Emerg Infect DisEIDEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-6059Centers for Disease Control and Prevention14609463303307903-017910.3201/eid0910.030179ArticleCephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli among
Summer Camp Attendees with SalmonellosisPratsGuillem*MirelisBeatriz*MiróElisenda*NavarroFerran*LlovetTeresa*JohnsonJames R.†CampsNeus‡DomínguezÁngela‡SallerasLluis‡Universitat Autònoma, Barcelona, SpainUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
Minnesota, USADept. de Sanitat i Seguretat Social,
Barcelona, SpainAddress for correspondence: Guillem Prats, Servei de
Microbiologia, Hospital Vall d’Hebrón. Pº Vall
d’Hebrón, 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain; fax: 34
932746801; email: gprats@cs.vhebron.es10200391012731280
Investigation of an acute gastroenteritis outbreak involving >100 persons
at a summer camp in Girona, Spain, in June 2002 led to the detection of
Salmonella and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant
Escherichia coli (ESCREC). Stool cultures were performed
for 22 symptomatic campers, three asymptomatic food handlers, and 10 healthy
household members. Of the 22 campers, 19 had Salmonella
enterica, 9 had an ESCREC strain carrying an extended-spectrum
β-lactamase, and 2 had a second ESCREC strain carrying a plasmidic
cephamycinase. Related ESCREC were detected in two (salmonella-negative)
asymptomatic food handlers and in none of the healthy household members. Fecal
ESCREC and its β-lactamases and plasmids were extensively
characterized. Three of the five ESCREC clones were recovered from multiple
hosts. The apparent dissemination of ESCREC suggests a food or water vehicle.
The observed distribution of resistance plasmids and β-lactamase
genes in several clones indicates a high degree of horizontal transfer.
Heightened vigilance and increased efforts must be made to discover the
reservoirs and vehicles for community dissemination of ESCREC.
Strains of Escherichia coli that produce enzymes capable of degrading
extended- spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs), i.e., extended-spectrum
β-lactamases (ESBLs), or these drugs plus cephamycins, i.e., plasmidic or
hyperproduction of chromosomal cephamycinases have recently emerged as important
nosocomial pathogens (1,2). Some of these strains cannot be reliably detected by clinical microbiology
laboratories by using conventional susceptibility tests (3), and even when recognized, treating infections caused by these strains can be
challenging because therapeutic options are limited. Infections attributable to such
strains are associated with prolonged hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and an
increased number of deaths if appropriate therapy is delayed (4,5).
To date, almost all reports of infection or colonization with ESBL- and plasmidic
cephamycinase-producing E. coli (i.e., extended-spectrum
cephalosporin-resistant E. coli [ESCREC]) have involved hospitalized
patients or nursing home residents (3,6). The few reported patients with community-acquired infection have been elderly
and debilitated and have had hospital contact, important coexisting conditions, or both
(3,6).
E. coli, including resistant strains, may be transmitted within the
community through the food supply. Indeed, other gram-negative enteric pathogens,
notably Salmonella enterica, are a frequent cause of foodborne disease
and, increasingly, are associated with antibiotic resistance, including antibiotic
resistance to ESCs (7–11). Available data regarding other resistant E. coli suggest that
ESCREC could also be disseminated through the food supply (12–19).
The cefoperazone-containing medium routinely used in our laboratory for the isolation of
Campylobacter occasionally yields other bacteria with
hyperproduction of chromosomal β-lactamases or their plasmidic derivatives,
as well as strains carrying extended-spectrum β-lactamases (unpub. data). By
using this media, we have isolated several resistant enterobacteriaceae strains from
patients with sporadic cases of gastroenteritis (unpub. data). During an investigation
of a summer camp-associated salmonellosis outbreak, we observed that stool cultures from
nine campers unexpectedly yielded, on cefoperazone-containing medium, colonies
resembling enterobacteriaceae, with a uniform mucoid appearance. This result suggested
the possibility that the same, probably ESC-resistant, enterobacterial strain was
present in all these persons, findings consistent with possible foodborne spread.
Consequently, all samples were reevaluated on media containing cefotaxime (see Methods)
to increase sensitivity for detection of ESC-resistant organisms. To gain more knowledge
of foodborne spread as a potential mechanism of dissemination of resistance genes, we
undertook an extensive molecular epidemiologic analysis of these isolates.
