An outbreak of cyclosporiasis occurred in attendees of a wedding reception held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on June 10, 2000. In a retrospective cohort study, 54 (68.4%) of the 79 interviewed guests and members of the wedding party met the case definition. The wedding cake, which had a cream filling that included raspberries, was the food item most strongly associated with illness (multivariate relative risk, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.6 to 10.5). Leftover cake was positive for
On June 10, 2000, a total of 83 persons attended a catered wedding reception in Pennsylvania. Approximately 8 days later, the bride notified the local health department that she, her husband, and many guests at the reception had a gastrointestinal illness. Stool specimens from attendees were positive for oocysts of the coccidian parasite
Previous foodborne outbreaks of cyclosporiasis in the United States have been associated with consumption of fresh raspberries, mesclun lettuce, and basil (
A retrospective cohort study was conducted by administering a structured questionnaire by telephone about symptoms and event-related exposures. A case of cyclosporiasis was defined as onset of illness 1–14 days after the reception and either (a) one positive stool specimen and at least one gastrointestinal symptom (i.e., loose stools, nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, gas/bloating, loss of appetite, and unintentional weight loss) or constitutional symptom (i.e., fever, chills, muscle aches, generalized body aches, and headaches); (b) any loose stools in a 24-hour period and at least one other gastrointestinal or constitutional symptom; or (c) a total of at least three gastrointestinal symptoms.
We attempted to identify more cases of cyclosporiasis by having the Pennsylvania State Bureau of Epidemiology alert health departments throughout the state of the investigation. We also requested the catering company to contact the six groups to which they had served raspberries during the period June 2–4 that might have been from the suspected raspberry shipments.
Univariate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using Epi-Info, version 6.04 (CDC). Multivariate Poisson regression analyses were conducted by using SAS, version 8.0 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
The local diagnostic reference laboratory examined stool specimens from five patients for
CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) used molecular methods to examine leftover wedding cake, which the bride and groom had frozen, for
The supernatant from each sample was aspirated to within 1 mL of the bottom, and the pellets were suspended in this volume and transferred to a 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube. The samples were then centrifuged for 2 min in a microcentrifuge at 14,000 x
CDC’s methods were as follows. DNA was extracted directly from nine randomly selected 1-g portions of raspberry filling from the cake by using selected components from the FastDNA kit (BIO 101, Inc., Vista, CA). The portions were placed into tubes containing disruption beads that were included in the kit, and DNA extraction was performed as described
Nested PCR amplification was performed by using primers modified from those described elsewhere
Besides the nested PCR, a 636-bp fragment from the
The reception facility was inspected, and food-handling and storage practices were observed. Information about illness in the catering staff was collected by examining the caterer’s sick logs. The caterer was also asked to contact the health department if staff called in sick. Ill staff members would then be asked whether they had had a gastrointestinal illness during the 3 weeks before and after the reception.
The caterer and the distributors that supplied his company were interviewed, and shipping documents were obtained to determine the source of the raspberries used in the cake
Seventy-nine (95.2%) of the 83 attendees of the wedding reception were interviewed. Fifty-four (68.4%) of the 79 had illness that met the case definition. Five (9.3%) of the 54 case-patients had laboratory-confirmed cyclosporiasis, and 49 (90.7%) of the 54 case-patients had clinically defined cyclosporiasis. All case-patients who met part (c) of the case definition also met part (b). Therefore, parts (b) and (c) were combined to represent the clinically defined category of the case definition. The median incubation period was 7 days (range 1–9 days) (
Dates of onset of symptoms in laboratory-confirmed case-patients (white box; n = 5) and clinically defined case-patients (black box; n = 49) who attended the wedding reception in June 2000 in Pennsylvania. The exact date of onset of symptoms was not specified for one case-patient who became ill after the reception.
| Variable | Case-patients (n=54)a | Non-case attendees (n=25)b |
|---|---|---|
| Age, y, median (range)c | 38.8 (18–87) | |
| Female sex, no. (%)c | 32 (59.3) | |
| Symptoms, no. (%) | ||
| Diarrhead | 54 (100) | 1 (4.0) |
| Nausea | 43 (79.6) | 1 (4.0) |
| Stomach cramps | 41 (75.9) | 1 (4.0) |
| Chills/sweats | 41 (75.9) | 0 |
| Headache | 36 (66.7) | 0 |
| Muscle/body aches | 36 (66.7) | 1 (4.0) |
| Fevere | 32 (59.3) | 0 |
| Vomiting | 26 (48.1) | 0 |
| Dizziness | 25 (46.3) | 0 |
| Rash | 3 (5.6) | 0 |
| Hospitalization, no. (%) | 2 (3.7) | 0 |
| Length of stay, days, median (range) | 12 (10–14) | 0 |
a Five of the 54 case-patients had laboratory-confirmed cyclosporiasis. bTwo of the 25 non-case attendees reported having at least one symptom. cInformation about age and sex was obtained from only two non-case attendees and was not included in the table. dDiarrhea was defined as having three or more loose stools in a 24-hour period. eIn case-patients, the median temperature was 37.8°C (range 37.2–38.5°C). No non-case attendees were febrile.
