Emerg Infect DisEmerging Infect. DisEIDEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-6059Centers for Disease Control and Prevention17283646337235206-062910.3201/eid1211.060629Letters to the EditorReal-time PCR for Francisella tularensis Types A and BPCR for Francisella tularensis Types A and BKugelerKiersten J.*PappertRyan*ZhouYan*PetersenJeannine M.*Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USAAddress for correspondence: Jeannine M. Petersen, Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Foothills Campus, PO Box 2087, Fort Collins, CO 80522, USA; email: nzp0@cdc.gov112006121117991801Keywords: Francisella tularensistularemiareal-time PCRtype Atype Bletter
To the Editor: Francisella tularensis, the etiologic agent of tularemia, is highly infectious and considered a potential bioweapon (1–3). Although 4 subspecies of F. tularensis are recognized, most cases of tularemia are due to infection by subsp. tularensis (type A) or holarctica (type B). North America is the only region where both type A and type B cause human disease. Subspecies novicida is also found in North America, but it is of reduced virulence. Disease incidence attributable to either type A or type B is essentially unknown because the traditional method for classification of these subspecies is glycerol fermentation, which requires culture recovery (4). F. tularensis is fastidious and slow growing, with isolates recovered in a small percentage of cases.
We developed real-time TaqMan PCR assays for classification of F. tularensis type A and type B after F. tularensis is identified by culture or, in the absence of culture, by a PCR method such as the F. tularensis multitarget TaqMan assay (5). The type A TaqMan assay targets pdpD, which is present in type A, almost entirely absent from type B, and contains a 144-bp insert in novicida (6,7) (F: 5´-GAGACATCAATTAAAAGAAGCAATACCTT-3´; R: 5´-CCAAGAGTACTATTTCCGGTTGGT-3´; probe: 5´-AAAATTCTGC"T"CAGCAGGATTTTGATTTGGTT-3´). The type B assay targets a junction between ISFtu2 and a flanking 3´ region (GenBank AY06) (F: 5´- CTTGTACTTTTATTTGGCTACTGAGAAACT-3´; R: 5´- CTTGCTTGGTTTGTAAATATAGTGGAA-3´; probe: 5´- ACCTAGTTCAACC"T"CAAGACTTTTAGTAATGGGAATGTCA-3´). In type A and novicida, ISFtu2 is absent from this position (8). Oligonucleotides were designed with Primer Express version 2.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Probes were synthesized with a 5´ 6-carboxy-fluorescein reporter and an internal quencher (either BHQ1 [type A] or QSY-7[type B]) at the nucleotide position indicated by the quotation marks.
Assays were optimized by using 1 ng of type A (strain SchuS4) or type B (strain LVS) DNA on the LightCycler 1.2 (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Optimized concentrations (20 μL final volume) were 1× LightCycler Fast Start DNA Master Hybridization Probe mix (Roche), 750 nmol/L primers, 200 nmol/L probe, 5 mmol/L MgCl2 and 0.5 U uracil-DNA glycosylase. PCR conditions were 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 65°C for 30 s, then 45°C for 5 min. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were calculated by using the second derivative maximum method with the y-axis at F1/F3 (LightCycler software version 3.5).
Sensitivity of each assay was assessed by using 10-fold serial dilutions (100,000 to 1 genomic equivalents [GE]) of SchuS4 or LVS DNA. Testing was performed in triplicate, with a reproducible detection limit of 10 GE for both assays. Specificity of each assay was tested with 1 ng of DNA from a panel of 62 Francisella isolates (Table A1) and 22 non-Francisella isolates (Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Brucella, Corynebacterium, Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Escherichia, Haemophilus, Klebsiella, Legionella, Proteus, Pseudomonas, Serratia, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Yersinia species). Isolates were grown, DNA purified, and quantified as previously described (5). Specificity was also evaluated with DNA (2 μL) extracted as previously described from Francisella-like tick endosymbionts of Dermacentor variabilis and Francisella-like soil bacteria (Table A1) (9,10). The type A assay recognized all type A isolates with an average Ct value of 17.9 (n = 19). The type B assay detected all type B strains with an average Ct value of 17.1 (n = 21). Neither assay displayed cross-reactivity with F. tularensis subsp. novicida (n = 7), F. philomiragia (n = 15), Francisella-like tick endosymbionts (n = 3), Francisella-like soil bacteria (n = 7) (Table A1), or non-Francisella spp. (n = 22).
To evaluate the ability of the type A and type B TaqMan assays, in conjunction with the multitarget assay, to identify F. tularensis and classify subspecies in primary specimens, human, animal, and tick samples were tested (Table ). DNA was extracted from 200 μL fluid, 25 mg liver, and 10 mg spleen or lung by using the QIAamp DNA MiniKit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and 1 μL tested. Multitarget PCR conditions were as described (5).