MethodsDescription of the Outbreak and Stool Sampling
Two hundred twenty-five elementary and secondary school students and 11 teachers
were spending a week (June 11–15, 2001) at a summer camp in
Palafrugell, Girona (Spain), when an outbreak of gastroenteritis began on June
14. An epidemiologic investigation involving 200 campers and staff failed to
identify the source of the outbreak. Clinical and epidemiologic studies were
initiated at the onset of the outbreak, but our participation as reference
laboratory began later. Consequently, a limited number of stools from
symptomatic patients and related persons were available to us for analysis.
From June 16 to 19, stool samples from 22 ill campers were collected for
analysis. On July 6 (18–19 days later), additional stool samples were
collected from four ill campers and from 10 asymptomatic household members of
the four ill campers. Stool samples were also collected from three asymptomatic
food handlers, on June 19, 22, and 28.
Microbiologic StudiesHuman Samples
Stool samples were processed according to conventional protocols for
isolation of enteropathogenic bacteria, in addition to special selection for
resistant organisms (as described below). Isolates were identified by
conventional methods (20). Stools (fresh and after modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining) were
microscopically examined for protozoa (21). Latex agglutination was used to detect rotavirus
immunochrotography to dectect adenovirus 40/41, and reverse
transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (22) to detect calcivirus.
Selection of ESCREC
Stool suspended in saline was added to trypticase soy broth containing 2 mg/L
cefotaxime (TSB-CTX), which after 18 h of incubation at 35°C, was
added to similarly supplemented MacConkey broth (MacC-broth-CTX). After an 18-h
incubation, a loopful of this broth was spread on similarly supplemented
MacConkey agar. A colony of each distinct morphotype was analyzed further.
Selection of Resistant S. enterica Strains
Stool samples were processed as for isolation of ESCREC, but after the initial
growth the MacC-broth-CTX was added to selenite broth. After 8 h of incubation
at 35°C, this broth was spread on cefotaxime-supplemented
xylose-lysine-deoxycholate agar. Colonies suspected of representing
Salmonella were analyzed further.
Food Studies
Eight unprepared food items from the camp kitchen were analyzed for
Salmonella and ESCREC as described for stool samples,
except that the initial TSB-CTX was replaced by peptone yeast extract broth.
Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
Disk diffusion susceptibility testing to 28 antibiotics (Table) was performed according to National Committee for
Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines (23). The activity of cefotaxime and ceftazidime, combined with clavulanate,
was determined by E test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). MICs to
β-lactam antibiotics were determined by broth microdilution
(Sensititre, Trek Diagnostic Systems LTD, West Sussex, England), according to
NCCLS guidelines (24,25).
Characteristics of 15 extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant fecal
Escherichia coli isolates derived from an outbreak
of salmonellosis
Patient no.
(age in y)
Schoolb
Isolate
Isolation
date
Biotype
Serotype
PFGE pattern
(clone)
Plasmid
profile
Southern blot pattern
β-lactamase
Associated
resistanced
PstI
SmaI
/ HincIIc
P5a (12)
EP
1
06-18-01
5671
NT
A
I ae
1
a
CTX-M-9
Tp, Sxt
P6a (11)
EP
1
06-18-01
5671
NT
A
I be
2
b
CTX-M-9
Tp, Sxt
P9a (12)
SB
1
06-19-01
5671
NT
A
I ce
2
b
CTX-M-9
Tp, Sxt
P10a (12)
SB
1
06-19-01
5671
NT
A
I ae
3
c
CTX-M-9
Tp, Sxt
2
06-19-01
7775
O:86
B
II ae
4
d
CMY-2
Tp, Sxt, Cm, Fur
P12a (11)
SB
1
06-19-01
5671
NT
A
I be
3
b
CTX-M-9
Tp, Sxt
2
07-06-01
5671
NT
A
I be
3
b
CTX-M-9
Tp, Sxt
P14a (12)
SB
1
06-19-01
1571
O:20
C
III
3
e
CTX-M-9 + TEM-1
Tp, Sxt, Km, Neo
P15 (11)
SB
1
06-19-01
0371
O:145
D
IV
3
f
CTX-M-9 + TEM-1
Tp, Sxt, Cm
P18a (11)
SB
1
06-19-01
5671
NT
A
I be
3
b
CTX-M-9
Tp, Sxt
2
06-19-01
7775
O:86
B
II be
4
d
CMY-2
Cm, Fur
P19a (12)
T
1
06-19-01
5671
NT
A
I be
3
b
CTX-M-9
Tp, Sxt
F2
1
06-22-01
1571
O:20
C
V
4
ndf
CTX-M-9 + TEM-1
Tp, Sxt, Km, Neo
F3
1
06-22-01
4571
O:55
E
VI
4
d
CMY-2 + TEM-1
Cm, Gm, Km, Neo, Tob
2
06-28-01
4571
O:55
E
VI
4
d
CMY-2 + TEM-1
Cm, Gm, Km, Neo, Tob
aSalmonella enterica also was
isolated. bSB, Sant Boi; T, Tarragona; EP, El
Prat. cThe SmaI RFLP pattern
was determined for those strains carrying the CTX-M-9 enzyme and the
HincII RFLP pattern was determined for those
carrying the CMY-2 enzyme. dAll ESCREC isolates
were resistant to all penicillins and cephalosporins, including ESCs, as
well as to nalidixic acid, tetracycline, sulfonamides and streptomycin.
