detected. Percentages are read across rows, not down columns. Significant difference in proportion of Q alleles isolated from different countries (p < 0.05, chi-square test for homogeneity).
Conclusions
The Q933 gene target was more commonly identified in human disease–associated strains of E. coli O157 than from strains of bovine origin. Amplification of the Q933 target, either alone or in combination with amplification of the Q21 target from the same isolate, was identified in 60 (9%) of 66 (55/66 alone and 5/66 in combination with Q21; 1 isolate amplified neither target) compared to 40 (44%) of 91 (32/91 alone, and 8/91 in combination with Q21) of bovine isolates (p < 0.001). Furthermore, these genetic subtypes were nonrandomly distributed among the E. coli O157 isolates of bovine origin obtained from different countries (p < 0.05) (Table 1).
These limited data suggest that the distribution of E. coli O157 strains in cattle may differ between countries or regions, thereby providing an explanation for geographic differences in the incidence of human E. coli O157 infection. More isolates from cattle need to be analyzed with these methods to better characterize the E. coli O157 in the bovine reservoir of each country.
A positive reaction with the Q933 target was significantly associated with higher OD results on the Shiga toxin ELISA (both noninduced and induced) and higher-fold increases in toxin production following induction than isolates amplifying the Q21 target alone (p < 0.0001) (Table 2). Despite these differences, we did not identify any clinical associations between the magnitude of Shiga toxin production and severity of human disease could be identified in this study. Other, non–Shiga toxin–related virulence factors and host susceptibility are also believed to play essential roles in the outcome of clinical STEC infections. The Q933-negative isolates obtained from human disease might have lost this Q933-containing prophage by the time of isolation, or these isolates might have been recovered from patients also infected with STEC containing Q933-type prophage (15). Whether specific Q-gene alleles directly correlate with the magnitude of Shiga-toxin production or whether other (unstudied) factors within the phage lytic cascade genetically linked to specific Q alleles instead are responsible for the magnitude of toxin production is not known.
Shiga toxin production by Escherichia coli O157:H7 by Q allele
Assay
Q allele
Response
Median
Minimum
Maximum
OD600nm noninduced
Q933
0.442
0.153
2.814
Q21
0.170
0.120
0.413
OD600nm induced
Q933
1.228
0.172
2.896
Q21
0.165
0.084
1.210
Fold increase in OD600nm after inductiona
Q933
2.2
0.3
7.7
Q21
0.9
0.4
5.1
a(ODinduced)/(ODnoninduced). The maximum and minimum optical density readings at 600 nm listed in each row are not necessarily from the same isolate; therefore, the maximum- and minimum-fold increase cannot be calculated directly from the table.
The antiterminator Q, the protein product of the Q gene, and PR´, the late promoter, are reputed to be involved in regulating phage late-genes and, because of the location of PR´ in prophage genome, of Shiga toxin production as well (5). In E. coli O157 phage 933W (GenBank no. 9632466) and E. coli O157 stx2vhd (GenBank no. 15718404), the 359-bp sequence immediately upstream of the stx2 gene is nearly identical (>95% nucleotide identity). However, further upstream of this area of identity, DNA sequences differ significantly. In E. coli O157 933W, this gene is identified as the antiterminator Q gene. In contrast, in E. coli O157 stx2vhd this area is occupied by a gene with >95% sequence identity with the antiterminator Q gene of bacteriophage 21 (gi 4539472). The Q gene of bacteriophage 21 does not share DNA sequence homology with the Q gene of bacteriophage 933W, and only 36% predicted amino acid homology. Since the Q gene is reputed to play an important role in regulating toxin production, our results provide a plausible explanation (differential regulation of Shiga toxin production) of why certain E. coli O157 genotypes are more commonly isolated from human patients (7).
Suggested citation for this article: LeJeune JT, Abedon ST, Takemura K, Christie NP, Sreevatsan S. Human Escherichia coli O157:H7 genetic marker in isolates of bovine origin. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2004 Aug [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1008.030784
Acknowledgments
We thank the state departments of health of Ohio, Washington, and Idaho for many of the human isolates used in this study and the SETC Center, Michigan State University, for providing two of the strains we tested.