Several food items were significantly associated with illness in univariate analyses (
| Attack rate in attendees, no. ill/no. exposed or unexposed (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food itemsa | Exposed | Unexposed | RR (95% CI) | |
| Wedding cakeb | 50/53 (94.3) | 4/26 (15.4) | 6.1 (2.5 to 15.1) | |
| Fresh fruitc | 36/43 (83.7) | 18/36 (50.0) | 1.7 (1.2 to 2.4) | |
| Arugula salad | 34/41 (82.9) | 20/38 (52.6) | 1.6 (1.1 to 2.2) | |
| Focaccia bread | 15/16 (93.8) | 39/63 (61.9) | 1.5 (1.2 to 1.9) | |
| Hearthbaked bread | 23/27 (85.2) | 31/52 (59.6) | 1.4 (1.1 to 1.9) | |
aMesclun lettuce was served as a garnish on several hors d’oeuvres trays, and basil was served fresh in one food item. Neither was significantly associated with illness. bFood item was statistically significant in multivariate analyses (relative risk, 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6 to 10.5). cFresh fruit included strawberries, raspberries, blueberries, and blackberries. Persons served themselves from a bowl of fresh strawberries and a bowl of fresh raspberries, blueberries, and blackberries next to the cake. The raspberries in the bowl came from a different source than the raspberries in the cake filling and were not statistically significant in multivariate analyses.
We did not identify additional cases through the Pennsylvania State Bureau of Epidemiology’s alert to local health departments. Moreover, the catering company contacted the six groups to which they served raspberries during June 2–4, and no additional cases were identified.
For three of the five case-patients who had laboratory-confirmed cyclosporiasis (
PCR analyses conducted by both FDA and CDC confirmed the presence of
None of the catering staff reported having been ill during the 3 weeks before or after the reception. However, on July 18, the local health department learned, through routine surveillance, about a caterer, who had worked during the reception, in whom gastrointestinal illness developed 8 days later; she had laboratory-confirmed cyclosporiasis. Although she could not recall her duties for the event, her usual tasks included cutting and serving wedding cake. She also identified two other staff members in whom gastrointestinal illness developed a median of 6 days after the reception; their symptoms resolved spontaneously, and no stool specimens were tested. They had not worked during the reception but had worked later that day and reported that they probably ate leftover cake.
Raspberries were the only produce used in the wedding cake. The catering company had received four shipments of fresh raspberries June 1–3. Some of the raspberries from these shipments were served fresh at events on June 3–4. The leftover raspberries were frozen for 1–4 days. Two to three pints of leftover, unwashed raspberries were thawed, crushed into pieces, and folded into the butter cream filling used in the cake. The cake was then frozen for another 4–5 days until it was thawed and eaten on June 10, the date of the wedding (
Flow chart with details about raspberries and wedding cake served at a wedding reception in June 2000 in Pennsylvania. The shipment of raspberries the catering company received on June 3 included raspberries from Guatemala. As noted, some details (e.g., the date the cake was prepared, the temperature of the freezer at the catering company) are unknown.
Local distributors A and B supplied the four shipments of raspberries received by the catering company during the period June 1–3 (
Flow chart with details about the possible sources of the raspberries used in the wedding cake served at a wedding reception in June 2000 in Pennsylvania. The Guatemalan farm was also a possible source of raspberries served at an event in Georgia in May 2000. This farm was the only known source in common to these two events.
The one Guatemalan farm that could have supplied the raspberries used in the cake was also one of the possible sources (and the only Guatemalan source) of raspberries served at a bridal brunch in Georgia in May 2000 that was associated with an outbreak of cyclosporiasis
We investigated an outbreak of cyclosporiasis associated with a wedding reception in Philadelphia in June 2000. The epidemiologic evidence and the identification by PCR analyses of
We do not know whether the outbreak involved more cases in Pennsylvania than the cluster of cases we investigated. The catering company for the wedding reception received four shipments of fresh raspberries the weekend before the cake was prepared; which raspberries from which shipment were used for the reception rather than the other six events during the period of interest at which raspberries were served is unknown. We did not identify any more cases of cyclosporiasis by contacting the other six groups. However, perhaps only one of the shipments of raspberries and only some of the raspberries in that shipment were contaminated. The same Guatemalan farm was one of the possible sources of the raspberries (and the only Guatemalan source) served at the reception in Pennsylvania in June 2000 and the bridal brunch in Georgia in May 2000. The identification of only one farm in common to the two events suggests that the events were related.
The year 2000 was the fifth year since 1995 (i.e., 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 2000) that outbreaks of cyclosporiasis occurred in the spring in the United States or Canada that definitely or probably were associated with Guatemalan raspberries
The cyclosporiasis outbreak in Philadelphia is the first for which raspberries that reportedly had been frozen, rather than served fresh, were implicated. The raspberries used in the wedding cake had been bought fresh but then reportedly frozen and thawed twice before they were served (
This Pennsylvania outbreak is the second documented U.S. outbreak, and the first associated with raspberries, for which
Fortunately, leftovers from both the Pennsylvania and Missouri outbreaks had been frozen and were available for testing. Contamination of the implicated food items for the 1999 outbreak was demonstrated by PCR analyses and light microscopy and for the 2000 outbreak by PCR analyses. The modes of contamination of the produce associated with outbreaks of cyclosporiasis have not yet been definitively identified for any of the outbreaks. However, molecular methods are sensitive tools that can be used to identify the organism in the vehicle and in environmental samples, which then may provide information useful for determining the mode of contamination. Molecular methods for detecting
We thank Michael Arrowood, Jeff Bier, Paul Blake, Loretta Brown, Ronald Colucci, Paula Davis-Debella, Phil DeLisle, Michelle Dunaway, Mark Eberhard, Kris Foster, John Guzewich, Travis Hunt, George Jackson, Stephanie Johnston, John Kvenberg, Eva Nace, Jim O’Neal, James Peiffer, Sarah Pichette, Kathleen Sinninger, Luis Solorzano, Bill Tackett, Susanne Wahlquist, Davina Watson, and Kimberly Won for their help with the investigation.
Alice Y. Ho is the Nurse Epidemiologist for the Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Division of Disease Control. She oversees communicable disease surveillance and outbreak investigations in Philadelphia.