Other antibiotics tested included ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate,
piperacillin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime,
cefepime, aztreonam, imipenem, chloramphenicol (Cm), gentamicin (Gm),
kanamycin (Km), tobramycin (Tob), amikacin, neomycin (Neo),
sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (Sxt), trimethoprim (Tp), ciprofloxacin,
fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, rifampin and furazolidone
(Fur). eThe only difference between the Ia,
Ib, and Ic, or the IIa and IIb plasmid profiles is one band higher than
100 kb within the particular plasmid pattern. fnd,
not determined.
Transfer of Resistance Determinants
Filter matings were performed with ESCREC donors, using as recipients either
E. coli HB101 (Nal Kan) for which transconjugants were
selected, according to described methods (26), or the S. enterica isolate from patient P12, for
which transconjugants were selected by adding the filter containing mixed growth
of E. coli and Salmonella to MacC-broth-CTX.
This broth, which was subsequently processed as described above for selection of
resistant S. enterica.
Extraction of β-Lactamases and Isoelectric Focusing (IEF)
Crude extracts of β-lactamases were obtained by ultrasonication.
Analytical IEF was performed as previously described (27).
Characterization of β-Lactamase Genes
The blaTEM,blaCTX-M-9 and blaCMY-2
genes were amplified as previously described (28–33). The DNA sequence was directly determined from PCR products for both
DNA strands (34).
Biotyping and Serotyping
The biotype, as determined for 12 metabolic reactions, was expressed as a 4-digit
code (35). The serotype and phage type of Salmonella isolates
were determined in the Servicio de Enterobacterias del Centro Nacional de
Microbiología, Instituto Carlos III, Majadahonda, Spain (M.A. Usera
and A. Echeita). The serogroup of the ESCREC was determined at the Laboratorio
de Referencia, Lugo, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (J. Blanco).
Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE)
Genomic profiles were analyzed by PFGE with XbaI (Amersham
Biosciences UK Limited, Buckinghamshire, England) (36,37). Isolates exhibiting indistinguishable PFGE profiles were considered to
represent the same clone.
Plasmid Profiles Analysis
Plasmid DNA was isolated by using a commercial kit (QIAGEN, Inc., Valencia, CA)
and subjected to 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis both without digestions and
after cleavage with PstI, SmaI, or
HincII (Amersham Biosciences). For southern hybridization
(38), both total and restricted plasmid DNA were transferred to nylon
membranes and hybridized with PCR-generated probes for
blaCTX-M-9 (850 bp) and
blaCMY-2 (1,017 bp), as labeled and detected
using the ECLTM Direct Nucleic Acid Labeling and Detection System
(Amersham Biosciences).
Statistical Methods
Comparisons of proportions were tested by using the Fisher exact test
(two-tailed).
ResultsEpidemiologic Survey
The 225 student campers, 10–16 years of age, and 11 teachers were from
three schools in three cities, Tarragona (T), El Prat (EP), and Sant Boi (SB).
Of the 200 campers and staff interviewed, 109 (54.5%), including 3 teachers, had
symptoms of gastroenteritis, with no significant differences between the three
schools (57%, 49%, and 62% respectively). The most frequent symptoms were
abdominal pain (80%), diarrhea (79%), and headache (64%). Two students were
admitted to hospital, but after supportive therapy were discharged within 48
hours. No person received antibiotic therapy.
Microbiologic StudyCampers
Of the 109 ill campers, 22 provided stool samples that were available for
microbiologic study in our laboratory. Nineteen (86%) of the acute-phase
stool samples yielded S. enterica serovar Enteritidis phage
type 4, which was susceptible to all tested antimicrobial agents. No fecal
pathogens were detected in the remaining three ill campers.
