i
Performance Comparison of Real-Time Light Scattering Dust Monitors Across Dust Types and Humidity Levels
-
June 12 2019
-
-
Source: Min Metall Explor. 36(4):741-749
[PDF-1.30 MB]
Details:
-
Alternative Title:Min Metall Explor
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Video techniques for monitoring exposure, such as NIOSH's "Helmet-CAM," employ both real-time dust monitors and mobile video cameras to assess workers' respirable dust exposures. Many real-time personally worn dust monitors utilize light scattering sensing elements, which are subject to measurement biases as a function of dust type (size, composition, shape factor) and environmental conditions such as relative humidity. These biased and inaccurate dust measurements impair the monitor's ability to properly represent actual respirable dust concentrations. In the testing described, instrument mass concentration data was collected using three different types of commonly used commercial off-the-shelf personal dust monitors and compared to a reference standard. This testing was performed in a calm air (Marple) dust chamber in which three units of each make and model (for a total of nine monitors) were used for each test. Equivalency factors (EF, a multiplier to match the Thermo TEOM 1400a reference instrument) ranged between 0.746 and 1.879 across all dusts and environmental conditions tested, and between 0.821 and 1.519 on the ISO test dust.
-
Subjects:
-
Source:
-
Pubmed ID:31768501
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC6876310
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Volume:36
-
Issue:4
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