This project was funded by beef and veal producers and importers through their $1-per-head checkoff and was produced for the Cattlemen's Beef Board and state beef councils by the National Cattlemen's Beef Association. Research in S.S. and J.T.L. laboratories is also supported by state and federal funds appropriated to the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center.
Source of human isolates used in this studya
FAHRP ID
Source ID
Country
Year
Clinical signs and symptoms
References or source
6
FRIK 528
USA
1998
Diarrhea
16
7
FRIK 579
USA
1998
Diarrhea
16
8
93-001
USA
1999
Hemorrhagic colitis
17
9
ATCC 35150
USA
1999
Hemorrhagic colitis
17
16
91671
USA
1999
Hemorrhagic colitis
17
17
ATCC 43889
USA
1999
Hemorrhagic colitis
17
18
NE 037
USA
1999
Hemorrhagic colitis
17
19
NE 15
USA
1999
Hemorrhagic colitis
17
39
E29962
UK
1991
NR
18
54
CL56
Canada
1991
NR
18
60
E32511
USA
2002
HUS
19
58
EDL933
USA
1982
Hemorrhagic colitis
20
126
02 5225
USA
2002
NR
Washingtonb
127
02 4857
USA
2002
NR
Washington
128
02 6776
USA
2002
NR
Washington
129
02 6579
USA
2002
NR
Washington
130
02 6546
USA
2002
NR
Washington
131
02 6722
USA
2002
NR
Washington
132
02 6598
USA
2002
NR
Washington
133
02 6696
USA
2002
NR
Washington
134
02 6791
USA
2002
NR
Washington
135
02 6829
USA
2002
NR
Washington
136
02 6755
USA
2002
NR
Washington
137
02 6644
USA
2002
NR
Washington
138
06 781
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Idahoc
139
06 852
USA
2002
NR
Idaho
140
06 854
USA
2002
Watery diarrhea, vomiting
Idaho
141
06 856
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Idaho
142
06 855
USA
2002
NR
143
06 886
USA
2002
Diarrhea, abdominal pain
Idaho
144
06 889
USA
2002
Abdominal pain
Idaho
145
06 988
USA
2002
Gastrointestinal bleeding
Idaho
146
07 004
USA
2002
Bloody stool
Idaho
147
07 007
USA
2002
Bloody stool
Idaho
148
07 023
USA
2002
Bloody stool
Idaho
149
07 085
USA
2002
NR
Idaho
150
07 147
USA
2002
NR
Idaho
151
07 154
USA
2002
NR
Idaho
152
O2191230
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohiod
153
O2191229
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
154
O2191231
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
155
O2191294
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
156
O2190819
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
157
O2190864
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
158
O2191309
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
159
O2191311
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
160
O2191313
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
161
O2191361
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
162
O2191602
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
163
O2191624
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
164
O2191541
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
165
O2191546
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
166
O2191423
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
167
O2191509
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
168
O2191363
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
169
O2191364
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
170
O2191365
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
171
O2191366
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
172
O2190889
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
173
O2190893
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
174
O2191176
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
175
O2191177
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
176
O2191623
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
177
O2191625
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
178
O2191645
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
179
O2191675
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
180
O2191765
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
181
O2191831
USA
2002
Diarrhea
Ohio
aFAHRP, Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio State University; NR, not reported; HUS, hemolytic uremic syndrome. bWashington State Department of Health isolates. cIdaho Department of Health and Welfare isolates. dOhio Department of Health isolates.