In addition, ESCREC were isolated from the initial stool sample for 9 (41%)
of the 22 campers, including 8 (42%) of 19 with salmonellae and 1 with no
detectable enteric pathogen (Table).
All nine samples contained an ESCREC isolate resistant to penicillins and
cephalosporins (including ESCs) but susceptible to cephamycins and
carbapenems (CTXR-cefoxitin FOXS-ESCREC), consistent
with production of an ESBL. Two of these samples also yielded a second
ESCREC type that was resistant to penicillins and cephalosporins, including
ESCs and cephamycins, but susceptible to carbapenems
(CTXR-FOXR-ESCREC), consistent with
hyperproduction of E. coli AmpC chromosomal
β-lactamase or presence of a plasmidic cephamycinase. All ESCREC
isolates exhibited multiple additional resistance markers (Table).
Follow-up stool samples (collected 18–19 days later) were
available for four campers. Neither salmonellae nor ESCREC was recovered,
except in one camper, from whom the initial ESCREC strain was isolated
(Table).
Food Handlers and Households Contacts
Although stool samples collected from the three (asymptomatic) food handlers were
negative for enteropathogens, two of these persons were carriers of ESCREC. One
had CTXR-FOXS-ESCREC at the second sampling, whereas the
other had CTXR-FOXR-ESCREC at both the second and third
samplings.
In contrast, neither enteropathogens nor ESCREC were detected in stool samples
from 10 healthy household members of four ill campers who had both ESCREC and
salmonellae in their acute-phase stool sample (for prevalence of ESCREC among
household members vs. campers or food handlers, p=0.03 and p=0.04,
respectively).
The eight cultured camp food items yielded neither S. enterica
serovar Enteritidis nor ESCREC.
E. coli β-Lactamases
In the 11 E. coli isolates phenotypically suspected of ESBL
production, a β-lactamase with an isoelectric point of 8.0 was
detected. PCR with blaCTX-M-9-specific primers and
sequence analysis confirmed the presence of the CTX-M-9 β-lactamase
(not shown).
Three of these isolates had an additional β-lactamase with pI 5.4,
which in IEF reacted with penicillin but not with ceftriaxone. PCR with
blaTEM-specific primers confirmed the presence
of a TEM-1-like β-lactamase (Table).
All four isolates phenotypically suspected of AmpC β-lactamase
production were PCR-positive with ampC-family primers. Sequence
analysis confirmed the presence of the CMY-2 β-lactamase (not
shown).
Biotyping, Serotyping, and PFGE Analysis of Isolates
Collectively, the 15 ESCREC isolates represented five distinct biotypes (Table). Overall, five serogroups (O20, O55,
O86, O145, and non-typable/NT) and five PFGE pulsotypes (A to E) were detected.
Biotype, serogroup, and pulsotype corresponded precisely, confirming the
presence of five discrete ESCREC clones (Table and Figure 1).
Restriction pattern (XbaI) by pulsed-field gel
electrophoresis of the five extended-spectrum, cephalosporin-resistant
Escherichia coli clones (A, B, C, D, E). mw:
marker.
Epidemiologic Distribution of Clones
Clone A (CTX-M-9), the most prevalent, was recovered from students from all three
cities, EP, SB, and T (Table). Clone B
(CMY-2) was recovered from two students from Sant Boi and clone E (also CMY-2)
was recovered from a food handler. Clone C (CTX-M-9 + TEM-1) was recovered from
both a Sant Boian student and a food handler. Clone D (CTX-M-9 + TEM-1) was
recovered from a Sant Boian student.
Plasmid Analysis
Plasmid profiles of the ESCREC isolates were largely concordant with clonal
assignments (Figure 2A, Table). In all but
one isolate, the probes for blaCTX-M-9 and
blaCMY-2 hybridized to a single large
(>150 kb) plasmid (Figure 2).