The multitarget and subspecies-specific PCR assays accurately identified and classified F. tularensis in all specimens positive by standard diagnostic methods (Table). In addition, the type A and type B assays provided subspecies information for positive specimens in which an isolate was not recovered for glycerol fermentation testing (Table ). All specimens negative by standard diagnostic methods tested negative by PCR. These preliminary results suggest that a F. tularensis PCR identification method, in combination with the type A and type B assays, provides the capability to identify F. tularensis and determine subspecies in the absence of culture.
We describe real-time PCR assays capable of classifying F. tularensis type A and type B and distinguishing these subspecies from the less virulent subsp. novicida. These assays are designed for use after F. tularensis has been identified by culture or by PCR. Supplemental use of these assays will allow laboratories to actively subtype F. tularensis isolates and primary specimens, thus providing subspecies information for a higher percentage of tularemia cases. Improved subspecies information will further understanding of the disease incidence and geographic distribution of F. tularensis type A and type B in North America.
Comparison of standard diagnostic methods with the multitarget Francisella tularensis TaqMan assay and type A and type B assays using primary specimens
Specimen
Source
F. tularensis identified*
Subspecies identification†
Multitarget F. tularensis TaqMan assay‡
Type A assay‡ (Ct value)§
Type B assay‡ (Ct value)
ISFtu2
IglC
tul4
Lymph node aspirate
Human
+
+
+
+
31
–
Bronchial wash
Human
+
A
+
+
+
34
–
Upper lung
Human
+
A
+
+
+
20
–
Lower lung
Human
+
A
+
+
+
26
–
Liver
Human
+
A
+
+
+
29
–
Spleen
Human
+
A
+
+
+
31
–
Pleural fluid
Human
+
B
+
+
+
–
36
Blood
Human
+
+
+
+
–
38
Spleen
Human
–
–
–
–
–
–
Liver
Human
–
–
–
–
–
–
Cerebrospinal fluid
Human
–
–
–
–
–
–
Blood
Human
–
–
–
–
–
–
Liver/spleen
Tamarin
+
+
+
+
28
–
Tissue
Tick¶
+
A
+
+
+
26
–
Tissue
Tick¶
+
A
+
+
+
33
–
Blood
Prairie dog
+
B
+
+
+
–
30
Blood
Prairie dog
+
B
+
+
+
–
27
Spleen
Prairie dog
+
B
+
+
+
–
21
Spleen
Prairie dog
+
B
+
+
+
–
31
Spleen
Prairie dog
–
–
–
–
–
–
Liver
Cat
–
–
–
–
–
–
Liver
Rat
–
–
–
–
–
–
Spleen
Rat
–
–
–
–
–
–
Spleen
Squirrel
–
–
–
–
–
–
*F. tularensis infection identified by culture, direct fluorescent antibody testing, or serologic testing. †Subspecies was determined by glycerol fermentation when an isolate was recovered. ‡+ = positive result, 17<Ct<38; – = negative result, no fluorescence detected after 45 cycles of amplification. §Ct, cycle threshold. ¶Tick species tested were Haemaphysalis leporispalustris and Dermacentor andersoni.
Suggested citation for this article: Kugeler KJ, Pappert R, Zhou Y, Petersen JM. Real-time PCR for Francisella tularensis types A and B [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2006 Nov [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1211.060629
Acknowledgments
We thank Francis Nano for sharing information regarding the pdpD gene; Cheryl Kuske and Susan Barns for sharing DNA from Francisella-like bacteria in soil; and Nikos Gurfield, Jean Creek, and Heidi Goethert for providing Francisella-like tick endosymbiont DNA samples.