Source of bovine isolates used in this study
FAHRPa ID
Source ID
Country
Year
References or source
1
FRIK 1986
USA
1991
21
2
FRIK 1997
USA
1991
21
3
FRIK 1994
USA
1991
21
4
FRIK 2002
USA
1991
21
5
FRIK 1987
USA
1991
21
10
FRIK 920
USA
1998
22
11
FRIK 1054
USA
1998
22
12
FRIK 1540
USA
1998
22
13
FRIK 1988
USA
1998
21
22
LCDC 87-2930
Canada
1991
23
27
OARDC1
USA
2002
FAHRP
29
OARDC2
USA
2002
FAHRP
31
OARDC3
USA
2002
FAHRP
35
P673
UK
1987
24
37
P277
UK
1987
24
47
c1526-77
Argentina
1991
23
50
CDC B9253-DMS1
USA
1991
23
51
A39
Canada
1991
23
52
A43
Canada
1991
23
56
LCDC 87-2924
Canada
1991
23
57
LCDC 87-1799
Canada
1991
23
62
CDC B6830-MS1/0
USA
1991
23
63
CDCB7205-MS1/0
USA
1991
23
64
CDC B8038-MS1/0
USA
1991
23
65
8832
USA
2002
25
66
EC66
USA
2002
FAHRP
67
EC 67
USA
2002
FAHRP
82
8833
USA
2002
25
83
EC 83
USA
2002
FAHRP
84
EC 84
USA
2002
FAHRP
85
8834
USA
2002
25
87
EC87
USA
2002
FAHRP
88
EC88
USA
2002
FAHRP
93
EC 93
USA
2002
FAHRP
94
EC94
USA
2002
FAHRP
95
EC95
USA
2002
FAHRP
96
EC96
USA
2002
FAHRP
97
EC97
USA
2002
FAHRP
98
EC98
USA
2002
FAHRP
99
EC99
USA
2002
FAHRP
100
EC100
USA
2002
FAHRP
102
EC102
USA
2002
FAHRP
103
EC103
USA
2002
FAHRP
104
EC104
USA
2002
FAHRP
113
8837
USA
2002
25
115
EC115
USA
2002
FAHRP
116
EC116
USA
2002
FAHRP
117
EC117
USA
2002
FAHRP
120
EC120
USA
2002
FAHRP
122
EC122
USA
2002
FAHRP
182
757
USA
1994
25
183
817
USA
1994
25
185
1104
USA
1994
25
186
1119
USA
1994
25
187
1124
USA
1994
25
188
1136
USA
1994
25
189
1273
USA
1994
25
190
3735
USA
1996
25
191
4048
USA
1996
25
192
7407
Japan
1996
25
193
7409
Japan
1996
25
194
7416
Japan
1996
25
195
7420
Japan
1996
25
196
7421
Japan
1996
25
197
7423
Japan
1996
25
198
7433
Japan
1996
25
199
7436
Japan
1996
25
200
7439
Japan
1996
25
201
7460
Japan
1996
25
202
7469
Japan
1996
25
203
7478
Japan
1996
25
204
7484
Japan
1996
25
205
7488
Japan
1996
25
206
7495
Japan
1996
25
207
7500
Japan
1996
25
208
7505
Japan
1996
25
209
7622
Scotland
1996
25
210
7630
Scotland
1999
25
211
7632
Scotland
1999
25
213
7637
Scotland
1999
25
214
7638
Scotland
1999
25
217
7648
Scotland
1999
25
218
7649
Scotland
1999
25
219
7653
Scotland
1999
25
220
8176
Australia
1999
25
221
8177
Australia
1996
25
222
8179
Australia
1997
25
223
8182
Australia
1997
25
224
8183
Australia
1997
25
225
8184
Australia
1998
25
226
8185
Australia
1999
25
aFAHRP, Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio State University.
Dr. LeJeune is an assistant professor in the Food Animal Health Research Program, in the Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University. His research interests include the epidemiology and ecology of foodborne pathogens in the preharvest stages of food production.