Plasmid profile (A) and hybridization with CTX-M-9 probe (B) and CMY-2
probe (C). The studied isolates, by lane, are: 1: P5, 2: P6, 3: P6T
(transconjugant of P6), 4: P9, 5: P10-1, 6: P12-1, 7: P12-2, 8: P14, 9:
P15, 10: P18-1, 11: P19, 12: F2, 15: P10-2, 16: P18-2, 17: P18-2T
(transconjugant of P18-2), 18: F3-1, 13, and 14: plasmid control strains
E. coli 678 CECT (= NCTC 50193 with the following
plasmid sizes: 54.38, 7.30, 5.56, 5.14, 3.98, 3.08, 2.71, and 2.06 kb)
and E. coli 679 CECT (= NCTC 50192 with the following
plasmid sizes: 148.5, 63.8, 36.2 and 7 kb.). M is marker III (Roche
Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Below each lane in panel A is
indicated the plasmid profile designation shown in the Table.
By Southern blot analysis, the blaCTX-M-9-containing
plasmids (clones A, C, and D) exhibited minor diversity within and greater
diversity among clones (Figures
2–4, Table). In the
uncut plasmid blot, the large, probe-positive plasmids of clones A and D were
uniform in size and larger than those of clone C (Figure 2B). The corresponding PstI Southern blot
showed three different patterns, which were not clone-specific (Figure 3, Table). All of these isolates
exhibited a band at ~1,289 bp (Figure 3B),
whereas three isolates (all clone A) also exhibited a variably sized larger band
(Figure 3B, Table). The corresponding
SmaI blot showed five patterns among the CTX-M-9-positive
isolates, including three closely related patterns among the clone A isolates
and unique patterns each for the clone C and D isolates (Figure 4, Table).
Plasmid restriction with SmaI (A) and hybridization of
isolates carrying the CTX-M-9 enzyme with the CTX-M-9 probe (B). The
isolates are as listed in Figure 1.
Below each line of hybridization, the pattern shown in the Table is
indicated.
Plasmid restriction with PstI (A) and hybridization of
isolates carrying the CTX-M-9 enzyme with the CTX-M-9 probe (B). The
isolates are as listed in Figure 1.
Below each line of hybridization, the pattern shown in the Table is
indicated.
In contrast, the blaCMY-2-containing isolates (clones
B and E) were indistinguishable in both the uncut plasmid blot (Figure 2C) and the PstI and
HincII blots, which showed a homogeneous single-band
pattern for all three isolates (not shown).
Transfer of Resistance in vitro
One CTX-M-9-positive isolate transferred its resistance by in vitro conjugation
to E. coli HB101 but not to a S. enterica
isolate from a patient. In contrast, a CMY-2-positive isolate was successfully
conjugated with this S. enterica isolate but not with
E. coli HB101 (probably due to the donor
strain’s production of a bacteriocin that inhibits HB101; data not
shown).
Discussion
Our microbiologic evaluation of an outbreak of Salmonella
gastroenteritis at a summer camp uncovered the unsuspected dissemination among
campers and camp staff of multiple clones of ESCREC containing diverse conjugally
transferable β-lactamases. Several lines of evidence indicated that
dissemination of ESCREC occurred within the summer camp. Sharing of ESCREC clones
was observed among multiple hosts who had no contact with one another before camp,
yet at camp lived together and shared a common food and water supply. Isolation of
ESCREC was limited to camp attendees, to the exclusion of members of the
campers’ households who did not attend camp. Finally, the high observed
prevalence of fecal ESCREC among camp attendees (11/25, 44%) contrasts strikingly
with the low prevalence of ESCREC detected by using similar methods in reference
fecal samples from 707 outpatients without an infectious disease diagnosis who
attended Sant Pau Hospital from February through May, 2001 (2%: p<0.001;
unpub. data) and among E. coli isolates from our hospital clinical
microbiology laboratory (e.g., in 2000, for CTX-M-9, 0.5%; for CMY-2, 0.2%) (29).
The mechanism for dissemination of ESCREC within the camp remains undefined. Direct
person-to-person spread is possible but seems unlikely, since there was no evidence
of transmission to household members after campers returned home was not evident, as
would be expected if domestic contact could lead to transmission. However, hygienic
conditions conceivably were worse at the camp, particularly during the outbreak of
gastroenteritis.
The concurrent outbreak of salmonellosis, a classic foodborne pathogen, suggested
that contaminated food (or possibly water) might have served as a vehicle for ESCREC
within the camp. Indeed, ESCREC clones A and B were confined to hosts who also had
salmonellae. Since only eight food items were cultured, the failure to recover
ESCREC from camp foods provides little evidence to rule out foodborne transmission.