Specificity evaluation with DNA from Francisella spp
Organism
Sample ID
Source
Geographic origin
Type A assay (Ct value)*
Type B assay (Ct value)*
F. tularensis subsp. tularensis (type A)
SchuS4
Human
Ohio
15.9
–
WY963418
Human
Wyoming
15.9
–
MA002987
Human
Massachusetts
18.4
–
CO012364
Cat
Colorado
18.3
–
CO013713
Rabbit
Colorado
16.5
–
ND000952
Human
North Dakota
16.9
–
KS000948
Cat
Kansas
16.7
–
OK002731
Human
Oklahoma
18.4
–
NC993990
Rabbit
North Carolina
16.8
–
AR000028
Human
Arkansas
18.8
–
UT983134
Human
Utah
16.9
–
NM990295
Rabbit
New Mexico
17.2
–
NC973057
Rabbit
North Carolina
16.5
–
NC015379
Cat
North Carolina
18.6
–
AR982146
Rabbit
Arkansas
18.0
–
OK004337
Human
Oklahoma
18.4
–
AR011117
Human
Arkansas
22.9
–
MO011907
Human
Missouri
20.3
–
CA020099
Human
California
18.2
–
F. tularensis subsp. holarctica (type B)
LVS
Rat
Russia
–
16.0
KY993387
Human
Kentucky
–
19.7
OR960246
Monkey
Oregon
–
16.7
CN985979
Human
Canada
–
17.1
AZ001325
Rat
Arizona
–
16.2
IL003633
Human
Illinois
–
18.4
MO011673
Human
Missouri
–
16.8
KY001708
Human
Kentucky
–
15.8
OH013029
Prairie dog
Ohio
–
16.7
UT002098
Human
Missouri
–
18.2
SP986120
Rabbit
Spain
–
17.5
IN983055
Rat
Indiana
–
15.6
CO961243
Vole
Colorado
–
15.5
CA990837
Human
California
–
16.5
IN002758
Human
Indiana
–
15.8
AZ001324
Squirrel
Arizona
–
15.9
CA993992
Monkey
California
–
16.9
SP982108
Human
Spain
–
17.8
NM002642
Human
New Mexico
–
17.9
JAP5-3-11
Human
Japan
–
18.6
KO971026
Human
Korea
–
19.0
F. tularensis subsp. novicida
GA993548
Human
Louisiana
–
–
GA993549
Human
California
–
–
GA993550
Water
Utah
–
–
UT014992
Human
Utah
–
–
AS020814
Human
Australia
–
–
FX1
Human
Texas
–
–
FX2
Human
Texas
–
–
F. philomiragia
GA012793
Human
California
–
–
GA012794
Human
Colorado
–
–
GA012795
Human
New York
–
–
GA012796
Human
California
–
–
GA012797
Human
Pennsylvania
–
–
GA012799
Human
Connecticut
–
–
GA012800
Human
Connecticut
–
–
GA012801
Human
New York
–
–
GA012802
Human
California
–
–
GA012803
Human
New Mexico
–
–
GA012804
Human
Virginia
–
–
GA012806
Human
Massachusetts
–
–
GA012810
Water
Utah
–
–
GA012811
Water
Utah
–
–
ATCC 25015
Muskrat
Utah
–
–
Francisella-like tick endosymbionts†
2040372
Tick
California
–
–
2040460
Tick
California
–
–
MV2
Tick
Massachusetts
–
–
Francisella-like bacteria‡
005
Soil
Texas
–
–
013
Soil
Texas
–
–
015
Soil
Texas
–
–
027
Soil
Texas
–
–
045
Soil
Texas
–
–
034
Soil
Texas
–
–
039
Soil
Texas
–
–
*Ct, cycle threshold; –, negative result, no fluorescence detected after 45 cycles of amplification. †See Kugeler et al. (10). ‡See Barns et al (9).
ReferencesEllisJ, OystonPC, GreenM, TitballRWTularemia.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:631–4610.1128/CMR.15.4.631-646.200212364373DennisDT, InglesbyTV, HendersonDA, BartlettJG, AscherMS, EitzenE, Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management.JAMA. 2001;285:2763–7310.1001/jama.285.21.276311386933SjostedtA Family XVII. Francisellaceae, genus I. Francisella In: Brenner DJ, editor. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2005OlsufjevNG, MeshcheryakovaISInfraspecific taxonomy of tularemia agent Francisella tularensis McCoy et Chapin.J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1982;26:291–97142690VersageJL, SeverinDD, ChuMC, PetersenJMDevelopment of a multitarget real-time TaqMan PCR assay for enhanced detection of Francisella tularensis in complex specimens.J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5492–910.1128/JCM.41.12.5492-5499.200314662930NanoFE, ZhangN, CowleySC, KloseKE, CheungKK, RobertsMJ, A Francisella tularensis pathogenicity island required for intramacrophage growth.J Bacteriol. 2004;186:6430–610.1128/JB.186.19.6430-6436.200415375123LarssonP, OystonPC, ChainP, ChuMC, DuffieldM, FuxeliusHH, The complete genome sequence of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia.Nat Genet. 2005;37:153–910.1038/ng149915640799PetersenJM, SchrieferME, CarterLG, ZhouY, SealyT, BawiecD, Laboratory analysis of tularemia in wild-trapped, commercially traded prairie dogs, Texas, 2002.Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:419–2515109407BarnsSM, GrowCC, OkinakaRT, KeimP, KuskeCRDetection of diverse new Francisella-like bacteria in environmental samples.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:5494–50010.1128/AEM.71.9.5494-5500.200516151142KugelerKJ, GurfieldN, CreekJG, MahoneyKS, VersageJL, PetersenJMDiscrimination between Francisella tularensis and Francisella-like endosymbionts when screening ticks by PCR.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:7594–710.1128/AEM.71.11.7594-7597.200516269811