ReferencesKarmaliMA, ArbusGS, PetricM, PatrickML, RoscoeM, ShawJ, Hospital-acquired Escherichia coli O157:H7 associated haemolytic uraemic syndrome in a nurse[letter]Lancet. 1988;1:52610.1016/S0140-6736(88)91310-42893931O'LoughlinEV, Robins-BrowneRMEffect of Shiga toxin and Shiga-like toxins on eukaryotic cells.Microbes Infect. 2001;3:493–50710.1016/S1286-4579(01)01405-811377211KimuraN, WatanabeM, KomatsubaraA[Verotoxin producing ability of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from fecal specimens of healthy persons is lower than that of patients]Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2000;74:849–5111109769PradelN, BoukhorsK, BertinY, ForestierC, MartinC, LivrelliVHeterogeneity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from hemolytic-uremic syndrome patients, cattle, and food samples in central France.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:2460–810.1128/AEM.67.6.2460-2468.200111375151WagnerPL, NeelyMN, ZhangX, AchesonDW, WaldorMK, FriedmanDIRole for a phage promoter in Shiga toxin 2 expression from a pathogenic Escherichia coli strain.J Bacteriol. 2001;183:2081–510.1128/JB.183.6.2081-2085.200111222608BakerDR, MoxleyRA, FrancisDHVariation in virulence in the gnotobiotic pig model of O157:H7 Escherichia coli strains of bovine and human origin.Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997;412:53–89191990KimJ, NietfeldtJ, BensonAKOctamer-based genome scanning distinguishes a unique subpopulation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains in cattle.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:13288–9310.1073/pnas.96.23.1328810557313McNallyA, RoeAJ, SimpsonS, Thomson-CarterFM, HoeyDE, CurrieC, Differences in levels of secreted locus of enterocyte effacement proteins between human disease-associated and bovine Escherichia coli O157.Infect Immun. 2001;69:5107–1410.1128/IAI.69.8.5107-5114.200111447192UnkmeirA, SchmidtHStructural analysis of phage-borne stx genes and their flanking sequences in shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and Shigella dysenteriae type 1 strains.Infect Immun. 2000;68:4856–6410.1128/IAI.68.9.4856-4864.200010948097ArberW, EnquistL, HohnB, MurrayK, MurrayN Experimental methods. In: Hendrix R, Roberts J, Stahl F, Weisberg R, editors. Lambda II. Cold Springs Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1983SchmidtH, ScheefJ, MorabitoS, CaprioliA, WielerLH, KarchHA new Shiga toxin 2 variant (Stx2f) from Escherichia coli isolated from pigeons.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:1205–810.1128/AEM.66.3.1205-1208.200010698793DornCR, AngrickESerotype O157:H7 Escherichia coli from bovine and meat sources.J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:1225–311677942LockingM HUS rates in Scotland. Glasgow: Scottish Centre for Infection & Environmental Health; 2002ElliottEJ, Robins-BrowneRM, O'LoughlinEV, Bennett-WoodV, BourkeJ, HenningP, Nationwide study of haemolytic uraemic syndrome: clinical, microbiological, and epidemiological features.Arch Dis Child. 2001;85:125–3110.1136/adc.85.2.12511466187KarchH, RussmannH, SchmidtH, SchwarzkopfA, HeesemannJLong-term shedding and clonal turnover of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 in diarrheal diseases.J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:1602–57650195GouveiaS, ProctorME, LeeM-S, LuchanskyJB, KasparCWGenomic comparisons and Shiga toxin production among Escherichia coli O157:H7 Isolates from a day care center outbreak and sporadic cases in southeastern Wisconsin.J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:727–339508303KimJ, NietfeldtJ, BensonAOctamer-based genome scanning distinguishes a unique subpopulation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains in cattle.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:13288–9310.1073/pnas.96.23.1328810557313DornCR, AngrickESerotype O157:H7 Escherichia coli from bovine and meat sources.J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:1225–311677942SchmittCK, McKeeML, O'BrienADTwo copies of Shiga-like toxin II-related genes common in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli strains are responsible for the antigenic heterogeneity of the O157:H- strain E32511.[Obtained from the STEC Center, Michigan State University.]Infect Immun. 1991;59:1065–731997410PernaNT, MayhewGF, PosfaiG, ElliottS, DonnenbergMS, KaperJB, Genome sequence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7.Nature. 2001;409:529–3310.1038/3505408911206551KimJ, NietfeldtJ, BensonAOctamer-based genome scanning distinguishes a unique subpopulation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains in cattle.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:13288–9310.1073/pnas.96.23.1328810557313ShereJA, BartlettKJ, KasparCWLongitudinal study of Escherichia coli O157:H7 dissemination on four dairy farms in Wisconsin.Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:1390–99546176DornCR, AngrickESerotype O157:H7 Escherichia coli from bovine and meat sources.J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:1225–311677942HuckLG, DornCR, AngrickEJDNA probe for detection of serogroup O157 enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli.Int J Food Microbiol. 1995;25:277–8710.1016/0168-1605(94)00084-J7654513DavisMA, HancockDD, BesserTE, RiceDH, HovdeCJ, DigiacomoR, Correlation between geographic distance and genetic similarity in an international collection of bovine faecal Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates.Epidemiol Infect. 2003;131:923–3010.1017/S095026880300888414596534