Although food handlers have been implicated in many foodborne outbreaks of intestinal
disease (39), in this instance they appeared an unlikely source for either ESCREC or
salmonellae. None of the three food handlers was colonized with salmonellae or with
ESCREC clones A, B, or D, all of which were present in one or more campers, whereas
one food handler had a unique ESCREC clone (clone E), one shared a distinct ESCREC
clone (clone C) with a single camper, and one had no detectable ESCREC. Thus, if
food were the vehicle, the contamination most likely occurred before the
food’s arrival at the camp, i.e., during production, processing, or
transport. Since CMY-2 is closely associated with food animals, the present
CMY-2-positive ESCREC plausibly could be of food animal origin. In contrast, CTX-M-9
and other ESBLs have been described only in humans. Thus, their presence suggests a
human source of contamination.
Plasmid analysis indicated that although distinctive CTX-M-9-encoding plasmids were
present in clones A, C, and D, the constituent
blaCTX-M-9 genes clearly derived from a common source,
as demonstrated by their internal sequence identity and conserved flanking
PstI sites, despite the diversity of flanking
SmaI sites. Minor within-clone diversity was evident among the
blaCTX-M-9-containing plasmids of clones A and
C, consistent with recent microevolution. In contrast to the CTX-M-9-positive
clones, clones B and E appeared to share the same
blaCMY-2-containing plasmid, consistent with recent
horizontal transfer. Since clone B was isolated from two different hosts, it
presumably acquired the CMY-2 plasmid before dissemination. By contrast, since clone
E was recovered from only one host, the timing of its acquisition of the plasmid
could not be determined. The diffusion of indistinguishable plasmids between
different clones and the presence of similar but distinct plasmids within the same
clone indicate the rapid biological dynamics of plasmids (9,10).
Conjugal transfer in vitro of broad-spectrum β-lactamases was achieved
from ESCREC isolates to both a laboratory strain of E. coli
(CTX-M-9) and an outbreak S. enterica isolate (CMY-2). These
findings, which are consistent with our previous work and that of others (30,31), suggest that intraspecies or intergeneric transfer of broad-spectrum
β-lactamases could occur in nature, either in vivo (in humans or animals)
or in an inanimate reservoir (e.g., sewage or manure) (9,10). Thus, ESCREC may pose a threat both because of their direct potential for
causing drug-resistant infections and because they can serve as vector of resistance
elements for transmission to other pathogens or opportunistic microorganisms.
Our findings provide novel evidence of the dissemination of ESCREC among otherwise
healthy persons. Moreover, in two persons ESCREC strains were documented to persist
for at least 6 days or 17 days, suggesting possible establishment of stable
colonization. Although no drug-resistant E. coli infections were
known to have resulted from this dissemination, the data nonetheless suggest the
possibility of widespread future emergence within the community of E.
coli that is resistant to ESCs and of the responsible resistance genes,
which could have substantial adverse health consequences (4,5).
Limitations of this study include the modest sample size (particularly for household
members), short longitudinal follow-up, unusual circumstances (concurrent
salmonellosis outbreak, summer camp setting), and absence of data regarding prior
antibiotic use and hospital contact. Future studies should seek ESCREC in a similar
setting, and in the general community, during a period without a known infectious
disease outbreak.
In summary, our microbiologic evaluation of an outbreak of
Salmonella gastroenteritis at a summer camp showed the unsuspected
dissemination among campers and staff of multiple clones of ESCREC that contained
diverse, conjugally transferable β-lactamases. Dissemination of ESCREC
within the summer camp, possibly through food or water, was suggested by several
lines of evidence. Confirmation of community-based transmission of ESCREC in other
contexts and locales would indicate a need for heightened vigilance and efforts to
discover the reservoirs and vehicles for dissemination of ESCREC within the
community.
Suggested citation for this article: Prats G, Mirelis B,
Miró E, Navarro F, Llovet T, Johnson JR, et al.
Cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli among summer camp
attendees with salmonellosis. Emerg Infect Dis [serial online] 2003 Oct
[date cited]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol9no10/03-0179.htm
Acknowledgments
We thank Jorge Blanco for the serotyping of E. coli strains; Pilar
Cortés, Montse Sabaté, and Laura Gómez for
technical support; and Irene Barrabeig, Sofia Minguell, and Rosa Sala for collecting
samples and clinical data from patients.
This study was partially supported by grants 97/0623 98/1293 from the
“Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias de la Seguridad Social de
España” (G.P.) and National Research Initiative Competitive
Grants Program/ United States Department of Agriculture grant 00-35212-9408
(J.R.J.).
Prof. Prats is a mircorbiologist and director of the Microbiology Department at the
Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron in Barcelona. His current research
interests include uropathogenic Escherichia coli and antibiotic
resistance of enterobacteria.
ReferencesNordmannPTrends in beta-lactam resistance among
Enterobacteriaceae.Clin Infect Dis.
1998;27(Suppl
1):S100–610.1086/5149059710678LivermoreDMβ-Lactamases in laboratory and
clinical resistance.Clin Microbiol Rev.
1995;8:557–848665470BradfordPAExtended-spectrum β-lactamases in the
21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this
important resistance threat.Clin Microbiol Rev.
2001;14:933–5110.1128/CMR.14.4.933-951.200111585791LautenbachE, PatelJB, BilkerWB, EdelsteinPH, FishmanNOExtended-spectrum
β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and
Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors for infection and
impact of resistance on outcomes.Clin Infect Dis.
2001;32:1162–7110.1086/31975711283805Wong-BeringerA, HindlerJ, LoeloffM, QueenanAM, LeeN, PeguesDA, Molecular correlation for the treatment outcomes in bloodstream
infections caused by Escherichia coli and
Klebsiella pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to
ceftazidime.Clin Infect Dis.
2002;34:135–4610.1086/32474211740699NathisuwanS, BurgessDS, LewisJSIIExtended-spectrum β-lactamases:
epidemiology, detection, and treatment.Pharmacotherapy.
2001;21:920–810.1592/phco.21.11.920.3452911718498MarsikFJ, ParisiJT, BlendenDCTransmissible drug resistance of
Escherichia coli and Salmonella from
humans, animals, and their rural environments.J Infect Dis.
1975;132:296–3021099148WhiteDG, ZhaoS, SudlerR, AyersS, FriedmanS, ChenS, The isolation of antibiotic-resistant salmonella from retail
ground meats.N Engl J Med.
2001;345:1147–5410.1056/NEJMoa01031511642230WinokurPL, BrueggemannA, DeSalvoDL, HoffmannL, ApleyMD, UhlenhoppEK, Animal and human multidrug-resistant, cephalosporin-resistant
salmonella isolates expressing a plasmid-mediated CMY-2 AmpC
β-lactamase.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2000;44:2777–8310.1128/AAC.44.10.2777-2783.200010991860WinokurPL, VonsteinDL, HoffmanLJ, UhlenhoppEK, DoernGVEvidence for transfer of CMY-2 AmpC
β-lactamase plasmids between Escherichia coli
and Salmonella isolates from food animals and humans.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2001;45:2716–2210.1128/AAC.45.10.2716-2722.200111557460ZhaoS, WhiteDG, McDermottPF, FriedmanS, EnglishL, AyersS, Identification and expression of cephamycinase bla(CMY) genes in
Escherichia coli and Salmonella
isolates from food animals and ground meat.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2001;45:3647–5010.1128/AAC.45.12.3647-3650.200111709361LintonAHAnimal to man transmission of Enterobacteriaceae.R Soc Health J.
1977;97:115–810.1177/146642407709700308329334LintonAH, HoweK, BennettPM, RichmondMH, WhitesideEJThe colonization of the human gut by antibiotic
resistant Escherichia coli from chickens.J Appl Bacteriol.
1977;43:465–9342480CorpetDEAntibiotic resistance from food.N Engl J Med.
1988;318:1206–710.1056/NEJM1988050531818183362171GarauJ, XercavinsM, Rodríguez-CarballeiraM, Gómez-VeraJR, CollI, VidalD, Emergence and dissemination of quinolone-resistant
Escherichia coli in the community.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
1999;43:2736–4110543756BrinasL, ZarazagaM, SáenzY, Ruiz-LarreaF, TorresCβ-Lactamases in ampicillin-resistant
Escherichia coli isolates from foods, humans, and
healthy animals.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2002;46:3156–6310.1128/AAC.46.10.3156-3163.200212234838SáenzY, ZarazagaM, BrinasL, LanteroM, Ruiz-LarreaF, TorresCAntibiotic resistance in Escherichia
coli isolates obtained from animals, foods and humans in Spain.Int J Antimicrob Agents.
2001;18:353–810.1016/S0924-8579(01)00422-811691568ShooterRA, CookeEM, FaiersMC, BreadenAL, O’FarrellSMIsolation of Escherichia coli,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella from
food in hospitals, canteens, and schools.Lancet.
1971;2:390–210.1016/S0140-6736(71)90111-54105171van den BogaardAE, LondonN, DriessenC, StobberinghEEAntibiotic resistance of faecal
Escherichia coli in poultry, poultry farmers and
poultry slaughterers.J Antimicrob Chemother.
2001;47:763–7110.1093/jac/47.6.76311389108MurrayP, BaronE, PfallerM, TenoverF, YolkenR Manual of clinical microbiology. Seventh ed. Washington:
American Society of Microbiology; 1999GarciaLS Practical guide to diagnostic parasitology. Washington: American
Society for Microbiology; 1999Le GuyaderF, EstesMK, HardyME, NeillFH, GreenJ, BrownDW, Evaluation of a degenerate primer for the PCR detection of human
caliciviruses.Arch Virol.
1996;141:2225–3510.1007/BF017182288973536National Committee for Clinical Laboratory
Standards Performance standards for antimicrobial disk
susceptibility test; NCCLS document M2-A7. Wayne (PA): The Committee;
2000National Committee for Clinical Laboratory
Standards Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests
for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard fifth edition. NCCLS
document M7-A5. Wayne (PA): The Committee; 2000National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
Supplemental tables: disk diffusion; NCCLS document M100-S10. Wayne (PA): The
Committee; 2000MiróE, del CuerpoM, NavarroF, SabatéM, MirelisB, PratsGEmergence of clinical Escherichia
coli isolates with decreased susceptibility to ceftazidime and
synergic effect with co-amoxiclav due to SHV-1 hyperproduction.J Antimicrob Chemother.
1998;42:535–810.1093/jac/42.4.5359818756BarthélémyM, GuionieM, LabiaRBeta-lactamases: determination of their
isoelectric points.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
1978;13:695–896731SabatéM, VergésC, MiróE, MirelisB, NavarroF, del RioE, Incidencia de betalactamasas de espectro ampliado en
Escherichia coli en un hospital universitario durante
1994-1996.Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin.
1999;17:401–410563089SabatéM, MiróE, NavarroF, VergésC, AliagaR, MirelisB, β-Lactamases involved in resistance to broad-spectrum
cephalosporins in Escherichia coli and
Klebsiella spp. clinical isolates collected between 1994
and 1996, in Barcelona (Spain).J Antimicrob Chemother.
2002;49:989–9710.1093/jac/dkf05712039891SabatéM, TarragóR, NavarroF, MiróE, VergésC, BarbéJ, Cloning and sequence of the gene encoding a novel
cefotaxime-hydrolyzing β-lactamase (CTX-M-9) from
Escherichia coli in Spain.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2000;44:1970–310.1128/AAC.44.7.1970-1973.200010858363SimarroE, NavarroF, RuizJ, MiróE, GómezJ, MirelisBSalmonella enterica serovar
Virchow with CTX-M-like beta-lactamase in Spain.J Clin Microbiol.
2000;38:4676–811101623MarcheseA, ArletG, SchitoGC, LagrangePH, PhilipponACharacterization of FOX-3, an AmpC-type
plasmid-mediated β-lactamase from an Italian isolate of
Klebsiella oxytoca.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
1998;42:464–79527810NavarroF, Pérez-TralleroE, MarimónJM, AliagaR, GomarizM, MirelisBCMY-2-producing Salmonella enterica,
Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Proteus mirabilis
and Escherichia coli strains isolated in Spain (October
1999–December 2000).J Antimicrob Chemother.
2001;48:383–910.1093/jac/48.3.38311533003Fernández de HenestrosaAR, RiveraE, TapiasA, BarbéJIdentification of the Rhodobacter
sphaeroides SOS box.Mol Microbiol.
1998;28:991–100310.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00860.x9663685LeMinorL, RichardC Méthodes de laboratoire pour
l'identification des enterobactéries. Paris: Institut
Pasteur; 1993SmithCL, KlcoS, CantorCR Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and the technology of large DNA
molecules. In: Davis K, editor. Genome analysis: a practical approach. Oxford:
IRL Press; 1988 p. 41–72.BannermanTL, HancockGA, TenoverFC, MillerJMPulsed-field gel electrophoresis as a replacement
for bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus.J Clin Microbiol.
1995;33:551–57751356SambrookJ, RusellDW Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Third ed. Cold Spring
Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001LeeR, PeppeJ, GeorgeHPulsed-field gel electrophoresis of genomic
digests demonstrates linkages among food, food handlers, and patrons in a
foodborne Salmonella javiana outbreak in Massachusetts.J Clin Microbiol.
1998;36:284–59431968